Past Performance Form Questionaires.docx
DOCX document 22 KB Posted
- Attached to
- FOUR PEAKS PIPE RAIL FENCE INSTALL Federal contract opportunity
- Solicitation number
- AG-94TZ-S-12-0049
About this file
Past Performance Questionaire
View the file
Other files for this federal contract opportunity
| File | Type | Posted |
|---|---|---|
| FourPeaksPipeRailSpecs.pdf | ||
| Solicitation.docx | DOCX document | |
| TONTO NF FIRE PLAN.docx | DOCX document | |
| Drawings.PDF | ||
| SF1442.pdf | ||
| Wage determination.docx | DOCX document |
On GovTribe
Work with this file on GovTribe
- Download the original file
- Contacts named in this file
- Similar government files
- Ask GovTribe AI about this file
Text version
SOURCE SELECTION INFORMATION/CONFIDENTIAL
Dear Customer:
Our firm has submitted a proposal to the USDA Forest Service, Region 3, Western Zone AQM. In accordance with the Federal Acquisition Regulations (FAR), they will evaluate our firm’s past performance. Your firm has been listed as a reference for work previously performed.
Your candid response to the attached survey will assist the evaluation team in this process and your participation in this evaluation is greatly appreciated. Please complete the enclosed survey as thoroughly as possible. General information regarding the responses may be released to the Offeror; the FAR prohibits the release of names providing the responses. Complete confidentiality will be maintained.
Please send the completed form to the address below to arrive NO LATER THAN 07/31/2012:
USDA Forest Service R3 Western Zone AQM 2324 E. McDowell Rd.
Phoenix, AZ 85006-2440 Attn: Carl Henderson
Or email it to: carlhenderson@fs.fed.us
DO NOT RETURN THIS FORM TO OUR COMPANY
SOURCE SELECTION INFORMATION/CONFIDENTIAL
PAST PERFORMANCE QUESTIONNAIRE
| 1. Contractor Name: |
| 2. Contract Number: |
3. Contractor Address:
4. Contract Type: __Firm Fixed Price ____Cost Reimbursement ___ Other (Please Specify)
5. Agency Name:
6. Agency POC/Phone/Fax:
7. Period of Performance:
8. Dollar Amount of Award:
9. Title of Contract:
10. Description of Contract Service:
11. Complexity of Work: Difficult: ____________ Routine: ____________
NOTE: Please use adjectival ratings from attached sheet.
| 12. Evaluation Factor |
| 13. Comments (Attach additional sheets, if necessary.) |
| 14. Rating |
a. Quality of Services
b. Personnel
c. Subcontractor Mgmt
d. Business Relations
e. Timeliness of Performance
f. Customer Satisfaction
g. Cost/Budget Control
15. Would you select this firm again? Please explain. (Attach additional sheet if necessary.)
| 16. Name & Date: |
| 17. Title: Contracting Officer |
PAST PERFORMANCE RATING GUIDELINES
Summarize Contractor Performance in each of the rating areas. Assign each area a rating of Unsatisfactory, Poor, Fair, Good, and Excellent. Use the following instructions as guidance in making these evaluations. Note: There is no corresponding guidance for “Customer Satisfaction”. Please use the comments area on the preceding form to justify the rating given “Customer Satisfaction.”
| Ratings |
| Quality of Work/ |
Personnel/Service
-Compliance w/contract requirements -Accuracy of reports -Appropriateness of personnel -Technical excellence
Cost Control
-Within budget -Current, accurate, complete billings -Relationship of negotiated costs to actual -Cost efficiencies -Change orders issued Timeliness of Performance
-Met interim milestones -Reliable -Responsive to technical direction -Completed on time Business Relations/Sub Contractor Mgmt
-Effective Mgmt -Businesslike correspondence -Responsive to contract reqmnts -Prompt notification of problems -Reasonable/ cooperative -Flexible -Pro-active -Effective SB/SDB Subcontract Program
| Unsatisfactory |
| Nonconformances |
are comprising the achievement of contract reqmnts
| Cost issues are comprising performance |
| Delays are compromising achievement of contract reqmts |
| Response is not effective |
| Poor |
| Nonconformances |
require major agency resources to ensure achievement of contract reqmnts
| Cost issues require major agency resources to ensure achievement of contract reqmnts |
| Delays require major agency resources to ensure achievement of contract reqmnts |
| Response is marginally effective |
| Fair |
| Nonconformances require minor agency resources to ensure achievement of contract reqmnts |
| Cost issues require minor agency resources to ensure |
achievement of contract reqmnts
| Delays require minor agency resources to ensure achievement of contract reqmnts |
| Response is somewhat effective |
| Good |
| Nonconformances |
do not impact achievement of contract reqmnts Cost issues do not impact achievement of contract reqmnts
| Delays do not impact achievement of contract reqmnts |
| Response is usually effective |
| Excellent |
| There are no quality problems |
| There are no cost issues |
| There are no delays |
| Response is effective |
File details come from the government source that posted it. Updated .