Att D.4 - Past Performance Questionnaire.doc
DOC document 131 KB Posted
- Attached to
- Vessel & Field Research Operations Support Services Federal contract opportunity
- Solicitation number
- 1305M223RNCNM0026
About this file
This document is a past performance questionnaire template for a federal solicitation seeking vessel and field research operations support services. The National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration within the Department of Commerce is soliciting proposals for these services under solicitation number 1305M223RNCNM0026. Respondents are to complete sections providing contract and assessor details, performance evaluation criteria, and an overall rating of either exceptional, very good, satisfactory, marginal, or unsatisfactory. Performance factors include technical performance, schedule performance, management, and cost control. Assessors are to base their evaluations on contracts held with the offeror and provide any relevant rationale, issues, or government contributions. Responses are due to sarah.appleman@noaa.gov by the specified deadline.
View the file
Other files for this federal contract opportunity
| File | Type | Posted |
|---|---|---|
| Att 5 - Questions and Responses (05-OCT-2023).docx | DOCX document | |
| Att 5 - Questions and Responses.docx | DOCX document | |
| RFP 1305M223RNCNM0026 VFROSS_9-27-23.pdf | ||
| Att D.3 - WD 2018-0172 (Rev 25).pdf | ||
| Att D.1 Performance Work Statement.pdf | ||
| Att D.2 - Base Contract Pricing Worksheet.xlsx | XLSX spreadsheet |
On GovTribe
Work with this file on GovTribe
- Download the original file
- Contacts named in this file
- Similar government files
- Ask GovTribe AI about this file
Text version
1305M223RNCNM0026
Past Performance Questionnaire
Past Performance Questionnaire Message to the assessor: Your feedback is requested by NOAA to assist with establishing the performance history for the requisite Contractor. Please e-mail the completed questionnaires to sarah.appleman@noaa.gov.
Instructions:
· Complete Sections II through VII in their entirety.
· Submit completed questionnaire to sarah.appleman@noaa.gov.
I. Solicitation Data (for the proposed effort)
| Solicitation Number |
| 1305M223RNCNM0026 |
| Project/Requirement |
| Vessel and Field Research Operations Support Services |
| Customer/Agency |
| National Ocean Service – Office of National Marine Sanctuaries |
II. Current or Historical Contract Information
Assessor: Complete relevant performance data for your contract with the Offeror below:
CONTRACTOR NAME & ADDRESS:
Contract No
Type of Contract
| Initial |
| Final |
| Contract Value |
| $ |
| $ |
Period of Performance/Delivery Schedule
Project/Requirement Description
Please select from the following as it applies to this contract:
| Contracting Role |
| FORMCHECKBOX |
PRIME
FORMCHECKBOX
SUBCONTRACTOR
| Termination History |
| FORMCHECKBOX |
Convenience
FORMCHECKBOX
Default
FORMCHECKBOX
N/A
III. Assessor Information Assessor Name
Title
Phone Number/Email Address
Identify your role in the contract award or administration and the period of your involvement.
| ( |
| Role |
| Period of Involvement |
Procuring Contracting Officer (PCO)
Administrative Contracting Officer (ACO)
Contract Specialist
Contracting Officer’s Representative (COR)
Technical Project Lead/Project Officer
Quality Assurance Specialist
Defense Contract Audit Agency (DCAA) Auditor
Other:
IV. Evaluation Definitions The following definitions should be used in your assessment of Contractor performance.
| EXCEPTIONAL |
| Performance EXCEEDS MOST contractual requirements to the Government’s benefit. The performance of areas being assessed was accomplished with few minor issues or concerns. |
| VERY GOOD |
| Performance EXCEEDS SOME contractual requirements to the Government’s benefit. The performance of areas being assessed was accomplished with few minor issues or concerns, for which the Contractor’s corrective actions were highly effective. |
| SATISFACTORY |
| Performance MEETS contractual requirements. The performance of the areas being assessed contains minor issues or concerns, for which corrective actions taken by the Contractor were effective. |
| MARGINAL |
| Performance MEETS SOME contractual requirements. The performance of the areas being assessed includes significant problems, issues, or concerns for which corrective actions taken by the Contractor were only somewhat effective. |
| UNSATISFACTORY |
| Performance DOES NOT MEET contractual requirement. The performance of the areas being assessed includes serious problems, issues, or concerns for which the Contractor’s corrective actions were ineffective. |
| NOT APPLICABLE (N/A) |
| Performance information not recent or relevant as defined in the Solicitation. Unable to provide assessment. |
V. Performance Evaluation
1. Technical Performance
a. What is your OVERALL assessment of the Contractor’s ability to meet the technical requirements?
| Exceptional |
| Very Good |
| Satisfactory |
| Marginal |
| Unsatisfactory |
| N/A |
Technical Performance
Please provide rationale for the assigned rating.
All comments are appreciated; however, at a minimum, rationale must be provided for ratings of exceptional or unsatisfactory.
b. Did the Government contribute in any way to any of the technical problems identified in the above assessment? Please explain.
2. Schedule Performance
a. What is your OVERALL assessment of the Contractor’s ability to meet the schedule?
| Exceptional |
| Very Good |
| Satisfactory |
| Marginal |
| Unsatisfactory |
| N/A |
Schedule Performance
Please provide rationale for assigned rating.
All comments are appreciated; however, at a minimum, rationale must be provided for ratings of exceptional or unsatisfactory.
b. Did the Government contribute in any way to any of the technical problems identified in the above assessment? Please explain.
3. Management
a. What is your OVERALL assessment of the Contractor’s management performance?
| Exceptional |
| Very Good |
| Satisfactory |
| Marginal |
| Unsatisfactory |
| N/A |
Management
b. Assess the Contractor’s management performance in the following areas.
| Management |
| Exceptional |
| Very Good |
| Satisfactory |
| Marginal |
| Unsatisfactory |
| N/A |
MANAGEMENT RESPONSIVENESS—Timeliness, completeness, and quality of problem identification, proposal submittal, history of cooperative behavior, effective business relations, teamwork AND Customer satisfaction.
SUBCONTRACT MANAGEMENT—Timely award and management of subcontracts and meeting subcontracting goals for small business, small disadvantaged business, etc.
PROGRAM MANAGEMENT—Effectiveness of integration and coordination of all activities required to execute the contract, use of resources, assignment of responsibility, internal coordination and communication, and risk management practices.
MANAGEMENT OF PERSONNEL—Ability to select, retain, support, and replace personnel with the experience and expertise necessary to accomplish the Government’s requirements within schedule and budget.
INTEGRATED PRODUCT TEAM MANAGEMENT—Commitment and participation to the IPT process.
All comments are appreciated; however, at a minimum, rationale must be provided for ratings of exceptional or unsatisfactory.
c. Did the Government contribute in any way to any of the technical problems identified in the above assessment? Please explain.
4. Cost Control
a. What is your OVERALL assessment of the Contractor’s ability to forecast, manage, and control costs?
| Exceptional |
| Very Good |
| Satisfactory |
| Marginal |
| Unsatisfactory |
| N/A |
Cost Control
b. Assess the Contractor’s cost performance in the following areas.
| Management |
| Exceptional |
| Very Good |
| Satisfactory |
| Marginal |
| Unsatisfactory |
| N/A |
COST REPORTING—Accuracy and timeliness of the Contractor’s cost reporting data.
NOTIFICATIONS—Timeliness of the Contractor’s notifications of costs as required by the Limitation of Cost/Funds Clauses.
RESOLUTION OF COST PROBLEMS—Commitment to resolve cost issues—may include utilizing principles such as Cost as an Independent Variable (CAIV)
ADHERENCE TO COST TARGETS—Ability to establish and meet the realistic cost targets.
SUBCONTRACT COST MANAGEMENT— Ability to forecast, negotiate, and control subcontract costs
All comments are appreciated; however, at a minimum, rationale must be provided for ratings of exceptional or unsatisfactory.
VI. Overall Rating of Contractor’s performance (technical, schedule, management, and cost) on contract being assessed.
| Exceptional |
| Very Good |
| Satisfactory |
| Marginal |
| Unsatisfactory |
VII. General Comments:
Assessor’s Signature
Date
Source Selection Information – See FAR 2.101 and FAR 3.104 For Official Use Only
File details come from the government source that posted it. Updated .