Asbestos Lead Survey_Bldg-9600_20150918.pdf

September 17, 2015

Mr. Aaron Williams USACE, Tulsa District 1645 South 101st East Avenue Tulsa, OK 74128 Phone: (918) 669-4915

RE: Submittal of Hazardous Building Material Surveys Contract No. W912BV-10-D-2011, Task Order 0002 Ft. Bliss Bldg. # 9600

Dear Mr. Williams, This document summarizes the Asbestos Survey and/or Lead Paint Survey Reports for the subject building.

The below listed information was utilized to complete the Scope of Work Tasks:

Bldg. No. 9600 POC: Jesse Moncada Phone No: 915-568-1838 Building Square Footage (SF) Reported: 5,040 Technical Summary:

1. LEAD PAINT. ENCON performed a total of one-hundred and twenty-three (123) XRF analyses, which included one-hundred and nine (109) building component measurements and fourteen (14) calibration checks. Thirty-six (36) of the building readings tested positive for lead paint. Refer to the attachments for more details.

2. ASBESTOS. A total of one-hundred and fourteen (114) bulk samples were effectively collected for lab analysis of this subject building. The attached analytical results indicated that asbestos containing materials were present in the subject building. Contact Ft. Bliss, DPW regarding the latest overall status of any asbestos or lead paint materials.

SUMMARY TABLE (with Action Level) Previously Surveyed by others

Were Found

Were Not Found

Actions Required Yes / No

1. Lead Containing Paint Materials (≥0.3 mg/cm2) X Yes

2. Asbestos Containing Materials (>1 %) X Yes

Please contact me with any technical questions, or follow-up needs that you may have.

Sincerely, David Epperly, Ph.D., P.E.

Project Manager – ALL Consulting

CC: Jesse Moncada (Ft Bliss DPW) Barry Vercoe (CESFW-PEC-TM)

ATTACHMENTS

1. Lead Paint Survey Report

2. Asbestos Survey Report

ATTACHMENT 1

Lead Paint Survey Report

COMPREHENSIVE LEAD PAINT SURVEY

BUILDING 9600

FORT BLISS, TEXAS 79916

Prepared for:

U.S. Army Corps of Engineers

Tulsa District

Prepared by:

ALL CONSULTING TEAM

ENCON International, Inc.

7307 Remcon Circle, #103

El Paso, TX 79912 and

ALL Consulting, LLC 1718 S. Cheyenne Ave.

Tulsa, OK 74119

Inspection Start Date:

July 30, 2015

LEAD PAINT SURVEY REPORT

Ft. Bliss, Texas ─ Building 9600

PURPOSE

The ALL Consulting Team was contracted by the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers (USACE), Tulsa

District, to perform comprehensive Hazardous Building Materials Surveys to identify the presence of any asbestos or lead paint at a number of buildings at Ft. Bliss, Texas. This project also included the development and population of a database to store the survey reports for access by the Ft. Bliss

Directorate of Public Works (DPW), and others. The buildings that are included within this contract scope of work includes buildings at McGregor Base Camp and Doña Ana Base Camp within the New Mexico portion of Ft. Bliss, in addition to the Ft. Bliss buildings within Texas.

BACKGROUND

Ft. Bliss has a large number of buildings constructed before 1990 when the use of asbestos and lead paint was prevalent in the construction of buildings. Because the presence of these materials still exists in these buildings, Ft. Bliss is required to identify the extent of the lead paint remaining at these buildings, as well as their condition. Lead in paint is a hazard that is regulated by the

Occupational Safety and Health Administration (OSHA) under 29 CFR 1926.62 for worker exposure. In addition to the dangers of occupational exposure to construction and maintenance workers, as well as building occupants, lead particles and lead dust may be inadvertently carried home on clothes and shoes to expose their families. Identifying components containing lead paint will not only protect the workers and their families, but will help to indemnify Ft. Bliss by preemptively identifying the location of these potential hazardous materials.

INTRODUCTION

In accordance with OSHA Lead Regulation 29 CFR 1926.62, and the OSHA Hazard

Communication standard (29 CFR 1910.1200), where lead exists workers must be notified and steps must be taken to protect them from the inherent hazards. By identifying the lead containing components in these buildings, and, when appropriate, removing the hazards or potential hazards, Ft. Bliss avoids the liability of workers becoming exposed. Lead paint was banned for use in residential dwellings starting in January of 1978, but lead paint is still available for non-residential applications.

FACILITY DESCRIPTION

Building 9600 was constructed in 1957, and was in use at the time of inspection. Its previous use was listed as an “administrative building.” A description of this building is presented in Table 1 below.

TABLE 1 – BUILDING DESCRIPTION

Building Items Description Area of building 5,040 square feet Date of Construction 1957 Number of floors Two (2) floors Exterior wall materials CMU

Roof type Generator room: Pitched Rest of building: Flat

Roof material Generator room: Shingles Rest of building: Built-up roof

Interior walls First floor: Drywall, CMU, wood panels Second floor: Drywall, CMU

Interior floors Concrete

Interior floor coverings First floor: 9x9 vinyl floor tiles, 12x12 vinyl floor tiles, ceramic tiles Second floor: 9x9 vinyl floor tiles, 12x12 vinyl floor tiles, carpet

Ceilings First floor: 12x12 acoustic ceiling tiles (pencil holes & pin holes), drywall Second floor: 2x4 lay-in ceiling tiles, 12x12 acoustic ceiling tiles (pin holes)

Notes:

UNIQUE PAINTING HISTORY

Lead can be found in paint, varnish, shellac, and stain, so any coated surface other than a factory coating is suspect for lead paint. A Lead Paint Survey is based upon coated components which are grouped into similar components with a similar (unique) painting history. This would include components with the same substrate, built or installed at the same time, with a common painting history. Items such as window components (sash and mullions), window frame (trim, header, sill, and apron), doors, and door frame materials, should be considered to have a possible separate painting history, and could have had different coatings applied throughout the years.

REGULATORY STANDARDS

Lead-based paint in residential structures, or Child Occupied Facilities (day care facilities, etc.), is regulated by the U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development (HUD) under 24 CFR 35, and also by the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (USEPA) under 40 CFR 745. Only a few of these types of facilities have been identified in the buildings included in this contract. For all buildings included in this category, both HUD and EPA regulations will apply. All other buildings identified in this project would be regulated under the OSHA standards pertaining to worker protection from hazards (29 CFR 1926.62).

Sampling protocols have already been thoroughly established by the HUD and the EPA for residential housing units. For non-residential structures, there is no specified lead paint sampling protocol, but HUD / EPA protocols were generally followed. These comprehensive lead paint surveys include thorough inspections to identify all lead painted components.

SAMPLING METHODOLOGY

The building materials survey tasks were performed in accordance with the Final Hazardous

Building Materials Surveys, Sampling Plan, Fort Bliss, Texas, December 2014, prepared by ALL

Consulting and ENCON International, Inc. A visual inspection of the building was conducted to develop a sampling strategy. This included identifying component groups with similar painting histories. Each component group was sampled throughout the building to establish whether or not the building contained lead at the prescribed action level for this project, at the time of the survey.

This Lead Paint Inspection was performed on July 30, 2015 & August 05, 2015 using an x-ray fluorescence (XRF) analyzer, to identify if any lead amounts in the paint were at or above 0.3 mg/cm2. A total of one-hundred and twenty-three (123) XRF analyses were performed, which included one-hundred and nine (109) building component measurements and fourteen (14) calibration checks. Drawings that illustrate the locations of all building measurements that tested positive for lead have been provided in Appendix A of this Report.

XRF RESULTS

The XRF analyzer indicated that lead-containing paint was identified in the building component types listed in the following Table 2. The table also provides additional details regarding building component types, and if the tested components were located at the exterior or interior of the subject building.

TABLE 2: LEAD CONTAINING COMPONENT TYPES

Component Substrate Condition Color

Exterior Building: First Floor

SOFFIT WOOD POOR YELLOW

FRIEZE BOARD WOOD POOR YELLOW

SATELLITE TOWER METAL POOR RED

WALL CMU FAIR YELLOW

WINDOW METAL POOR YELLOW

EXTERIOR SILL CMU POOR YELLOW

SOFFIT WOOD FAIR YELLOW

WALL CMU POOR YELLOW

PORCH FLOOR STRIP CONCRETE POOR YELLOW

FRIEZE BOARD WOOD FAIR YELLOW

PORCH FLOOR CONCRETE POOR RED

THRESHOLD CONCRETE POOR YELLOW

LADDER METAL POOR BROWN

Exterior Building: Second Floor

SOFFIT WOOD POOR TAN

FRIEZE BOARD METAL POOR TAN

LADDER METAL POOR TAN

DOOR CASING METAL POOR TAN

WALL TRIM METAL POOR TAN

WALL WOOD POOR TAN

WALL CMU POOR TAN

WALL WOOD FAIR TAN

Interior Building: First Floor

WALL CMU FAIR WHITE

WALL CMU FAIR TAN

CROWN MOLDING WOOD FAIR TAN

BOTTOM OF STAIR

STRINGER METAL FAIR WHITE

DOOR CASING WOOD POOR BROWN

UPPER WALL CMU FAIR TAN

LOWER WALL WOOD FAIR BROWN

WALL CMU POOR BLUE

WALL DRYWALL POOR BLUE

CROWN MOLDING WOOD FAIR GREEN

BASEBOARD WOOD POOR BLACK

STAIR STRINGER METAL POOR BLACK

Interior Building: Second Floor

STAIR RISER METAL FAIR BLACK

WALL CMU FAIR WHITE

The following Table 3 indicates that a total of thirty-six (36) of the building measurements tested positive, which confirmed the presence of lead at or above 0.3 mg/cm2. The complete XRF lead paint data, including negative measurements and calibration readings, have been provided in

Appendix B of this Report. Note that the XRF analyzer makes a final determination regarding if a building component is positive or negative for lead in paint. This analytical determination is b e p t e t r 0.3 mg/cm2), the measurement obtained, and the analytical range of the margin of error for the XRF analyzer. On occasion, a measurement obtained using this test method

(EPA method # 6200) that is slightly above or below the standard may effectively result in a positive or negative determination, due to the analyzer’s margin of error. Any measurements that are determined to be positive or negative for lead paint by the XRF analyzer, will be accepted as such, during this Survey. Any results to which this would apply would have been noted with an asterisk (*) in the “Results” column of Appendix B of this Report.

TABLE 3: POSITIVE XRF LEAD PAINT MEASUREMENTS

No. Component Substrate Condition Color Measurement Location Action Level

(mg/cm2)

Results PbC

(mg/cm2) Exterior Building: First Floor

14 SOFFIT WOOD POOR YELLOW S SIDE 0.3 5.2

15 FRIEZE BOARD WOOD POOR YELLOW S SIDE 0.3 4.4

18 SATELLITE TOWER METAL POOR RED W SIDE 0.3 2.7

19 WALL CMU FAIR YELLOW W WALL 0.3 0.4

20 WINDOW METAL POOR YELLOW W WALL 0.3 0.6

22 EXTERIOR SILL CMU POOR YELLOW W WALL 0.3 0.4

23 SOFFIT WOOD FAIR YELLOW N SIDE 0.3 3.2

24 WINDOW METAL POOR YELLOW N WALL 0.3 0.8

25 WALL CMU POOR YELLOW E WALL 0.3 0.4

26 PORCH FLOOR STRIP CONCRETE POOR YELLOW E SIDE 0.3 0.5

29 FRIEZE BOARD WOOD FAIR YELLOW E SIDE 0.3 5.1

36 PORCH FLOOR CONCRETE POOR RED E SIDE 0.3 0.4

37 THRESHOLD CONCRETE POOR YELLOW E SIDE 0.3 0.5

38 LADDER METAL POOR BROWN S SIDE 0.3 0.4

Exterior Building: Second Floor

40 SOFFIT WOOD POOR TAN W SIDE 0.3 2.3

41 FRIEZE BOARD METAL POOR TAN W SIDE 0.3 2.1

42 LADDER METAL POOR TAN W SIDE 0.3 6.7

45 DOOR CASING METAL POOR TAN W ENTRANCE 0.3 0.4

46 WALL TRIM METAL POOR TAN W PORCH; N WALL 0.3 2.9

47 WALL WOOD POOR TAN W PORCH; N WALL 0.3 4

48 WALL CMU POOR TAN NE SIDE ON ROOF; S WALL 0.3 0.4

49 WALL WOOD FAIR TAN NE SIDE ON ROOF; W WALL 0.3 1.7

Interior Building: First Floor

58 WALL CMU FAIR WHITE E STAIRWAY ENTRYWAY;

E WALL 0.3 0.7

62 WALL CMU FAIR TAN MAIL RM.; S WALL 0.3 0.8

67 CROWN MOLDING WOOD FAIR TAN S HALLWAY; E WALL 0.3 0.6

72 BOTTOM OF STAIR

STRINGER METAL FAIR WHITE RESTROOM; E SIDE OF CEILING 0.3 1

74 DOOR CASING WOOD POOR BROWN N ENTRANCE TO S HALLWAY 0.3 0.7

83 UPPER WALL CMU FAIR TAN N HALLWAY; S WALL 0.3 0.6

90 LOWER WALL WOOD FAIR BROWN N HALLWAY; S WALL 0.3 1

91 WALL CMU POOR BLUE STORAGE RM. 1; N WALL 0.3 0.5

93 WALL DRYWALL POOR BLUE STORAGE RM. 1; W WALL 0.3 0.3

96 CROWN MOLDING WOOD FAIR GREEN COMMUNICATION RM.; N WALL 0.3 1.2

97 BASEBOARD WOOD POOR BLACK COMMUNICATION RM.; N WALL 0.3 1.1

102 STAIR STRINGER METAL POOR BLACK STAIRWAY TO SECOND FLOOR 0.3 6.2

No. Component Substrate Condition Color Measurement Location Action Level

(mg/cm2)

Results PbC

(mg/cm2) Interior Building: Second Floor

103 STAIR RISER METAL FAIR BLACK STAIRWAY TO SECOND FLOOR 0.3 3.4

116 WALL CMU FAIR WHITE OFFICE RM.; E WALL 0.3 0.5

QUALIFICATIONS

This Comprehensive Lead Paint Survey was performed by an Inspector that was qualified to perform work in Texas, per the Texas Department of State Health Services (DSHS), and in New

Mexico per USEPA certification credentials. This individual has received training under the HUD

/ EPA training criteria for the required Lead Paint Inspector and/or Risk Assessor courses and has received the refresher training within the prescribed period for each jurisdiction. Company and individual licenses and credentials have been provided and are available for review in the project sampling plan documents, which have been submitted to the USACE.

LIMITATIONS

The overall purpose of this Comprehensive Lead Paint Survey was to identify if lead-containing components were present, within the qualifications and limitations summarized below. Reliance on this Report is specifically limited to gathering initial information regarding the presence of lead in paint. Any time that lead-based paint may be identified during the performance of a lead inspection, the owner of the building is responsible to the occupants and to the public to properly manage these materials, per Local, State and Federal regulations. Prior to the abatement or removal of any lead containing materials, a Lead Project Design should be properly performed, by a qualified Lead Firm, to 1) ensure that materials will be properly managed, and 2) to prepare a more accurate estimate of actual materials to be addressed. This Survey Report was specifically prepared for ALL Consulting’s Client (USACE and Ft. Bliss), and the extent of liability incurred, is limited to the amount of the Report Fee paid by its Client. The USACE agrees that the ALL

Consulting Team cannot be held responsible for any liability based on reliance of this Report by any third party.

CONCLUSIONS

1. Specific Conclusions. Lead-containing paint was found on components either inside and / or outside of this building.

• Lead paint should not be disturbed without proper procedures in place. Should the lead paint need to be disturbed, personnel should be evacuated in advance, and only properly trained persons with adequate PPE should be allowed to disturb the lead paint material.

• Lead painted components in poor condition should be stabilized with interim controls or abatement procedures by properly trained personnel.

• Lead hazard air monitoring should be performed during abatement activities.

• Following abatement activities, clearance wipe samples should be collected and sent to an approved laboratory for lead paint analysis.

• The OSHA Hazard Communication Standard and the Lead Paint Standard both require anyone working in such areas to be informed of lead paint hazards and methods to avoid the hazards.

2. General Conclusions. Proper notification should be made to the appropriate authorities prior to disturbance of any lead-containing materials, including abatement activity, renovations, or operations and maintenance (O&M) activities, or demolition of any facilities or public buildings.

Other personnel working in the area must be alerted by signage and the appropriate regulated area designations. OSHA specifies worker protection and engineering controls, as well as work practices to ensure the safety of workers and anyone who will be in the area after the conclusion of the work.

Contact the personnel listed below with any clarifications that may be needed.

Inspected by: Reviewed by: Approved by:

Tim Jones, RPIH Alex Woelper, P.E., RPIH David Epperly, Ph.D., P.E.

Lead Inspector Environmental Consultant Project Manager ENCON International, Inc. ENCON International, Inc. ALL Consulting, LLC License # 2070306

APPENDICES:

A. Lead Paint Measurement Location Drawing(s) B. XRF Lead Paint Data

APPENDIX A

Lead Paint Measurement Location Drawing(s)

Draw by: JA 7307 Remcon Cir, Ste 103 El Paso, Texas, 79912 915.833.3740

Sheet

ENV-1

ENCON INTERNATIONAL, INC

## Positive Lead Paint Measurement Locations

Date:

08-19-2015

Project: # 139-14

ALL CONSULTING TEAM

Hazardous Materials Surveys

Location:McGregor Base Camp

Building # 9600 Fort Bliss Installation

Room 7Mech.

Room

Mailroom

Restroom

Kitchen Lobby

Hall

Storage

Room 5

Room 6

Comm.

Room

Storage

Room 4

Room 3

Room 2

Room 1

North Hallway

Lead Paint Measurement Locations - First Floor PlanN

19 20 22

97Generator Room

South Hallway

El Paso, Texas, 79912 915.833.3740

Sheet

ENV-1

ENCON INTERNATIONAL, INC

Lead Paint Measurement Locations - 2nd Floor

Date:

08-19-2015

Project: # 139-14

ALL CONSULTING TEAM

Hazardous Materials Surveys

Location:McGregor Base Camp

Building # 9600 Fort Bliss Installation

N

Observation Room

Roof

Entry Way

Conference Room

Office

Electric Room

Roof

Roof

Roof 40 4142 45

49102

## Positive Lead Paint Measurement Locations

APPENDIX B

XRF Lead Paint Data

Note that the XRF analyzer makes a final determination regarding if a building component is positive or negative for lead in paint. This analytical determination is based upon the standard (≥0.3 mg/cm2), the measurement obtained, and the analytical range of the margin of error for the XRF analyzer. On occasion, a measurement obtained using this test method (EPA method # 6200) that is above or below the standard may effectively result in a negative or positive determination, due to the analyzer’s margin of error. Any measurements that are determined to be negative or positive for lead paint by the XRF analyzer, will be accepted as such, for this Survey. Any results that apply to this situation will be noted with an asterisk (*) in the table to follow.

McGregor Base Camp, New Mexico XRF Lead Paint Data Bldg. 9600

No. Component Substrate Condition Color Measurement Location Results Action Level

(mg/cm2)

Results PbC

(mg/cm2)

1 SHUTTER_CAL 4.68

2 CALIBRATE N/A 0.3 0.9

3 CALIBRATE N/A 0.3 1.1

4 CALIBRATE N/A 0.3 1

5 DOOR CASING METAL FAIR BROWN N WALL Negative 0.3 0.1 6 DOOR CASING METAL FAIR BROWN N WALL Negative 0.3 0.03 7 PORCH CEILING CONCRETE POOR YELLOW N PORCH Null 0.3 0.08 8 PORCH CEILING CONCRETE POOR YELLOW N PORCH Null 0.3 0.08 9 PORCH CEILING CONCRETE POOR YELLOW N PORCH Negative 0.3 0.09

10 UPPER WALL CMU POOR YELLOW N PORCH Negative 0.3 0.1 11 PORCH FLOOR CONCRETE POOR YELLOW N PORCH Negative 0.3 0.02 12 SOFFIT WOOD POOR YELLOW GENERATOR RM.; E SIDE Negative 0.3 0.08 13 VENT METAL POOR YELLOW GENERATOR RM.; E WALL Negative 0.3 0.06 14 SOFFIT WOOD POOR YELLOW S SIDE Positive 0.3 5.2 15 FRIEZE BOARD WOOD POOR YELLOW S SIDE Positive 0.3 4.4 16 DOOR CASING METAL POOR BROWN GENERATOR RM. Negative 0.3 0.01 17 BOLLARD METAL POOR YELLOW W SIDE Negative 0.3 0.01 18 SATELLITE TOWER METAL POOR RED W SIDE Positive 0.3 2.7 19 WALL CMU FAIR YELLOW W WALL Positive 0.3 0.4 20 WINDOW METAL POOR YELLOW W WALL Positive 0.3 0.6 21 EXTERIOR SILL CMU POOR YELLOW W WALL Null 0.3 0.09 22 EXTERIOR SILL CMU POOR YELLOW W WALL Positive 0.3 0.4 23 SOFFIT WOOD FAIR YELLOW N SIDE Positive 0.3 3.2 24 WINDOW METAL POOR YELLOW N WALL Positive 0.3 0.8 25 WALL CMU POOR YELLOW E WALL Positive 0.3 0.4 26 PORCH FLOOR STRIP CONCRETE POOR YELLOW E SIDE Positive 0.3 0.5 27 DOOR CASING METAL FAIR BROWN E WALL Negative 0.3 0.04 28 THRESHOLD CONCRETE POOR YELLOW E WALL Negative 0.3 0.03

Exterior Building: First Floor

07/30/15 & 08/05/15 ALL CONSULTING TEAM 1

Action Level

(mg/cm2)

Results PbC

(mg/cm2)

29 FRIEZE BOARD WOOD FAIR YELLOW E SIDE Positive 0.3 5.1 30 DOOR CASING METAL FAIR BROWN E WALL Negative 0.3 -0.14 35 DOOR CASING METAL FAIR BROWN E WALL Negative 0.3 0.15 36 PORCH FLOOR CONCRETE POOR RED E SIDE Positive 0.3 0.4 37 THRESHOLD CONCRETE POOR YELLOW E SIDE Positive 0.3 0.5 38 LADDER METAL POOR BROWN S SIDE Positive 0.3 0.4

31 EXTERIOR SILL CONCRETE POOR YELLOW E WALL Null 0.3 0.13 32 EXTERIOR SILL CONCRETE POOR YELLOW E WALL Null 0.3 0.08 33 EXTERIOR SILL CONCRETE POOR YELLOW E WALL Null 0.3 0.1 34 EXTERIOR SILL CONCRETE POOR YELLOW E WALL Negative 0.3 0.05 39 WALL CMU FAIR TAN W WALL Negative 0.3 *0.3 40 SOFFIT WOOD POOR TAN W SIDE Positive 0.3 2.3 41 FRIEZE BOARD METAL POOR TAN W SIDE Positive 0.3 2.1 42 LADDER METAL POOR TAN W SIDE Positive 0.3 6.7 43 WALL WOOD FAIR SILVER W SIDE Negative 0.3 0 44 DOOR METAL FAIR TAN W ENTRANCE Negative 0.3 0.12 45 DOOR CASING METAL POOR TAN W ENTRANCE Positive 0.3 0.4 46 WALL TRIM METAL POOR TAN W PORCH; N WALL Positive 0.3 2.9 47 WALL WOOD POOR TAN W PORCH; N WALL Positive 0.3 4 48 WALL CMU POOR TAN NE SIDE ON ROOF; E WALL Positive 0.3 0.4 49 WALL WOOD FAIR TAN NE SIDE ON ROOF; N WALL Positive 0.3 1.7 50 RAILING WOOD POOR TAN W SIDE ON ROOF Negative 0.3 0.01

51 CALIBRATE N/A 0.3 0.9

52 CALIBRATE N/A 0.3 0.9

53 CALIBRATE N/A 0.3 1

54 SHUTTER_CAL 4.66

55 CALIBRATE N/A 0.3 3.4

56 CALIBRATE N/A 0.3 1

Exterior Building: Second Floor

07/30/15 & 08/05/15 ALL CONSULTING TEAM 2

Action Level

(mg/cm2)

Results PbC

(mg/cm2)

57 CALIBRATE N/A 0.3 0.9

58 WALL CMU FAIR WHITE E STAIRWAY ENTRYWAY; E WALL Positive 0.3 0.7 59 DOOR CASING METAL FAIR BROWN MAIL RM.; NE ENTRANCE Negative 0.3 0.13 60 DOOR WOOD FAIR BROWN MAIL RM.; NE ENTRANCE Negative 0.3 0 61 DUCT METAL FAIR WHITE MAIL RM.; E SIDE CEILING Negative 0.3 0.06 62 WALL CMU FAIR TAN MAIL RM.; S WALL Positive 0.3 0.8 63 ACCESS PANEL METAL FAIR BROWN MAIL RM.; N WALL Negative 0.3 0.06 64 DOOR CASING METAL FAIR BROWN MAIL RM.; S WALL Negative 0.3 0.15 65 DOOR CASING METAL POOR BROWN MAIL RM.; NW ENTRANCE Negative 0.3 0.11 66 CEILING DRYWALL FAIR WHITE S HALLWAY Negative 0.3 0.02 67 CROWN MOLDING WOOD FAIR TAN S HALLWAY; E WALL Positive 0.3 0.6 68 DOOR CASING WOOD POOR BROWN RESTROOM ENTRANCE Negative 0.3 0 69 DOOR WOOD FAIR TAN RESTROOM ENTRANCE Negative 0.3 0 70 SHELF WOOD FAIR WHITE RESTROOM; S WALL Negative 0.3 0 71 BOTTOM OF STAIR STRINGER METAL FAIR BLACK RESTROOM; E SIDE OF CEILING Negative 0.3 0.08 72 BOTTOM OF STAIR STRINGER METAL FAIR WHITE RESTROOM; E SIDE OF CEILING Positive 0.3 1 73 BASEBOARD CERAMIC TILEPOOR BLACK RESTROOM; S WALL Negative 0.3 0.03 74 DOOR CASING WOOD POOR BROWN N ENTRANCE TO S HALLWAY Positive 0.3 0.7 75 CROWN MOLDING WOOD FAIR BROWN KITCHEN; W WALL Negative 0.3 0 76 DOOR WOOD FAIR BROWN KITCHEN ENTRANCE Negative 0.3 0 77 ACCESS PANEL METAL FAIR TAN HALL; E WALL Negative 0.3 0.04 78 WALL PANEL WOOD FAIR BROWN LOBBY; S WALL Negative 0.3 0 79 DUTCH DOOR WOOD FAIR DARK BROWN LOBBY; W WALL Negative 0.3 0 80 DOOR CASING WOOD FAIR BROWN LOBBY; E WALL Negative 0.3 0 81 WALL DRYWALL POOR TAN HALL; W WALL Negative 0.3 0 82 DOOR CASING METAL FAIR BROWN HALL; N WALL Negative 0.3 *0.3 83 UPPER WALL CMU FAIR TAN N HALLWAY; S WALL Positive 0.3 0.6 84 DOOR CASING METAL FAIR BROWN N HALLWAY; E WALL Negative 0.3 0.04

Interior Building: First Floor

07/30/15 & 08/05/15 ALL CONSULTING TEAM 3

Action Level

(mg/cm2)

Results PbC

(mg/cm2)

85 DOOR WOOD FAIR GREEN N HALLWAY; RM. 1 ENTRANCE Negative 0.3 0 86 DOOR WOOD FAIR GREEN N HALLWAY; RM. 2 ENTRANCE Negative 0.3 0 87 DOOR CASING METAL FAIR GREEN N HALLWAY; RM. 3 ENTRANCE Negative 0.3 0.07 88 DOOR METAL POOR TAN N HALLWAY; RM. 4 ENTRANCE Negative 0.3 0.04 89 DOOR CASING METAL POOR BROWN N HALLWAY; RM. 4 ENTRANCE Negative 0.3 0.13 90 LOWER WALL WOOD FAIR BROWN N HALLWAY; S WALL Positive 0.3 1 91 WALL CMU POOR BLUE STORAGE RM. 1; N WALL Positive 0.3 0.5 92 WALL DRYWALL POOR BLUE STORAGE RM. 1; W WALL Null 0.3 0.3 93 WALL DRYWALL POOR BLUE STORAGE RM. 1; W WALL Positive 0.3 0.3 94 DOOR CASING WOOD FAIR BROWN COMMUNICATION RM. ENTRANCE Negative 0.3 0 95 CEILING DRYWALL POOR TAN COMMUNICATION RM. Negative 0.3 0.02 96 CROWN MOLDING WOOD FAIR GREEN COMMUNICATION RM.; N WALL Positive 0.3 1.2 97 BASEBOARD WOOD POOR BLACK COMMUNICATION RM.; N WALL Positive 0.3 1.1 98 DOOR CASING WOOD POOR BROWN RM. 5; S WALL Negative 0.3 0.02 99 DOOR WOOD POOR BROWN STORAGE RM. 2 ENTRANCE Negative 0.3 0.15

100 DOOR CASING METAL FAIR BROWN STORAGE RM. 2 ENTRANCE Negative 0.3 *0.3 101 STAIR RAILING METAL FAIR BLACK STAIRWAY Negative 0.3 0.01

102 STAIR STRINGER METAL POOR BLACK STAIRWAY TO SECOND FLOOR Positive 0.3 6.2 103 STAIR RISER METAL FAIR BLACK STAIRWAY TO SECOND FLOOR Positive 0.3 3.4 104 DOOR CASING METAL POOR BROWN STAIRWAY; LANDING; N WALL Negative 0.3 0.03 105 DOOR CASING METAL FAIR BROWN N OF STAIRWAY LANDING; W WALL Negative 0.3 0.05 106 DOOR WOOD FAIR BROWN OBSERVATION RM. ENTRANCE Negative 0.3 0 107 DOOR METAL FAIR BROWN W EXIT DOOR Negative 0.3 0.06 108 DOOR WOOD FAIR BROWN N OF STAIRWAY LANDING; E CABINET DOORNegative 0.3 -0.06 109 CEILING DRYWALL FAIR WHITE STAIRWAY LANDING Negative 0.3 0 110 DUCT METAL FAIR TAN STAIRWAY LANDING; CEILING Null 0.3 0.12 111 DUCT METAL FAIR TAN STAIRWAY LANDING; CEILING Negative 0.3 0.02 112 WALL DRYWALL FAIR WHITE CONFERENCE RM.; W WALL Negative 0.3 0

Interior Building: Second Floor

07/30/15 & 08/05/15 ALL CONSULTING TEAM 4

Action Level

(mg/cm2)

Results PbC

(mg/cm2)

113 DOOR CASING WOOD FAIR WHITE OFFICE RM. ENTRANCE Negative 0.3 0 114 DOOR WOOD FAIR BROWN OFFICE RM. ENTRANCE Negative 0.3 0 115 BASEBOARD WOOD FAIR WHITE CONFERENCE RM.; S WALL Negative 0.3 0 116 WALL CMU FAIR WHITE OFFICE RM.; E WALL Positive 0.3 0.5 117 DOOR WOOD FAIR BROWN ELECTRIC RM. ENTRANCE Negative 0.3 0 118 DOOR CASING WOOD FAIR WHITE ELECTRIC RM. ENTRANCE Null 0.3 0 119 DOOR CASING WOOD FAIR WHITE ELECTRIC RM. ENTRANCE Negative 0.3 0 120 WALL DRYWALL FAIR WHITE ELECTRIC RM.; E WALL Negative 0.3 0

121 CALIBRATE N/A 0.3 1.1

122 CALIBRATE N/A 0.3 1

123 CALIBRATE N/A 0.3 0.9

Null - Any result of "null" in the table above indicates that an inconclusive measurement was obtained with the XRF analyzer, and was therefore repeated in the same location until a measurement was obtained.

07/30/15 & 08/05/15 ALL CONSULTING TEAM 5

ATTACHMENT 2

Asbestos Survey Report

COMPREHENSIVE ASBESTOS SURVEY

BUILDING 9600

FORT BLISS, TEXAS 79916

Prepared for:

U.S. Army Corps of Engineers

Tulsa District

Prepared by:

ALL CONSULTING TEAM

ALL Consulting, LLC 1718 S. Cheyenne Ave.

Tulsa, OK 74119

Inspection Start Date:

August 04, 2015

ENCON International, Inc.

7307 Remcon Circle, #103

El Paso, TX 79912

COMPREHENSIVE ASBESTOS SURVEY

Ft. Bliss, Bldg. 9600

PURPOSE

The ALL Consulting Team was contracted by the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers (USACE), Tulsa

District, to perform comprehensive Hazardous Building Materials Surveys to identify the presence of any asbestos or lead paint at a number of buildings at Ft. Bliss, Texas. This project also included the development and population of a database to store the survey reports for access by the Ft. Bliss

Directorate of Public Works (DPW), and others. The buildings that are included within this contract scope of work include buildings at McGregor Base Camp and Doña Ana Base Camp within the New Mexico portion of Ft. Bliss, in addition to the Ft. Bliss buildings within Texas.

BACKGROUND

Ft. Bliss has a large number of buildings constructed before 1990 when the use of asbestos and lead paint was prevalent in construction of buildings. Because these materials may still exist within these buildings, Ft. Bliss is required to identify (asbestos or lead containing materials), assess the condition (stable or deteriorating), determine the nature of building materials (i.e., drywall or floor tile), and the extent of these hazardous substances. In accordance with the Clean Air Act (40 CFR

61 Subpart M, Asbestos), any renovation, remodeling or demolition of any structure, (i.e., buildings, facilities, etc.), shall be surveyed for asbestos-containing materials (ACMs) and properly abated prior to any disturbance of the material.

INTRODUCTION

The buildings selected for this project were provided to the ALL Consulting Team by USACE, Tulsa District. The selected buildings were located in four (4) geographic areas: Ft. Bliss main post, Biggs Field (now known as East Bliss), McGregor Base Camp, NM, and Doña Ana Base

Camp, NM. Records were available for some of these buildings where previous partial or complete inspections had been performed. When available, prior asbestos reports were referenced to enhance the thoroughness of the asbestos inspection performed for this building. The goal of this project was to provide a comprehensive inspection of the designated facilities, but destructive sampling was not authorized. Therefore, on rare occasion some ACMs may be hidden behind walls, under subfloors, or located in other areas that were inaccessible to the inspector. If or when any building is to undergo future demolition, an additional investigation may be undertaken in which destructive sampling is authorized.

REGULATORY STANDARDS

Asbestos in building materials is regulated on the federal level by the Environmental Protection

Agency (EPA), and the Occupational Safety and Health Administration (OSHA). On the state level, Texas also has regulations pertaining to sampling and abatement of asbestos in buildings.

The inspection was conducted to ensure compliance with National Emission Standards for

Hazardous Air Pollutants (NESHAP) – 40 CFR Part 61, Subpart M, which states that “prior to the commencement of the demolition or renovation, thoroughly inspect the affected facility or part of the facility where the demolition or renovation operation(s) will occur for the presence of asbestos, including Category I and Category II non-friable ACM.” Regulated asbestos containing materials have been designated as RACM. Asbestos Inspectors for both Texas and New Mexico facilities were trained under the EPA AHERA (40 CFR 763) standards. For buildings in the State of Texas, the Texas Asbestos Health Protection Rules (TAHPR) were complied with, which specify inspector licensure and a minimum of three (3) samples for each homogeneous area. In New

Mexico, facilities were sampled under the applicable regulations from the EPA, 40 CFR 61.

FACILITY DESCRIPTION

Building 9600 was constructed in 1957, and was in use at the time of inspection. Its previous use was listed as an “administrative building.” A description of this building is presented in Table 1 below.

TABLE 1 – BUILDING DESCRIPTION

Building Items Description Area of building 5,040 square feet Date of Construction 1957 Number of floors Two (2) floors Exterior wall materials CMU

Roof type Generator room: Pitched Rest of building: Flat

Roof material Generator room: Shingles Rest of building: Built-up roof

Interior walls First floor: Drywall, CMU, wood panels Second floor: Drywall, CMU

Interior floors Concrete

Interior floor coverings First floor: 9x9 vinyl floor tiles, 12x12 vinyl floor tiles, ceramic tiles Second floor: 9x9 vinyl floor tiles, 12x12 vinyl floor tiles, carpet

Ceilings First floor: 12x12 acoustic ceiling tiles (pencil holes & pin holes), drywall Second floor: 2x4 lay-in ceiling tiles, 12x12 acoustic ceiling tiles (pin holes)

Notes:

FUNCTIONAL AREAS

Functional areas were areas (or groups of areas), within a structure or building that were constructed to have the same use or purpose, constructed of the same materials, and were relatively the same age. A general administrative area, or several identical buildings within a facility, could typically be considered a single functional area.

The functional area(s), or purpose, of this facility was identified as follows:

“Administrative Building”

HOMOGENEOUS AREAS

Within functional areas, homogeneous areas were determined. Homogeneous Areas are areas of surfacing material, thermal system insulation (TSI), or miscellaneous materials that were uniform in color, texture, substrate, and were relatively of the same age. Table 2 below lists the homogeneous areas and the general locations where they were identified.

TABLE 2 - Homogeneous Areas and Locations Identified

# Homogeneous Areas (Suspect Materials) Location

1 Built- up roofing Throughout roof (except generator room)

2 Roof flashing Along N. parapet wall on first floor roof & exterior of second floor W. wall

3 Roof repair SW corner of first floor roof 4 Suspect transite panel Along observation room exterior wall 5 Cove base & mastic (black) Throughout first floor 6 12x12 vinyl floor tile & mastic (beige) Throughout first floor (except communication room & S. hallway) 7 Interior door caulking Throughout building

8 12x12 acoustic ceiling tiles (pencil holes) First floor: lobby, hall, storage room 1, kitchen Second floor: observation room

9 Texture drywall joint compound – walls (smooth) Kitchen, S. hallway & restroom 10 Caulking at CMU & drywall Throughout building 11 Corner caulking at CMU - walls Throughout first floor 12 Caulking at baseboard / crown molding Throughout building 13 Corner caulking at drywall - walls Throughout building 14 Caulking at fixtures Restroom 15 Roof duct sealant At A/C unit on NE corner of first floor roof

16 12x12 acoustic ceiling tiles (pin holes) First floor: N. hallway, Rm. 1, Rm. 2, Rm. 3, Rm. 4 & mail room.

Second floor: electrical room & office

17 Roof shingles Roof of generator room 18 2x4 lay-in ceiling tiles Second floor: conference room 19 12x12 vinyl floor tile & mastic (blue) Second floor: Stair landing, observation room & roof entryway 20 Carpet & black mastic Second floor: conference room 21 12x12 vinyl floor tile & mastic (brown) Second floor: office & electrical room

22 9x9 vinyl floor tile & mastic & leveling compound (black) First floor: communication room

# Homogeneous Areas (Suspect Materials) Location

23 Texture drywall joint compound – walls (texture) First Floor: storage room 1 & hall Second Floor: conference room

24 Floor edge caulking Second floor: along blue tile edge 25 9x9 vinyl floor tiles & mastic (brown) Second floor: office 26 Exterior door caulking S. & E. Walls 27 Exterior CMU wall texture Throughout building 28 Caulking at vent E. & W. side of generator room 29 Exterior window caulking N. & W. walls 30 Pipe wrap (exterior) S. wall (first floor) 31 Exterior CMU corner caulking S. side of building 32 Caulking at porch ceiling S. entrance 33 Exterior CMU wall expansion joint E. & W. walls 34 Caulking at soffit Throughout building 35 Flashing sealant S. side of building along roof edge at generator room 36 Exterior door caulking Generator room (S. wall)

37 Exterior penetration sealant Generator room: E. wall;

Main building: N. & E. walls (first floor)

38 Caulking at panel First floor exterior W. wall

SAMPLING METHODOLOGY

The building materials survey tasks were performed in accordance with the Final Hazardous

Building Materials Surveys, Sampling Plan, Fort Bliss, Texas, December 2014, prepared by ALL

Consulting and ENCON International, Inc. A visual inspection of the building was conducted to develop a sampling strategy. This task included determining both functional areas and homogeneous areas / materials, as well as sample collection locations. Friability was assessed by manually manipulating the suspect asbestos materials utilizing hand pressure to determine if the materials, when dry, could be crumbled, pulverized, or reduced to powder. Thirty-eight (38) homogeneous areas were established and at least three (3) samples were collected from each area to adequately identify accessible asbestos in the building. Portions of the subject building that had suspect asbestos-containing surfacing, thermal system insulation, or miscellaneous materials were divided into homogeneous areas for sampling. These samples were each uniquely and individually identified and logged into a chain of custody document and prepared for shipment to a third-party, independent laboratory for analysis. Building materials that were not considered suspect ACM included the following; concrete, metal, glass, asphalt, plastic, and wood. Destructive sampling was not authorized or performed to locate hidden or inaccessible materials.

One-hundred and fourteen (114) samples were collected and submitted for laboratory analysis.

Bulk sample analyses were conducted utilizing polarized light microscopy (PLM), as per EPA

Test Method 600/R-93/116. This method separates the sample material into various layers based on their morphology, and then identifies the presence of the different asbestos fibers in each of these layers when detected. The analysis was performed by Apex Precision Analytical Services, Inc., located in Friendswood, TX. ACM is defined as a material that contains greater than 1% of any asbestos type including Chrysotile, Amosite, Crocidolite, Tremolite, Anthophyllite, and

Actinolite, or combinations of these materials. Asbestos materials were determined as recommended in the July 1993 EPA/600/R-93/116 document titled, "Method for the

Determination of Asbestos in Bulk Building Materials." Copies of the asbestos laboratory test results and related laboratory documentation have been provided in Appendix B of this Report.

LABORATORY ANALYSIS

The sample collection and subsequent laboratory analysis indicated that asbestos was identified in the building material listed below. The NESHAPS definitions were used to define the condition of ACMs, per 40 CFR 61, Subpart M.

The quantities provided above are rough estimates only and must be field verified by any future abatement contractors.

QUALIFICATIONS

This Comprehensive Asbestos Survey was performed by Inspector Tim Jones on August 04 & 05, 2015 and was conducted in accordance with the EPA National Emission Standards for Hazardous

TABLE 3 – Identified Asbestos Containing Materials (> 1%) Sample

No. Asbestos Containing Materials Approx.

Qty. Location

Condition (friable, cat, damaged)

10-12 Transite panel 120 SF Along observation room exterior wall Cat. II, Non-friable 37 Corner caulking at drywall - walls 260 SF Throughout building Cat. I, Non-friable

58-60 Carpet black mastic 300 SF Second floor: conference room Cat. I, Non-friable 61-63 12x12 vinyl floor tile mastic 190 SF Second floor: office & electrical room Cat. I, Non-friable 64-66 9x9 vinyl floor tile 130 SF First floor: communication room Cat. I, Non-friable 73-75 9x9 vinyl floor tile & mastic 45 SF Second floor: office Cat. I, Non-friable 77,78 Exterior door caulking 110 SF S. & E. walls Cat. I, Non-friable 85-87 Exterior window caulking 122 LF N. & W. walls Cat. I, Non-friable 88-90 Pipe wrap (exterior) 2 LF S. wall Cat. I, Non-friable 97,98 Exterior CMU wall expansion joint 120 LF E. & W. walls Cat. I, Non-friable

100-102 Caulking at soffit 320 LF Throughout building Cat. I, Non-friable

109,111 Exterior penetration sealant 12 SF Generator room: E. wall Main building: N. & E. walls (first floor) Cat. I, Non-friable

Air Pollutants (NESHAP): 40 CFR Part 61, Subpart M. The Inspector has received training under the AHERA required Inspector Course and has received annual refresher training within the past year.

LIMITATIONS

The overall purpose of this Comprehensive Asbestos Survey was to identify if ACM was present, within the qualifications and limitations summarized below. Reliance on this report is specifically limited to gathering initial information regarding the presence of asbestos in building materials.

Any time that ACMs may be identified during the performance of an asbestos survey, the owner of the building is responsible to the occupants and to the public to manage these materials properly, per Local, State and Federal regulations. Prior to the abatement or removal of any ACMs, an asbestos project design should be properly created, by a qualified asbestos consulting firm, 1) to ensure that materials will be properly managed, and 2) to prepare a more accurate estimate of materials to be abated. This Survey Report was specifically prepared for ALL Consulting’s Client

(USACE and Ft. Bliss), and the extent of liability incurred, is limited to the amount of the report fee paid by its Client. The USACE agrees that the ALL Consulting Team cannot be held responsible for any liability based on reliance of this report by any third party for any business reasons.

CONCLUSIONS

1. The ALL Consulting Team was retained by the USACE to perform a Comprehensive

Asbestos Survey at the subject building located within Ft. Bliss.

2. The survey for the subject building was successfully completed, as required, per State and

Federal environmental standards. Refer to Table 1 for building details.

3. One (1) functional area was identified for this building.

4. Suspect ACMs were potentially identified in thirty-eight (38) homogeneous areas at the subject building. Refer to Table 2 for a listing of homogeneous areas.

5. A total of one-hundred and fourteen (114) suspect ACM samples were collected from either the building interior, building exterior, or the roof, and were properly analyzed by an independent, qualified third-party laboratory. Refer to the Appendices for details regarding sample locations and descriptions.

6. A review of the laboratory test results indicated that ACMs were identified at the subject building. Refer to Table 3 for a listing of any identified ACMs

7. ACMs were identified in twelve (12) homogeneous areas at the subject building. Refer to the Appendices for details regarding positive sample locations and descriptions.

8. Ft. Bliss is responsible for properly managing the ACMs at the subject building.

9. Prior to any renovation or demolition activities, asbestos related activities will need to be performed by properly licensed personnel. ACMs should not be disturbed by unlicensed and / or untrained personnel.

10. In the unlikely event that additional “hidden suspect ACMs” are encountered during any future renovation or demolition activities, then further sampling and lab analysis will be required. Ft. Bliss DPW personnel should be notified immediately for public safety and environmental compliance actions to properly manage any confirmed additional

ACMs.

11. Any Asbestos Project Designs must be prepared by a Texas licensed Asbestos Consulting

Firm.

12. Proper 10-day advance NESHAP notification should be made to the appropriate authorities prior to disturbance of any ACMs. Such disturbance includes abatement activities, building renovations, routine operation & maintenance activities, or any planned demolition in facilities or public buildings.

13. If disturbance of ACMs is anticipated, then these materials shall be properly removed in advance by licensed and trained personnel, as required by State and Federal regulations.

14. Abatement activities should be performed by a licensed Asbestos Abatement Contractor, with project management and air monitoring support by a licensed Asbestos Consulting

Firm.

Contact the personnel listed below with any clarifications that may be needed.

Inspected by: Reviewed by: Reviewed by:

Tim Jones, RPIH Alex Woelper, P.E., RPIH David Epperly, Ph.D., P.E.

Asbestos Inspector Environmental Consultant Project Manager ENCON International, Inc. ENCON International, Inc. ALL Consulting, LLC License #10-5575

APPENDICES:

A. Asbestos Drawing(s) B. Laboratory Documentation

APPENDIX A

Asbestos Drawing(s)

El Paso, Texas, 79912 915.833.3740

Sheet

ENV-1

ENCON INTERNATIONAL, INC

NOT TO SCALE

N

Positive Asbestos Sample Locations

Asbestos Sample Location Drawing - First Floor Plan

## Asbestos Sample Locations

Project: # 139-14

ALL CONSULTING TEAM

Hazardous Materials Surveys

Location:McGregor Base Camp

Building # 9600 Fort Bliss Installation

Generator Room

Room 7Mech.

Room

Mailroom

Restroom

Kitchen Lobby

Hall

Storage

Room 5

Room 6

Comm.

Room

Storage

Room 4

Room 3

Room 2

Room 1

North Hallway

2840 - 42

49 (Roof)

50 (Roof)

51 (Roof) 64

82, 83

88 - 90

94 - 96

97 98

100101

105 (Roof)

103 (Roof)

104 (Roof)

106 - 108

112 - 114

Date:

08-19-2015

South Hallway

El Paso, Texas, 79912 915.833.3740

Sheet

ENV-1

ENCON INTERNATIONAL, INC

NOT TO SCALEPositive Asbestos Sample Locations

Asbestos Sample Location Drawing - 2nd Floor

## Asbestos Sample Locations

Project: # 139-14

ALL CONSULTING TEAM

Hazardous Materials Surveys

Location:McGregor Base Camp

Building # 9600 Fort Bliss Installation

N

Roof

Observation Room

Entry Way Electric Room

Conference Room

Office

Roof

Roof

01 (Roof)

03 (Roof)

02 (Roof)

04 (Roof)

05 (Roof)

06 (Roof)

07 (Roof) 09 (Roof)

08 (Roof)

29 30

39 38

44 (Roof) 43 (Roof)

45 (Roof)

7071 72

73 74

Date:

08-12-2015

El Paso, Texas, 79912 915.833.3740

Sheet

ENV-1

ENCON INTERNATIONAL, INC

NOT TO SCALE

Caulking at Soffit

Window Caulking (Exterior)

Door Caulking (Exterior)

9x9 Vinyl Floor Tile

Pipe Wrap

Exterior CMU Wall Expansion Joint

Asbestos Homogeneous Areas - First Floor

Asbestos Homogeneous Areas

Date:

08-24-2015

Project: # 139-14

ALL CONSULTING TEAM

Hazardous Materials Surveys

Location:McGregor Base Camp

Building # 9600 Fort Bliss Installation

Room 7Mech.

Room

Mailroom

Restroom

Kitchen Lobby

Hall

Storage

Room 5

Room 6

Comm.

Room

Storage

Room 4

Room 3

Room 2

Room 1

North Hallway

N Generator Room

Exterior Penetration Sealant

Corner Caulking at Drywall - Walls

Transite Panel

12x12 Vinyl Floor Tile & Mastic

Carpet Black Mastic

Corner Caulking at Drywall - Walls

Asbestos Homogeneous Areas

9x9 Vinyl Floor Tile & Mastic

Draw by: JA 7307 Remcon Cir, Ste 103 El Paso, Texas, 79912 915.833.3740

Sheet

ENV-1

ENCON INTERNATIONAL, INC

NOT TO SCALE

Asbestos Homogeneous Areas - 2nd Floor

Date:

08-24-2015

Project: # 139-14

ALL CONSULTING TEAM

Hazardous Materials Surveys

Location:McGregor Base Camp

Building # 9600 Fort Bliss Installation

N

Roof

Observation Room

Entry Way Electric Room

Conference Room

Office

Roof

Roof

Roof

APPENDIX B

Laboratory Documentation

01231&45#$65"#785"9

:$;86#%&& /,+/<.=>?

+@><+?&A&B(79C75)&>=,, ."/+#"0+#$%1","23#

*"+%,'--$./0%'.%!1'2$3/4%567

DE7*&C8F(G$5#&*E"99&H$&F85*7C$6$C&"&C(9I&*7)5$C&867)75"9&6$;86#&8J&

#E$&6$*(9#*&8H#"75$C&J68G&#E$&"5"9I*$*&;$6J86G$CK&&'99&"5"9I*$*&"6$&

C85$&L7#E75&)8M$65G$5#&)(7C$975$*&"5C&6$)(9"#785*K&&

!"#$%&'(#$)*+,-$&,)#".)*+/0*&,)#*+)1+"+*#&+.)2%)!/+3)4*+(','0")!"#$%&'(#$)5+*6'(+,)#&)&7+)*+8-+,&)09)#".)90*)&7+)+3($-,'6+)-,+)09)&7+)/+*,0")0*)+"&'&%):($'+"&;)"#<+.)0"),-(7)*+/0*&=))>+,-$&?)*+/0*&,)0*)

(0/'+,)09),#<+)@'$$)"0&)2+)*+$+#,+.)2%)!/+3)4*+(','0")!"#$%&'(#$)5+*6'(+,)&0)#"%)&7'*.)/#*&%)@'&70-&)&7+)@*'&&+")*+8-+,&)9*0<)($'+"&=)))A7+,+)*+,-$&,)0"$%)*+/+,+"&))&7+)<#&+*'#$,),-2<'&&+.=))5-//0*&'"1)

$#20*#&0*%).0(-<+"&#&'0"))',)#6#'$#2$+)-/0")*+8-+,&=))A7',)*+/0*&)(#""0&)2+)-,+.)&0)*+/*+,+"&)(0".'&'0",)#&)#"%)0&7+*)$0(#&'0"?).#&+)0*)&'<+)#".).0+,)"0&)'</$%)&7#&)&7',),/#(+)',)9*++)9*0<)&7+,+)0*)#"%)

0&7+*)(0"&#<'"#"&,=))B0)*+,/0",'2'$'&%)0*)$'#2'$'&%)',)#,,-<+.)90*)&7+)<#""+*)'")@7'(7)&7+,+)*+,-$&,)#*+)-,+.)0*))'"&+*/*+&+.=))A7',)<-,&)"0&)2+)-,+.)&0)($#'<)/*0.-(&)+".0*,+<+"&)2%)BCD!4)0*)#"%)

106+*"<+"&)#1+"(%)09)&7+)E"'&+.)5&#&+,=)!/+3)4*+(','0")!"#$%&'(#$)5+*6'(+,)*+,+*6+,)&7+)*'17&)&0).',/0,+)09)#$$),#</$+,)#9&+*)#)/+*'0.)09)&7'*&%):FG;).#%,?)#((0*.'"1)&0)#$$),&#&+)#".)9+.+*#$)1-'.+$'"+,?)

-"$+,,)0&7+*@',+),/+('9'+.=

!"#$%&#'(&)*+,-&.//0112/&%#3&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&45676&$8(,89*8&#:;,<8,=-&1/2/1>.&%#3?%)3

%'@,&.&*A&>0

!"#$%&'()*$+$,-./-01-$,23(4-5-$6/7180$+$95-'3($:;

!"#$%&'()*+%,--./012033,%456789%$:'8%"6(5;8(5*<=

">?@>%A<(':<8(5*<89 /'B*:(%>7;C':D% E-3E0F,1G

H2-H%/';I*<%?5:I9'J%K75('%3-- /'B*:(%L8('D%% $7M76(%3-J%F-3E

"9%#86*J%NO%H113F K8;B9'6%?*99'I('+D% -P.G0E.3E

13E0P2202HG- L8('%/'I'5Q'+D%% $7M76(%HJ%F-3E

?*<(8I(D%N5;%R*<'6 N7:<08:*7<+%(5;'D%%% FG%S*7:6

R*C%AL%.%K5('D%% 32103G%.%T759+5<M%1,--

/0-1)$

2"1+,"-.()+

/0-1)$+

314+("4)$5

'6(6$+7+8)9:$%.#%6*+7+;%1$609+7+

/6*;%1$609+7+<6-6=)*)%#4

>91)9#69+'6*#)*#+

?4.)+@+A

/6*B>91)9#69+

;%1$609+?4.)+@+A

01 5015-2694-01 None Detected Fibrous Glass 5% Binder

02 5015-2694-02 None Detected Fibrous Glass 5% Binder

03 5015-2694-03 None Detected Fibrous Glass 5% Binder

04 5015-2694-04 None Detected Binder

05 5015-2694-05 Silver / Flashing / Fibrous / Homogeneous None Detected Cellulose 2% Binder

06 5015-2694-06 None Detected Binder

07 5015-2694-07 None Detected Cellulose 2% Binder

08 5015-2694-08 None Detected Cellulose 2% Binder

09 5015-2694-09 None Detected Cellulose 2% Binder

10 5015-2694-10 Chrysotile 40% None Detected Binder

Black / Roofing Material / Fibrous /

Homogeneous

Black / Roofing Material / Fibrous /

Homogeneous

Black / Roofing Material / Fibrous /

Homogeneous

Black,Silver / Flashing / Fibrous /

Homogeneous

Cellulose

Wollastonite

5%

2%

Black,Silver / Flashing / Fibrous /

Homogeneous

Cellulose

Wollastonite

5%

2%

Silver / Roofing Material / Fibrous /

Homogeneous

Silver / Roofing Material / Fibrous /

Homogeneous

Silver / Roofing Material / Fibrous /

Homogeneous

Yellow,Grey / Transite / Fibrous /

Homogeneous

!"#$%&'(#$)*+,-$&,)#".)*+/0*&,)#*+)1+"+*#&+.)2%)!/+3)4*+(','0")!"#$%&'(#$)5+*6'(+,)#&)&7+)*+8-+,&)09)#".)90*)&7+)+3($-,'6+)-,+)09)&7+)/+*,0")0*)+"&'&%):($'+"&;)"#<+.)0"),-(7)*+/0*&=))>+,-$&?)*+/0*&,)0*)

(0/'+,)09),#<+)@'$$)"0&)2+)*+$+#,+.)2%)!/+3)4*+(','0")!"#$%&'(#$)5+*6'(+,)&0)#"%)&7'*.)/#*&%)@'&70-&)&7+)@*'&&+")*+8-+,&)9*0<)($'+"&=)))A7+,+)*+,-$&,)0"$%)*+/+,+"&))&7+)<#&+*'#$,),-2<'&&+.=))5-//0*&'"1)

$#20*#&0*%).0(-<+"&#&'0"))',)#6#'$#2$+)-/0")*+8-+,&=))A7',)*+/0*&)(#""0&)2+)-,+.)&0)*+/*+,+"&)(0".'&'0",)#&)#"%)0&7+*)$0(#&'0"?).#&+)0*)&'<+)#".).0+,)"0&)'</$%)&7#&)&7',),/#(+)',)9*++)9*0<)&7+,+)0*)#"%)

0&7+*)(0"&#<'"#"&,=))B0)*+,/0",'2'$'&%)0*)$'#2'$'&%)',)#,,-<+.)90*)&7+)<#""+*)'")@7'(7)&7+,+)*+,-$&,)#*+)-,+.)0*))'"&+*/*+&+.=))A7',)<-,&)"0&)2+)-,+.)&0)($#'<)/*0.-(&)+".0*,+<+"&)2%)BCD!4)0*)#"%)

106+*"<+"&)#1+"(%)09)&7+)E"'&+.)5&#&+,=)!/+3)4*+(','0")!"#$%&'(#$)5+*6'(+,)*+,+*6+,)&7+)*'17&)&0).',/0,+)09)#$$),#</$+,)#9&+*)#)/+*'0.)09)&7'*&%):FG;).#%,?)#((0*.'"1)&0)#$$),&#&+)#".)9+.+*#$)1-'.+$'"+,?)

-"$+,,)0&7+*@',+),/+('9'+.=

!"#$%&#'(&)*+,-&.//0112/&%#3&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&45676&$8(,89*8&#:;,<8,=-&1/2/1>.&%#3?%)3

%'@,&1&*A&>0

!"#$%&'()*$+$,-./-01-$,23(4-5-$6/7180$+$95-'3($:;

!"#$%&'()*+%,--./012033,%456789%$:'8%"6(5;8(5*<=

">?@>%A<(':<8(5*<89 /'B*:(%>7;C':D% E-3E0F,1G

H2-H%/';I*<%?5:I9'J%K75('%3-- /'B*:(%L8('D%% $7M76(%3-J%F-3E

"9%#86*J%NO%H113F K8;B9'6%?*99'I('+D% -P.G0E.3E

13E0P2202HG- L8('%/'I'5Q'+D%% $7M76(%HJ%F-3E

?*<(8I(D%N5;%R*<'6 N7:<08:*7<+%(5;'D%%% FG%S*7:6