Att I - PPQ (24Q0400).pdf

1. Contract or Identifying Number: ________________________________________________

2. Contract Value: _____________________________________________________________

3. Period of Performance:

4. Brief description of items provided:

5. Name of Person Completing Questionnaire: _______________________________________

Agency/Company:______________________________________________________________

Title: __________________________________ Phone: _____________________________ e-mail: _____________________________________________________________________

Alternate POC name: ________________________________________

Alternate POC phone number: _________________________________

Alternate POC e-mail address: _________________________________

PAST PERFORMANCE QUESTIONNAIRE

RFQ SPE604-24-Q-0400

Our firm is currently in the process of preparing a proposal for the Defense Logistics Agency (DLA) Energy Electricity Acquisition Support Services effort, RFQ number SPE604-24-Q-0400. As part of our proposal, we have listed you as a reference on our performance for this type of service with your agency under the previous/current contract listed below. Your input on our performance is therefore requested.

This questionnaire is due to DLA Energy no later than March 21, 2024, 1:00 p.m. EST.

The questionnaire must be submitted directly via e-mail to CSTeam@dla.mil. The email subject line should be ATTN: PPQ, RFQ SPE604-24-Q-0400, (Company Name).

If you will not be available for verification of this past performance evaluation March 22, 2024 through March 29, 2024, please designate an alternate POC for the DLA Contracting Officer to contact.

Thank you.

NAME OF OFFEROR:______________________________

Phone: ________________ E-mail: _________________________

I. Current or Historical Contract Information

CONTRACT REFERENCED:

II. EVALUATION. Please rate the Contractor utilizing the guide below. Explanatory narratives for as many responses as possible would be appreciated. These narratives need not be lengthy, just detailed. Attach additional pages if more space is needed.

Evaluation Definitions –

The following definitions should be used in the assessment of Contractor performance.

EXCEPTIONAL

Performance EXCEEDS MOST contractual requirements. The performance of areas being assessed was accomplished with few minor issues or concerns.

VERY GOOD

Performance EXCEEDS SOME contractual requirements. The performance of areas being assessed was accomplished with few minor issues or concerns, for which the Contractor’s corrective actions were highly effective.

SATISFACTORY

Performance MEETS contractual requirements. The performance of the areas being assessed contains minor issues or concerns, for which corrective actions taken by the Contractor were effective.

MARGINAL

Performance MEETS SOME contractual requirements. The performance of the areas being assessed includes significant problems, issues, or concerns for which corrective actions taken by the Contractor were only somewhat effective.

UNSATISFACTORY

Performance DOES NOT MEET contractual requirement. The performance of the areas being assessed includes serious problems, issues, or concerns for which the Contractor’s corrective actions were ineffective.

NOT APPLICABLE (N/A)

Performance information not recent or relevant as defined in the

Solicitation. Unable to provide assessment.

Past Performance Evaluation

Question 1. Performance

What is your assessment of the Contractor’s ability to meet your requirements?

Exceptional Very Good Satisfactory Marginal Unsatisfactory N/A

Performance

Comments, if any.

Questions 2 . Timeliness

What is your assessment of the Contractor’s ability to provide products in a timely manner?

Exceptional Very Good Satisfactory Marginal Unsatisfactory N/A

Timeliness

Ability to

Resolve

Timeliness

Problems

Comments, if any.

Question 3. Quality of Workload Management

What is your assessment of the Contractor’s ability to manage workload, produce quality deliverables and coordinate with subcontractors ( if any) to meet requirements of the applicable performance work statement?

Exceptional Very Good Satisfactory Marginal Unsatisfactory N/A

Quality of

Management

Comments, if any.

Question 4. Overall Rating of Contractor’s performance

What is your overall rating of Contractor’s performance (requirements, schedule) on contract being assessed?

Exceptional Very Good Satisfactory Marginal Unsatisfactory

General Comments: