AHS-27 Evaluation Criteria.docx
DOCX document 15 KB Posted
- Attached to
- Autism Housing Support Pilot
- Solicitation number
- BD-27-1023-1023C-1023L-134723
- Issued by
- Massachusetts
About this file
This document outlines the evaluation criteria for the Autism Housing Support Pilot (AHS-27) issued by the Massachusetts Department of Developmental Services. The Project Management Team (PMT) will use a consensus scoring approach to evaluate written responses based on understanding of service scope, comprehensiveness and clarity, operational strength and efficiency, appropriateness and feasibility of proposed services, effectiveness of approach, innovation, and responsiveness to procurement goals. The PMT may also consider providers' history and experience serving similar individuals and families, as well as past performance with the Department.
The scoring system employs a four-point scale with modifiers applied to each question score. A zero-point response lacks adequate description or demonstrates insufficient understanding of service expectations; a one-point response incompletely addresses question components and falls below established standards; a two-point response meets minimum standards with demonstrated provider experience; a three-point response completely and clearly addresses all components with some elements exceeding minimum standards; and a four-point response exceeds all standards with exceptional and innovative proposed services demonstrating expertise, coupled with exceptional prior provider experience. Specific pricing terms, set-asides, funding amounts, and contract duration are not addressed in this evaluation criteria document.
View the file
Other files
Show all 12
On GovTribe
Work with this file
- Download the original file
- Contacts named in this file
- Similar government files
- Ask GovTribe AI about this file
Text version
Autism Housing Support Pilot (AHS-27) Evaluation Criteria
The PMT shall score responses using a consensus scoring approach based on the information submitted in the written response. The PMT shall review and evaluate the written response based on the following criteria: understanding of the nature and scope of the services requested, comprehensiveness and clarity of response, operational strength and efficiency, appropriateness and feasibility of proposed services, effectiveness of proposed approach, innovation, and responsiveness to the goals of the procurement. The PMT may additionally consider the Provider’s history and/or experience serving these or similar individuals and families, and the Provider’s past performance with the Department.
The PMT shall score each question in accordance with the rating scale below. Each question also has a scoring modifier; once the question is scored, the score will be multiplied by the modifier to achieve the final score.
0 points: response is lacking a description, or the description is materially incomplete, not relevant to the services provided, or the description fails to meet the standards established in the RFR; response demonstrates a lack of understanding of service expectations and/or the proposed services are not feasible or appropriate.
1 point: response does not address all components of the question completely and clearly and is below standard; proposed services/approaches do not meet standards set forth in the RFR or do so only in part; Provider has limited experience or poor prior performance in providing this or similar service.
2 points: response addresses all components of the question completely, the proposed services/approaches meet the minimum standards set forth in the RFR, Provider demonstrates experience in providing this or similar service.
3 points: response addresses all components of the question completely and clearly; some components of the proposed services/approaches exceed the standards set forth in the RFR while others meet the minimum standards; Provider experience in providing this or similar service.
4 points: response addresses all components of the question completely and clearly and exceeds the standards set forth in the RFR, proposed services are exceptional, and innovative, and demonstrate expertise and a deep understanding of successful ways to provide support to diverse individuals and families, Provider demonstrates exceptional prior experience in providing this or similar service.
File details come from the government source that posted it. Updated .