Atch_4_Perf_Questionnaire.pdf
PDF 187 KB Posted
- Attached to
- Replace Floating Dock-TIMU Federal contract opportunity
- Solicitation number
- 140P5421R0021
About this file
This document is a performance questionnaire for contractor 140P5421R0021 to replace a floating dock at the Timothy Bay Unit of the National Park Service Southeast Region. The questionnaire collects information on the contractor's management, quality, cost, and overall performance on the contract from the evaluator. Specific questions address the contractor's communication, responsiveness, problem resolution ability, and compliance with regulations. The evaluator is asked if the contractor met technical and schedule requirements, if contract modifications or cure notices were necessary, and if the contractor's costs were reasonable and billing accurate. The evaluator also provides an overall performance rating and recommends whether similar contracts would be awarded to this contractor in the future.
View the file
Other files for this federal contract opportunity
| File | Type | Posted |
|---|---|---|
| Atch_1_to_Amd_1_QandAs_0001.pdf | ||
| Atch_2_to_Amd_1_Plans_0001.pdf | ||
| Sol_140P5421R0021_Amd_0001.pdf | ||
| Atch_6_Photos.pdf | ||
| Atch_5_Manatee_Protection_Guidelines.pdf | ||
| Atch_2_DBA_WD_Duval_County.pdf | ||
| Sol_140P5421R0021.pdf | ||
| Entire_RFP_w_Atchs_140P5421R0021.pdf | ||
| Atch_3_Site_Visit_Info.pdf | ||
| Atch_1_SOW.pdf |
On GovTribe
Work with this file on GovTribe
- Download the original file
- Contacts named in this file
- Similar government files
- Ask GovTribe AI about this file
Text version
140P5421R0021 Attachment 4
N/A=NOT APPLICABLE U=UNSATISFACTORY M=MARGINAL S=SATISFACTORY VG=VERY GOOD E=EXCEPTIONAL
Page 1 of 2 Pages
PERFORMANCE QUESTIONNAIRE
For use in Solicitation # 140P5421R0021, Replace Floating Dock-TIMU
(This questionnaire, when completed, shall not be disclosed to anyone outside the Government)
Contractor: Contract#: ________________________________________
Prime or Sub? ________ Contract Value at Award: $ ____________ Final Contract Value: $ ______________________
Contract Type: _______________________ Description of Service: _
Period of Performance: __________________________________ Date Questionnaire Completed: ________________
PLEASE FILL IN THE FOLLOWING RESPONDENT INFORMATION:
Name of Evaluator: ___________________________________ Organization: __________________________________
Phone #: ____________________ Fax #: ____________________ Email: ____________________________________
Position Title: _____________________________ Dates of Involvement in Contract: _____________________________ When responding, circle the corresponding letter (using the key at the bottom of the page) which most accurately describes the contractor’s performance or situation.
MANAGEMENT:
1. Management performance……………………………………………………….…. N/A U M S VG E
2. Effective Communication…………………………………………………………… N/A U M S VG E
3. Working relationship ………………………….……..……… N/A U M S VG E
4. Responsiveness to requirements……….……………………………… N/A U M S VG E
5. Ability to assimilate and incorporate changes in requirements and/or priority.…… N/A U M S VG E
6. Complied with gov’t or other regulations and industry standards…………….…… N/A U M S VG E
7. Willingness to resolve problems in:
(a) Scheduling Projects…………………………………………………….…….. N/A U M S VG E
(b) Quality Control……………………………………………………….…….… N/A U M S VG E
8. Ability to resolve problems in:
(a) Scheduling Projects………………………………………………….……..… N/A U M S VG E
(b) Quality Control………………………………………………………….….… N/A U M S VG E
9. To your knowledge, has contractor had any contracts terminated for default?
(If YES, please explain in “REMARKS”) ...…………………………………....…
….. YES NO
10. Has your organization ever elected to not exercise an option due to contractor’s poor performance? (If YES, please explain in “REMARKS”) ………
QUALITY
11. Were modifications issued due to contractor failure to meet technical requirements and/or delivery/cost schedules? (If YES, explain in “REMARKS”)
….... YES NO
12. Has a cure notice ever been issued? ...(If YES, explain in “REMARKS”)……… …….. ….... YES NO
13. Has a show-cause letter ever been issued? (If YES, explain in “REMARKS”)… …….. ….... YES NO
140P5421R0021 Attachment 4
N/A=NOT APPLICABLE U=UNSATISFACTORY M=MARGINAL S=SATISFACTORY VG=VERY GOOD E=EXCEPTIONAL
Page 2 of 2 Pages
COST
14. Ability to meet the terms of the contract within the contractually-agreed price(s).. N/A U M S VG E
15. Have contract concessions/changes ever been made due to contractor’s failure to accurately estimate costs? (If YES, explain in “REMARKS”)………………..….
16. Were the proposed costs for new items and/or requests for equitable adjustments considered reasonable?
17. Have there been any disputes/claims relative to the contract? (If YES, explain in
“REMARKS”)………………………………………………………………..……
18. Was the Contractor able to provide current, accurate and complete billing?........... …….. ….. YES NO
GENERAL
19. Contractor’s Overall Cooperation...………………………………………………. N/A U M S VG E
20. Contractor’s Overall Performance…………………………….…………………... N/A U M S VG E
21. Did the Contractor meet contract performance time and/or delivery schedule?...... …….. ….. YES NO
22. Would you award similar contracts to this contractor? (If NO, explain in
“REMARKS”)………………………………………………………………….….
23. What do you think was the Contractor’s strongest management attribute and why?
24. What was the Contractor’s weakest management attribute and why? Did the Contractor correct, or attempt to correct the weaknesses?
25. Remarks (areas having significance when considering this contractor for a similar contract; exceptional and unsatisfactory ratings):
THANK YOU IN ADVANCE FOR YOUR ASSISTANCE
Please email to Mary_Stefanos@nps.gov (specifying 140P5421R0021 in subject line) once completed mailto:Mary_Stefanos@nps.gov
File details come from the government source that posted it. Updated .