Atch 7 Construction Past Performance Questionnaire.docx
DOCX document 45 KB Posted
- Attached to
- Y1DA--Project 596-20-105 - Improve Site Security, Sousley Campus Federal contract opportunity
- Solicitation number
- 36C24924R0009
About this file
This document contains a past performance questionnaire for a construction contractor bidding on a project to improve site security at the Lexington, Kentucky VA Healthcare System campus. The questionnaire requests performance assessments from previous customers on quality, schedule, and business relations for projects such as compliance with requirements, cost control, working relationships, and responsiveness. Assessors are to provide ratings and rationales using an acceptable/unacceptable scale. The solicitation number is 36C24924R0009 and is being conducted by the Department of Veterans Affairs VISN 9 for the Sousley campus project with a response deadline of December 11, 2023. General comments are also requested along with assessor identification and contact information.
View the file
Other files for this federal contract opportunity
| File | Type | Posted |
|---|---|---|
| Atch 8 Existing Utilities Bldg 1 Exterior.pdf | ||
| Atch 11 Existing Gate Submittal.pdf | ||
| Atch 10 Datasheet H5A Multisensor Camera.pdf | ||
| Atch 12 Pre-Bid Sign In Sheet.pdf | ||
| Atch 4 Drawing S-101 R1 FINAL.pdf | ||
| 36C24924R0009 0002.docx | DOCX document | |
| Atch 9 Existing Utilities - Existing Grades.pdf | ||
| 36C24924R0009 0001.docx | DOCX document | |
| Atch 5 Project Specification 596-20-105.pdf | ||
| Atch 6 Construction Pricing Schedule.xlsx | XLSX spreadsheet | |
| Atch 4 Drawing S-101 FINAL.pdf | ||
| Atch 3 Drawing S-100 FINAL.pdf | ||
| Atch 1 WD Fayette County Construction Building KY20230090 dated 09082023.pdf | ||
| 36C24924R0009_1.docx | DOCX document | |
| Atch 2 Drawing Concrete Post Barricade.pdf |
Show all 15
On GovTribe
Work with this file on GovTribe
- Download the original file
- Contacts named in this file
- Similar government files
- Ask GovTribe AI about this file
Text version
ATTACHMENT 2: PAST PERFORMANCE QUESTIONNAIRE
PAST PERFORMANCE QUESTIONNAIRE
SUBJECT: Past Performance Questionnaire for Project 596-20-105, Improve Site Security at the Lexington VA Healthcare System, Franklin R Sousley Campus in Lexington, Kentucky.
PAST PERFORMANCE INSTRUCTIONS
The NCO 9 Network Contracting Activity has issued a solicitation to Improve Site Security at the Lexington VA Healthcare System, Franklin R Sousley Campus
Past performance information will be used to evaluate proposals received. Section A is to be completed by the Offeror. Section A of the enclosed questionnaire lists the contractor who has identified your office as a source to evaluate their past performance. Section A also authorizes release of this information to NCO 9 Network Contracting Activity.
The Offeror must provide this entire document to each of its assessors. The Assessor shall only submit past performance questionnaires directly to the Contract Specialist, Jen Jamieson by way of email at jen.jamieson@va.gov.
Section B in its entirety is to be completed by the assessor(s). An individual assessor knowledgeable of the contractor’s quality of supplies and services rendered is requested to verify, complete the questionnaire, and submit to the Contracting Office. If evaluating more than one contract for the same contractor, use a separate questionnaire for each contract being evaluated.
Because this information is critical to the evaluation process, your time and effort in providing your assessment is greatly appreciated. The questionnaire should be completed as soon as possible but not later than December 11, 2023, at 2:00pm Eastern Standard Time. Assessor is requested to send electronically to (jen.jamieson@va.gov). Assessor: Please do not send this information to the Offeror being evaluated.
Thank you in advance for your cooperation and expeditious response to this request.
PAST PERFORMANCE QUESTIONNAIRE
SECTION A: Contractor Information (to be completed by the contractor for who past performance information is being collected, prior to forwarding to assessors)
Solicitation Number
Project/Requirement
Customer/Agency
1. Prospective Government Contractor’s Name and Address:
2. Contractor Point of Contact:
3. Phone number (with area code):
4. Assessor Contract Award number:
5. Description of Services provided under contract:
6. Contract award date: Contract Amount: Initial Final
7. Period of Performance or Delivery Date:
ASSESSOR INFORMATION:
Assessor Name
Title
Phone Number/Email Address
8. Authorization is hereby granted to provide the information requested in this questionnaire to NCO 9 Network Contracting Activity, Murfreesboro, Tennessee
(Signature)
(Name and Title of Authorizing Official) (Date)
SECTION B: Assessors Information (to be completed by assessors.)
RATING SCALE Definitions Past Performance Evaluation Ratings
| Rating |
| Description |
| ACCEPTABLE |
| Based on the Offeror’s performance record, the Government has a reasonable expectation that the offeror will successfully perform the required effort, or the Offeror’s performance |
record is unknown. (See note below.)
| UNACCEPTABLE |
| Based on the Offeror’s performance record, the Government has no reasonable expectation that the offeror will be able to successfully perform the required effort. |
The questions on the survey (see below) shall be rated in accordance with the definitions provided in the Rating Scale. Any unsatisfactory or marginal rating shall be supplemented with an explanation in the space provided.
QUALITY OF SERVICE
1. Rate the contractor’s compliance with contractual requirements.
ACCEPTABLE UNACCEPTABLE
2. Overall rating of contractor quality of service.
ACCEPTABLE UNACCEPTABLE
PLEASE PROVIDE RATIONALE FOR ASSIGNED RATING:
SCHEDULE
3. Delivery of service was within required time specified by contract requirements.
ACCEPTABLE UNACCEPTABLE
4. Rate the contractor’s ability to control cost and submit invoices. Are invoices complete, accurate, and timely?
ACCEPTABLE UNACCEPTABLE
BUSINESS RELATIONS
5. Overall rating of contractor’s business practices (e.g. maintaining A positive working relationship, business ethics, timely and effectively Resolution of any problems, etc.)
ACCEPTABLE UNACCEPTABLE
6. Rate the working relationship between contractor’s management, and your company (i.e. contractor’s history of reasonable and cooperative behavior, commitment of customer satisfaction; concern for the interest of the customer).
ACCEPTABLE UNACCEPTABLE
7. Rate the contractor's ability to submit required reports and/or invoices in a timely manner.
ACCEPTABLE UNACCEPTABLE
8. Rate the contractor’s responsiveness to customer complaint resolution.
ACCEPTABLE UNACCEPTABLE
9. Overall rating of contractor’s business relations.
ACCEPTABLE UNACCEPTABLE
How would you feel about awarding another contract to this contractor?
| Would not hesitate to award another contract to this contractor. |
| Would most likely award another contract to this contractor. |
| Would think twice about awarding another contract to this contractor, but would do so if no better alternative existed. |
| Do not wish to award another contract to this contractor. |
| Would not award another contract to this contractor. |
Overall Rating of Contractor’s performance (quality, schedule, business relations,) on contract being assessed.
| ACCEPTABLE |
| UNACCEPTABLE |
VII. General Comments:
ASSESSOR:
Identify your role in the contract award or administration and the period of your involvement.
| Role |
| Period of Involvement |
Contract Specialist/Contracting Officer
Technical Project Lead/Project Officer
OTHERS
(Signature) (Date)
(Typed or Printed Name) (Organization Name)
(Phone Number)
File details come from the government source that posted it. Updated .