Attach 8 PPQ.pdf

FA2823-22-Q-A016 Industrial Environmental Control & Filtration System Maintenance Past Performance Questionnaire

For Official Use Only Page 1 of 4

To Be Completed by Offeror/Contractor:

1. Name of Contractor:

2. Point of Contact:

3. Telephone #:

4. E-Mail:

We are currently in the process of preparing our quote for Solicitation Number FA2823-22-Q-A016, to provide Industrial Environmental Control and Filtration System Maintenance at Eglin AFB, Florida. As part of our quote, we have offered as a reference on our performance for this type of work, under the previous/current contract listed below, with your company.

Your input on our performance is therefore requested. Please complete this survey and provide a sufficient description so this contract may be evaluated whether it is the same or similar in scope to this solicitation. Please return to the Point of Contact listed above so that it may be provided with the quote. Thank you. Survey is due no later than

To Be Completed by Assessor:

1. Name of Prime Contractor:

2. Contract or Identifying Number:

3. Title/Description of Contract:

4. Brief description of scope of work:

For Official Use Only Page 2 of 4

EVALUATION: Please rate the Contractor’s performance on your contract utilizing the guide below.

Explanatory narratives for as many responses as possible would be appreciated. These narratives need not be lengthy, just detailed. Attach additional pages if more space is needed.

Assessment Definition Exceptional Performance meets contractual requirements and exceeds many to the Government’s benefit.

The contractual performance of the element or sub-element being evaluated was accomplished with few minor problems for which corrective actions taken by the contractor were highly effective.

Very Good Performance meets contractual requirements and exceeds some to the Government’s benefit.

The contractual performance of the element or sub-element being evaluated was accomplished with some minor problems for which corrective actions taken by the contractor were effective.

Satisfactory Performance meets contractual requirements. The contractual performance of the element or sub-element contains some minor problems for which corrective actions taken by the contractor appear or were satisfactory.

Marginal Performance does not meet some contractual requirements. The contractual performance of the element or sub-element being evaluated reflects a serious problem for which the contractor has not yet identified corrective actions. The contractor’s proposed actions appear only marginally effective or were not fully implemented.

Unsatisfactory Performance does not meet most contractual requirements and recovery is not likely in a timely manner. The contractual performance of the element or sub-element contains a serious problem(s) for which the contractor’s corrective actions appear or were ineffective.

Contract or Identifying Number:

The Contractor:

1. Demonstrated ability to hire, maintain, and replace, if necessary qualified personnel during the contract period (maintenance staff were authorized, trained, qualified, and current for operations.)

SUPPORTING INFORMATION:

2. Followed approved quality control plan, if applicable.

3. Provided effective quality control and /or inspection procedures to meet contract requirements.

4. Corrected deficiencies in timely manner and pursuant to their quality control procedures.

For Official Use Only Page 3 of 4

The Contractor:

5. Provided timely resolution of contract discrepancies.

6. Identified maintenance problems as they occurred.

7. Displayed initiative to solve problems.

8. Provide adequate project supervision.

9. Cooperated with Customer personnel after award.

10. Demonstrated responsiveness to short notice repair taskings.

11. How would you rate the Contractor's overall performance?

12. Was the contractor ever issued a cure or show cause notice under the referenced contract?

If yes, explain.

EXPLANATION:

☐ Yes

☐ No

For Official Use Only Page 4 of 4

13. Would you award another contract to this contractor? If not, explain.

EXPLANATION:

14. Is the Contractor rated in CPARS?

BRIEF EXPLANATION OF OVERALL RATING GIVEN:

ADDITIONAL COMMENTS:

Name of person completing evaluation:

Position Title/Grade:

Base/Company:

Email Address:

Signature Date