Att 03 - IRM-IT RFP - Past Performance Questionnaire.xlsx
XLSX spreadsheet 24 KB Posted
- Solicitation number
- 20240501_IRM_IT_SOURCES_SOUGHT
About this file
This document is a Past Performance Questionnaire that is part of a competitive procurement for Information Resource Management-Information Technology (IRM-IT) services in Iraq being conducted by the United States Department of State (DOS).
The Questionnaire requests the prospective offeror XXXXX to identify customers with whom it has recently been under contract, to serve as potential references on its past performance record. The survey covers the contractor's quality of services, compliance with schedules, price/cost control, management effectiveness, small business utilization, and compliance with regulatory requirements. The completed survey should be emailed to the specified DOS procurement officials.
The related federal contract opportunity is a Pre-Solicitation for IRM-IT services at the U.S. Embassy and Consulate in Iraq. The DOS is seeking 8(a) companies with a Top Secret Facility Clearance and an Iraq Business License to provide a variety of IT-related services. Interested offerors must submit questions and comments by the stated deadline.
View the file
Other files
| File | Type | Posted |
|---|---|---|
| Att 04 - IRM-IT RFP - Staffing Plan - Direct Labor Hour Pricing.xlsx | XLSX spreadsheet | |
| IRM-IT RFP DRAFT Questions and Responses_1 May 2024.xlsx | XLSX spreadsheet | |
| Att 02 - IRM-IT RFP - CLINs and Annual Prices.xlsx | XLSX spreadsheet | |
| 01 - IRM-IT RFP Sections B-M.docx | DOCX document | |
| Att 01 - IRM-IT RFP - PWS Draft.docx | DOCX document |
On GovTribe
Work with this file
- Download the original file
- Contacts named in this file
- Similar government files
- Ask GovTribe AI about this file
Text version
Past Performance Survey
| RELEVANT PERFORMANCE QUESTIONNAIRE | ||
| Introduction: The United States Department of State (DOS) is currently conducting a competitive procurement for its Information Resource Management-Information Technology (IRM-IT) in Iraq for which the prospective offeror [XXXXX] has been requested to identify customers with whom it is currently or has been recently under contract, to serve as potential references on its past performance record. You are being asked to complete the attached Contractor Past Performance Survey. You may also be contacted by a DOS procurement official to arrange a telephone interview, using the survey as the focal point of the interview. To ensure frank and open evaluations and expressions of opinions by evaluators, all parties are advised that the identity of respondents completing the survey will be held in confidence and will not be released or disclosed to the prospective offeror or outside the Government. | ||
| Instructions: Please complete all areas of this form indicated in light yellow. | ||
| PART I - CONTRACT INFORMATION | ||
| a. Contractor: | XXXXX | |
| b. Customer Name (Federal Agency): | ||
| c. Point of Contact Information | ||
| i. Name: | ||
| ii. Telephone Number: | ||
| iii. Facsimile Number: | ||
| iv. E-mail Address: | ||
| v. Mailing Address: | ||
| vi. Position Title/Grade: | ||
| d. Contract Number: | ||
| e. Type of Contract | (Select responses from drop down menu) | |
| i. Negotiated or Sealed Bidding: | Negotiated | |
| ii. Competitive or Non-Competitive: | Competitive | |
| iii. Firm-Fixed-Price, Cost-Plus, Time-and-Materials/Labor Hour, Hybrid, or Other: | Firm-Fixed-Price | |
| iv. Indefinite Quantity, Requirements, or neither: | Indefinite Quantity | |
| f. Contract Period of Performance: |
| h. Initial Contract Value: $ |
| i. Current (or Completed) Contract Value: $ |
| j. Brief Description of the Requirement, Scope, and Complexity, Location of Performance, Role of the Contractor (Prime or Sub), Size of Contract (e.g. number of employees, services, sites supported, persons supported): |
| PART II - GOVERNMENT PAST PERFORMANCE/CUSTOMER SATISFACTION EVALUATION |
| EVALUATION RATINGS |
| EXCELLENT: Indicates the Contractor's performance within the area of evaluation clearly and consistently exceed contractual requirements. |
| SATISFACTORY: Indicates the Contractor's performance within the area of evaluation met the contractual requirements. |
| MARGINAL: Indicates the Contractor's performance within the area of evaluation experienced minor problems for which solutions were satisfactory. |
| UNACCEPTABLE: Indicates the Contractor's performance within the area of evaluation experienced serious problems. The Contractor is/was in danger of being unable to satisfy contractual requirements and timely recovery is not likely or did not occur. |
| EVALUATION AREA 1: QUALITY OF SERVICES | |
| (Select the rating that applies from drop down menu) | |
| Overall ability to proactively and aggressively perform contract requirements: | |
| Overall ability to resolve performance issues: | |
| Demonstration of reasonable and cooperative behavior in dealing with clients | |
| Effectiveness and reliability of contractor's key personnel: | |
| EVALUATION AREA 2: COMPLIANCE WITH SCHEDULES | |
| (Select the rating that applies from drop down menu) | |
| Overall performance in planning, scheduling, and monitoring: | |
| Completion of major milestones on schedule: | |
| Timely completion of efforts within period of performance: | |
| EVALUATION AREA 3: PRICE/COST CONTROL | |
| (Select the rating that applies from drop down menu) | |
| Quality, completeness, and accuracy of price/cost proposals/invoices: | |
| Accuracy and timeliness of cost reports: | |
| Ability to perform within negotiated costs/prices: | |
| Ability to provide innovative solutions that resulted in cost savings: | |
| EVALUATION AREA 4: MANAGEMENT EFFECTIVENESS | |
| (Select the rating that applies from drop down menu) | |
| Effictiveness in managing and directing contract resources: | |
| Ability to work in collaboration with other contractors towards a common goal: | |
| Ability to choose and manage quality subcontractors: | |
| EVALUATION AREA 5: SMALL BUSINESS UTILIZATION | |
| (Select the rating that applies from drop down menu) | |
| Demonstrated support for small businesses through subcontracting opportunities: | |
| Adherence to small business subcontracting goals | |
| Demonstrated support for developing small business capabilities through mentoring campaigns | |
| EVALUATION AREA 6: COMPLIANCE WITH REGULATORY REQUIREMENTS | |
| (Select the rating that applies from drop down menu) | |
| Adherence with regulatory requirements of contract | |
| Proactive engagement to identify regulatory requirements | |
| Proactive engagement to identify regulatory requirement risks | |
| Proactive engagement to mitigate regulatory requirement risks | |
| COMMENTS (Please include any additional comments concerning the past performance of the contractor): |
| Thank You for completing this past performance evaluation. Please email the completed survey to the following address: |
| U. S. Department of State |
| Office of Acquisition Management |
| ATTN: |
Jason Lillie and Stephen Law
E-MAIL ADDRESS:
lilliejm@state.gov LawS2@state.gov
SAQMMA-16-R-0106
Attachment 12 - Past Performance Survey
&P
File details come from the government source that posted it. Updated .