ATT 5 - CNH Medicare and Medicaid QASP.docx
DOCX document 41 KB Posted
- Attached to
- Q402--Multi Award Opportunity Louisiana CNHs
- Solicitation number
- 36C25624Q1485
About this file
This document is a Quality Assurance Surveillance Plan (QASP) that outlines the government's method for evaluating the contractor's performance on a nursing home care contract. The QASP identifies the key government personnel responsible for oversight, including the Contracting Officer (CO) and Contracting Officer's Representative (COR). It defines the specific performance indicators and standards that will be monitored, along with the acceptable quality levels and surveillance methods. The QASP also describes the process for documenting both acceptable and unacceptable contractor performance, including the use of Contract Discrepancy Reports. Finally, it addresses the frequency of performance assessments and meetings between the government and contractor.
The related federal contract opportunity is a multi-award solicitation for nursing home care services, issued by the Department of Veterans Affairs, Veterans Health Administration, Veterans Integrated Service Network 16. The solicitation number is 36C25624Q1485, and the opportunity type is a solicitation.
View the file
Other files
| File | Type | Posted |
|---|---|---|
| ATT 1 Resource Utilization Grps RUGs IV Desc.docx | DOCX document | |
| ATT 2 WD 2015-5177 rev 25 dtd 072224 Std.pdf | ||
| ATT 4 WD 2015-5189 rev 28 dtd 072224 Std.pdf | ||
| ATT 3 WD 1973-0121 R59 20240722_ non-std.pdf | ||
| 36C25624Q1485.docx | DOCX document |
On GovTribe
Work with this file
- Download the original file
- Contacts named in this file
- Similar government files
- Ask GovTribe AI about this file
Text version
Medicare and Medicaid QASP
1. PURPOSE
This Quality Assurance Surveillance Plan (QASP) provides a systematic method to evaluate performance for the stated contract. This QASP explains the following:
· What will be monitored?
· How monitoring will take place.
· Who will conduct the monitoring?
· How monitoring efforts and results will be documented.
This QASP does not detail how the contractor accomplishes the work. Rather, the QASP is created with the premise that the contractor is responsible for management and quality control actions to meet the terms of the contract. It is the Government’s responsibility to be objective, fair, and consistent in evaluating performance.
This QASP is a “living document” and the Government may review and revise it on a regular basis. However, the Government shall coordinate changes with the contractor. Copies of the original QASP and revisions shall be provided to the contractor and Government officials implementing surveillance activities.
2. GOVERNMENT ROLES AND RESPONSIBILITIES
The following personnel shall oversee and coordinate surveillance activities.
a. Contracting Officer (CO) - The CO shall ensure performance of all necessary actions for effective contracting, ensure compliance with the contract terms, and safeguard the interests of the United States in the contractual relationship. The CO shall also assure that the contractor receives impartial, fair, and equitable treatment under this contract. The CO is ultimately responsible for the final determination of the adequacy of the contractor’s performance.
· Assigned Contracting Officer (CO): Melanie Hawley, 228-523-5000 Ext 38606
· Assigned Contract Specialist: Nathan Carver, 479-444-5035
· Organization or Agency: U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs / RPO Central/ Network Contracting Officer 16 (NCO 16)
b. The Contracting Officer’s Representative (COR) shall be responsible for technical administration of the contract and shall assure proper Government surveillance of the contractor’s performance. The COR shall keep a quality assurance file. The COR is not empowered to make any contractual commitments or to authorize any contractual changes on the Government’s behalf. Assigned COR: Stephen Picchi, 800-935-8387, Ext. 67233
c. Other Key Government Personnel - Keisha Pollard, 800-935-8387, Ext. 62075
QUALITY ASSURANCE SURVEILLANCE PLAN
Nursing Home Care
| No. |
| Paragraph in PWS |
| Indicator/Performance Standard |
| Standard for Quality Level |
| Acceptable Quality Level |
| Method of Surveillance[footnoteRef:2] [2: See “Methods of Surveillance,” paragraph 6 of this QASP, for additional methods of monitoring performance.] |
Incentive
| 1 |
| (C)(9) |
| Nursing Home shall provide VA with copies of all State / Federal licensures, certifications, and investigations reports when requested. |
| 100% |
| 100% |
| Periodic Reviews and spot checks |
| Positive past performance rating |
| 2 |
| (C)(10) |
| The Contractor shall cooperate in developing plans of corrective action according to outlined criteria in the Performance Work Statement. |
| 100% |
| 100% |
| Periodic Reviews and spot checks |
| Positive past performance rating |
| 3 |
| (C)(13) |
| Notice of veteran being hospitalized within 72 hours and notice of any veteran death within 24 hours or immediately the first business day after a weekend or holiday. |
| 100% |
| 95% |
| Periodic Reviews and spot checks |
| Positive past performance rating |
| 4 |
| (C)(16) |
| Notice of all reportable events on VA contract veterans and all facility sentinel events within 24 hours or immediately upon the first business day after a weekend or holiday. |
| 100% |
| 100% |
| Periodic reviews |
| Positive past performance rating |
| 5 |
| (C)(18) |
| All medical records concerning the veteran's care in the nursing home a) will be readily accessible to VA, and b) within acceptable standards and practice. |
| 100% |
| 100% |
| Periodic Reviews and spot checks |
| Positive past performance rating |
| 6 |
| (C)(23) |
| Invoices shall be timely and accurate for all items billed. |
| 100% |
| 95% -100% |
| Periodic Reviews and spot checks |
| Positive past performance rating |
3. CONTRACTOR REPRESENTATIVES
The following employees of the contractor serve as the contractor’s program manager for this contract.
a. Program Manager – As assigned by facility
b. Other Contractor Personnel - As assigned by facility
4. PERFORMANCE STANDARDS
Performance standards define desired services. The Government performs surveillance to determine if the contractor exceeds, meets or does not meet these standards.
5. INCENTIVES/RATING STANDARDS
Incentives shall be based on exceeding, meeting, or not meeting performance standards.
6. METHODS OF QA SURVEILLANCE
Various methods exist to monitor performance.
a. DIRECT OBSERVATION
b. PERIODIC INSPECTION
c. USER SURVEY
d. VALIDATED USER/CUSTOMER COMPLAINTS
e. ASSESSMENT
f. PERIODIC SAMPLING
g. RANDOM SAMPLING
h. PROGRESS OR STATUS MEETINGS
i. ANALYSIS OF CONTRACTOR’S PROGRESS REPORTS
7. RATINGS
Metrics and methods are designed to determine if performance exceeds, meets, or does not meet a given standard and acceptable quality level. A rating scale shall be used to determine a positive, neutral, or negative outcome. The following ratings shall be used:
See above Acceptable Quality Level & Method of Surveillance located in QASP.
8. DOCUMENTING PERFORMANCE
a. ACCEPTABLE PERFORMANCE
The Government shall document positive OR Negative performance. Any report may become a part of the supporting documentation for any contractual action.
b. UNACCEPTABLE PERFORMANCE
When unacceptable performance occurs, the COR shall work with the Contracting Officer (CO) who will inform the contractor. This will normally be in writing unless circumstances necessitate verbal communication. In any case, the COR shall document the discussion and place it in the COR’s file. In order to assure that the contractor receives impartial, fair, and equitable treatment under this contract, the COR will work with the contractor to increase performance to an acceptable level.
When the CO determines formal written communication is required, the COR and CO shall prepare a Contract Discrepancy Report (CDR) and present it to the contractor's program manager.
The contractor shall acknowledge receipt of the CDR in writing. The CDR will specify if the contractor is required to prepare a corrective action plan to document how the contractor shall correct the unacceptable performance and avoid a recurrence. The CDR will also state how long after receipt the contractor has to present this corrective action plan to the COR. The Government shall review the contractor's corrective action plan to determine acceptability.
Any CDRs may become a part of the supporting documentation for any contractual action deemed necessary by the CO.
9. FREQUENCY OF MEASUREMENT
a. Frequency of Measurement.
During contract performance, the COR and the CO will periodically analyze whether the negotiated frequency of surveillance is appropriate for the work being performed.
b. Frequency of Performance Assessment Meetings.
The COR and CO shall meet with the contractor as needed to assess performance and provide a written assessment.
Signature – Contractor
Signature – Contracting Officer Representative
Signature – Contracting Officer
Effective Date: 12/19/2022 Revision: 03 Page 1 of 5
File details come from the government source that posted it. Updated .