ATTACHMENT J1 QAP.doc
DOC document 73 KB Posted
- Attached to
- FORESTWIDE ROAD MAINTENANCE Federal contract opportunity
- Solicitation number
- AG-52B1-S-09-0005
About this file
Quality Assurance Plan (QAP)
View the file
Other files for this federal contract opportunity
| File | Type | Posted |
|---|---|---|
| Amend 002.doc | DOC document | |
| AG52B1S090005-Amendment 001.pdf | ||
| RFP AG-52B1-S-09-0005.pdf | ||
| Attachment J-7 Hoosier_seedmix.pdf | ||
| road typical.doc | DOC document | |
| Swing gate .pdf | ||
| Notice to Offerors.pdf | ||
| WD 05-2187.pdf | ||
| Attachment J3.doc | DOC document | |
| WD 05-2183.pdf | ||
| Pipe gate.pdf | ||
| drain dip typical.pdf |
Show all 12
On GovTribe
Work with this file on GovTribe
- Download the original file
- Contacts named in this file
- Similar government files
- Ask GovTribe AI about this file
Text version
ATTACHMENT J.1
| REQUIREMENT |
| TASKS/CRITICAL |
SUB-TASKS
QUALITY
STANDARDS
| AQL |
| RELATED |
DRAWING
MONITOR
METHOD
INCENTIVE/
DISINCENTIVE
1. Roadway
| 1.a.1 Vegetation and debris removal (Brushing) |
| Maintain as shown in template. |
| All areas as described on typical are free of vegetation and debris of the size and height as shown in the drawings |
| 99% to standard drawing |
| HNF ? |
| Visual 100% |
| Positive/Negative performance to be reported to NIH. Potential additional option years. Full unit price payment will not be made and will be representative of the quality of work completed. Reasonable attempts to rework sites will be allowed. *** |
1.b.1 Mulched
Seeding
| Revegetate disturbed or eroded areas as directed. |
| Seed is provided and distributed |
| 80 % germination with no bare spots in excess of one square foot. Straw to have 90% coverage by area. |
| N/A |
| Visual 100% |
| Positive/Negative performance to be reported to NIH. Potential additional option years. Full unit price payment will not be made and will be representative of the quality of work completed. Reasonable attempts to rework sites will be allowed*** |
| 1.b.2 Silt Fence |
| Installation of 36” high silt fence for erosion control as directed |
| Silt fence is installed per construction standards |
| 95% of fence properly installed so material does not run under or around the ends of the fence |
| N/A |
| Visual 100% |
| Positive/Negative performance to be reported to NIH. Potential additional option years. Full unit price payment will not be made and will be representative of the quality of work completed. Reasonable attempts to reinstall will be allowed*** |
| 1.b.3 |
| Installation of Hay bale erosion control device |
| Installation of staked hay bales per construction standards |
| 95% of hay bales installed so material does not run under or around the ends of the bales |
| N/A |
| Visual 100% |
| Positive/Negative performance to be reported to NIH. Potential additional option years. Full unit price payment will not be made and will be representative of the quality of work completed. Reasonable attempts to reinstall will be allowed*** |
| 1.c. Signs |
| Repair/Replace traffic control, route marker, and roadside info signs, FS will provide panels, contractor required to provide hardware, post and all labor. |
| MUTCD |
| 100% |
| MUTCD, AND |
FS Sign Installation Guidelines
| Visual 100% |
| Positive/Negative performance to be reported to NIH. Potential additional option years. Full unit price payment will not be made and will be representative of the quality of work completed. Reasonable attempts to rework sites will be allowed. *** |
| 1.d. Gates |
| Repair/Replace gates including markers, hardware, gate posts |
| Maintain per gate typicals |
| 100% |
| HNF Swing gate dwg and Pipe gate dwg. |
| Visual 100% |
| Positive/Negative performance to be reported to NIH. Potential additional option years. Full unit price payment will not be made and will be representative of the quality of work completed. Reasonable attempts to rework sites will be allowed. *** |
2. Road Surface
| REQUIREMENT |
| TASKS/CRITICAL |
SUB-TASKS
QUALITY
STANDARDS
| AQL |
| RELATED |
DRAWING
MONITOR
METHOD
INCENTIVE/
DISINCENTIVE
| 2.a. Grading |
| Provide safe, smooth, drained surface free of potholes, ruts, berms, washboard and organic soil and debris while recovering any useable existing aggregate. This work also included the reconditioning of drainage dips, turn-outs, and turnarounds. All potholes will be scarified to the lowest point in the hole and the aggregates regarded and smoothed over the entire roadway to produce smooth uniform surface free of rocks, debris and soil. Water, if needed to prevent heavy dusting and/or to allow the aggregates to bind, will be applied as needed. |
| Maintain per road surface typical |
| a. Safe = 100% |
b. Smooth Surface 95%
c. Potholes, Ruts, Washboard = 95%
d. Berms/organic soil = 95%
| Drivability on 100% of the road |
| Positive/Negative performance to be reported to NIH. Potential additional option years. Full unit price payment will not be made and will be representative of the quality of work completed. Reasonable attempts to rework sites will be allowed. *** |
| 2.b. Aggregate |
| Provide and Place as required |
| Gradation/quality meets State Standards for aggregate materials placement in accordance with travelway typical and Task Order |
| In accordance with State Standards accepted industry practice100% |
| T.O. |
| Certification of Quality of Aggregate one sample per lot. |
| Positive/Negative performance to be reported to NIH. Potential additional option years. Full unit price payment will not be made and will be representative of the quality of work completed. Reasonable attempts to rework sites will be allowed. *** |
| 2.c RipRap |
| Provide and Place as required in task order, could require machine placement. |
| Gradation/quality meets State Standards for rock materials placement in accordance with culvert typicals |
| In accordance with State Standards accepted industry practice100% |
| T.O. |
| Certification of Quality of rock - one sample per lot. |
| Positive/Negative performance to be reported to NIH. Potential additional option years. *** |
3. Drainage
| REQUIREMENT |
| TASKS/CRITICAL |
SUB-TASKS
QUALITY
STANDARDS
| AQL |
| RELATED |
DRAWING
| METHOD OF MONITORING |
| INCENTIVE/ |
DISINCENT
| 3.a. Dips (install) |
| Install drainage dip in locations as directed by FS |
| Install as per typical |
| 100% install to typical |
| WNF: 4 |
| Visual/drivability |
| Positive/Negative performance to be reported to NIH. Potential additional option years. *** |
| 3.b. Culvert (clean) |
| Clean culvert to maintain free flow |
| Removal of blockages, debris, and obstructions including barrel, inlet/outlet basins |
| Free flowing to maximum attainable flow. |
| WNF: 5 |
| Visual random sample |
| Contractor will pay FS for repeated reinspections. Positive/Negative performance to be reported to NIH. Potential additional option years. *** |
| 3.c. Culvert (replacement) |
| Replace/install culverts in locations as directed by FS. |
| Install per FS EM-7720-100 dated 1996, and as shown on drawings |
| 100% compliance with FS EM-7720-100 |
| WNF: 5 |
| In accordance with FS EM-7720-100 |
| Contractor will pay FS for repeated reinspections. Positive/Negative performance to be reported to NIH. Potential additional option years for good performance. Reasonable attempts to rework sites will be allowed. *** |
| 3.d. Ditches |
| Clean ditches to maintain free flow in an environmentally sound manner. |
| Maintain original ditch shape for free flow |
| Free flowing |
| WNF: 1,5 |
| Visual random sample |
| Contractor will pay FS for repeated reinspections. Positive/Negative performance to be reported to NIH. Potential additional option years. *** |
| 4. Equipment |
| Provide and operate equipment as approved by FS for road maintenance work not specifically covered under other tasks and items. |
| OSHA, Industry practice, and FS fire suppression provisions. |
| Reasonable production for the task |
| N/A |
| Visual 100% by FS inspector while work is being done. |
| Positive/Negative performance to be reported to NIH. Potential additional option years. *** |
*** - See below:
1. If all items on the task order are completed with no reworkings and a minimum of 2.5% ahead of TO deadline-contractor will be paid a bonus of 2.5% of TO total.
2. If the entire TO is preformed with only one or two reworkings of sites and ahead of time – contractor will be paid a bonus of 1% of TO total.
3. If the entire TO is completed on time with three to five reworkings-contractor will be paid the full TO amount.
4. If the contractor does not complete the TO on time but complies with less than or equal to two reworkings of site with the terms agreed to in a cure notice issued by the CO a 1% reduction in TO payment will be made.
5. If the contract does not complete on time but complies with a CO issued cure notice and has fewer than 5 reworkings, a deduction of 3% will made on the TO payment.
6. If contractor does not complete TO in a reasonable time, after having a cure notice issued, the task order may be canceled and future optional years not executed by Government. A 10% deduction in payment value for all items completed will be made on all payments after the date of the Cure Notice under the TO.
File details come from the government source that posted it. Updated .