ATT_09_DISP_EVAL_SB_SEA_05272020_NHLTS.docx
DOCX document 29 KB Posted
- Solicitation number
- 88310320Q00075
View the file
Other files
| File | Type | Posted |
|---|---|---|
| SF 30R_06032020_ALL.pdf | ||
| ATT_07_DISP_QUOTEFORM_SB_SEA_05272020_NHLTS.docx | DOCX document | |
| ATT_05 DISP_SB_SEA_FAR_CLAUSES_05272020NHLTS.doc | DOC document | |
| ATT_01_DISP_Sch_SB_SEA_05272020NHLTS.doc | DOC document | |
| ATT_03_WD_SF_CA_beta.SAM.gov.pdf | ||
| ATT_06_DISP_QUOTEINSTRUCT_SB_SEA_05272020NHLTS.docx | DOCX document | |
| ATT_02_DISP_A_PWS_2Step_SB_SEA_05272020_NHLTS.docx | DOCX document | |
| ATT_10_DISP_PPQ_SB_SEA_05272020_NHLTS.docx | DOCX document | |
| ATT_08_DISP_KEYPERS_SB_SEA_05272020.docx | DOCX document | |
| ATT_04_DISP_FAR 52.212-4 Addm_SB_SEA_05272020_NHLTS.doc | DOC document | |
| ATT_03_WD_KINGWA_beta.SAM.gov.pdf |
Show all 11
On GovTribe
Work with this file
- Download the original file
- Contacts named in this file
- Similar government files
- Ask GovTribe AI about this file
Text version
RFQ No.:88310320Q00075 Page 1 of 1
SECURE DOCUMENT DESTRUCTION – FEDERAL RECORDS CENTERS SAN BRUNO AND SEATTLE
ATTACHMENT 9
EVALUATION FACTORS FOR AWARD
The Vendor’s technical quotation requirements described in the solicitation will be evaluated in accordance with Evaluation and award will be in accordance with Simplified Acquisition Procedures at FAR Subpart 13.106, Solicitation Competition, Evaluation of Quotations or Offers, Award and Documentation authorized by FAR Subpart 13.5, Simplified Acquisition for Certain Commercial Items as prescribed by FAR 12.301(c)(2) using the following evaluation factors. Vendor selection will be based on the best overall value to the Government. For best value, price is the lowest Total Net Expense (Revenue* less NARA shipping expenses = Total Net Expense) to the Government (base and four option years). *Revenue to the government is computed as (highest percentage paid of Official Board Markets high quote price for mixed paper – Pacific Northwest).
I. TECHNICAL FACTORS
The technical factor Technical Understanding and Approach is of greater importance than Relevant Past Performance.
1. Technical Understanding and Approach. The Government will assess the Vendor's demonstrated technical knowledge and competence with regard to the Government’s requirements and program objectives; understanding of, and approach to, the work that the Vendor would have to perform under the prospective purchase order. The Government will assess whether the Vendor exhibits adequate techniques and approaches to meet task order needs and provide effective and efficient support services. The Government will evaluate the qualifications of the Vendor's personnel.
2. Relevant Past Performance. The Vendor will be evaluated to assess the demonstrated quality of performance on similar work, to include the ability to control the quality and cost of work, timeliness of performance, and effectiveness at accomplishing the goals of previous work.
II. PRICE
All evaluation factors other than price, when combined, are more important than price. Selection of the firm to perform this task order will be based on NARA’s assessment of the best overall value to the Government. This is intended as a no cost to the government award. For best value, price is the lowest Total Net Expense (Revenue* less NARA shipping expenses = Total Net Expense) to the Government (base and four option years). *Revenue to the government is computed as (highest percentage paid of Official Board Markets high quote price for mixed paper – Northwest). This is intended as a no cost $0.00 award.
File details come from the government source that posted it. Updated .