APQ-166 Azimuth CCA RFI 0.2.docx

REQUEST FOR INFORMATION

B-52 Azimuth CCA 5998-01-228-5360 The Government is conducting market research to identify potential non-commercial sources to develop a new source of procurement for the B-52 Azimuth CCA.

Contractors/Institutions responding to this market research are placed on notice that participation in this survey may not ensure participation in future solicitations or contract awards. The government will not reimburse participants for any expenses associated with their participation in this survey.

FAR 52.215-3, Request for Information or Solicitation for Planning Purposes (Oct 1997) applies to this request for information:

(a) The Government does not intend to award a contract on the basis of this request or to otherwise pay for the information solicited except as provided in subsection 31.205-18 Bid and Proposal (B&P) Costs, of Federal Acquisition Regulation

(b) Although "proposal" and "offeror" are used in this Request for Information, your response will be treated as information only. It shall not be used as a proposal.

(c) This solicitation is issued for the purpose of: informational planning and budgetary forecasting by the government.

INSTRUCTIONS:

1. The document(s) below contain a description of the Azimuth CCA fit-form-function replacement development requirements and a Contractor Capability Survey. The Survey allows Contractors to provide their company’s capability.

2. If, after reviewing these documents, you desire to participate in the market research, you should provide documentation that supports your company’s capability in meeting these requirements. Failure to provide documentation may result in the government being unable to adequately assess your capabilities. If you lack sufficient experience in a particular area, please provide details explaining how you would overcome the lack of experience/capabilities in order to perform that portion of the requirement (i.e., teaming, subcontracting, etc.)

Identify any areas of work that your organization believes should be broken out exclusively for Small Business.

3. Both large and small businesses are encouraged to participate in this Market Research. Joint ventures or teaming arrangements are encouraged.

Questions relative to this market survey should be addressed to Lt. Brenden Collins, Logistics Manager or via email at brenden.collins@us.af.mil.

PURPOSE

This RFI is being conducted to identify different potential non-commercial sources in determining if a future contract effort can be competitively awarded and/or awarded on a total or partial Small Business Set-Aside basis. The applicable North American Industrial Classification System (NAICS) code assigned to this effort is 334511 (Search, Navigation, Guidance, Aeronautical, and Nautical System and Instrument Manufacturing).

The Government does not own the complete technical data package (TDP) or the unlimited rights to the technical data required for manufacture. The OEM of this item is The Boeing Company. To mitigate supply chain risks associated with a single source of supply, avoid obsolescence bottlenecks, and ensure long-term sustainment for the B-52 fleet, the Government's primary objective is to qualify a new, competitive manufacturing source that can deliver a form, fit, function, and interface replacement for this CCA.

If the Government decides to award a contract for this or related effort, a solicitation will be published and posted on the System for Award Management (SAM) website. The Government will use this information solely to determine the appropriate acquisition strategy for this procurement. The Government is interested in all small business concerns.

Contractors/Institutions responding to this market research are placed on notice that participation in this survey may not ensure participation in future solicitations or contract awards. The government will not reimburse participants for any expenses associated with their participation in this survey.

Interested sources may identify their interest and capability to respond to the requirements. Interested sources must maintain facilities and cleared personnel for manufacturing, handling, storing, and maintaining information and operating systems with security classifications up to and including Secret.

DESCRIPTION

The National Stock Number (NSN), Part Number (PN), and quantity for a 10-year period is as follows:

The Azimuth Circuit Card Assembly (CCA) is designated as the A1 assembly within the Azimuth Data Conversion unit (NHA: 377-11730) of the B-52G/H Strategic Radar System (AN/APQ-166). The Azimuth CCA performs critical signal processing and conversion tasks for the antenna subsystem's azimuth scanning functions.

Key Physical and Technical Characteristics:

· Board Architecture: Multi-layer Printed Wiring Board (PWB) utilizing high-density dual-in-line packaging (DIP) integrated circuits, precision discrete resistors, capacitors, operational amplifiers, line drivers/receivers, and logic arrays.

· Structural Elements: Incorporates a dedicated board stiffener (P/N 377-11708-2) to prevent structural deflection and vibration damage in strategic environments.

· Thermal Management: Utilizes a dedicated copper/aluminum thermal plane (P/N 377-11905-1) paired with thermal wafers (P/N 377-11736-602 and 377-11736-603) to efficiently conduct heat away from active components to the system chassis.

· Interfacing:

· Primary system connection is established through a high-reliability multi-pin connector (P1) (Type: M55302 series).

· Incorporates dedicated on-board Test Points (P2) for diagnostics and system verification.

· Electrical Power Inputs:

· Requires multiple regulated DC voltage rails: +15 VDC, -15 VDC, +5 VDC, +12 VDC, -12 VDC, +28, and +24 VDC.

· Separate, isolated grounds for Analog and Digital signals to minimize electrical noise coupling.

· Special Environmental and Design Classifications:

· Electrostatic Discharge Sensitive (ESDS): Classified as Electrostatic Sensitive (MIL-STD-1686 Class 1/2 or equivalent). All design, assembly, and handling processes must strictly adhere to static protection practices.

· Nuclear Hardness Critical Item (NHCI): This CCA is a Nuclear Hardness Critical Item (HCI). It must maintain nuclear survivability and electromagnetic pulse (EMP) hardness. Any replacement design or proposed component substitution must be rigorously evaluated for nuclear and radiation hardness impacts by the appropriate engineering activity. Hardness Critical Processes (HCP) apply.

The replacement Azimuth CCA must meet all form, fit, function, and interface requirements as referenced in T.O. 11B46-6-5-4. The development effort shall include providing a proactive solution for obsolete electronic components and the engineering support required to investigate future Deficiency Reports and Material Improvement Projects (MIPs).

CONTRACTOR CAPABILITY SURVEY

B-52 APQ-166 Azimuth CCA NSN 5998-01-228-5360 Part I. Business Information Please provide the following business information for your company/institution and for any teaming or joint venture partners:

· Company/Institute Name:

· Address:

· Point of Contact:

· CAGE Code:

· Phone Number:

· E-mail Address:

· Web Page URL:

· Size of business pursuant to North American Industry Classification System (NAICS) Code:

The applicable North American Industrial Classification System (NAICS) code assigned to this effort is 334511 (Search, Detection, Navigation, Guidance, Aeronautical, and Nautical System and Instrument Manufacturing) with the Small Business Size Standard of 1250 employees.

Based on the above NAICS Code, state whether your company is:

· A statement as to whether your company is domestically or foreign owned (if foreign, please indicate the country of ownership).

Please send email responses no later than close of business on 16 Sept 2026. Please email your response to:

Lt. Brenden Collins Logistics Manager Common Avionics

407 SCMS/GULBA

brenden.collins@us.af.mil 235 Byron St, Suite 19A Robins AFB, GA 31098-1670

Questions relative to this market research should be addressed to Lt. Brenden Collins, Logistics Manager or via email at brenden.collins@us.af.mil.

Part II. Capability Survey Questions General Capability Questions:

1. Describe briefly the capabilities of your manufacturing and testing facilities, including the nature of the high-reliability military electronics you currently produce. Include a description of your staff composition and engineering management structure.

2. Describe your company's experience on previous projects similar in complexity to this requirement (high-density, multi-layer CCAs for military radar or avionics systems). Include contract numbers, a brief description of the work performed, period of performance, and the customer agency/organization.

3. Describe your company’s experience in developing, manufacturing, and testing military hardware in the absence of a complete, unlimited-rights Technical Data Package (TDP). What is your process for reverse-engineering or developing form-fit-function equivalents from physical samples, partial drawings, or Technical Orders?

4. Describe your company's capabilities for generating, handling, processing, storing, and securing classified material and data (up to Secret classification) at your facility.

Manufacturing and Obsolescence Management Questions:

1. Describe your capabilities and experience in manufacturing multi-layer circuit card assemblies that require strict Nuclear Hardness Critical (NHCI) compliance and Electrostatic Discharge (ESD) controls. What specific quality control measures and Hardness Critical Processes (HCP) does your facility utilize?

2. Describe your configuration management and supply chain monitoring processes. How do you identify, mitigate, and resolve active electronic component obsolescence and Diminishing Manufacturing Sources and Material Shortages (DMSMS) issues?

3. Discuss your proposed engineering process for addressing any fit, form, function, or electrical interface issues that may arise when qualifying this replacement card inside the AN/APQ-166 Radar System.

4. Describe your process for maintaining inventory records and reporting manufacturing, testing, and delivery schedules to the Government.

5. In the absence of original Boeing test procedures or environmental test specs, discuss how your organization will develop and qualify high-reliability test screening protocols (e.g., thermal shock, vibration, burn-in) to ensure flight-worthiness.

6. If your organization cannot manufacture the CCA entirely in-house, state which portions (e.g., bare board fabrication, SMT/thru-hole assembly, conformal coating, thermal plane integration, or qualification testing) you would intend to subcontract.

Commerciality Questions:

1. Are there established commercial catalog or market prices for equivalent military-grade signal conversion CCAs?

2. If you offer similar products and/or design services to both U.S. Government and commercial sources, is the same engineering and manufacturing workforce utilized?

3. Describe your standard warranty, return, and failure analysis process for avionics assemblies furnished to the Government.

Continuity of Operations and Cybersecurity:

1. Does your company have an active Continuity of Operations Plan (COOP) or equivalent in the event of a natural disaster or other catastrophic event that causes facilities or operations to be disrupted?

2. What mitigation strategies are in place for your company to resume operations and prevent further supply chain disruptions?

3. What customer notification and reporting processes are in place to provide company operational status updates to your clients?

4. Does your company have primary and secondary transportation modes to ship and track sensitive military avionics?

5. How does your company manage traceability for shipments and sub-tier components (both domestic and international)?

6. What records management procedures are in place to ensure that lifecycle technical knowledge of the qualified card is not lost when key design or manufacturing employees leave the company?

7. Is your company currently facing any financial disruption, impending mergers, acquisitions, and/or foreign investment?

8. Has your company ever experienced a cyber or operational disruption resulting in a threat to National Security?

Foreign Influence:

1. Describe any affiliations your company has with foreign countries, or companies owned by entities in foreign countries, at the primary company and sub-vendor levels. Are any of your sub-vendors or affiliates in countries barred from doing business with the United States (U.S.)? See the OFAC Sanctions Programs for reference.

2. Describe any affiliations your company has with foreign nationals and/or blocked persons. See the Specially Designated Nationals (SDN) List for reference.

3. If there is Foreign Ownership, Control, or Influence (FOCI) present in your company, what percentage of the company is owned by the foreign entity(ies)? Which foreign country(ies)/entity(ies) owns part or all of your company?

4. Are any of your company's primary engineering or manufacturing functions performed in foreign countries? If so, is there an on-site Defense Contract Management Agency (DCMA) representative?

5. If any sub-assembly functions are performed by an overseas vendor, what quality control, inspection processes, and export controls (ITAR/EAR) are implemented?

6. How does your company incorporate proactive risk management and counterfeit parts prevention (e.g., AS5553 compliance) into your microelectronic and semiconductor procurement processes?

Cybersecurity:

1. Does your company have a formal policy/plan for preventing and mitigating risks associated with internal and external information systems security?

2. Identify actions your company has taken to prevent unauthorized access to design servers, CAD data lakes, and inventory databases, and describe the results of those actions.

3. Does your company have procedures to ensure server security in a cloud environment that utilizes Government information? If so, is it in compliance with DFARS 252.239-7010?

4. Has your company implemented the cybersecurity requirements set forth in DFARS clause 252.204-7012, "Safeguarding Covered Defense Information and Cyber Incident Reporting"?

5. Does the company maintain a secure Software Bill of Materials (SBOM) or a list of vendors providing commercial off-the-shelf (COTS) software embedded in any programmable logic devices used on this card?

6. For products that contain programmable components (e.g., ROMs/PROMs as seen in the T.O. parts list), what procedures are in place to securely upgrade or flash software/firmware?

7. What procedures does your company (or your vendors) follow to perform software/firmware vulnerability assessments and mitigate identified risks?

8. Provide a brief description of the strategy your company uses to continuously monitor the effectiveness of cybersecurity controls to detect and defend against attacks protecting sensitive technical drawings.

9. What is the frequency schedule to perform cybersecurity assessments (annual, semi-annual, quarterly, etc.)? Reference DoDI 8510.01.

10. Does your company evaluate the cybersecurity practices of lower-tier component vendors and printed circuit board fabricators before subcontracting to them?

11. Is your company current with the Contractor Self-Assessment against the Basic National Institute of Standards and Technology (NIST) SP 800-171 controls, and is that assessment reflected in the Supplier Performance Risk System (SPRS)?

12. Does your company have an active Plan of Action and Milestones (POA&M) to remediate any deficiencies related to the Basic NIST SP 800-171 controls?

13. Has your company employed microelectronics protections that manage risk in the supply chain for components or subcomponent products (e.g., integrated circuits, field-programmable gate arrays (FPGA), printed circuit boards) when they are identifiable (to the supplier) as having a Department of Defense (DoD) end-use? Reference: DoDI 5200.44, para 4.c.(2).