Att 8 - PPQ.pdf
PDF 245 KB Posted
- Solicitation number
- 1291S8-20-R-0015
About this file
This document contains a past performance questionnaire for a federal solicitation. The solicitation is for hazardous fuels reduction services within Southern California national forests. Contractors must provide this questionnaire to references to evaluate past performance on similar contracts. The questionnaire asks references to rate contractors on a scale of 1 to 5 on criteria such as management quality, personnel, quality control, scheduling, and overall performance. References are also asked if the contractor was issued any cure notices and if they would award to the contractor again. Completed questionnaires must be returned to the contracting office by the solicitation closing date. The related federal opportunity is for vegetation management and hazardous fuels reduction services in Region 5 to reduce wildfire risks and improve forest health. Treatments include manual and mechanical thinning, piling, chipping, and fuel break construction. The agency is the USDA Forest Service Pacific Southwest Region.
View the file
Other files
Show all 21
On GovTribe
Work with this file
- Download the original file
- Contacts named in this file
- Similar government files
- Ask GovTribe AI about this file
Text version
Attachment 1 Solicitation no. 1291S820R0015
When Filled In This Document Is Source Selection Sensitive IAW FAR 2.101 and FAR 3.104
PAST PERFORMANCE QUESTIONNAIRE
March 25, 2020 Hazardous Fuels Reduction IDIQ
Southern California National Forests
Offerors responding to the RFP shall provide this Past Performance Questionnaire [PPQ] to their references/clients for their references/clients to complete and submit with Proposal. PPQ may also be submitted directly to Forest Service by references/clients.
A. GENERAL INFORMATION: Please correct any information below known to be inaccurate:
“Contractor Name = the contractor responding to the solicitation”
Contractor’s Name:_______________________ Address:________________________________
POC:______________________________________
Tel number:________________________________ Fax number:________________________________
Project Title and Brief Description of Work:_______________________________________________________
Contract Period or Dates of Performance Provided by Offeror:________________________________________
Contract Number Reference: ______________________________Dollar Amount: $______________________
Contractor performed as the Prime Contractor Sub-Contractor Key Personnel.
NOTE: If offeror holds or has held other contracts for the same or similar requirement with your agency/organization in the last three (3) years, a separate evaluation forms for those contracts is requested.
RESPONDENT INFORMATION:
“Respondent = Name of the Reference filling out the Questionnaire”
Name of Respondent: __________________________Title:___________________________- Address:________________________________
Tel number:________________________________ Email: _____________________________________
E-MAIL COMPLETED SURVEY FORM TO: Daniel.lara@usda.gov Daniel Lara, Contracting Office, Forest Service Region 5 Phone No: 707-562-9165
COMPLETED SURVEYS MUST BE RECEIVED BY THE GOVERNMENT BY THE SOLICITATION
CLOSING DATE AND TIME. LATE SURVEYS WILL NOT BE CONSIDERED.
mailto:Daniel.lara@usda.gov
When Filled In This Document Is Source Selection Sensitive IAW FAR 2.101 and FAR 3.104
CONTRACTOR’S NAME: ________________________ CONTRACT NUMBER:______________________________
Note: Include this information on each page of the questionnaire form to ensure there is mix of information among contracts surveyed for respective prime or subcontractor.
PERFORMANCE INFORMATION: Choose the appropriate number on the scale (1, 2, 3, 4, and 5) that most accurately describes the contractor’s performance or situation. PLEASE PROVIDE A NARRATIVE EXPLANATION FOR ANY RATINGS OF 4 or 5.
1 2 3 4 5
Substantial Confidence
Satisfactory Confidence
Limited Confidence
No Confidence Unknown Confidence
Performance meets contractual requirements with many exceeded to the Government’s benefit. The contractual performance of the element or sub-element being assessed was accomplished with no more than a few minor problems for which corrective actions taken by the contractor were highly effective
Performance meets contractual requirements.
The contractual performance of the element or sub-element contains some minor problems for which corrective actions taken by the contractor were satisfactory
Performance does not meet some contractual requirements.
The contractual performance of the element or sub-element being assessed reflects a serious problem for which the contractor has not yet identified corrective actions or the contractor’s proposed actions appear only marginally effective or were not fully implemented
Performance does not meet most contractual requirements and recovery is not likely in a timely manner. The contractual performance of the element or sub-element contains a serious problem(s) for which the contractor’s corrective actions appear or were ineffective
Performance was not observed or not applicable to the current effort being reported against
When Filled In This Document Is Source Selection Sensitive IAW FAR 2.101 and FAR 3.104
Place an “X” in the appropriate column using the definitions matrix above.
THE CONTRACTOR 1 2 3 4 5
1 Provided experienced managers and supervisors with the technical and administrative abilities needed to meet contract requirements.
2 Demonstrated ability to hire, maintain, and replace, if necessary, qualified personnel during the contract period.
3 Delegated authority to project managers and supervisors commensurate with contract requirements.
4 Followed approved quality control plan.
5 Provided effective quality control and/or inspection procedures to meet contract requirements.
6 Corrected deficiencies in timely manner and pursuant to their quality control procedures.
7 Provided timely resolution of contract discrepancies
8 Identified problems as they occurred.
9 Suggested alternative approaches to problems.
10 Displayed initiative to solve problems.
11 Developed realistic progress schedules.
12 Met established project schedules.
13 Was responsive to contract changes.
14 Provided adequate project supervision.
15 Paid subcontractors/suppliers in a timely manner.
16 Provided accurate and complete line item cost proposals including all aspects of work required for each task.
17 Cooperated with Government personnel after award.
18 How would you rate the contractor's overall performance?
19 Was the contractor ever issued a cure or show cause notice under the referenced contract? If yes, explain outcome in “remarks.”
YES/NO
20 Would you award another contract to this contractor? If not, explain in “remarks.”
YES/NO
21 Is the contractor rated in CPARS? YES/NO
Additional Remarks: _________________________________________________________________
File details come from the government source that posted it. Updated .