Attach 2 FTQW261200 Comprehensive Planning Platform (CPP) Requirements.pdf

Attachment 2 – Comprehensive Planning Platform (CPP) Requirements The Comprehensive Planning Platform (CPP) is an online platform to provide to facilitate continuous updates of planning information and use long-range planning products (such as a District Plan) to develop tactical implementation plans (e.g. projects) to support the plan. Within the CPP, there are five pages for each district; the District Plan will inform the information to be documented on the CPP. In order to facilitate populating the district pages in the CPP, the contractor will be required to submit the following documents:

1. Word template and images for the District Overview

2. Word template for the Constraints

3. Word template and images for the Regulating Component

4. Excel template for the Analysis

5. Word template for each of the Planning Actions

This addendum provides the format and requirements for the submission for each section. The Contractor is not required to make the updates in the CPP; this will be done by the installation planner at the conclusion of the contract.

1. District Overview Page

The contractor will provide a Word document including each of the sections in the Overview. The Overview provides information normally included in an Executive summary of a traditional planning document. Bulleted statements are allowed. Plain text will be used. There are no limits to length of the text for each section, however this is intended to be an overview and there are recommendations on length for each section.

1.1. District Summary: Describe the character, key customers, and key features of the District. Provide the vision for the District. Describe any planned development such as approved MILCON projects, mission beddowns, or facility optimization initiatives. This section should be one to two paragraphs (approximately 1,000 to 2,000 characters).

1.2. Goals and Objectives: Summarize the key development goals and objectives as identified in the Program Analysis phase of the District Planning process. Goals and objectives should be used to measure the effectiveness of different planning alternatives and support the DoD, Air Force, and the Installation’s development goals. Generally Districts will have 3 to 5 Goals with 2 to 3 Objectives for each of the Goals. There is no limit to the number of characters for this section.

1.3. District Assumptions: List the assumptions used to guide and/or limit Goals, Objectives, and Planning Action development. List assumptions that substantially influence Planning Action development. Assumptions can include statements about the existing conditions changing or not changing, as well as assumptions about availability of funding or critical dates. The Assumptions should be agreed upon during the development of the Goals and Objectives and analysis of existing conditions. This section should be one to two paragraphs (approximately 1,000 to 2,000 characters).

1.4. Analysis Summary: Include a summary of the analysis completed as part of the District Planning process. This should summarize the major findings of the analysis as well as any limitations to the Analysis. Tie in planning alternatives as necessary. This section should be one to two paragraphs (approximately 1,000 to 2,000 characters).

1.5 Related Studies: Document previously completed planning efforts which influenced the recommendations and identified Planning Actions for this District. This may include, but is not limited to, Component Plans, Area Development Plans, Campus Plans, Activity Management Plans, and other studies. Include the date the plan was completed.

1.6. Issues and Concerns: This section includes a summary of the findings based on the analysis. Outline the gaps in condition, capacity, or configuration of the facilities to meet the customers’ requirements and assuring mission accomplishment and the ability to meet planning goals and objectives. This section provides a narrative on why the status quo is not sufficient. Mission Capability Gaps become the foundation for Planning Actions. This section should be three to four paragraphs (2,000 to 3,000 characters).

1.7. Recommendations: Include recommendations for the future development for the District. Recommendations should support goal and objective achievement. All recommendations requiring major facility and infrastructure investment will have Planning Actions. Recommendations can also include non-investment recommendations, such as changes to the Compatible Functions or Installation Planning Standards for the District. There is no limit to section. Recommend bulleted statements.

The Contractor shall provide high-resolution image files (e.g. JPEG) that show the Illustrative Plan (preferred alternative) map, and any other applicable maps associated with the above sections.

2. District Constraints

The Contractor shall provide a word document annotating the recommended constraint rating for each constraint. The Contractor will provide two to four sentences summarizing the major and minor constraint for the District. For constraints rated as “not applicable and/or insufficient data,” the Contractor will indicate whether the constraint is not present (e.g. the installation does not have a runway) or what information was missing in order to not be able to make a severity rating. Reference the Integrated Installation Playbook for a description of each constraint.

2.1 The following constraints will be included:

a. Air Installations Compatible Use Zones (AICUZ)

b. Airfield Clearance

c. Antiterrorism (AT)

d. Explosive Safety Zones

e. Bird/Wildlife Aircraft Strike Hazard (BASH)

f. Floodplains

g. Installation Restoration Program (IRP)

h. Landforms

i. Soils and Geology

j. Threatened and Endangered Species (T&E)

k. Wetlands

l. Historic Structures

m. Historical and Archaeological Sites

2. The following are the constraint severity descriptions:

a. Major Constraint:

• Mission-critical compliance requirements prohibit most development and/or redevelopment

• Potential threats to health, safety or security prohibit most development and/or redevelopment

• Environmental restrictions/limitations to growth, development and/or redevelopment

b. Minor Constraint

• Mission-critical compliance requirements restrict many types of development and/or redevelopment

• Minor threats to health, safety or security may limit development and/or redevelopment

• Minor environmental limitations to growth, development and/or redevelopment

c. No Constraint

• No mission-critical requirements restricting and/or prohibiting future growth, development and/or redevelopment

• No threats to health, safety or security limiting development and/or redevelopment

• No environmental limitations to growth, development and/or redevelopment

d. Not Applicable and/or Insufficient Data

• Subject cannot be quantified to provide a measure of constraint or additional data is needed

• Constraint does not exist because of the character of the installation (e.g. there is no airfield)

3. Regulating Component

3.1 Regulating Component Summary: Include a brief summary of the Regulating Component (e.g.

number of parcels, key attributes, etc.) This section should be one to two paragraphs (approximately 1,000 to 2,000 characters).

3.2. Conditional Development: List of what is permitted / not permitted for the “Yellow” functions on the Compatible Function Matrix. This section shall describe why a particular function is allowed on a conditional basis and will cover all compatible functions determined to be Yellow in the Installation Development Framework.

3.3. Developable Areas Summary: Include a brief summary of the Developable Areas in the district (e.g. number of areas, acreage, tier level, other notes as necessary). This section should be one to two paragraphs (approximately 1,000 to 2,000 characters).

The Contractor shall provide high-resolution image files (e.g. JPEG) that show the Regulating Plan Map and supporting table(s), and the Developable Areas Map for the district.

4. District Analysis

4.1. The District Analysis is a table of the major assets in the district. The purpose of this section is to summarize the key facilities in the district, the customers (key stakeholders), and the asset management analysis for each facility, and document the long-term investment strategy. The Contractor will provide an Excel workbook with the required details on the government provided template. This workbook will include RPUID, CATCODE, Facility Number, Facility Name, Primary Customer, MDI, BCI, Utilization Rate, Area (SF), Year Constructed, PRV, and Analysis Action. The Government will supply details for each asset which is based on the Real Property Record. The installation can define the major assets, but at a minimum should include any asset recommended for investment or demolition in the District Plan.

4.2. The planning process will determine the Analysis Action. The Analysis Action should match the Recommendations provided in the Overview. Note, the Recommendations do not need to address all of the assets, but should address the major investments. The following definitions will be used for the Analysis Action:

a. Maintain: Continue use of the facility as configured and maintain building systems.

b. Renovate: Continue use of the facility and renovate to improve condition, configuration or capacity.

c. Dispose: No USAF function requires this facility and it will be demolished or will no longer be maintained by the USAF.

d. Recapitalize: Replacement of the facility is planned.

e. Consolidate: Additional functions will be moved into this facility to increase utilization rates.

4.3. The Contractor will annotate any discrepancies between the Real Property Record and observed conditions in the Notes column. The Notes column can also be used to describe the rational for a particular recommendation/decision with the Analysis Action.

5. Planning Actions

The Contractor shall provide a Word document containing the following information for each recommendation identified in section 1.7 above.

5.1. Title: Describe the requirement, not the execution strategy. Titles should not assume a specific course of action. The field is limited to 70 characters. Examples of Planning Action titles:

• Mitigate risk to failing Taxiway B pavements

• Provide 8-bed confinement facility

• Beddown F-16: provide sufficient hangar and ramp space

• Provide quality facilities to support mission currently in Bldg 450

5.2. Validation/Justification: This section should describe how the requirement supports the mission and how current or projected deficiencies are affecting the mission.

5.3. Authorization Quantity IAW DAFMAN 32-1018: If applicable, provide the authorized space associated with the requirement.

5.4 Description of Current Situation: Describe how and under what conditions the requirement is presently being met. Comments should support the stated requirement and identify and describe the current assets and why they are unsuitable.

5.5 Description of Planning Action: Provide a brief, clear and accurate background statement about what needs to addressed, e.g., 300 unaccompanied enlisted personnel are currently housed in substandard facilities (condition code 3 dormitories). There is no limit this section, however, it should be concise. This fills in the gaps of the character limitations in the Title.

5.6 Alternatives: List any alternatives examined to address the gap or deficiency, including a brief description of the alternative, type of alternative (e.g. new construction, renovation, partnership), major pros and cons for each alternative, initial cost estimates, and provide the recommended preferred alternative and a brief description as to why the preferred alternative was chosen.