Atch3 Past Performance Questionnaire.PDF
PDF 449 KB Posted
- Attached to
- Pilatus PC12 NGX Pilot Training Services
- Solicitation number
- 15F06724R00000169
About this file
This document is a Past Performance Questionnaire for a federal contract opportunity. The Federal Bureau of Investigation (FBI) is seeking to acquire Pilatus PC12 NGX Pilot Training Services under RFP 15F06724R0000169. The questionnaire requests information from past performance references to evaluate an offeror's relevant past performance. It includes rating criteria for Quality of Service, Schedule, Cost Control, Business Relations, Management of Key Personnel, and Utilization of Small Business. The overall contract will be a five-year, firm-fixed price Blanket Purchase Agreement for the pilot training services. Proposals are due by July 10, 2024 and questions are due by June 24, 2024. The North American Industry Classification System code is 611512, Flight Training with a small business size standard of $30,000,000.
View the file
Other files
On GovTribe
Work with this file
- Download the original file
- Contacts named in this file
- Similar government files
- Ask GovTribe AI about this file
Text version
FEDERAL BUREAU OF INVESTIGATION
FINANCE AND FACILITIES DIVISION | PROCUREMENT SECTION
PAST PERFORMANCE QUESTIONNAIRE
Attachment 3: Past Performance Questionnaire RFP 15F06724R0000169 Page 1
To Whom It May Concern:
The Federal Bureau of Investigation intends to acquire Pilatus PC12 NGX Pilot Training Services
In order to accurately evaluate an Offerors past performance, your assistance is requested in obtaining and verifying its relevant past performance history on the attached Past Performance Rating Form. Please note that the Offeror was directed to submit to you a copy of the Experience Narrative for your contract that it submitted as part of its proposal.
Upon completion of this form, please e-mail it directly to the Contracting Officer, Kaitlin B.
Casey, kbcasey@fbi.gov ; Contract Specialist, Corey Linnen, clinnen@fbi.gov
Please make the subject line of the e-mail read “RFP 15F06724R0000069 Pilatus PC12 NGX Pilot Training Services PPQ”
– Past Performance Questionnaire –
The following standards will be used in arriving at the rating:
Outstanding The Contractor’s performance exceeded customer expectations and was technically acceptable, providing significant features or benefits.
Satisfactory The Contractor met customer expectations or contract requirements and demonstrated an acceptable understanding of the requirements.
Unsatisfactory The Contractor’s performance was either marginal or did not meet customer expectations or contract requirements.
Other If the element is not applicable, indicate with “N/A.” If no data has been obtained or additional comments are provided, please note in this column.
mailto:kbcasey@fbi.gov mailto:clinnen@fbi.gov
AMDAILEY
Highlight
PAST PERFORMANCE QUESTIONNAIRE
Attachment 3: Past Performance Questionnaire Page 2
PAST PERFORMANCE PROJECT IDENTIFICATON
CONTRACTOR NAME:
CONTRACT or ORDER
NUMBER:
PROJECT TITLE: Click here to enter text.
TOTAL PERIOD OF
PERFORMANCE,
INCLUDING OPTIONS
Click here to enter text.
PAST PERFORMANCE REFERENCE INFORMATION
NAME: Click here to enter text.
TITLE: Click here to enter text.
AGENCY or CUSTOMER: Click here to enter text.
PHONE: Click here to enter text.
E-MAIL Click here to enter text.
DESCRIPTION OF SERIVICES PROVIDED:
Click here to enter text.
For each of the Six (6) criteria listed below, the rater must choose One (1) Adjectival Rating by checking the box, as applicable. At a minimum, for any rating that is checked Marginal or Unsatisfactory, please submit additional comments to substantiate the rating. If Cost Control is N/A, Please explain why.
RFP 15F06724R0000169
PAST PERFORMANCE QUESTIONNAIRE
Attachment 3: Past Performance Questionnaire Page 3
1. QUALITY OF SERVICE
RATING Adjectival Rating
Definition
Exceptional Performance meets contractual requirements and exceeds many to the Government’s benefit. The element being assessed was accomplished with few minor problems for which corrective actions taken by the Contractor were highly effective
Very Good Performance meets contractual requirements and exceeds some to the Government’s benefit. The element being assessed was accomplished with some minor problems for which corrective actions taken by the Contractor were effective
Satisfactory Performance meets contractual requirements. The element being assessed contains some minor problems for which corrective actions taken by the Contractor appear or were satisfactory
Marginal Performance does not meet some contractual requirements. The element being assessed reflects a serious problem for which the Contractor has not yet identified corrective actions.
Unsatisfactory Performance does not meet most contractual requirements and recovery is not likely in a timely manner. The element being assessed contains a serious problem(s) for which the Contractor’s corrective actions appear or were ineffective.
ADDITIONAL COMMENTS:
Click here to enter text.
2. SCHEDULE
RATING Adjectival Rating
Definition
Exceptional Performance meets contractual requirements and exceeds many to the Government’s benefit. The element being assessed was accomplished with few minor problems for which corrective actions taken by the Contractor were highly effective
PAST PERFORMANCE QUESTIONNAIRE
Attachment 3: Past Performance Questionnaire Page 4
Very Good Performance meets contractual requirements and exceeds some to the Government’s benefit. The element being assessed was accomplished with some minor problems for which corrective actions taken by the Contractor were effective
Satisfactory Performance meets contractual requirements. The element being assessed contains some minor problems for which corrective actions taken by the Contractor appear or were satisfactory
Marginal Performance does not meet some contractual requirements. The element being assessed reflects a serious problem for which the Contractor has not yet identified corrective actions.
Unsatisfactory Performance does not meet most contractual requirements and recovery is not likely in a timely manner. The element being assessed contains a serious problem(s) for which the Contractor’s corrective actions appear or were ineffective.
ADDITIONAL COMMENTS:
Click here to enter text.
3. COST CONTROL
RATING Adjectival Rating
Definition
Exceptional Performance meets contractual requirements and exceeds many to the Government’s benefit. The element being assessed was accomplished with few minor problems for which corrective actions taken by the Contractor were highly effective
Very Good Performance meets contractual requirements and exceeds some to the Government’s benefit. The element being assessed was accomplished with some minor problems for which corrective actions taken by the Contractor were effective
Satisfactory Performance meets contractual requirements. The element being assessed contains some minor problems for which corrective actions taken by the Contractor appear or were satisfactory
PAST PERFORMANCE QUESTIONNAIRE
Attachment 3: Past Performance Questionnaire Page 5
Marginal Performance does not meet some contractual requirements. The element being assessed reflects a serious problem for which the Contractor has not yet identified corrective actions.
Unsatisfactory Performance does not meet most contractual requirements and recovery is not likely in a timely manner. The element being assessed contains a serious problem(s) for which the Contractor’s corrective actions appear or were ineffective.
Not Applicable
ADDITIONAL COMMENTS:
Click here to enter text.
4. BUSINESS RELATIONS
RATING Adjectival Rating
Definition
Exceptional Performance meets contractual requirements and exceeds many to the Government’s benefit. The element being assessed was accomplished with few minor problems for which corrective actions taken by the Contractor were highly effective
Very Good Performance meets contractual requirements and exceeds some to the Government’s benefit. The element being assessed was accomplished with some minor problems for which corrective actions taken by the Contractor were effective
Satisfactory Performance meets contractual requirements. The element being assessed contains some minor problems for which corrective actions taken by the Contractor appear or were satisfactory
Marginal Performance does not meet some contractual requirements. The element being assessed reflects a serious problem for which the Contractor has not yet identified corrective actions.
Unsatisfactory Performance does not meet most contractual requirements and recovery is not likely in a timely manner. The element being
PAST PERFORMANCE QUESTIONNAIRE
Attachment 3: Past Performance Questionnaire Page 6 assessed contains a serious problem(s) for which the Contractor’s corrective actions appear or were ineffective.
ADDITIONAL COMMENTS:
Click here to enter text.
5. MANAGEMENT OF KEY PERSONNEL
RATING Adjectival Rating
Definition
Exceptional Performance meets contractual requirements and exceeds many to the Government’s benefit. The element being assessed was accomplished with few minor problems for which corrective actions taken by the Contractor were highly effective
Very Good Performance meets contractual requirements and exceeds some to the Government’s benefit. The element being assessed was accomplished with some minor problems for which corrective actions taken by the Contractor were effective
Satisfactory Performance meets contractual requirements. The element being assessed contains some minor problems for which corrective actions taken by the Contractor appear or were satisfactory
Marginal Performance does not meet some contractual requirements. The element being assessed reflects a serious problem for which the Contractor has not yet identified corrective actions.
Unsatisfactory Performance does not meet most contractual requirements and recovery is not likely in a timely manner. The element being assessed contains a serious problem(s) for which the Contractor’s corrective actions appear or were ineffective.
ADDITIONAL COMMENTS:
PAST PERFORMANCE QUESTIONNAIRE
Attachment 3: Past Performance Questionnaire Page 7
Click here to enter text.
6. UTILIZATION OF SMALL BUSINESS
RATING Adjectival Rating
Definition
Exceptional Performance meets contractual requirements and exceeds many to the Government’s benefit. The element being assessed was accomplished with few minor problems for which corrective actions taken by the Contractor were highly effective
Very Good Performance meets contractual requirements and exceeds some to the Government’s benefit. The element being assessed was accomplished with some minor problems for which corrective actions taken by the Contractor were effective
Satisfactory Performance meets contractual requirements. The element being assessed contains some minor problems for which corrective actions taken by the Contractor appear or were satisfactory
Marginal Performance does not meet some contractual requirements. The element being assessed reflects a serious problem for which the Contractor has not yet identified corrective actions.
Unsatisfactory Performance does not meet most contractual requirements and recovery is not likely in a timely manner. The element being assessed contains a serious problem(s) for which the Contractor’s corrective actions appear or were ineffective.
ADDITIONAL COMMENTS:
Click here to enter text.
PAST PERFORMANCE QUESTIONNAIRE
Attachment 3: Past Performance Questionnaire Page 8
Overall Would you have any reservations about soliciting this contractor in the future or having them perform one of your critical and demanding programs? Why or why not?
Click here to enter text.
| CONTRACTOR NAME: |
| CONTRACT or ORDER NUMBER: |
| PROJECT TITLE: |
| Click here to enter text: |
| Click here to enter text_2: |
| NAME: |
| Click here to enter text_3: |
| TITLE: |
| Click here to enter text_4: |
| Click here to enter text_5: |
| PHONE: |
| Click here to enter text_6: |
| EMAIL: |
| Click here to enter text_7: |
| Click here to enter text_8: |
| undefined_2: |
| undefined_4: |
| undefined_5: |
| undefined_6: |
| undefined_8: |
| Click here to enter text_9: |
| undefined_10: |
| undefined_12: |
| undefined_13: |
| undefined_14: |
| undefined_16: |
| Click here to enter text_10: |
| undefined_18: |
| undefined_20: |
| undefined_21: |
| undefined_22: |
| undefined_24: |
| undefined_25: |
| Click here to enter text_11: |
| undefined_27: |
| undefined_29: |
| undefined_30: |
| undefined_31: |
| undefined_32: |
| Click here to enter text_12: |
| undefined_34: |
| undefined_36: |
| undefined_37: |
| undefined_38: |
| undefined_40: |
| Click here to enter text_13: |
| undefined_42: |
| undefined_44: |
| undefined_45: |
| undefined_46: |
| undefined_48: |
| Click here to enter text_14: |
| Click here to enter text_15: |
| Check Box2: Off |
| Check Box3: Off |
| Check Box4: Off |
| Check Box5: Off |
| Check Box6: Off |
| Check Box7: Off |
| Check Box8: Off |
| Check Box9: Off |
| Check Box10: Off |
| Check Box11: Off |
| Check Box12: Off |
| Check Box13: Off |
| Check Box14: Off |
| Check Box15: Off |
| Check Box16: Off |
| Check Box17: Off |
| Check Box18: Off |
| Check Box19: Off |
| Check Box20: Off |
| Check Box21: Off |
| Check Box22: Off |
| Check Box23: Off |
| Check Box24: Off |
| Check Box25: Off |
| Check Box26: Off |
| Check Box27: Off |
| Check Box28: Off |
| Check Box29: Off |
| Check Box30: Off |
| Check Box31: Off |
| Check Box32: Off |
| INSERT COMPANY'S NAME: Insert Evaluated Company’s Name |
File details come from the government source that posted it. Updated .