Appendix A, A1 Evaluation.pdf

PDF 131 KB Posted

Attached to
RRCC 27-03-IFB01C Nursing & Health Imaging Bldg GC Pre-qual
Solicitation number
IFB1 GJLA 2027000040 3
Issued by
Jefferson County, Colorado

About this file

This is an evaluation appendix document for the Red Rocks Community College (RRCC) Nursing & Health Imaging Building General Contractor Pre-qualification solicitation (27-03-IFB01C) in Colorado. The document establishes the evaluation criteria and methodology for assessing general contractor qualifications for this construction project. The evaluation framework outlines specific technical and administrative requirements that prospective bidders must meet to demonstrate their capability to undertake the nursing and health imaging building construction. The pre-qualification process is designed to ensure that only qualified contractors with relevant experience, financial stability, and bonding capacity are permitted to submit bids for the actual construction contract.

The evaluation criteria address contractor experience, past performance on similar projects, financial capacity, insurance and bonding requirements, and organizational resources. The document specifies weighted scoring categories and minimum qualifications that applicants must satisfy to advance in the selection process. This pre-qualification approach allows RRCC to streamline the bidding process by pre-vetting contractors before the formal bid phase, reducing risk and ensuring project delivery capability for this significant institutional construction project.

View the file

Other files

On GovTribe

Work with this file

  • Download the original file
  • Contacts named in this file
  • Similar government files
  • Ask GovTribe AI about this file

Text version

App-A

STATE OF COLORADO

OFFICE OF THE STATE ARCHITECT

STATE BUILDINGS PROGRAM

APPENDIX A: EVALUATION OF QUALIFICATIONS FORM

Name of Firm: ____________________________________________________________________ Name of Project: _________________________________________________________________ Evaluator No: _______________________________________ Date: ______________________________________________

If the minimum requirements have not been met, specify the reason(s):

INSTRUCTIONS:

1. Weights are to be assigned prior to evaluation and are to be consistent on all evaluation forms.

2. Use only whole numbers.

3. Total score includes the sum total of all criteria.

Weight x Rating = Score

Item I: General Information ___5__ X _______ = ______

Item II: Location Received ______

Item III: General Contracting Experience ___10__ X _______ = ______

Item Iva: Qualification of Key Personnel: Project Mgr. ___10__ X _______ = ______

Item IV b: Qualification of Key Personnel: Superintendent ___10__ X _______ = ______

ITEM VI: Schedule Control ___5__ X _______ = ______

ITEM VII Safety Program ___5__ X _______ = ______

ITEM VIII: Successful Project Completion ___3__ X _______ = ______

Item IX: Bonding Capacity Received ______

Item IX: Insurance Availability Received ______

ITEM X: Current Workload/Capacity to Complete ___5__ X _______ = ______

Item XI: Affidavit Received ______

Total Score: _________

STATE OF COLORADO

OFFICE OF THE STATE ARCHITECT

STATE BUILDINGS PROGRAM

APPENDIX A1: EVALUATION OF INTERVIEW FORM

Name of Firm: ____________________________________________________________________ Name of Project: _________________________________________________________________ Evaluator No: _______________________________________ Date: ______________________________________________

INSTRUCTIONS:

1. Weights are to be assigned prior to evaluation and are to be consistent on all evaluation forms.

2. Use only whole numbers.

3. Rating: 0 = not provided, 1 = Unacceptable, 2 = Poor, 3 = Fair, 4 = Good, 5 = Excellent

4. Total score includes the sum total of all criteria.

5. A passing score (as a percentage of the total points available) is to be established by the state prior to evaluation.

1. Demonstrated a team approach to the project Weight

Rating

Score

5 x =

2. Management team demonstrated their qualifications

5 X =

3. Project management approach appears clear and concise

4. Prior project experience/success

5. Equity, diversity and inclusion

3 X =

Total Score: _________

FIRM

QUALIFICATIONS

TOTAL

QUALS

SCORE

INTERVIEW

COMBINED

RANK

EVAL

#1

EVA

L #2

EVA

L #3

EVA

L #4

EVA

L #5

File details come from the government source that posted it. Updated .