Attach 3 Evaluation Criteria Rivercane Site Assessment.pdf
PDF 224 KB Posted
- Solicitation number
- 12445026Q0065
- Issued by
-
Department of Agriculture Forest Service
About this file
This is an evaluation template for assessing key personnel qualifications for a Rivercane Site Suitability Assessment contract related to post-Hurricane Helene recovery efforts. The document establishes three minimum qualifications that vendors must meet, structured as a Go/No Go evaluation checklist to be completed by assigned evaluators.
The three mandatory qualifications are: (1) Scientists holding a PhD in Biology with a concentration in forestry, ecology, and/or natural resource management; (2) Three years of work experience in forest resources statistical applications specific to Rivercane Site (Arundinaria gigantea, a woody bamboo relative); and (3) Demonstrated experience advising scientists on research study designs, data analysis, and manuscript review prior to peer-reviewed publication, with documentation of the number of years and annual consultation volume. The template includes columns for Vendor Name, Tasks Description, Evaluator Comments, and Go/No Go determinations, with a signature line for the reviewing evaluator.
View the file
Other files
On GovTribe
Work with this file
- Download the original file
- Contacts named in this file
- Similar government files
- Ask GovTribe AI about this file
Text version
Rivercane Site Suitability Assessment for Post-Hurricane Helene Recovery
Technical evaluation factors:
Key Personnel Minimum Qualifications
Vendor Name Tasks Description Evaluator Comments Go/No Go
1. Scientists with PhD in Biologist with a concentration in forestry, ecology, and/or natural resource management.
2. Three (3) years’ work experience in forest resources statistical applications. In Rivercane Site (Arundinaria gigantea - a woody bamboo relative)
3. The offeror resume demonstrated how many years, and how many consultations per year, they advised scientists on research study designs, data analysis, and reviewing and improving their manuscripts before the scientist published their results in a peer-reviewed scientific journal.
Reviewed by:
Name:
File details come from the government source that posted it. Updated .