ATCH_3_1240BE25Q0029_QASP.pdf

1240BE25Q0029_QASP

US Department of Agriculture (USDA)

Quality Assurance Surveillance Plan

Post Fire Seed Collection

In the Southern Blue Mountains Malheur National Forest

Solicitation: 1240BE25Q0029

Purchase Order: TBD

Contents Project Name Solicitation / Contract Number Section 1: Introduction

1.1 Purpose

1.2 QASP Relation to the Contract

1.2.1 QASP Revisions

1.2.2 Surveillance of Performance Progression

1.3 QASP Relation to the Quality Control Plan (QCP)

Section 2: Performance Description

2.1 Performance Standards and Acceptable Quality Levels (AQLs)

2.1.1 Allowable Deviation

2.1.2 Substantially Complete

2.2 Non-Performance

2.2.1 Documentation

2.2.2 Remedial Actions

Section 3: Contractor and Government Responsibilities

3.1 Contractor Responsibility

3.2 Government Responsibility

3.2.1 Contracting Officer (CO)

3.2.2 Contracting Officer Representative (COR)

3.2.3 Customers

Section 4: Surveillance Methods to Perform Quality Assurance

4.1 Surveillance Methods

4.2 Analysis and Results

Appendix A: Purity Standards Appendix B: Forest Service Daily Diary

Project Name Post Fire Seed Collection in the Southern Blue Mountains Malheur National Forest

Solicitation / Contract Number 1240BE25Q0029 / Contract Number

Section 1: Introduction This Quality Assurance Surveillance Plan (QASP) is pursuant to the requirements listed in the performance work statement (PWS) entitled Post Fire Seed Collection in the Southern Blue Mountains Malheur National Forest This plan sets forth the procedures and guidelines that the USDA, US Forest Service and will use in ensuring the required performance standards or services levels are achieved by the contractor.

1.1 Purpose

The purpose of the QASP is to describe the systematic methods used to measure performance and to identify the reports required and the resources to be employed. The QASP provides a means for evaluating whether the contractor is meeting the performance standards identified in the PWS. This QASP is designed to define roles and responsibilities, identify the performance objectives, define the methodologies used to monitor and evaluate the contractor’s performance, describe quality assurance reporting, and describe the analysis of quality assurance monitoring results.

1.2 QASP Relation to the Contract

1.2.1 QASP Revisions

The Contracting Officer Representative (COR) may make revisions or changes to the QASP procedures and surveillance methods or increase or decrease the degree of surveillance methods at any time during the contract performance period. Changes to the Metric must be incorporated into the PWS, Performance Requirement Summary (PRS) and QASP by a bilateral modification to contract that is issued by the Contracting Officer (CO). A copy of the QASP is provided to the contractor to enable the contractor to enhance its Quality Control (QC) program to perform in accordance with its Quality Control Plan (QCP).

1.2.2 Surveillance of Performance Progression

As the performance period progresses, the levels of surveillance may be altered for service areas where performance is either consistently excellent or unsatisfactory. If consistently good performance, then the amount of surveillance may be reduced. If observations reveal consistent deficiencies, increased surveillance may be implemented.

1.3 QASP Relation to the Quality Control Plan (QCP)

The QCP is a required element of contract and the Contractor shall adhere to its established quality control processes and procedures in managing and performing work as described in the contract. While the QCP represents the way in which the Contractor will ensure its quality and timeliness of services, as defined in the PWS, the QASP represents the way in which the Government personnel specified in Section 3: Contractor and Government Responsibilities, Paragraph 3.2, Government Responsibilities will evaluate the contractor’s performance. The contractor’s QC program and the residual organization’s QASP should be complementary programs that ensure successful contractor performance.

Section 2: Performance Description Performance of the contractor will be monitored through the surveillance methods described in Section 4: Surveillance Methods to Perform Quality Assurance to assess the Contractor’s performance against PWS requirements.

2.1 Performance Standards and Acceptable Quality Levels (AQLs) For selected activities in the PWS, the PRS provides a performance standard and an AQL. A performance standard is the expected level of contractor performance. An AQL defines the level of performance that is satisfactory. Depending on the service evaluated and the evaluation method selected, performance standards and AQLs may be stated as a number of occurrences or as a percentage. Performance standards and AQLs for random sampling and 100 percent inspection are generally stated as percentages. For periodic inspections, performance standards may be stated as either percentages or as absolute numbers.

The contract requires the Contractor to perform all work as specified. Any inaccuracies or omissions in services or products are referred to as “defects” on the part of the Contractor. The Contractor shall be responsible for all identified defects and may be required to perform the work at no cost to the government. The AQLs take into account that in some instances an allowable level of deficiencies (deviations) is possible while overall performance continues to meet the government’s desired level of service.

2.1.1 Allowable Deviation

The AQLs define the level or number of performance deficiencies the Contractor is permitted to reach under this contract. AQLs take into account the difference between an occasional defect and a gross number of defects. AQLs can be expressed as a percentage of or as an absolute number (e.g., three per month). There may be instances where 100 percent compliance is required, and no deviation is acceptable (e.g., where safety is involved).

2.1.2 Substantially Complete

In some cases, service outputs are evaluated using subjective values (e.g., excellent, satisfactory, unsatisfactory). The criteria for acceptable performance and for defects must be defined for these service outputs. The concept of “substantially complete” should be the basis for inspections based on subjective scales. Work is considered “substantially complete” where there has been no significant departure from the terms of the contract and no omission of essential work. In addition, the Contractor has performed the work required to the best of its ability and the only variance consists of minor omissions or deficiencies.

2.2 Non-Performance

Non-performance occurs when the contractor’s performance does not meet the AQL for a given requirement.

Requirements may contain multiple performance elements, and therefore, deficiencies may occur in one or more aspects of performance (e.g., timeliness, accuracy, completeness, etc.) or subject areas of effort.

When surveillance indicates that the contractor's service output is not in compliance with the contract requirements, the Contracting Officer’s Representative (COR) must determine whether the Contractor or the Government caused the deficiency. If the cause of the defect rests with the Government, corrective action must be taken through Government channels. If the cause of the defect is due to action or inaction by the contractor, the contractor is responsible for correction of the problem at no additional expense to the Government.

2.2.1 Documentation

Documentation of work non-performed or unacceptable work is essential for tracking Contractor performance. The COR will document deficient work by compiling facts describing the inspection methods and results and to substantiate nonconformance with the contract. A sample documentation reporting forma are provided in Appendix A,B, C. The documentation, with any recommendations, will be forwarded to the CO. In the case of the Contractor, the COR will decide whether to elevate the problem to the CO for corrective action.

2.2.2 Remedial Actions

The Federal Acquisition Regulation allows for penalties in the event that the Contractor fails to perform the required services. Penalties are defined as those actions taken under the direction of the CO against the contractor within the general provisions of the contract for nonconformance to the PWS and PRS.

Section 3: Contractor and Government Responsibilities

3.1 Contractor Responsibility

The Contractor is responsible for delivering products or services in accordance with the contract. Implementing its QCP, which describes the Contractor’s methods for ensuring all products and services under the contract meet established performance standards and AQLs. Maintaining, and providing for audit, quality control records and reports and all records associated with the investigation and complaint resolutions. Appointing a single quality control point-of-contact to act as a central recipient of communication from the COR or CO.

3.2 Government Responsibility

3.2.1 Contracting Officer (CO)

The CO is responsible for administering and monitoring contract compliance, contract administration, and cost control and for resolving any differences between the observations documented by COR and the contractor’s performance. The CO may delegate various day-to-day contract administration duties to a Administering ACO (ACO) and/or the COR for performance management and administrative actions such as invoice approval and issuance of Contract Discrepancy Reports may be, and normally are, delegated by the CO to the COR. The CO shall approve any revisions to the QASP processes or standards.

3.2.2 Contracting Officer Representative (COR)

The COR, is designated in writing, by the CO. The COR will ensure that the QA function is properly executed, plays a key role in contract administration and performs the contract surveillance and monitoring. Some key contract administration duties include, but are not limited to, performs surveillance as required by this QASP; make recommendations to the CO for issuance of Contract Discrepancy Reports or letters of commendation and acceptance or rejection of completed work and for administrative actions based on unsatisfactory or non-performed work, and revisions or changes to the QASP;

and assists the CO in identifying necessary contract modifications and preparing reports of Contractor performance and cost.

The COR may use the form(s) included in the Appendices to perform the inspection or other forms as approved by the

CO.

3.2.3 Customers

Customers or organizations/offices that the Contractor provided support may be requested to assist the COR in conducting QA to provide information relating to the Contractor’s performance through Customer Feedback.

Information gained from the Customer Feedback may be used in conjunction with other methods of observation to rate the performance of the Contractor.

Section 4: Surveillance Methods to Perform Quality Assurance

4.1 Surveillance Methods

The surveillance methods used in the QA process are the Government’s tools to monitor the Contractor’s products and services. The best means of determining whether the Contractor has met all contract requirements is to inspect the Contractor’s service products and analyze the results. Further, documented inspection results are an effective tool in contract administration that can confirm the successful achievement of all performance requirements or highlight areas where defects exist and improvements are necessary.

4.1.1 Calculating Acceptable Quality Level, AQLs

Acceptable quality levels AQL will be calculated by dividing the number of acceptable occurrences observed by the number of possible occurrences observed. For example: Paragraph 34 in month one the COR observed 20 surface maintenance tasks. Of the 20 observed services, 19 were satisfactory. 19 satisfactory observations divided by 20 possible observation equals 0.95 or 95%.

4.2 Analysis and Results

When the inspections and validations have been completed, the COR will perform an analysis of the Contractor’s performance. The purpose of the analysis is to ensure Government is receiving high-quality products and services from the Contractor. The COR will review the results, rate the Contractor’s compliance with the performance standards and AQLs, and characterize the Contractor’s overall performance. Analysis of all types of contract monitoring will result in one of the following outcomes:

Performance Rating Criteria

Exceptional Performance meets contractual requirements and exceeds many to the Government’s benefit. The contractual performance of the element or sub-element being evaluated was accomplished with few minor problems for which corrective actions taken by the contractor were highly effective.

Very Good Performance meets contractual requirements and exceeds some to the Government’s benefit. The contractual performance of the element or sub-element being evaluated was accomplished with some minor problems for which corrective actions taken by the contractor were effective.

Satisfactory Performance meets contractual requirements. The contractual performance of the element or sub-element contains some minor problems for which corrective actions taken by the contractor appear or were satisfactory.

Marginal

Performance does not meet some contractual requirements. The contractual performance of the element or sub-element being evaluated reflects a serious problem for which the contractor has not yet identified corrective actions. The contractor’s proposed actions appear only marginally effective or were not fully implemented.

Unsatisfactory Performance does not meet most contractual requirements and recovery is not likely in a timely manner. The contractual performance of the element or sub-element contains a serious problem(s) for which the contractor’s corrective actions appear or were ineffective.

Appendix A: Purity Standards

(a) The Government sh to ensure services are performed IAW this PWS all have access to the seed for inspection purposes during all phases of seed collection, transportation, cleaning, and packaging. The Government will conduct verification inspections to determine compliance with specifications. Verification inspections may consist of the following:

Items 1a – 1d

(1) That seed collection sites are identified on GPS.

(2) That all required collection records are legible and accurate, and complete.

(3) That GPS coordinates are accurate within 150 feet.

(4) Collection sites will be monitored for excessive vegetation trampling, and/or over-collection

Items 2a – 2g

(5) Seed delivered to the Government will be visually inspected for debris and chaff content, seed species, signs of disease, insect, and mechanical damage. Cut tests and other determinations of seed readiness will also be done as part of the inspection

(6) The Government will be responsible for the final cleaning, testing, and weighing of delivered seed. A sample of rough cleaned seed will be evaluated by the COR prior to acceptance [see section(b)(3) for requirements].

(b) Non-acceptable Seed: The Government will not accept seed exhibiting the following:

(1) Seed that is not packaged and properly identified according to the specifications.

(2) Unless otherwise approved by the COR, seed packages that contain more than 20 percent by rough weight of damaged seed (insects, disease or mechanical injury) or seed chaff, twigs, leaves, or other debris based on a visual inspection will be considered non-acceptable. These seedlots shall be recleaned at no cost to the Government or rejected for payment.

(3) Rough cleaned seedlots that do not meet the following standards:

Rough cleaned seedlots shall meet the following standards:

Species Class

Purity1

(min % by weight)

Noxious Weeds2 (max %)

Non-target Species (max %)

Graminoids 90 0 0.3

Forbs 90 0 0.2

Shrubs 90 0 0.5

1 Seedlots with less than 90 percent pure seeds shall receive a reduced payment 2 Oregon Seed Certification Service Handbook, Section V

Items 1a – 1d

(a) Upon completion of locating and mapping seed collection sites the Government will pay 100% of the bid price for this portion of the contracted work.

Items 2a – 2g

(b) Upon weighing and acceptance of the rough cleaned seed, a progress payment may be made for 50% of the contract price.

(c) A final payment will be made upon receipt and acceptance of seed test results (purity and weed content) for each subitem. Seed not meeting contract specifications 11(b)(3) but accepted by the Government will be paid for at a reduced price in accordance with the following payment schedule:

(1) Reduced Payment Schedule Based on Purity: Seedlots with less than 90% purity based on inspection by COR will receive a payment reduction as outlined below. Seedlots with less than 85 percent purity will not be accepted by the Government.

PURITY AMOUNT

90 – 100% 100% Pay

85 -89% Actual % purity

Less than 85% Not Acceptable.

Appendix B: Forest Service Daily Diary

USDA - Forest Service FS-6300-0020 Rev 01/17

CONTRACT DAILY DIARY

(Reference FSH 6309.32)

1. FOREST

2. CONTRACT NO.

3. PROJECT

4. CONTRACTOR 5. CONTRACTOR

REPRESENTATIVE ON

SITE

6. GOVERNMENT OFFICIALS ON SITE

7. DATE 8. DAY OF WEEK 9. TIME ARRIVED 10. TIME DEPARTED 11. WEATHER

12.

TEMPE

Min.

RATURE °F.

Max.

13. GROUND CONDITION 14. CONTRACT TIME 15. DAYS USED 16. COMPLETION DATE

17. TIME USED (%) 18. WORK COMPLETED (%) 19. WORK ON SCHEDULE 20. CONTRACTOR'S WORK - (X Appropriate Box)

YES NO Acceptable Unacceptable - Explain in narrative

21. CHANGE ORDERS/AMENDMENTS ISSUED 22. WORK ORDERS ISSUED (Include SUSPEND/RESUME)

23. MATERIALS FURNISHED TO JOB SITE (Furnished By: G-Govt.; C-Cont.; S-Subcont.)

24. LIST EQUIPMENT ON SITE (Furnished by G-Govt.; C-Cont.; S-Subcont.)

Type Contract Item Number and Location of Use Hours Used

25. LIST CONTRACT PAYMENTS, REPORTS, CORRESPONDENCE,

ETC.

26. WORKERS ON SITE Number

Item Prep Submit Classification PRIME SUB

27. GOVERNMENT PROVIDED SERVICES ADEQUATELY AND

TIMELY

YES NO - Explain in narr ativ e

28. NARRATIVE REPORT

29. SIGNATURE 30. TITLE 31. ADDTL SPACE NEEDED

(continued on 6300-21)