Appendix A, A1 Evaluation.pdf
PDF 131 KB Posted
- Solicitation number
- IFB1 GJLA 2027000040 2
- Issued by
- Jefferson County, Colorado
About this file
This document is an evaluation form issued by the State of Colorado Office of the State Architect State Buildings Program to assess general contractor qualifications and interview performance for state construction projects. The evaluation process consists of two components: a qualifications assessment (Appendix A) and an interview evaluation (Appendix A1). The qualifications evaluation assigns weighted scores across ten criteria including general information, general contracting experience, key personnel qualifications for project managers and superintendents, schedule control, safety programs, successful project completion, bonding capacity, insurance availability, current workload and capacity, and affidavit submission. Each criterion is assigned a weight prior to evaluation, with total weights distributed across the categories to produce a combined qualifications score. The interview evaluation assesses five criteria including team approach demonstration, management team qualifications, project management approach clarity, prior project experience and success, and equity, diversity, and inclusion initiatives, each weighted at specified points with ratings on a scale from zero to five. Evaluators complete separate forms and assign whole-number ratings that are multiplied by assigned weights to calculate individual scores.
The evaluation framework requires that weights be assigned consistently across all evaluator forms prior to any assessment and that a passing score threshold be established by the state before evaluation begins. The final scoring includes separate tallies for qualifications and interview performance, which are then combined to produce a total score used to rank competing firms. The document does not specify pricing information, contract terms, set-asides, incumbent contractors, funding sources, or project-specific details such as scope, timeline, or deliverables, as it serves as a standardized evaluation template applicable to various state building projects.
View the file
Other files
On GovTribe
Work with this file
- Download the original file
- Contacts named in this file
- Similar government files
- Ask GovTribe AI about this file
Text version
App-A
STATE OF COLORADO
OFFICE OF THE STATE ARCHITECT
STATE BUILDINGS PROGRAM
APPENDIX A: EVALUATION OF QUALIFICATIONS FORM
Name of Firm: ____________________________________________________________________ Name of Project: _________________________________________________________________ Evaluator No: _______________________________________ Date: ______________________________________________
If the minimum requirements have not been met, specify the reason(s):
INSTRUCTIONS:
1. Weights are to be assigned prior to evaluation and are to be consistent on all evaluation forms.
2. Use only whole numbers.
3. Total score includes the sum total of all criteria.
Weight x Rating = Score
Item I: General Information ___5__ X _______ = ______
Item II: Location Received ______
Item III: General Contracting Experience ___10__ X _______ = ______
Item Iva: Qualification of Key Personnel: Project Mgr. ___10__ X _______ = ______
Item IV b: Qualification of Key Personnel: Superintendent ___10__ X _______ = ______
ITEM VI: Schedule Control ___5__ X _______ = ______
ITEM VII Safety Program ___5__ X _______ = ______
ITEM VIII: Successful Project Completion ___3__ X _______ = ______
Item IX: Bonding Capacity Received ______
Item IX: Insurance Availability Received ______
ITEM X: Current Workload/Capacity to Complete ___5__ X _______ = ______
Item XI: Affidavit Received ______
Total Score: _________
STATE OF COLORADO
OFFICE OF THE STATE ARCHITECT
STATE BUILDINGS PROGRAM
APPENDIX A1: EVALUATION OF INTERVIEW FORM
Name of Firm: ____________________________________________________________________ Name of Project: _________________________________________________________________ Evaluator No: _______________________________________ Date: ______________________________________________
INSTRUCTIONS:
1. Weights are to be assigned prior to evaluation and are to be consistent on all evaluation forms.
2. Use only whole numbers.
3. Rating: 0 = not provided, 1 = Unacceptable, 2 = Poor, 3 = Fair, 4 = Good, 5 = Excellent
4. Total score includes the sum total of all criteria.
5. A passing score (as a percentage of the total points available) is to be established by the state prior to evaluation.
1. Demonstrated a team approach to the project Weight
Rating
Score
5 x =
2. Management team demonstrated their qualifications
5 X =
3. Project management approach appears clear and concise
4. Prior project experience/success
5. Equity, diversity and inclusion
3 X =
Total Score: _________
FIRM
QUALIFICATIONS
TOTAL
QUALS
SCORE
INTERVIEW
COMBINED
RANK
EVAL
#1
EVA
L #2
EVA
L #3
EVA
L #4
EVA
L #5
File details come from the government source that posted it. Updated .