Att B Past Performance Questionnaire.pdf
PDF 173 KB Posted
- Attached to
- Refuse Collection and Disposal Services Eglin AFB, FL Federal contract opportunity
- Solicitation number
- FA282321Q4002
About this file
This document contains a past performance questionnaire and details of a related federal contract opportunity for refuse collection and disposal services at Eglin Air Force Base in Florida. The opportunity is a combined synopsis and solicitation issued under the Streamlined Procedures for Commercial Items of the Federal Acquisition Regulation. Services required include personnel, equipment, vehicles and other items to perform integrated solid waste management and municipal solid waste collection and recycling across Eglin AFB, Duke Field, Camp Rudder and Eglin ranges covering over 750 square miles. The past performance questionnaire requests information on the contractor's performance on similar past contracts to assess areas such as non-conformance issues, resources, subcontractors, responsiveness and overall ratings. It will be used to evaluate offerors for the refuse collection and disposal services contract at Eglin AFB under Solicitation FA282321Q4002, set aside for the Section 8(a) Program and issued by the Air Force Test Center Installation Operational Contracting Division.
View the file
Other files for this federal contract opportunity
| File | Type | Posted |
|---|---|---|
| Att 2 Performance Work Statement Rev 2-March-21.pdf | ||
| Q_A 3-2-21.pdf | ||
| Att 2 Performance Work Statement Rev 25-Feb-21.pdf | ||
| Q_A 2-24-21.pdf | ||
| Att 2 Performance Work Statement Rev 22-Feb-21.pdf | ||
| Q_A 2-22-21.pdf | ||
| Att 2 Performance Work Statement Rev 18-Feb-21.pdf | ||
| Q_A 2-19-21.pdf | ||
| Att 4 Refuse Bid Schedule Rev 18-Feb-21.xlsx | XLSX spreadsheet | |
| Q_A 2_11_21.pdf | ||
| Appendix B Eglin_2020.pdf | ||
| Appendix B Duke_7sfg_2020.pdf | ||
| Appendix B ResVicinity_2020.pdf | ||
| Appendix B Rudder_JG_D-51_C-6_2020.pdf | ||
| FA282321Q4002.pdf | ||
| Att C - Financial Responsibility Questionnaire.pdf | ||
| Att D - Consent Form.pdf | ||
| Att A Past Performance References.pdf | ||
| Att 3 Wage Determinations.pdf | ||
| Att 4 Refuse Bid Schedule.xlsx | XLSX spreadsheet | |
| Att 1 Provisions and Clauses.pdf | ||
| Att 2 Performance Work Statement.pdf |
Show all 22
On GovTribe
Work with this file on GovTribe
- Download the original file
- Contacts named in this file
- Similar government files
- Ask GovTribe AI about this file
Text version
ATTACHMENT B
PAST PERFORMANCE QUESTIONNAIRE
Solicitation: FA282321Q4002 Base Refuse, Eglin AFB, FL 32542
1. Name of Contractor:
Contract or Identifying Number:
Title/Description of Contract:
2. Brief description of scope of work:
EXAMPLE: Provide all personnel, equipment, tools, materials, vehicles, supervision, and other items and services necessary to perform Integrated Solid Waste Management, Municipal Solid Waste (MSW) collection and Recycling services in an area exceeding 750 square miles
3. Estimated Amount of Annual Volume of Service Awarded Amount: $____________________ C&D Rolloffs: YES / NO Compactors YES / NO Front Load YES / NO
EVALUATION: Please rate the Contractor utilizing the guide below. Explanatory narratives for as many responses as possible would be appreciated. These narratives need not be lengthy, just detailed. Attach additional pages if more space is needed.
A. Did the contractor have any non-conformance issues? If so, what kind?
B. Did the contractor have adequate resources to complete the required performance?
C. Were there issues with the subcontractor’s testing lab and/or material suppliers?
D. Did the contractor submit required documents on time and answer questions in a timely manner?
Assessment Definition Substantial Confidence
(SC)
Based on the offeror’s recent/relevant performance record, we have a high expectation that the offeror will successfully perform the required effort.
Satisfactory Confidence
(SAT)
Based on the offeror’s recent/relevant performance record, we have a reasonable expectation that the offeror will successfully perform the required effort.
Limited Confidence
(LC)
Based on the offeror’s recent/relevant performance record, we have a low expectation that the offeror will successfully perform the required effort.
No Confidence
(NC)
Based on the offeror’s recent/relevant performance record, we have no expectation that the offeror will successfully perform the required effort.
Unknown Confidence (Neutral) (UC)
No recent/relevant performance record is available or the offeror’s performance record is so sparse that no meaningful confidence assessment rating can be reasonably assigned.
Based upon the assessment definitions above, indicate your assessment of the contractor’s performance on your contract described on Attachment A. Your assessment should consider the contractor’s performance in accordance with the contractual requirements. Circle all that apply.
CONTRACTOR’S NAME: __________________________ CONTRACT NO.: ___________________________
CONTRACT PERFORMANCE EVALUATION
1. Working relationship with your Company SC SAT LC NC UC
2. Responsiveness to your Company’s requirement. SC SAT LC NC UC
3. Rate contractor’s overall performance. Please explain in remarks section.
SC SAT LC NC UC
4. Demonstration of ability to work independent of outside guidance
SC SAT LC NC UC
5. Exhibited knowledge of and compliance with Government (or other) regulations and industry standards.
SC SAT LC NC UC
6. To your knowledge, has the Contractor had any contracts terminated for default (or cause)?
Yes No N/A
7. Have there been any disputes/claims relative to the contract? If yes, please explain in remarks section.
Yes No N/A
8. Did the contractor demonstrate the ability to hire, maintain, and replace, if necessary qualified personnel during the contract? If no, please explain.
Yes No N/A
9. Did the home/corporate office participate in solving significant local problems? If no, please explain.
Yes No N/A
10. Did the on-site project manager have the authority and resources to execute the contract? If no, please explain.
Yes No N/A
11. Does the contractor provide timely and accurate documents, records, and invoices as required by the SOW? If no, please explain.
Yes No N/A
12. Would you award similar contracts to this contractor?
Please provide explanation for response.
Yes No N/A
13. Did the contractor provide experienced managers and supervisors with the technical and administrative abilities needed to meet contract requirements: If no, Yes No N/A please explain.
QUALITY OF SERVICE/CONTROL
1. Contractor’s accomplishment in meeting quality standards.
SC SAT LC NC UC
2. Overall Quality of Service/Control. Specifically – was the Contractor’s quality control plan and execution separate from the Government and how much Government oversight was required to ensure satisfactory performance? Please provide explanation.
SC SAT LC NC UC
3. Were modifications issued due to contractor failure to meet requirements and/or delivery/cost schedule? If yes, please explain.
Yes No N/A
4. Did the contractor provide an effective quality control plan or inspection procedures to meet contract requirements? If no, please explain.
Yes No N/A
5. Did the contractor provide and properly maintain all equipment and vehicles throughout the term of the contract? If no, please explain.
TIMELINESS OF PERFORMANCE
1. Overall rating of timeliness of performance. SC SAT LC NC UC
2. Did the contractor respond in a timely manner to emergency events/services? If no, please explain.
Yes No N/A
3. Did the contractor respond in a timely manner to unscheduled events/services? If no, please explain.
Yes No N/A
4. Were scheduled services completed per SOW requirements? If no, please explain.
Yes No N/A
5. Did the contractor correct contract deficiencies in a timely manner? If no, please explain.
BUSINESS RELATIONS
1. How effectively and efficiently does the contractor respond to customer complaints/inquiries?
SC SAT LC NC UC
2. Rate customer satisfaction with overall contractor performance. Provide details/explanation as appropriate.
SC SAT LC NC UC
3. Overall business relations rating. SC SAT LC NC UC
4. Has the contractor demonstrated ethical business practices throughout the term of the contract? If no, please explain.
Yes No N/A
5. Has the contractor caused any damage to facilities, Government furnished equipment, or materials? If yes, please explain.
COMPLIANCE WITH ENVIRONMENTAL, SAFETY, HEALTH AND SECURITY
REQUIREMENTS
1. How well did the contractor comply with local, State, and Federal environmental standards?
SC SAT LC NC UC
2. Overall rating for compliance with environmental, safety, health, and security requirements.
SC SAT LC NC UC
3. Has the contractor ever violated any local, State and/or Federal environmental standards?
Yes No N/A
4. Did the contractor comply with reporting and responding procedures and perform all requirements for spills or releases to include accepting all liability as defined in the SOW? If no, please explain.
Yes No N/A
5. Did the contractor comply with all licensing, certification requirements for personnel, equipment, and vehicles? If no, please explain.
Yes No N/A
6. Has the contractor ever violated any security or safety standards? If yes, please explain.
Yes No N/A
7. Have the contractor or contractor employees ever been involved in any verbal or physical altercations on the work site? If yes, please explain.
OVERALL RATING: ______________________________
BRIEF EXPLANATION OF OVERALL RATING GIVEN:
ADDITIONAL COMMENTS
Name of Person Completing Evaluation:
Base/Company: Date:
Position Title/Grade: Phone:
Email: Fax:
File details come from the government source that posted it. Updated .