00001_AG-4146-S-15-0008.pdf

Road Maintenance IDIQ, NFsAL AG-4146-S-15-0008

REVISED MAY 26, 2015 41

(2) An offeror with limited or no recent or relevant past performance will receive a rating of Neutral/Unknown Confidence, and will not be rated favorably or unfavorably on past performance.

(3) Past performance shall be evaluated on the basis of the following sub factors of equal importance:

i. Contract Performance in projects of the same size and scope ii Timeliness of Performance

. iii. Quality of Service/Control

3. EXPERIENCE: The offeror’s experience shall be evaluated on the basis of if the offeror meets or exceeds the desired qualifications specified below and has shown the experience and skills required to perform the tasks similar to those identified in this solicitation.

Desired Qualifications:

The offeror has experience with at least three road maintenance operations of the same size and scope of this project within the past 5 years.

A project is work completed within a specified period of time. For work done on continuing annual basis, a project is the work completed in any given year.

4. Note: Past Performance and experience will be evaluated only for the prime contractor due to limited sub-contracting possibilities. Therefore, sub-contractor information will not be considered for evaluation purposes. (Refer to FAR 52.219-14)

5. Past Performance and experience when combined is more important than price. Past performance is more important than experience.

5. The Government reserves the right to award the contract to other than the lowest priced offeror.

(e) AWARD WITHOUT DISCUSSIONS. The Contracting Officer will only clarify the offerors’ information; no discussions are contemplated in accordance with FAR 15.306. Offerors may be given the opportunity to clarify relevance or adverse past performance to which the offeror has not previously had an opportunity to respond. Clarifications are limited exchanges between the Government and offerors that may occur when award without discussions is contemplated. If discussions are determined to be necessary the procedures described in FAR 15.306 will be used.

52.204-16 Commercial and Government Entity Code Reporting (Nov 2014)

52.215-5 -- Facsimile Proposals (Oct 1997)’

(a) Definition.

Facsimile proposal, as used in this provision, means a proposal, revision or modification of a proposal, or withdrawal of a proposal that is transmitted to and received by the Government via facsimile machine.

(b) Offerors may submit facsimile proposals as responses to this solicitation. Facsimile proposals are subject to the same rules as paper proposals.

(c) The telephone number of receiving facsimile equipment is: 334-241-8111/8177

(d) If any portion of a facsimile proposal received by the Contracting Officer is unreadable to the degree that conformance to the essential requirements of the solicitation cannot be ascertained from the document --

(1) The Contracting Officer immediately shall notify the offeror and permit the offeror to resubmit the proposal;

(2) The method and time for resubmission shall be prescribed by the Contracting Officer after consultation with the offeror; and

(3) The resubmission shall be considered as if it were received at the date and time of the original unreadable submission for the purpose of determining timeliness, provided the offeror complies with the time and format requirements for resubmission prescribed by the Contracting Officer.

(e) The Government reserves the right to make award solely on the facsimile proposal. However, if requested to do so by the Contracting

Officer, the apparently successful offeror promptly shall submit the complete original signed proposal.

52.216-27 -- Single or Multiple Awards (Oct 1995)

The Government may elect to award a single delivery order contract or task order contract or to award multiple delivery order contracts or task order contracts for the same or similar supplies or services to two or more sources under this solicitation.