Asbestos Report

Asbestos and Lead-Based Paint Report 1855 Godby Road, College Park, Georgia

Cardno i

Asbestos and Lead-Based Paint Report

855 NW State Road 45, Newberry

Insert job reference

1855 Godby Road College Park, Fulton County, Georgia

July 6, 2020

Prepared for:

City of College Park

Cardno ii

Asbestos and Lead-Based Paint Survey Report

Prepared for: Mr. Artie Jones, III, MPA Program Director Director of Economic Development 3667 Main Street College Park, GA 30337

Project Name: Asbestos and Lead-Based Paint Survey Report 1855 Godby Road College Park, Fulton County, Georgia

ACRES: 243010

Date: July 6, 2020

Cardno iii

Table of Contents Executive Summary 1 1 Introduction 2

1.1 Purpose 2

1.2 Site History 2

1.3 Property/Building Descriptions 2

1.4 Previous Assessments 2

1.5 Limitations / Exceptions of Assessment 2

1.6 Special Terms and Conditions (User Reliance) 2

2 Sampling Activities 4

2.1 Asbestos Survey 4

2.2 Limited Lead-Based Paint Survey 5

3 Analytical Results 6

3.1 Asbestos-Containing Materials 6

3.2 Lead-Based Paint 6

4 Conclusions/Recommendations 7

Figures 1 Site Boundary Map 2 Building Location Map 3 Building Diagram with Asbestos and Lead-Based Paint Sample Locations

Tables 1 Asbestos Sample Summary 2 Paint Chip Sample Summary

Appendices A Photographic Log B Laboratory Analytical Reports C Inspector Accreditations

Cardno 1

Executive Summary

Cardno has completed a comprehensive pre-demolition Asbestos-Containing Materials (ACM) and limited Lead-Based Paint (LBP) inspection of the on-site structure located at 1855 Godby Road (Parcel ID 13070B B006) in College Park, Fulton County, Georgia. The study property is herein referred to as "the Subject Site/Property" or "the Site" (as generally depicted in Figure 1). The Subject Site is comprised of one parcel of land totaling approximately 0.72 and supporting one residential structure totaling 1,800 square feet. The Site is bordered to the north by vacant land; to the east by a gasoline filling station and dry cleaners; to the west by vacant/wooded land; and to the south by Godby Road. A building location map is included as Figure 2. This work was completed under an EPA Site Specific Quality Assurance Project Plan (SSQAPP) dated June 16, 2020.

The comprehensive pre-demolition asbestos survey and a limited LBP survey included the collection of 22 building material samples to be analyzed for ACMs and 6 paint chip samples to be analyzed for LBP.

In summary,

• Asbestos: Comparison of the laboratory analytical results to the Occupational Safety and Health Administration’s (OSHA) for building materials containing >1% asbestos revealed:

o Joint compound on drywall (wall and ceiling), located throughout the building, totaling approximately 3,000 square feet (SF).

o Linoleum backing, located in the kitchen, totaling approximately 120 SF.

o Exterior cementitious boarding, located on the east and west building faces, totaling approximately 200 SF.

o Exterior gray window caulk, located on exterior window frames, totaling approximately 150 LF.

o Exterior white pipe wrap, located in the crawlspace, totaling approximately 50 LF.

• Lead-Based Paint: Comparison of the laboratory analytical results to the Environmental

Protection Agency (EPA) and Housing and Urban Development (HUD) for paint chips identified the following materials as lead-based paint:

o No LBPs were identified in the interior/exterior of the on-site building.

Based on the results of this Inspection, Cardno recommends:

• The identified asbestos containing material appeared to be intact and overall in good condition with no significant deterioration or damages. Therefore, the identified ACM has a low probability of disturbance during ordinary use. Prior to any demolition that may cause the ACM to become friable, the material should be removed or abated by a qualified asbestos abatement contractor.

If the ACM is to be left in place, an Operation and Maintenance (O&M) plan should be implemented regarding the handling of the identified ACM.

Cardno 2

1 Introduction

1.1 Purpose

The purpose of this report is to identify asbestos and lead-based paint associated with the Subject Site at the time of the site reconnaissance. The report documents our findings, opinions, and conclusions.

This inspection was conducted at the request of the City of College Park, GA. This work was completed under an EPA approved SSQAPP dated XX.

1.2 Site History

The Subject Property is located in a generally residential and commercial area to the south of downtown College Park. Historically, the surrounding area has been undeveloped or interspersed with single-family residences and light commercial businesses since the 1960s. A single-family residential home has occupied the Subject Property since the late 1960s.

1.3 Property/Building Descriptions

The Subject Property consists of one single-family residential home. The on-site building is an approximate 1,800 square foot (SF) building, constructed of CMU block walls (exterior) and wood framing (interior) on a crawlspace, and a wood framed pitched roof. The building location is depicted in Figure 2. A rough floor plan of the building is included as Figure 3.

1.4 Previous Assessments

Based on Cardno’s previous investigations and information obtained from the current and former property owners, no prior asbestos or LBP assessments have been conducted on the on-site building.

1.5 Limitations / Exceptions of Assessment

A comprehensive asbestos and limited LBP survey was completed by Cardno to identify potential ACM and LBP. Any suspect building materials not sampled and analyzed for asbestos during this investigation should be treated as presumed asbestos containing materials (PACM) until further sampling by a certified inspector indicates otherwise. Any suspect LBP not sampled and analyzed for lead during this investigations should be treated as LBP until further sampling by a certified inspector indicates otherwise.

No other warranty is expressed or implied.

1.6 Special Terms and Conditions (User Reliance)

This report is for the use and benefit of the Client and may be relied upon by this entity as well as any of their respective affiliates, successors, and assigns, in connection with a commercial real estate

Cardno 3 transaction involving the property, and in accordance with the terms and conditions in place between Cardno and the Client for this project. Any third party agrees by accepting this report that any use or reliance on this report shall be limited by the exceptions and limitations set forth within this report, and with the acknowledgment that actual site conditions may change with time, and that hidden conditions may exist at the property that were not discovered within the authorized scope of the assessment. Any use by or distribution of this report to third parties without the express written consent of Cardno is at the sole risk and expense of such third party.

Cardno makes no other representation to any third party except that it has used the degree of care and skill ordinarily exercised by environmental consultants in the preparation of the report and in the assembling of data and information related thereto. No other warranties are made to any third party, either expressed or implied.

“The remainder of this page intentionally left blank.”

Cardno 4

2 Sampling Activities

2.1 Asbestos Survey

A comprehensive pre-demolition asbestos inspection was conducted on June 17, 2020. The inspection was performed by Cardno’s Douglas Strait, P.E. and Ashton Smithwick, Georgia licensed and accredited asbestos inspectors, in accordance with the Asbestos Hazardous Emergency Response Act (AHERA) and Asbestos School Hazard Abatement Reauthorization Act (ASHARA). Mr. Strait and Mr.

Smithwick’s accreditation certificates are included as Appendix C.

In accordance with National Emission Standards for Hazardous Air Pollutants (NESHAP), 40 CFR 61-Subpart M, paragraph 145, all asbestos containing materials (ACMs) must be identified and removed prior to disturbance, either during a renovation or demolition. ACM is defined by OSHA as materials that contain greater than 1% asbestos fibers.

The ACM survey included a visual survey of all accessible interior areas of the on-site building.

Destructive testing was performed to verify the existence and extent of ACM in all building materials.

The exterior and portions of the roof were also included during this survey. Due to the overall building condition, Cardno did not get on top of the roof and complete a comprehensive survey of the roofing system. This survey was performed in accordance with AHERA and ASHARA protocols.

Cardno made an attempt to visually identify all suspect materials or homogeneous areas (HAs). Each HA was visually assess for condition, friability, and quantity. All identified ACMs were classified by their category as denoted by EPA AHERA/ASHARA and OSHA. These categories include:

• Thermal System Insulation (TSI) – insulation typically over pipes, fittings, elbows, boilers, tanks, ducts, etc.

• Surfacing material – material that is sprayed, troweled-on, or otherwise applied to surfaces.

• Miscellaneous – All other ACMs

• Friable – ACM that can be crumbled pulverized or reduced to a powder by hand pressure when dry

• Category I Non-Friable – ACM consisting of packing material, gaskets, resilient floor covering, and asphalt roofing products

• Category II Non-Friable – All ACM that is not listed in Category I Non-Friable ACM

• Presumed Asbestos Containing Material (PACM) – all potential ACM not analytically analyzed indicating it is not ACM.

A summary of all bulk samples collected is included as Table 1.

During the inspection, Cardno collected 22 samples from 10 different HAs. All bulk samples were collected and stored in appropriate sample containers, labeled, and delivered to Analytical Environmental Services, Inc. (AES) in Atlanta, Georgia. This laboratory is accredited by the National Institute of Standards of Technology (NIST) and is recognized under the National Voluntary Laboratory Accreditation Program (NVLAP). AES analyzed all samples using Polarized Light Microscopy (PLM) via EPA Method 600/R-93/116. A copy of the analytical results including the laboratory certification is included in Attachment B.

Cardno 5

2.2 Limited Lead-Based Paint Survey

A limited lead-based paint (LBP) inspection was conducted on June 17, 2020. All inspections were performed by Cardno’s Douglas Strait, P.E. and Ashton Smithwick, EPA trained LBP inspectors. All testing was completed in accordance with applicable state and federal regulations regarding LBP inspections. Mr. Strait and Mr. Smithwick’s pertinent training and licensing certificates are included as Appendix C. No previous LBP sampling information was provided by the Client or the property owner.

The LBP testing was performed in general accordance with the inspection protocol in Chapter 7 of the HUD Guidelines for the Evaluation and Control of Lead-Based Paint Hazards in Housing. Painted surfaces were tested by collecting paint chips of various painted surfaces throughout the interior and exterior of the buildings. LBP is defined by EPA as containing greater than 0.5% lead in painted materials.

The interior and exterior of the building was inspected. During the inspection, Cardno collected six (6) paint chip samples from unique locations throughout the interior and exterior of the on-site building. A summary of all paint chip samples collected is included as Tables 2.

The paint chip samples were collected into appropriate containers, labeled, and delivered to AES in Atlanta, Georgia. This laboratory is accredited by the NIST program, and is recognized under the NVLAP. The laboratory analyzed the samples using flame atomic absorption spectrometry (FAAS) via National Institute for Occupational Safety and Health (NIOSH) Method 7082. A copy of the analytical results included the laboratory certification is included in Appendix B.

Cardno 6

3 Analytical Results

3.1 Asbestos-Containing Materials

Based on the analytical results of suspect ACM samples conducted during this inspection, the following materials were identified as asbestos-containing:

• Joint compound on drywall (wall and ceiling), located throughout the building, totaling approximately 3,000 square feet (SF).

• Linoleum backing, located in the kitchen, totaling approximately 120 SF.

• Exterior cementitious boarding, located on the east and west building faces, totaling approximately 200 SF.

• Exterior gray window caulk, located on exterior window frames, totaling approximately 150

LF.

• Exterior white pipe wrap, located in the crawlspace, totaling approximately 50 LF.

The identified joint compound was observed throughout the buildings walls and ceiling totaling approximately 3,000 SF. This material was in fair condition and as such is considered a Miscellaneous Category-2 non-friable material.

The linoleum backing identified was observed in the kitchen totaling approximately 120 SF. This material was in fair condition and as such is considered a Miscellaneous Category-1 non-friable material.

The cementitious boarding observed on the exterior east and west siding totals approximately 200 SF.

This material was in fair condition and as such is considered a Miscellaneous Category-2 non-friable material.

The exterior gray window caulk observed totaled approximately 150 LF. This material was in fair condition and as such is considered a Miscellaneous Category-2 non-friable material.

The white TSI wrap identified in the crawlspace totaled approximately 50 LF. This material was in poor condition and are considered a TSI friable material.

Photos of some of the identified ACMs are included as Attachment A.

The laboratory report is included as Attachment B with results summarized in Tables 1.

3.2 Lead-Based Paint

In accordance with EPA, any paint containing 0.5% by weight of lead is categorized as containing lead.

Based on the paint chip sampling results, no LBPs were identified in the interior/exterior of the on-site building. The laboratory report is included as Appendix B with results summarized in Tables 2.

Cardno 7

4 Conclusions/Recommendations

Based on the results of this inspection, Cardno recommends the following:

• The identified asbestos containing material appeared to be intact and overall in good condition with no significant deterioration or damages. Therefore, the identified ACM has a low probability of disturbance during ordinary use. Prior to any demolition that may cause the ACM to become friable, the material should be removed or abated by a qualified asbestos abatement contractor.

If the ACM is to be left in place, an Operation and Maintenance (O&M) plan should be implemented regarding the handling of the identified ACM.

Figures

“This is not a map of survey.”

Source: Google Earth

LEGEND

Approximate Site Boundary (For reference purposes only, not a surveyed boundary)

Figure 1 Site Boundary Map

55 0 55

ACM/LBP Survey 1855 Godby Road College Park, Fulton County, Georgia City of College Park EPA Cooperative Agreement: #BF-00D94219-0

On-Site Building

Source: GeoSearch Aerial Map (2018)

LEGEND

Approximate Building Boundary (For reference purposes only, not a surveyed boundary)

Figure 2 Building Location Map

30 0 30

ACM/LBP Survey 1855 Godby Road College Park, Fulton County, Georgia

EPA Cooperative Agreement: #BF-00D94219-0

Figure 3 ACM / LBP Survey Location

*Crawlspace and Roof Samples Not Depicted **Drywall / joint compound noted throughout

LEGEND

Location of identified ACM linoleum

Location of identified ACM window caulking

ACM/LBP Survey 1855 Godby Road College Park, Fulton County, Georgia

EPA Cooperative Agreement: #BF-00D94219-0

Tables

TABLE 1: SUMMARY OF BULK SAMPLE ANALYSIS AND ASSESSMENT

HA ID Date HA Description Material Location Percent and Type of Asbestos Detected1

Type of ACM2 Friability3 Physical

Condition

HA-01-01a 6/17/20 Drywall LR-2 NAD n/a n/a NF Fair HA-01-01b 6/17/20 Drywall (joint compound) LR-2 NAD n/a n/a NF Fair HA-01-02a 6/17/20 Drywall BR-2 NAD n/a n/a NF Fair HA-01-02b 6/17/20 Drywall (joint compound) BR-2 NAD n/a n/a NF Fair HA-01-03a 6/17/20 Drywall CL-7 NAD n/a n/a NF Fair

HA-01-03b 6/17/20 Drywall (joint compound) CL-7 2% CH 3,000 SF* Misc. Cat 1 NF Fair

HA-02-01a 6/17/20 Drywall on ceiling LR-1 NAD n/a n/a NF Fair

HA-02-01b 6/17/20 Drywall on ceiling (joint compound) LR-1 2% CH 3,000 SF* Misc. Cat

1 NF Fair

HA-02-02a 6/17/20 Drywall on ceiling LR-2 NAD n/a n/a NF Fair

HA-02-02b 6/17/20 Drywall on ceiling (joint compound) LR-2 2% CH 3,000 SF* Misc. Cat

1 NF Fair

HA-02-03a 6/17/20 Drywall on ceiling BR-3 NAD n/a n/a NF Fair

HA-02-03b 6/17/20 Drywall on ceiling (joint compound) BR-3 2% CH 3,000 SF* Misc. Cat

1 NF Fair

HA-03-01a 6/17/20 White Linoleum (vinyl) Kitchen NAD n/a n/a NF Fair

HA-03-01b 6/17/20 White Linoleum (Backing) Kitchen 40% CH 120 SF Misc. Cat 1 NF Fair

HA-03-01c 6/17/20 White Linoleum (Glue) Kitchen NAD n/a n/a NF Fair HA-03-02a 6/17/20 White Linoleum (vinyl) CL-1 NAD n/a n/a NF Fair HA-03-02b 6/17/20 White Linoleum (Backing) CL-1 NAD n/a n/a NF Fair HA-03-02c 6/17/20 White Linoleum (Glue) CL-1 NAD n/a n/a NF Fair HA-04-01 6/17/20 Beige Linoleum RR NAD n/a n/a NF Fair HA-04-02 6/17/20 Beige Linoleum RR NAD n/a n/a NF Fair

HA-05-01 6/17/20 Cementitious boarding Exterior West Siding 20% CH 200 SF Misc. Cat

2 NF Fair

HA-05-02 6/17/20 Cementitious boarding Exterior West Siding 20% CH 200 SF Misc. Cat

2 NF Fair

HA-06-01 6/17/20 Roof felt (Behing cementitious boarding) Exterior West NAD n/a n/a NF Fair

HA-06-02 6/17/20 Roof felt (Behing cementitious boarding) Exterior West NAD n/a n/a NF Fair

HA-07-01 6/17/20 Gray window caulk Exterior North Window 3% CH 150 LF Misc. Cat

2 NF Fair

HA-07-02 6/17/20 Gray window caulk Exterior South Window 3% CH 150 LF Misc. Cat

2 NF Fair

HA-08-01 6/17/20 Roof shingles Exterior Southwest NAD n/a n/a NF Fair

HA-08-02 6/17/20 Roof shingles Exterior Northwest NAD n/a n/a NF Fair

HA-09-01 6/17/20 Window glazing Exterior North Window NAD n/a n/a NF Fair

HA-09-02 6/17/20 Window glazing Exterior South Window NAD n/a n/a NF Fair

HA-10-01 6/17/20 White pipe wrap Crawlspace 60% CH 50 LF TSI NF Fair HA-10-02 6/17/20 White pipe wrap Crawlspace 60% CH 50 LF TSI NF Fair

Notes: (1) CH = Chrysotile; AM = Amosite; CR = Crocidolite; AN = Anthophyllite; AC = Actinolite; NAD = No Asbestos Detected

(2) Misc = Miscellaneous; TSI = Thermal System Insulation; SM= Surfacing Material

(3) F = Friable; NF - Non friable. For ACMs only: I = Non-Friable Category I; II = Non-Friable Category II NM - not measured LF = linear feet NA = Not Analyzed n/a - not applicable SF = square feet PS = Positive stop, sample not analyzed

FACILITY NAME: 1855 GODBY ROAD

Estimated Quantity

*Joint compound quantity is obtained estimated total quantity of associated drywall

COLLEGE PARK, GEORGIA

TABLE 2: SUMMARY OF PAINT CHIP ANALYSIS AND ASSESSMENT

COLLEGE PARK, GEORGIA

Sample ID Date Location Color Substrate Percentage

Lead Estimated Quantity

Physical Condition

LBP-01 2/18/20 CL-7 White CMU BRL N/A Intact LBP-02 2/18/20 LR-2 White Drywall BRL N/A Peeling LBP-03 2/18/20 BR-1 White Drywall BRL N/A Intact LBP-04 2/18/20 Exterior Window White Wood 0.256% N/A Intact LBP-05 2/18/20 Exterior Awning White Wood 0.436% N/A Peeling LBP-06 2/18/20 Exterior Wall White CMU BRL N/A Intact

Notes: NM - not measured LF = linear feet n/a - not applicable SF = square feet

FACILITY NAME: 1855 GODBY ROAD

BRL = Below Laboratory Reporting Limit

Appendix A

Photographic Log

PHOTOGRAPHIC LOG

Client Name: City of College Park, GA Project Site: 1855 Godby Road Project No.

0002304013

Photo No.

Date:

6/17/20

Direction Photo Taken:

NA

Description:

Confirmed ACM in Living Room 1 (LR-1); Joint compound on ceiling.

Photo No.

Confirmed ACM in Kitchen; Linoleum backing.

0002304013

Photo No.

Confirmed ACM on exterior siding; Cementitious boarding.

Confirmed ACM on exterior window; Gray window caulk.

0002304013

Photo No.

Confirmed ACM in crawlspace; white pipe wrap.

1/30/20

North

View of the on-site building from Godby Road.

Appendix B

Laboratory Analytical Reports

23-Jun-20Date:Analytical Environmental Services, Inc

Client:

Case Narrative1855 Godby Rd.

Cardno

Lab ID:

Project:

2006K13

Sample 2006K13-007A had three types of flooring. Client will be charged for 2 extra samples.

ANALYTICAL ENVIRONMENTAL SERVICES, INC.

23-Jun-20

Bulk Sample Summary Report

AES Job Number:

Project Number:Project Name:

Client Name:

LocationClient ID AES ID Asbestos Mineral Percentage Comments

2006K13

1855 Godby Rd. 1855

Cardno

AMCH CR AN TR AC

3080 Presidential Drive

Atlanta,GA 30340

Tel :(770) 457-8177

Fax:(770) 457-8188 Report Date:

Drywall tape. Paint included as binder

NDNDNDNDNDNDSEE COC2006K13

-001A 01-01

Layer:

WallboardNDNDNDNDNDNDSEE COC2006K13

-001A 01-01

Layer:

Joint compoundNDNDNDNDNDNDSEE COC2006K13

-002A 01-02

Layer:

NDNDNDNDNDNDSEE COC2006K13

-002A 01-02

Layer:

NDNDNDNDNDNDSEE COC2006K13

-002A 01-02

Layer:

Joint compound. Paint included as binder

NDNDNDNDND2SEE COC2006K13

-003A 01-03

Layer:

Note: CH=chrysotile, AM=amosite, CR=crocidolite, AC=actinolite, TR=tremolite, AN=anthophylite

ND = None Detected

For comments on the samples, see the individual analysis sheets.

AES,Inc. is accredited by NIST’s National Voluntary Laboratory Accreditation Program (NVLAP) for Polarized Light Microscopy (PLM) analysis, Lab

Code 102082-0. All analyses performed in accordance with EPA “Interim Method for the Determination of Asbestos in Bulk Insulation Samples” (EPA

600/M4-82-020), 1982 as found in 40 CFR, Part 763, Appendix E to Subpart E and “Method for the Determination of Asbestos in Bulk Building

Materials” (EPA/600/R-93/116), 1993.

These test results apply only to those samples actually tested, as submitted by the client. All percentages are reported by visually estimated volume.

PLM is not consistently reliable in detecting small concentrations of asbestos in floor tiles and similar nonfriable materials, quantitative TEM is currently the only method that can be used to determine conclusive asbestos content.

This report must not be reproduced except in full without written approval of Analytical Environmental Services , Inc.

Microanalyst: QC Analyst:

Yelena KhaninaElena Ivanova Page 4 of 12

Bulk Sample Summary Report

AES Job Number:

Project Number:Project Name:

Client Name:

LocationClient ID AES ID Asbestos Mineral Percentage Comments

2006K13

1855 Godby Rd. 1855

Cardno

AMCH CR AN TR AC

3080 Presidential Drive

Atlanta,GA 30340

Tel :(770) 457-8177

Fax:(770) 457-8188 Report Date:

NDNDNDNDNDNDSEE COC2006K13

-003A 01-03

Layer:

NDNDNDNDNDNDSEE COC2006K13

-003A 01-03

Layer:

Joint compound. Paint included as binder

NDNDNDNDNDNDSEE COC2006K13

-004A 02-01

Layer:

NDNDNDNDNDNDSEE COC2006K13

-004A 02-01

Layer:

Joint compoundNDNDNDNDND2SEE COC2006K13

-004A 02-01

Layer:

NDNDNDNDNDNDSEE COC2006K13

-004A 02-01

Layer:

Note: CH=chrysotile, AM=amosite, CR=crocidolite, AC=actinolite, TR=tremolite, AN=anthophylite

ND = None Detected

For comments on the samples, see the individual analysis sheets.

AES,Inc. is accredited by NIST’s National Voluntary Laboratory Accreditation Program (NVLAP) for Polarized Light Microscopy (PLM) analysis, Lab

Code 102082-0. All analyses performed in accordance with EPA “Interim Method for the Determination of Asbestos in Bulk Insulation Samples” (EPA

600/M4-82-020), 1982 as found in 40 CFR, Part 763, Appendix E to Subpart E and “Method for the Determination of Asbestos in Bulk Building

Materials” (EPA/600/R-93/116), 1993.

These test results apply only to those samples actually tested, as submitted by the client. All percentages are reported by visually estimated volume.

PLM is not consistently reliable in detecting small concentrations of asbestos in floor tiles and similar nonfriable materials, quantitative TEM is currently the only method that can be used to determine conclusive asbestos content.

This report must not be reproduced except in full without written approval of Analytical Environmental Services , Inc.

Yelena KhaninaElena Ivanova Page 5 of 12

Bulk Sample Summary Report

AES Job Number:

Project Number:Project Name:

Client Name:

LocationClient ID AES ID Asbestos Mineral Percentage Comments

2006K13

1855 Godby Rd. 1855

Cardno

AMCH CR AN TR AC

3080 Presidential Drive

Atlanta,GA 30340

Tel :(770) 457-8177

Fax:(770) 457-8188 Report Date:

Joint compound. Paint included as binder

NDNDNDNDNDNDSEE COC2006K13

-005A 02-02

Layer:

NDNDNDNDNDNDSEE COC2006K13

-005A 02-02

Layer:

Joint compoundNDNDNDNDND2SEE COC2006K13

-005A 02-02

Layer:

NDNDNDNDNDNDSEE COC2006K13

-005A 02-02

Layer:

Joint compoundNDNDNDNDNDNDSEE COC2006K13

-006A 02-03

Layer:

Joint compound. Paint included as binder

NDNDNDNDND2SEE COC2006K13

-006A 02-03

Layer:

Note: CH=chrysotile, AM=amosite, CR=crocidolite, AC=actinolite, TR=tremolite, AN=anthophylite

ND = None Detected

For comments on the samples, see the individual analysis sheets.

AES,Inc. is accredited by NIST’s National Voluntary Laboratory Accreditation Program (NVLAP) for Polarized Light Microscopy (PLM) analysis, Lab

Code 102082-0. All analyses performed in accordance with EPA “Interim Method for the Determination of Asbestos in Bulk Insulation Samples” (EPA

600/M4-82-020), 1982 as found in 40 CFR, Part 763, Appendix E to Subpart E and “Method for the Determination of Asbestos in Bulk Building

Materials” (EPA/600/R-93/116), 1993.

These test results apply only to those samples actually tested, as submitted by the client. All percentages are reported by visually estimated volume.

PLM is not consistently reliable in detecting small concentrations of asbestos in floor tiles and similar nonfriable materials, quantitative TEM is currently the only method that can be used to determine conclusive asbestos content.

This report must not be reproduced except in full without written approval of Analytical Environmental Services , Inc.

Yelena KhaninaElena Ivanova Page 6 of 12

Bulk Sample Summary Report

AES Job Number:

Project Number:Project Name:

Client Name:

LocationClient ID AES ID Asbestos Mineral Percentage Comments

2006K13

1855 Godby Rd. 1855

Cardno

AMCH CR AN TR AC

3080 Presidential Drive

Atlanta,GA 30340

Tel :(770) 457-8177

Fax:(770) 457-8188 Report Date:

NDNDNDNDNDNDSEE COC2006K13

-006A 02-03

Layer:

NDNDNDNDNDNDSEE COC2006K13

-006A 02-03

Layer:

Yellow vinylNDNDNDNDNDNDSEE COC2006K13

-007A 03-01

Layer:

BackingNDNDNDNDNDNDSEE COC2006K13

-007A 03-01

Layer:

Beige vinylNDNDNDNDNDNDSEE COC2006K13

-007B 03-01

Layer:

BackingNDNDNDNDND40SEE COC2006K13

-007B 03-01

Layer:

Note: CH=chrysotile, AM=amosite, CR=crocidolite, AC=actinolite, TR=tremolite, AN=anthophylite

ND = None Detected

For comments on the samples, see the individual analysis sheets.

AES,Inc. is accredited by NIST’s National Voluntary Laboratory Accreditation Program (NVLAP) for Polarized Light Microscopy (PLM) analysis, Lab

Code 102082-0. All analyses performed in accordance with EPA “Interim Method for the Determination of Asbestos in Bulk Insulation Samples” (EPA

600/M4-82-020), 1982 as found in 40 CFR, Part 763, Appendix E to Subpart E and “Method for the Determination of Asbestos in Bulk Building

Materials” (EPA/600/R-93/116), 1993.

These test results apply only to those samples actually tested, as submitted by the client. All percentages are reported by visually estimated volume.

PLM is not consistently reliable in detecting small concentrations of asbestos in floor tiles and similar nonfriable materials, quantitative TEM is currently the only method that can be used to determine conclusive asbestos content.

This report must not be reproduced except in full without written approval of Analytical Environmental Services , Inc.

Yelena KhaninaElena Ivanova Page 7 of 12

Bulk Sample Summary Report

AES Job Number:

Project Number:Project Name:

Client Name:

LocationClient ID AES ID Asbestos Mineral Percentage Comments

2006K13

1855 Godby Rd. 1855

Cardno

AMCH CR AN TR AC

3080 Presidential Drive

Atlanta,GA 30340

Tel :(770) 457-8177

Fax:(770) 457-8188 Report Date:

GlueNDNDNDNDNDNDSEE COC2006K13

-007B 03-01

Layer:

Gray vinylNDNDNDNDNDNDSEE COC2006K13

-007C 03-01

Layer:

BackingNDNDNDNDNDNDSEE COC2006K13

-007C 03-01

Layer:

WoodNDNDNDNDNDNDSEE COC2006K13

-007C 03-01

Layer:

VinylNDNDNDNDNDNDSEE COC2006K13

-008A 03-02

Layer:

BackingNDNDNDNDNDNDSEE COC2006K13

-008A 03-02

Layer:

Note: CH=chrysotile, AM=amosite, CR=crocidolite, AC=actinolite, TR=tremolite, AN=anthophylite

ND = None Detected

For comments on the samples, see the individual analysis sheets.

AES,Inc. is accredited by NIST’s National Voluntary Laboratory Accreditation Program (NVLAP) for Polarized Light Microscopy (PLM) analysis, Lab

Code 102082-0. All analyses performed in accordance with EPA “Interim Method for the Determination of Asbestos in Bulk Insulation Samples” (EPA

600/M4-82-020), 1982 as found in 40 CFR, Part 763, Appendix E to Subpart E and “Method for the Determination of Asbestos in Bulk Building

Materials” (EPA/600/R-93/116), 1993.

These test results apply only to those samples actually tested, as submitted by the client. All percentages are reported by visually estimated volume.

PLM is not consistently reliable in detecting small concentrations of asbestos in floor tiles and similar nonfriable materials, quantitative TEM is currently the only method that can be used to determine conclusive asbestos content.

This report must not be reproduced except in full without written approval of Analytical Environmental Services , Inc.

Yelena KhaninaElena Ivanova Page 8 of 12

Bulk Sample Summary Report

AES Job Number:

Project Number:Project Name:

Client Name:

LocationClient ID AES ID Asbestos Mineral Percentage Comments

2006K13

1855 Godby Rd. 1855

Cardno

AMCH CR AN TR AC

3080 Presidential Drive

Atlanta,GA 30340

Tel :(770) 457-8177

Fax:(770) 457-8188 Report Date:

GlueNDNDNDNDNDNDSEE COC2006K13

-008A 03-02

Layer:

Floor tileNDNDNDNDNDNDSEE COC2006K13

-009A 04-01

Layer:

GlueNDNDNDNDNDNDSEE COC2006K13

-009A 04-01

Layer:

Floor tileNDNDNDNDNDNDSEE COC2006K13

-010A 04-02

Layer:

GlueNDNDNDNDNDNDSEE COC2006K13

-010A 04-02

Layer:

Paint included as binderNDNDNDNDND20SEE COC2006K13

-011A 05-01

Layer:

Note: CH=chrysotile, AM=amosite, CR=crocidolite, AC=actinolite, TR=tremolite, AN=anthophylite

ND = None Detected

For comments on the samples, see the individual analysis sheets.

AES,Inc. is accredited by NIST’s National Voluntary Laboratory Accreditation Program (NVLAP) for Polarized Light Microscopy (PLM) analysis, Lab

Code 102082-0. All analyses performed in accordance with EPA “Interim Method for the Determination of Asbestos in Bulk Insulation Samples” (EPA

600/M4-82-020), 1982 as found in 40 CFR, Part 763, Appendix E to Subpart E and “Method for the Determination of Asbestos in Bulk Building

Materials” (EPA/600/R-93/116), 1993.

These test results apply only to those samples actually tested, as submitted by the client. All percentages are reported by visually estimated volume.

PLM is not consistently reliable in detecting small concentrations of asbestos in floor tiles and similar nonfriable materials, quantitative TEM is currently the only method that can be used to determine conclusive asbestos content.

This report must not be reproduced except in full without written approval of Analytical Environmental Services , Inc.

Yelena KhaninaElena Ivanova Page 9 of 12

Bulk Sample Summary Report

AES Job Number:

Project Number:Project Name:

Client Name:

LocationClient ID AES ID Asbestos Mineral Percentage Comments

2006K13

1855 Godby Rd. 1855

Cardno

AMCH CR AN TR AC

3080 Presidential Drive

Atlanta,GA 30340

Tel :(770) 457-8177

Fax:(770) 457-8188 Report Date:

Paint included as binderNDNDNDNDND20SEE COC2006K13

-012A 05-02

Layer:

NDNDNDNDNDNDSEE COC2006K13

-013A 06-01

Layer:

NDNDNDNDNDNDSEE COC2006K13

-014A 06-02

Layer:

Paint included as binderNDNDNDNDND3SEE COC2006K13

-015A 07-01

Layer:

Paint included as binderNDNDNDNDND3SEE COC2006K13

-016A 07-02

Layer:

NDNDNDNDNDNDSEE COC2006K13

-017A 08-01

Layer:

Note: CH=chrysotile, AM=amosite, CR=crocidolite, AC=actinolite, TR=tremolite, AN=anthophylite

ND = None Detected

For comments on the samples, see the individual analysis sheets.

AES,Inc. is accredited by NIST’s National Voluntary Laboratory Accreditation Program (NVLAP) for Polarized Light Microscopy (PLM) analysis, Lab

Code 102082-0. All analyses performed in accordance with EPA “Interim Method for the Determination of Asbestos in Bulk Insulation Samples” (EPA

600/M4-82-020), 1982 as found in 40 CFR, Part 763, Appendix E to Subpart E and “Method for the Determination of Asbestos in Bulk Building

Materials” (EPA/600/R-93/116), 1993.

These test results apply only to those samples actually tested, as submitted by the client. All percentages are reported by visually estimated volume.

PLM is not consistently reliable in detecting small concentrations of asbestos in floor tiles and similar nonfriable materials, quantitative TEM is currently the only method that can be used to determine conclusive asbestos content.

This report must not be reproduced except in full without written approval of Analytical Environmental Services , Inc.

Yelena KhaninaElena Ivanova Page 10 of 12

Bulk Sample Summary Report

AES Job Number:

Project Number:Project Name:

Client Name:

LocationClient ID AES ID Asbestos Mineral Percentage Comments

2006K13

1855 Godby Rd. 1855

Cardno

AMCH CR AN TR AC

3080 Presidential Drive

Atlanta,GA 30340

Tel :(770) 457-8177

Fax:(770) 457-8188 Report Date:

NDNDNDNDNDNDSEE COC2006K13

-018A 08-02

Layer:

Paint included as binderNDNDNDNDNDNDSEE COC2006K13

-019A 09-01

Layer:

Paint included as binderNDNDNDNDNDNDSEE COC2006K13

-020A 09-02

Layer:

NDNDNDNDND60SEE COC2006K13

-021A 10-01

Layer:

NDNDNDNDND60SEE COC2006K13

-022A 10-02

Layer:

Note: CH=chrysotile, AM=amosite, CR=crocidolite, AC=actinolite, TR=tremolite, AN=anthophylite

ND = None Detected

For comments on the samples, see the individual analysis sheets.

AES,Inc. is accredited by NIST’s National Voluntary Laboratory Accreditation Program (NVLAP) for Polarized Light Microscopy (PLM) analysis, Lab

Code 102082-0. All analyses performed in accordance with EPA “Interim Method for the Determination of Asbestos in Bulk Insulation Samples” (EPA

600/M4-82-020), 1982 as found in 40 CFR, Part 763, Appendix E to Subpart E and “Method for the Determination of Asbestos in Bulk Building

Materials” (EPA/600/R-93/116), 1993.

These test results apply only to those samples actually tested, as submitted by the client. All percentages are reported by visually estimated volume.

PLM is not consistently reliable in detecting small concentrations of asbestos in floor tiles and similar nonfriable materials, quantitative TEM is currently the only method that can be used to determine conclusive asbestos content.

This report must not be reproduced except in full without written approval of Analytical Environmental Services , Inc.

Yelena KhaninaElena Ivanova Page 11 of 12

End of Report

June 24, 2020

Dear Order No:

RE:

Analytical Environmental Services, Inc. received samples on for the analyses presented in following report.

No problems were encountered during the analyses. Additionally, all results for the associated

Quality Control samples were within EPA and/or AES established limits. Any discrepancies associated with the analyses contained herein will be noted and submitted in the form of a project Case Narrative.

AES’s accreditations are as follows:

-NELAP/State of Florida Laboratory ID E87582 for analysis of Non-Potable Water, Solid & Chemical

Materials, Air & Emissions Volatile Organics, and Drinking Water Microbiology & Metals, effective

07/01/19-06/30/20.

State of Georgia, Department of Natural Resources ID #800 for analysis of Drinking Water Metals, effective through 06/30/20 and Total Coliforms/ E. coli, effective 04/20/20-04/24/23.

-AIHA-LAP, LLC Laboratory ID: 100671 for Industrial Hygiene samples (Metals and PCM Asbestos), Environmental Lead (Paint, Soil, Dust Wipes, Air), and Environmental Microbiology (Fungal) Direct

Examination, effective until 11/01/21.

These results relate only to the items tested as received. This report may only be reproduced in full.

If you have any questions regarding these test results, please feel free to call.

Sincerely, Project Manager

2006K14

Douglas Strait Cardno

6611 Bay Circle Norcross GA 30071

1855 Godby Rd.

Ioana Pacurar

6/17/2020 11:30:00 AM

Douglas Strait:

24-Jun-20Date:Analytical Environmental Services, Inc

Case Narrative1855 Godby Rd.

Cardno

Lab ID:

Project:

2006K14

Asbestos Samples:

The PLM/Asbestos samples received under this Chain of Custody were reported under a separate AES work order.

Analytical Environmental Services, Inc Date: 24-Jun-20

Cardno Total Lead in Paint SW3050B/NIOSH 7082

Matrix:

Lab Order: 2006K14

Paint

Date Received:

Project: 1855 Godby Rd.

6/17/2020 11:30:00 AM

Client:

Reporting

Limit AnalystUnitsResultClient Sample IDLaboratory ID

Date

Analyzed

Date

Collected DF Qual

2006K14-001A LBP-01 BRL wt% 0.00962 1 06/17/2020 06/22/2020 JM

2006K14-002A LBP-02 BRL wt% 0.00978 1 06/17/2020 06/22/2020 JM

2006K14-003A LBP-03 BRL wt% 0.00955 1 06/17/2020 06/22/2020 JM

2006K14-004A LBP-04 0.256 wt% 0.00987 1 06/17/2020 06/22/2020 JM

2006K14-005A LBP-05 0.436 wt% 0.0115 1 06/17/2020 06/22/2020 JM

2006K14-006A LBP-06 BRL wt% 0.00966 1 06/17/2020 06/22/2020 JM

Qualifiers: BRL - Not Detected at the Reporting Limit DF - Dilution Factor

B - Analyte detected in the associated Method Blank

SAMPLE/COOLER RECEIPT CHECKLIST

1. Client Name: AES Work Order Number:

2. Carrier: FedEx UPS USPS Client Courier Other

Yes No N/A Details Comments

3. Shipping container/cooler received in good condition? damaged leaking other

4. Custody seals present on shipping container?

5. Custody seals intact on shipping container?

6. Temperature blanks present?

7.

Cooler temperature(s) within limits of 0 6 C? [See item 13 and 14 for temperature recordings.]

Cooling initiated for recently collected samples / ice present

8. Chain of Custody (COC) present?

9. Chain of Custody signed, dated, and timed when relinquished and received?

10. Sampler name and/or signature on COC?

11. Were all samples received within holding time?

12. TAT marked on the COC? If no TAT indicated, proceeded with standard TAT per Terms & Conditions.

13. Cooler 1 Temperature C Cooler 2 Temperature C Cooler 3 Temperature C Cooler 4 Temperature C

Cooler 5 Temperature C Cooler 6 Temperature C Cooler 7 Temperature C Cooler 8 Temperature C

15. Comments:

I certify that I have completed sections 1 1 (dated initials).

Yes No N/A Details Comments

16. Were sample containers intact upon receipt?

17. Custody seals present on sample containers?

18. Custody seals intact on sample containers?

19. Do sample container labels match the COC?

incomplete info illegible no label other

20. Are analyses requested indicated on the COC?

21. Were all of the samples listed on the COC received?

samples received but not listed on COC samples listed on COC not received

22. Was the sample collection date/time noted?

23. Did we receive sufficient sample volume for indicated analyses?

24. Were samples received in appropriate containers?

25. Were VOA samples received without headspace (< 1/4" bubble)?

26. Were trip blanks submitted? listed on COC not listed on COC

27. Comments:

I certify that I have completed sections 1 27 (dated initials).

Yes No N/A Details Comments

28. Have containers needing chemical preservation been checked? *

29. Containers meet preservation guidelines?

30. Was pH adjusted at Sample Receipt?

I certify that I have completed sections 28 30 (dated initials).

Clear Save as

Cardno 2006K14

AMBIENT

14.

LM 6/18/20

This section only applies to samples where pH can be checked at Sample Receipt.

LM 6/18/20

* Note: Certain analyses require chemical preservation but must be checked in the laboratory and not upon Sample Receipt such as Coliforms, VOCs and Oil & Grease/TPH.

LM 6/18/20

Checklist 6.9.17 Rev 2 Locked

24-Jun-20Date:Analytical Environmental Services, Inc

BatchID:Workorder:

Project Name:

ANALYTICAL QC SUMMARY REPORT

1855 Godby Rd.

2006K14

Cardno

298801

RPT Limit QualAnalyte Result SPK value SPK Ref Val %REC Low Limit High Limit RPD Ref Val %RPD RPD Limit

SampleType: BatchID: Analysis Date: Seq No:TestCode: 298801MBLK 06/22/2020Total Lead in Paint SW3050B/NIOSH 7082

Units: Prep Date:Sample ID: Client ID: Run No:wt% 06/19/2020 428386MB-298801

9709840

Lead 0.0100BRL

RPT Limit QualAnalyte Result SPK value SPK Ref Val %REC Low Limit High Limit RPD Ref Val %RPD RPD Limit

SampleType: BatchID: Analysis Date: Seq No:TestCode: 298801LCS 06/22/2020Total Lead in Paint SW3050B/NIOSH 7082

Units: Prep Date:Sample ID: Client ID: Run No:wt% 06/19/2020 428386LCS-298801

9709841

Lead 0.02370.6017 0.6010 0.002220 99.8 80 120

RPT Limit QualAnalyte Result SPK value SPK Ref Val %REC Low Limit High Limit RPD Ref Val %RPD RPD Limit

SampleType: BatchID: Analysis Date: Seq No:TestCode: 298801MS 06/22/2020Total Lead in Paint SW3050B/NIOSH 7082

LBP-03 Units: Prep Date:Sample ID: Client ID: Run No:wt% 06/19/2020 4283862006K14-003AMS

9709844

Lead 0.009640.05160 0.0482 0.003878 99.0 75 125

RPT Limit QualAnalyte Result SPK value SPK Ref Val %REC Low Limit High Limit RPD Ref Val %RPD RPD Limit

SampleType: BatchID: Analysis Date: Seq No:TestCode: 298801MSD 06/22/2020Total Lead in Paint SW3050B/NIOSH 7082

LBP-03 Units: Prep Date:Sample ID: Client ID: Run No:wt% 06/19/2020 4283862006K14-003AMSD

9709845

Lead 0.009710.05352 250.0485 0.003878 102 75 125 0.05160 3.65

Qualifiers:

J Estimated value detected below Reporting Limit

BRL Below reporting limit H Holding times for preparation or analysis exceeded

N Analyte not NELAC certified

B Analyte detected in the associated method blank

E Estimated (value above quantitation range)

S Spike Recovery outside limits due to matrix

< Less than Result value> Greater than Result value

R RPD outside limits due to matrix

Rpt Lim Reporting Limit

End of Report

Appendix C

Inspector Accreditations