Atch 8 - PP Questionnaire.docx
DOCX document 24 KB Posted
- Attached to
- Integrated Data Environment & Global Transportation Network Convergence (IGC) Amend 3 Federal contract opportunity
- Solicitation number
- HTC71124QD003
About this file
The document is a Past Performance Questionnaire related to the federal contract opportunity for the Integrated Data Environment & Global Transportation Network Convergence (IGC) requirement, Solicitation Number HTC71124QD003. The questionnaire requests information on the contractor's past performance, including staffing and quality of service, cost control, contract performance and management, and technical performance. The rating definitions are provided, and the respondent is asked if they would award to this contractor in the future. The related federal contract opportunity is a Request for Quotation (RFQ) for a total small business set-aside task order under the GSA Multiple Award Schedule. The services and support required include contract and task order management, software development, monitoring and production application support, CCMD exercise support, RMF support, cloud migration support, and other related efforts. The period of performance includes a transition phase-in period and five one-year option periods. Questions on the RFQ are due by April 30, 2024, and quotes are due by May 16, 2024.
View the file
Other files for this federal contract opportunity
Show all 23
On GovTribe
Work with this file on GovTribe
- Download the original file
- Contacts named in this file
- Similar government files
- Ask GovTribe AI about this file
Text version
SOURCE SELECTION INFORMATION –
SEE FAR 2.101 AND 3.104
PAST PERFORMANCE QUESTIONAIRE
HTC71124QD003
Program Executive Office – TRANSCOM (PEO-T) Integrated Data Environment & Global Transportation Network Convergence (IGC)
Complete the following questionnaire and return via email no later than 1000 (CT) 16 May 2024 to:
EMAIL SUBJECT: HTC71124QD003 – Past Performance Questionnaire, (Contractor’s Name)
ATTENTION: Teyroko Perkins, Contract Specialist Teyroko.s.perkins.civ@mail.mil and Amy Miller, Contracting Officer amy.m.miller50.civ@mail.mil
I. PAST PERFORMANCE REFERENCE
Company/Agency:
PPQ Reference/Completed By: ___________________________________________________________
Relation to Program: (e.g., Program Manager):
Contact Information (Phone/Email):
Signature (Digital, if possible):
II. WORK PERFORMED IDENTIFICATION
Contractor (Company/Division):
Contract Number:
Contract Value (including options):
Period of Performance:
Contract Type (FFP, CPFF, etc.):
Brief Description of the Contract Effort and required Tasks:
Use of Subcontractors (percentage)
III. PERFORMANCE EVALUATION
Please identify the appropriate rating for each of the following questions as it relates to the contractor’s performance for the contract reference, as applicable. The ratings and their associated definitions are located at the end of this document. At the end of the questionnaire, there is a comments section to add any information pertinent to the contractor’s performance record.
| Staffing and Quality of Service | Poor | Fair Good Excellent | |||||
| (1) Appropriate skills and expertise provided | □ | □ | □ | □ | |||
| (2) Technical excellence | □ | □ | □ | □ | |||
| (3) Minimum vacancies/replacement of personnel | □ | □ | □ | □ | |||
| (4) Emphasis on customer satisfaction | □ | □ | □ | □ | |||
| (5) Compliance with Contract requirements | □ | □ | □ | □ |
Cost Control Poor Fair Good Excellent
| (1) Accurate and timely invoicing | □ | □ | □ | □ | ||
| (2) Effective cost control and notification | □ | □ | □ | □ | ||
| (3) Cost efficiencies | □ | □ | □ | □ |
| Contract Performance/Management | Poor Fair Good Excellent | |||||||
| (1) Reliability | □ | □ | □ | □ | ||||
| (2) Responsiveness to Technical Direction | □ | □ | □ | □ | ||||
| (3) Met Delivery Schedule | □ | □ | □ | □ | ||||
| (4) Accuracy of Deliverables | □ | □ | □ | □ | ||||
| (5) Effective Management | □ | □ | □ | □ | ||||
| (6) Overall contract administration/communication | □ | □ | □ | □ |
Technical Performance
(1) Experience managing a software sustainment program.
Substantial Moderate Limited
(2) Experience developing and sustaining large data warehouses hosted at multiple locations, staging and integrating data from multiple heterogeneous sources, and data distribution.
Substantial Moderate Limited
(3) Experience providing agile software development methodology via a DevSecOps pipeline in the cloud.
Substantial Moderate Limited
(4) Experience maintaining existing operational environments through transition to a cloud based environment.
Substantial Moderate Limited
Would you award to this contractor in the future? If not, please explain further.
Additional Comments
Please note that your responses may be subject to disclosure to the contractor; however, the contractor will not be made aware of the respondent’s name or office.
| Rating |
| Definition |
| Poor |
| Significant problems have occurred; difficulty managing costs, delivering, and/or performing contract/technical requirements. |
| Fair |
| Some problems have occurred; some issues managing costs, delivering, and/or performing contract/technical requirements. |
| Good |
| Minor problems have occurred; minimal issue in managing costs, delivering, and/or performing contract/technical requirements. |
| Excellent |
| No problems/issues have occurred; Effectively managing costs, delivering, and/or performing contract/technical requirements. Has provided added benefit in some way above and beyond contract requirements. |
| Rating |
| Definition |
| Limited |
| Work effort is not related and the contractor has little to no experience as a result of performance under this effort. |
| Moderate |
| Work effort is somewhat related and the contractor has some experience as a result of performance under this effort. |
| Substantial |
| Work effort is similarly related and the contractor has ample experience as a result of performance under this effort. |
HTC71124QD003_Attachment 8
File details come from the government source that posted it. Updated .