Atch 2 Draft Evaluation Criteria.pdf

TECHNICAL EVALUATION CRITERIA

Aspect I: Manning Workload Analysis IAW PWS Appendix 1:

a) Proposal provides a detailed CAT workload analysis derived from PWS workload tables (ref. Appendix 1) that clearly explains the proposed CAT manning, manning mix, full and part-time employees (if used) required for instruction and management. CAT man-year calculations will include all direct, indirect and ancillary time;

scheduled leave, holidays, and any other factors affecting workload capability. The analysis should clearly show how the offeror arrived at their manpower estimates and how that manpower is sufficient to cover all programmed and continuation training in the PWS.

b) Proposal provides a detailed CWD manning workload analysis derived from PWS (Para A1.4) for all courseware requirements that clearly explains CWD manning, manning mix, full and part-time employees (if used). Courseware development time will be presented as both a rate (number of hours proposed per instructional hour) and total hours required to complete all deliverables listed in Tables A1.9. and A1.10. to include administrative support. Offeror will provide a percentage breakdown for each skillset (individual) required to produce a given deliverable and clearly identify the total hours for each skillset (individual) proposed to meet all PWS requirements.

c) Proposal demonstrates a clear understanding of all support position manpower requirements and provides a detailed workload breakout that explains their proposed support manning, manning mix, full and part-time employees (if used).

d) Proposal provides a detailed breakout for each individual position and the overall manning proposed resulting from their CAT/CWD and support workload analysis to include the number of full and/or part time personnel (if used) required for each position. This may be separate or combined with the information required by a) thru c) above.

Aspect II: Training Workload Management Plan IAW PWS 1.3.2:

a) Proposed Training Workload Management Plan clearly demonstrates methods, procedures, and policies which ensure all required work at both the FTU and the Operational Bases is accomplished IAW the PWS.

b) Proposal demonstrates effective processes for daily and long range scheduling that mitigate the risks associated with workload fluctuations or other factors to ensure all PWS work is accomplished.

Aspect III: Organizational Structure:

a) Proposal demonstrates an effective organizational structure detailing contractor's line(s) of authority to include subcontractors and/or teaming partners for both the FTU and the Operational Bases.

b) Proposal provides an organizational chart depicting the organizational structure and demonstrating each participant’s role at each location.

c) Proposal demonstrates the functional relationships and effective roles and responsibilities of the member’s organization/s and provide communication with Government representatives counterparts to effectively execute the PWS requirements.