Atch3 Past Performance Questionnaire.PDF

PDF 449 KB Posted

Attached to
Pilatus PC12 NGX Pilot Training Services
Solicitation number
15F06724R00000169
Issued by

About this file

This document is a Past Performance Questionnaire for a federal contract opportunity. The Federal Bureau of Investigation (FBI) is seeking to acquire Pilatus PC12 NGX Pilot Training Services under RFP 15F06724R0000169. The questionnaire requests information from past performance references to evaluate an offeror's relevant past performance. It includes rating criteria for Quality of Service, Schedule, Cost Control, Business Relations, Management of Key Personnel, and Utilization of Small Business. The overall contract will be a five-year, firm-fixed price Blanket Purchase Agreement for the pilot training services. Proposals are due by July 10, 2024 and questions are due by June 24, 2024. The North American Industry Classification System code is 611512, Flight Training with a small business size standard of $30,000,000.

View the file

Other files

On GovTribe

Work with this file

  • Download the original file
  • Contacts named in this file
  • Similar government files
  • Ask GovTribe AI about this file

Text version

FEDERAL BUREAU OF INVESTIGATION

FINANCE AND FACILITIES DIVISION | PROCUREMENT SECTION

PAST PERFORMANCE QUESTIONNAIRE

Attachment 3: Past Performance Questionnaire RFP 15F06724R0000169 Page 1

To Whom It May Concern:

The Federal Bureau of Investigation intends to acquire Pilatus PC12 NGX Pilot Training Services

In order to accurately evaluate an Offerors past performance, your assistance is requested in obtaining and verifying its relevant past performance history on the attached Past Performance Rating Form. Please note that the Offeror was directed to submit to you a copy of the Experience Narrative for your contract that it submitted as part of its proposal.

Upon completion of this form, please e-mail it directly to the Contracting Officer, Kaitlin B.

Casey, kbcasey@fbi.gov ; Contract Specialist, Corey Linnen, clinnen@fbi.gov

Please make the subject line of the e-mail read “RFP 15F06724R0000069 Pilatus PC12 NGX Pilot Training Services PPQ”

– Past Performance Questionnaire –

The following standards will be used in arriving at the rating:

Outstanding The Contractor’s performance exceeded customer expectations and was technically acceptable, providing significant features or benefits.

Satisfactory The Contractor met customer expectations or contract requirements and demonstrated an acceptable understanding of the requirements.

Unsatisfactory The Contractor’s performance was either marginal or did not meet customer expectations or contract requirements.

Other If the element is not applicable, indicate with “N/A.” If no data has been obtained or additional comments are provided, please note in this column.

mailto:kbcasey@fbi.gov mailto:clinnen@fbi.gov

AMDAILEY

Highlight

PAST PERFORMANCE QUESTIONNAIRE

Attachment 3: Past Performance Questionnaire Page 2

PAST PERFORMANCE PROJECT IDENTIFICATON

CONTRACTOR NAME:

CONTRACT or ORDER

NUMBER:

PROJECT TITLE: Click here to enter text.

TOTAL PERIOD OF

PERFORMANCE,

INCLUDING OPTIONS

Click here to enter text.

PAST PERFORMANCE REFERENCE INFORMATION

NAME: Click here to enter text.

TITLE: Click here to enter text.

AGENCY or CUSTOMER: Click here to enter text.

PHONE: Click here to enter text.

E-MAIL Click here to enter text.

DESCRIPTION OF SERIVICES PROVIDED:

Click here to enter text.

For each of the Six (6) criteria listed below, the rater must choose One (1) Adjectival Rating by checking the box, as applicable. At a minimum, for any rating that is checked Marginal or Unsatisfactory, please submit additional comments to substantiate the rating. If Cost Control is N/A, Please explain why.

RFP 15F06724R0000169

PAST PERFORMANCE QUESTIONNAIRE

Attachment 3: Past Performance Questionnaire Page 3

1. QUALITY OF SERVICE

RATING Adjectival Rating

Definition

Exceptional Performance meets contractual requirements and exceeds many to the Government’s benefit. The element being assessed was accomplished with few minor problems for which corrective actions taken by the Contractor were highly effective

Very Good Performance meets contractual requirements and exceeds some to the Government’s benefit. The element being assessed was accomplished with some minor problems for which corrective actions taken by the Contractor were effective

Satisfactory Performance meets contractual requirements. The element being assessed contains some minor problems for which corrective actions taken by the Contractor appear or were satisfactory

Marginal Performance does not meet some contractual requirements. The element being assessed reflects a serious problem for which the Contractor has not yet identified corrective actions.

Unsatisfactory Performance does not meet most contractual requirements and recovery is not likely in a timely manner. The element being assessed contains a serious problem(s) for which the Contractor’s corrective actions appear or were ineffective.

ADDITIONAL COMMENTS:

Click here to enter text.

2. SCHEDULE

RATING Adjectival Rating

Definition

Exceptional Performance meets contractual requirements and exceeds many to the Government’s benefit. The element being assessed was accomplished with few minor problems for which corrective actions taken by the Contractor were highly effective

PAST PERFORMANCE QUESTIONNAIRE

Attachment 3: Past Performance Questionnaire Page 4

Very Good Performance meets contractual requirements and exceeds some to the Government’s benefit. The element being assessed was accomplished with some minor problems for which corrective actions taken by the Contractor were effective

Satisfactory Performance meets contractual requirements. The element being assessed contains some minor problems for which corrective actions taken by the Contractor appear or were satisfactory

Marginal Performance does not meet some contractual requirements. The element being assessed reflects a serious problem for which the Contractor has not yet identified corrective actions.

Unsatisfactory Performance does not meet most contractual requirements and recovery is not likely in a timely manner. The element being assessed contains a serious problem(s) for which the Contractor’s corrective actions appear or were ineffective.

ADDITIONAL COMMENTS:

Click here to enter text.

3. COST CONTROL

RATING Adjectival Rating

Definition

Exceptional Performance meets contractual requirements and exceeds many to the Government’s benefit. The element being assessed was accomplished with few minor problems for which corrective actions taken by the Contractor were highly effective

Very Good Performance meets contractual requirements and exceeds some to the Government’s benefit. The element being assessed was accomplished with some minor problems for which corrective actions taken by the Contractor were effective

Satisfactory Performance meets contractual requirements. The element being assessed contains some minor problems for which corrective actions taken by the Contractor appear or were satisfactory

PAST PERFORMANCE QUESTIONNAIRE

Attachment 3: Past Performance Questionnaire Page 5

Marginal Performance does not meet some contractual requirements. The element being assessed reflects a serious problem for which the Contractor has not yet identified corrective actions.

Unsatisfactory Performance does not meet most contractual requirements and recovery is not likely in a timely manner. The element being assessed contains a serious problem(s) for which the Contractor’s corrective actions appear or were ineffective.

Not Applicable

ADDITIONAL COMMENTS:

Click here to enter text.

4. BUSINESS RELATIONS

RATING Adjectival Rating

Definition

Exceptional Performance meets contractual requirements and exceeds many to the Government’s benefit. The element being assessed was accomplished with few minor problems for which corrective actions taken by the Contractor were highly effective

Very Good Performance meets contractual requirements and exceeds some to the Government’s benefit. The element being assessed was accomplished with some minor problems for which corrective actions taken by the Contractor were effective

Satisfactory Performance meets contractual requirements. The element being assessed contains some minor problems for which corrective actions taken by the Contractor appear or were satisfactory

Marginal Performance does not meet some contractual requirements. The element being assessed reflects a serious problem for which the Contractor has not yet identified corrective actions.

Unsatisfactory Performance does not meet most contractual requirements and recovery is not likely in a timely manner. The element being

PAST PERFORMANCE QUESTIONNAIRE

Attachment 3: Past Performance Questionnaire Page 6 assessed contains a serious problem(s) for which the Contractor’s corrective actions appear or were ineffective.

ADDITIONAL COMMENTS:

Click here to enter text.

5. MANAGEMENT OF KEY PERSONNEL

RATING Adjectival Rating

Definition

Exceptional Performance meets contractual requirements and exceeds many to the Government’s benefit. The element being assessed was accomplished with few minor problems for which corrective actions taken by the Contractor were highly effective

Very Good Performance meets contractual requirements and exceeds some to the Government’s benefit. The element being assessed was accomplished with some minor problems for which corrective actions taken by the Contractor were effective

Satisfactory Performance meets contractual requirements. The element being assessed contains some minor problems for which corrective actions taken by the Contractor appear or were satisfactory

Marginal Performance does not meet some contractual requirements. The element being assessed reflects a serious problem for which the Contractor has not yet identified corrective actions.

Unsatisfactory Performance does not meet most contractual requirements and recovery is not likely in a timely manner. The element being assessed contains a serious problem(s) for which the Contractor’s corrective actions appear or were ineffective.

ADDITIONAL COMMENTS:

PAST PERFORMANCE QUESTIONNAIRE

Attachment 3: Past Performance Questionnaire Page 7

Click here to enter text.

6. UTILIZATION OF SMALL BUSINESS

RATING Adjectival Rating

Definition

Exceptional Performance meets contractual requirements and exceeds many to the Government’s benefit. The element being assessed was accomplished with few minor problems for which corrective actions taken by the Contractor were highly effective

Very Good Performance meets contractual requirements and exceeds some to the Government’s benefit. The element being assessed was accomplished with some minor problems for which corrective actions taken by the Contractor were effective

Satisfactory Performance meets contractual requirements. The element being assessed contains some minor problems for which corrective actions taken by the Contractor appear or were satisfactory

Marginal Performance does not meet some contractual requirements. The element being assessed reflects a serious problem for which the Contractor has not yet identified corrective actions.

Unsatisfactory Performance does not meet most contractual requirements and recovery is not likely in a timely manner. The element being assessed contains a serious problem(s) for which the Contractor’s corrective actions appear or were ineffective.

ADDITIONAL COMMENTS:

Click here to enter text.

PAST PERFORMANCE QUESTIONNAIRE

Attachment 3: Past Performance Questionnaire Page 8

Overall Would you have any reservations about soliciting this contractor in the future or having them perform one of your critical and demanding programs? Why or why not?

Click here to enter text.

CONTRACTOR NAME:
CONTRACT or ORDER NUMBER:
PROJECT TITLE:
Click here to enter text:
Click here to enter text_2:
NAME:
Click here to enter text_3:
TITLE:
Click here to enter text_4:
Click here to enter text_5:
PHONE:
Click here to enter text_6:
EMAIL:
Click here to enter text_7:
Click here to enter text_8:
undefined_2:
undefined_4:
undefined_5:
undefined_6:
undefined_8:
Click here to enter text_9:
undefined_10:
undefined_12:
undefined_13:
undefined_14:
undefined_16:
Click here to enter text_10:
undefined_18:
undefined_20:
undefined_21:
undefined_22:
undefined_24:
undefined_25:
Click here to enter text_11:
undefined_27:
undefined_29:
undefined_30:
undefined_31:
undefined_32:
Click here to enter text_12:
undefined_34:
undefined_36:
undefined_37:
undefined_38:
undefined_40:
Click here to enter text_13:
undefined_42:
undefined_44:
undefined_45:
undefined_46:
undefined_48:
Click here to enter text_14:
Click here to enter text_15:
Check Box2: Off
Check Box3: Off
Check Box4: Off
Check Box5: Off
Check Box6: Off
Check Box7: Off
Check Box8: Off
Check Box9: Off
Check Box10: Off
Check Box11: Off
Check Box12: Off
Check Box13: Off
Check Box14: Off
Check Box15: Off
Check Box16: Off
Check Box17: Off
Check Box18: Off
Check Box19: Off
Check Box20: Off
Check Box21: Off
Check Box22: Off
Check Box23: Off
Check Box24: Off
Check Box25: Off
Check Box26: Off
Check Box27: Off
Check Box28: Off
Check Box29: Off
Check Box30: Off
Check Box31: Off
Check Box32: Off
INSERT COMPANY'S NAME: Insert Evaluated Company’s Name

File details come from the government source that posted it. Updated .