Appendix B_Technology Readiness Levels.pdf
PDF 499 KB Posted
- Solicitation number
- N61331-24-SN-Q37
About this file
This document is a Request for Information (RFI) for the Department of the Navy's Technology Operational Experimentation Event (TOEE) 25.2, which will focus on emerging technologies to support operational objectives related to Subsea and Seabed Warfare (SSW).
The RFI is seeking information on innovative, agile solutions that map to three focus areas: autonomous undersea navigation and collaborative autonomy, sensors and automated target recognition, and Command and Control (C2) tools and decision aids for planning and mission coordination. The Government is interested in technologies with a technology readiness level (TRL) of five or greater that can support live experimentation in FY25. Respondents are required to submit a quad chart and a white paper addressing operational relevance, cost, system/subsystem architecture, critical technical parameters, dependencies and special considerations, technology and integration readiness levels, and the team. An industry day event is scheduled for August 28, 2024, and responses to the RFI are due by September 27, 2024.
View the file
Other files
| File | Type | Posted |
|---|---|---|
| RFI N61331-24-SN-Q37 Document.pdf | ||
| RFI N61331-24-SN-Q37 Document.pdf | ||
| Focus Areas.pdf | ||
| Key Dates.pdf | ||
| TOEE 25.2 SSW Appendix A QUAD format.pptx | PPTX presentation |
On GovTribe
Work with this file
- Download the original file
- Contacts named in this file
- Similar government files
- Ask GovTribe AI about this file
Text version
Appendix B: Technology Readiness Levels
Level IRL TRL
Execute a support program that meets operational support performance requirements and sustains the system in the most cost-effective manner over its total life cycle.
Integration is mission-proven through successful mission operations.
Actual integration completed and mission-qualified through test and demonstration in the system Environment.
Actual system completed and qualified through test and demonstration.
The integration of technologies has been verified and validated with sufficient detail to be actionable.
System prototype demonstration in relevant environment.
The integrating technologies can accept, translate, and structure information for its intended Application.
System/subsystem model demonstration in relevant environment.
There is sufficient control between technologies necessary to establish, manage, and terminate the Integration.
Component and/or breadboard validation in relevant environment.
There is sufficient detail in the quality and assurance of the integration between technologies.
Component and/or breadboard validation in laboratory environment.
There is compatibility between technologies to orderly and efficiently integrate and interact.
Analytical and experimental critical function and/or characteristic proof of Concept.
There is some level of specificity to characterize the interaction between technologies through their interface.
Technology concept and/or application formulated.
An interface between technologies has been identified with sufficient detail to allow characterization of the relationship.
Basic principles observed and reported.
Integration not observed; required interfaces lacking.
File details come from the government source that posted it. Updated .