Amendment_01.pdf

AMENDMENT OF SOLICITATION/MODIFICATION OF CONTRACT

1. CONTRACT ID CODE

2. AMENDMENT/MODIFICAITON NO. 3. EFFECTIVE DATE 4. REQUISITION/PURCHASE REQ. NO. 5. PROJECT NO. (If applicble)

7. ADMINISTERED BY (If other than Item 6) CODE

STANDARD FORM 30 (REV. 10-83)

Prescribed by GSA FAR (48 CFR) 53.243

FACILITY CODE

9A. AMENDMENT OF SOLICIATION NO.

9B. DATED (SEE ITEM 11)

10A. MODIFICATION OF CONTRACT/ORDER NO.

10B. DATED (SEE ITEM 11)

11. THIS ITEM ONLY APPLIES TO AMENDMENTS OF SOLICITATIONS

The above numbered solicitation is amended as set forth in Item 14. The hour and date specified for receipt of Offers is extended, is not extended.

Offers must acknowledge receipt of this amendment prior to the hour and date specified in the solicitation or as amended, by one of the following methods:

(a)By completing items 8 and 15, and returning copies of the amendment; (b) By acknowledging receipt of this amendment on each copy of the offer submitted;

or (c) By separate letter or telegram which includes a reference to the solicitation and amendment numbers. FAILURE OF YOUR ACKNOWLEDGMENT TO BE RECEIVED AT THE PLACE DESIGNATED FOR THE RECEIPT OF OFFERS PRIOR TO THE HOUR AND DATE SPECIFIED MAY RESULT IN REJECTION OF YOUR OFFER. If by virtue of this amendment your desire to change an offer already submitted, such change may be made by telegram or letter, provided each telegram or letter makes reference to the solicitation and this amendment, and is received prior to the opening hour and date specified.

12. ACCOUNTING AND APPROPIRATION DATA (If required)

13. THIS ITEM ONLY APPLIES TO MODIFICATION OF CONTRACTS/ORDERS.

IT MODIFIES THE CONTRACT/ORDER NO. AS DESCRIBED IN ITEM 14.

CHECK ONE A. THIS CHANGE ORDER IS ISSUED PURSUANT TO: (Specify authority) THE CHANGES SET FORTH IN ITEM 14 ARE MADE IN THE CONTRACT ORDER

NO. IN ITEM 10A.

B. THE ABOVE NUMBERED CONTRACT/ORDER IS MODIFIED TO REFLECT THE ADMINISTRATIVE CHANGES (such as changes in paying office, appropriation date, etc.) SET FORTH IN ITEM 14, PURSUANT TO THE AUTHORITY OF FAR 43.103(b).

C. THIS SUPPLEMENTAL AGREEMENT IS ENTERED INTO PURSUANT TO AUTHORITY OF:

D. OTHER (Specify type of modification and authority)

E. IMPORTANT: Contractor is not, is required to sign this document and return copies to the issuing office.

Except as provided herein, all terms and conditions of the document referenced in Item 9A or 10A, as heretofore changed, remains unchanged and in full force and effect.

15C. DATE SIGNED

15A. NAME AND TITLE OF SIGNER (Type or print)

16C. DATE SIGNED

16A. NAME AND TITLE OF CONTRACTING OFFICER (Type or print)

14. DESCRIPTION OF AMENDMENT/MODIFICATION (Organized by UCF section headings, including solicitation/contract subject matter where feasible.)

PAGE OF PAGES

6. ISSUED BY CODE

8. NAME AND ADDRESS OF CONTRACTOR (No., street, county, State and ZIP Code) (X)

CODE

15B. CONTRACTOR/OFFEROR

(Signature of person authorized to sign)

16B. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA

(Signature of Contracting Officer)

NSN 7540-01-152-8070

Previous edition unusable bajohnson03 Cross-Out

COMBINED SECTIONS

L - INSTRUCTIONS, CONDITIONS, AND NOTICES TO OFFERORS OR

RESPONDENTS

AND

M - EVALUATION FACTORS FOR AWARD

L/M.1 FAR 52.252-1 SOLICITATION PROVISIONS INCORPORATED BY

REFERENCE (FEB 1998)

This solicitation incorporates one or more solicitation provisions by reference, with the same force and effect as if they were given in full text. Upon request, the Contracting Officer will make their full text available. The offeror is cautioned that the listed provisions may include blocks that must be completed by the offeror and submitted with its quotation or offer. In lieu of submitting the full text of those provisions, the offeror may identify the provision by paragraph identifier and provide the appropriate information with its quotation or offer. Also, the full text of a solicitation provision may be accessed electronically at this/these address(es):

www.arnet.gov/far/

FAR 52.212-1 -- INSTRUCTIONS TO OFFERORS -- COMMERCIAL ITEMS (APR 2014)

FAR 52.212-2 -- EVALUATION -- COMMERCIAL ITEMS (JAN 1999)

(a) The Government will award a contract resulting from this solicitation to the responsible offeror whose offer conforming to the solicitation will be most advantageous to the Government, price and other factors considered. The following factors shall be used to evaluate offers:

Refer to “Table of Evaluation Factors” on Pages 138-139.

Acceptable Technical and Past Performance firms will have prices evaluated.

(b) Options. The Government will evaluate offers for award purposes by adding the total price for all options to the total price for the basic requirement. The Government may determine that an offer is unacceptable if the option prices are significantly unbalanced. Evaluation of options shall not obligate the Government to exercise the option(s).

(c) A written notice of award or acceptance of an offer, mailed or otherwise furnished to the successful offeror within the time for acceptance specified in the offer, shall result in a binding contract without further action by either party. Before the offer’s specified expiration time, the Government may accept an offer (or part of an offer), whether or not there are negotiations after its receipt, unless a written notice of withdrawal is received before award.

52.216-1 TYPE OF CONTRACT (APR 1984)

The Government contemplates award of an Indefinite Delivery-Indefinite Quantity contract resulting from this solicitation.

AG-05M6-S-13-0038 Project: MBS Road Maintenance MATOC Page 132 of 147 http://www.arnet.gov/far/

52.216-27 SINGLE OR MULTIPLE AWARDS (OCT 1995)

The Government intends to award multiple task order contracts for the same or similar services to no more than five (5) sources under this solicitation.

L/M.2 GENERAL INSTRUCTIONS-PROPOSAL INSTRUCTIONS

(a) General: Offerors shall submit a written proposal as described in this solicitation. The proposal shall be presented in a clear and logical manner. Any narrations shall clearly convey specific details of the planned approach sufficient to describe how the offeror plans to meet the requirements of the proposed contract. Offerors are cautioned that statements such as “will comply”, “will meet the intent of”, or other such paraphrasing will not be acceptable. The technical portion of the proposal shall contain sufficient information to enable the evaluators to make a complete analysis of the proposal.

(b) Discrepancies: If an offeror believes the requirements in this solicitation contain an error, omission, or are otherwise unsound, the offeror shall immediately notify the Contracting Officer (CO) in writing with supporting rationale. The offeror is reminded that the Government reserves the right to award this effort based on initial proposals, as received, without discussions.

(c) Source Selection Evaluation Process: The source selection process will be a 2-Phase process utilizing the Lowest Price Technically Acceptable Source Selection process identified in FAR Part 15.101-2.

Phase I: This phase of the solicitation will consist of issuing the solicitation documents for the IDIQ contract, the Technical Information offerors are required to submit as identified in the Table of Evaluation Factors, Contractor Submittals, and Pricing. The Government will conduct an evaluation for determining offerors either Technically Acceptable or Technically Unacceptable. Offerors determined as Technically Acceptable will be allowed to continue to Phase II. Firms determined to be Technically Unacceptable will be promptly notified.

Phase II: Price proposals for offerors determined Technically Acceptable will be evaluated for the initial Task Order(s) identified in Section J of this solicitation. The Government will award the IDIQ contract to no more than five (5) of the Technically Acceptable firms with the lowest acceptable evaluated prices. The firm(s) with the lowest prices will be awarded the initial Task Order(s). The Government reserves the right to award orders to other than the lowest offeror (multiple awards) in order to meet minimum guarantees.

(d) Source Selection Evaluation Team (SSET): The SSET will evaluate the technical proposals.

Criteria for the technical evaluation of the contractor’s performance capabilities are set forth in the Table of Evaluation Factors, Contractor Submittals, and Evaluation Process and will be the sole basis for determining the technical acceptability of offerors. The technical evaluation will be an objective evaluation of the Offeror's proposal.

(e) The Written Offer. Submittal envelopes/packages shall be clearly marked with the solicitation number. Proposals must be received not later than the date and time specified in the solicitation.

AG-05M6-S-13-0038 Project: MBS Road Maintenance MATOC Page 133 of 147

Volume 1: One (1) original and four (4) complete copies of all available information as described in the requirements set forth in the Table of Evaluation Factors, Contractor Submittals, and Evaluation Process (Pages 138-139) shall be included. Technical information includes: Similar Past Performance (Prime) to include associated questionnaires, Key Personnel (Project Manager – Prime). Past Performance information is obtained for evaluation purposes only.

Information submitted that was not requested, as part of this solicitation will not be evaluated.

Offers shall be submitted on 8 ½” by 11” sheets of paper. Pages may be printed front to back.

Type shall be 12-point font. Text shall be spaced a minimum of 1 ½ spaces or not to exceed 35 lines per page and 100 characters per line. Use of bold face type for paragraph headings is acceptable. Each page of each copy should be marked with the following text:

“Source Selection Information”

NOTE: Offerors are cautioned to submit sufficient information to enable the evaluator(s) to fully ascertain the Offeror’s capability to perform the requirements of the solicitation.

Volume 2: An original and complete copy of proposals for Blanket Task Orders (BTOs) must be submitted. Offerors are cautioned to review all sections carefully and complete the necessary fill-ins and certifications. BTO documents to submit include the Standard Form 1449 and the Section B – Schedule of Items for at least one of the following BTOs:

Attachment 3 – BTO #1, AG-05M6-S-13-0043 (North Bend) Attachment 4 – BTO #2, AG-05M6-S-13-0044 (Enumclaw) Attachment 5 – BTO #3, AG-05M6-S-13-0045 (Skykomish) Attachment 6 – BTO #4, AG-05M6-S-14-0025 (Mt. Baker) Attachment 7 – BTO #5, AG-05M6-S-14-0026 (Darrington)

(f) Evaluation: Offers will be evaluated using the criteria listed in the Table of Evaluation Factors, Contractor Submittals, and Evaluation Process. Noncompliance with the RFP requirements may raise serious questions regarding an offeror’s technical and/or price performance and may be grounds to eliminate the proposal from consideration for contract award. Completion and submission of an offer (proposal) will indicate the offeror’s unconditional consent to the terms and conditions in this RFP, including all amendments.

i. General: The Government intends to evaluate proposals and make award without discussions. However, during the evaluation period the Government may determine that it is necessary to conduct discussions. In that case, the Contracting Officer will establish a competitive range and conduct discussions with the firms in that range. Award of an IDIQ contract will be made to the offeror(s) whose offer provides the greatest overall value to the Government based on Technical and Price evaluations. Award may or may not be made to the proposal with the lowest proposed price.

ii. Responsibility Determination: Award shall not be made to any offeror failing to be determined responsible in accordance with FAR 9.104. As part of this determination, all contractors must have adequate financial resources to perform the contract or ability to obtain them.

AG-05M6-S-13-0038 Project: MBS Road Maintenance MATOC Page 134 of 147

iii. Phase I – Technical Proposal: Offeror’s are cautioned to submit sufficient information to enable the evaluator to ascertain fully the offeror’s capability to perform the requirements of the solicitation. The data submitted with each proposal shall be complete, concise, and conform to the requirements set forth in paragraph (e), the written offer, Volume 1 of this section, and the Table of Evaluation Factors, Contractor Submittals, and Evaluation Process.

iv. Phase II – Price Proposal: Prices shall be submitted for Task Orders listed in Section J.

Award of the basic IDIQ will be made based upon the sum of the total proposed prices for each of the Task Orders. The purpose of the price evaluation is to determine whether an offeror’s proposed prices are reasonable and realistic in relation to the solicitation requirements. Offerors are advised that unrealistically high or low price estimates, initially or subsequently, may be grounds for eliminating a proposal from competition either on the basis that the offeror does not understand the requirement, or has made an unrealistic proposal.

(g) Basis of Award: Lowest Price Technically Acceptable Source Selection procedures identified in FAR Part 15.101-2, shall be utilized to select the successful contactors. Those firms determined Technically Acceptable for Factor 1 will receive an overall rating of Technically Acceptable. Award of the IDIQ contract will be made to the Technically Acceptable Offeror(s) whose offer provides the greatest overall value to the Government based on the lowest acceptable evaluated price.

(h) Debriefings: In accordance with FAR 15.505 & 506, offerors excluded from the competitive range or otherwise excluded from the competition during Phase I technical evaluations may submit a written request for a pre-award debriefing to the Contracting Officer. After award, unsuccessful offerors may submit a written request for a post-award debriefing to the Contracting Officer. Unsuccessful offerors will be debriefed and will be furnished with the basis for the selection decision. Debriefing information will include the Government's evaluation of the strong and weak or deficient factors in the Offeror's proposal; however, item-by-item comparisons with other offerors' proposals will not be made. Debriefings will not reveal the relative merits or technical standing of competitors or the evaluation results of competitors. Moreover, debriefings will not reveal any information that is not releasable under the Freedom of Information Act (FOIA).

(i) Submittals: Submit the following by the due date (see page A-1, Block 8, and applicable solicitation amendments):

a. Part A – Multiple Award Task Order Contract (MATOC) submittals:

1. General Info – Offeror Submit original (no copies needed):

• Standard Form 1449 (Page 1)

• Representations and Certifications (all Section K Pages 117-131)

2. Technical Information – Offeror Submit original and 4 Copies. Statements such as “will comply,” “will meet the intent of,” or other such phrases are not acceptable.

The forms shall contain sufficient information for evaluators to determine that you meet or exceed the minimum evaluation requirements.

AG-05M6-S-13-0038 Project: MBS Road Maintenance MATOC Page 135 of 147

• Offeror Past Performance Submittal Form/Technical Information Form 1

(Page 140): Submit one form for each project that meets or exceeds the criteria listed in the Table of Evaluation Factors (Pages 138-139).

3. Technical Info - Contracting agency/private sector company returns the following by the due date (Page 1, Block 8):

• Project Past Performance Questionnaire (Pages 142-147).

NOTE: The responsibility to send out and track the completion of this form including the Government agencies’ or private sector companies’ submittal to the Contracting Officer rests solely with the Offeror. Forms received directly from the offeror will NOT be evaluated. The offeror may verify receipt of these forms by contacting Brian Johnson, Contracting Officer, at bajohnson03@fs.fed.us or

(425) 783-6056 (phone). The completed forms must be received no later than the date/time set for receipt of proposals.

4. Where/how to Submit: All submittals (except the Project Past Performance

Questionnaire) must be submitted by the offeror to:

Mail/Overnight: Mt. Baker-Snoqualmie NF Attn: Brian Johnson (Mailroom – Do not open) 2930 Wetmore Ave, Suite 3A Everett, WA 98201-4067

Email: Not allowed for initial offer. Offer may be rejected if submitted by email.

FAX: Not allowed for initial offer. Offer may be rejected if submitted by FAX.

FAX Amendments to the initial Offer: Offer can be amended by FAX: (425) 783-0129.

The Project Past Performance Questionnaires must be submitted by the contracting agency/company by US Mail, overnight delivery, email or fax to:

Mail/Overnight: Mt. Baker-Snoqualmie NF

Attn: Brian Johnson (Mailroom – Do not open) 2930 Wetmore Ave, Suite 3A Everett, WA 98201-4067

Email: bajohnson03@fs.fed.us

FAX: (425) 783-0129

The offeror shall send the Project Past Performance Questionnaire to those Government agencies or private sector companies identified by the offeror. These agencies or companies

AG-05M6-S-13-0038 Project: MBS Road Maintenance MATOC Page 136 of 147 mailto:bajohnson03@fs.fed.us must have detailed information concerning contracts that demonstrate your firm’s ability to perform the proposed work.

b. Part B – Blanket Task Order (BTO) submittals:

Each offeror is required to submit the completed Standard Form 1449 as well as the Section B - Schedule of Items for each BTO (district) your company desires to perform road maintenance services. To be considered for contract award your firm must submit pricing for a minimum of one BTO. The following BTOs are attached as separate files under the solicitation as advertised on the Federal Business Opportunities (FBO) website:

Attachment 3 – BTO #1, AG-05M6-S-13-0043 (North Bend) Attachment 4 – BTO #2, AG-05M6-S-13-0044 (Enumclaw) Attachment 5 – BTO #3, AG-05M6-S-13-0045 (Skykomish) Attachment 6 – BTO #4, AG-05M6-S-14-0025 (Mt. Baker) Attachment 7 – BTO #5, AG-05M6-S-14-0026 (Darrington)

(j) Proposal Retention: In accordance with FAR Subpart 4.8 (Government Contract Files), the government will retain one copy of all unsuccessful proposals. Unless the offeror requests otherwise, the Government will destroy extra copies of unsuccessful proposals.

(k) Cost of Proposal: This solicitation does not commit the Government to pay any costs incurred for preparation of proposals.

AG-05M6-S-13-0038 Project: MBS Road Maintenance MATOC Page 137 of 147

Offerors: Please note the closing date/time for the BTOs is the same as the closing date/time for the MATOC. Please refer to the MATOC, Page 1 of 147, Block 8 of the Standard Form 1449 to determine when this project closes. This information is also available as stated on the Federal Business Opportunities (FBO) website.

bajohnson03 Highlight

TABLE OF EVALUATION FACTORS, CONTRACTOR SUBMITTALS, AND EVALUATION PROCESS

Factor 1 Proposed Prime Contractor Recent and Relevant Experience. Projects submitted for this factor must contain elements of the criteria and the contractor must have been the prime contractor for the project.

Criteria

Completed or more than 50% completed: Submit at LEAST two (2) but not more than five (5) contracts, as a prime contractor over the past three (3) years that consist of road maintenance services in mountainous terrain or other environmentally sensitive areas similar to national forests. At least 25% of the work shall have been completed by the offeror as the prime contractor. All of the following elements shall be represented:

• Road Grading

• Cold Mix Surface Maintenance.

• Cutting Roadside Vegetation

• Roadway drainage Maintenance, including ditch and culvert cleaning. • Road Hazard and Obstruction Removal Each contract submitted must have been satisfactorily completed, or if not yet completed, must be marked by satisfactory progress.

The Government will not consider a contract that is less than 50% construction complete or an effort that concluded more than 3 years ago.

Submittal

A brief narrative of at LEAST two (2) but not more than five (5) contracts, each on a separate Technical Information Form 1, for projects that contain the specified criteria.

Contact Information – Submit name of the contracting agency, phone number, name of primary person responsible for the contract, address, and fax number. Failure to provide Point of Contacts for all of the above contracts may eliminate the offeror from further consideration.

Modification Synopsis – List the awarded contract price and the final contract price. If contract modification(s) occurred, briefly explain reason(s) for deviation(s) in cost and how the change/modification was initiated. Address only significant actions.

Complete the questionnaires (Pages 142-147) and the offeror’s Technical Information Form 1 (Pages 140-141) per instructions for each project.

Completed Past Performance Questionnaires shall be faxed or emailed, by the agency/private sector company, directly to the following point of contact:

ATTN: Brian Johnson Fax: (425) 783-0129 USFS AQM E-Mail: bajohnson03@fs.fed.us 2930 Wetmore Ave, Suite 3A Documents must be marked: “Source Selection Information” Everett, WA 98201-4067

Questionnaires received directly from the offeror will be not be evaluated.

Evaluation Process

The recent and relevant experience information is critical in determining the contractors potential ability to successfully accomplish the tasks identified in the solicitation.

RATING

Technically Acceptable Technically Unacceptable

Based on the Offeror’s record, the contractor has the requisite experience AND

• Has NO “Unsatisfactory or Poor” identifiers on their questionnaires; AND

• Has no more than 2 “Fair” ratings assigned on their questionnaires.

Based on the Offeror’s record, the contractor does not have the requisite experience

OR.

• Has 1 or more “Unsatisfactory or Poor” identifiers on their questionnaires; OR

• Has 3 or more “Fair” ratings assigned on their questionnaires.

AG-05M6-S-13-0038 Project: MBS Road Maintenance MATOC Page 138 of 147

TABLE OF EVALUATION FACTORS, CONTRACTOR SUBMITTALS, AND EVALUATION PROCESS

(Continued)

Factor 2 Price – Proposed price on initial project(s).

Criteria

1. Reasonable: Are proposed unit prices based on current market conditions and reasonable to effectively perform the task order.

2. Realistic: Prices are evaluated by assessing the compatibility of proposed prices with proposed scope of work. Proposals unrealistically high or low in price, when compared to the government estimate may be indicative of an inherent lack of understanding of the solicitation requirements and may result in proposal rejection without discussion. Any inconsistency, whether real or apparent, between proposed performance and price must be clearly explained in the price proposal.

Submittal Project Schedule of Items

Evaluation Process

Award of the IDIQ contracts will be made to no more than five (5) Offerors whose offers are determined to be Technically Acceptable and with the lowest evaluated acceptable price. Of these firms, the firm(s) with the lowest price(s) will be awarded the initial task order(s).

AG-05M6-S-13-0038 Project: MBS Road Maintenance MATOC Page 139 of 147

OFFEROR PAST PERFORMANCE SUBMITTAL FORM

TECHNICAL EVALUATION FACTOR 1

Directions: Complete this form for EACH project submitted for evaluation that meets or exceeds the stated criteria for Factor 1 (Page 138).

Offeror Information:

Company Name:

Company Address:

Point of Contact:

Phone Number:

*E-mail Address:

*Company Website:

Note: Items with an * are optional.

Past Performance Project Information:

Project Title

Project Number

Contract Number

Project Location (Town/State/Forest…)

Owner/Agency

Contact Name: Contact Number:

Contract Information (for project listed above):

Contract Award Date: Contract Start Date:

Original Completion Date: Final Completion Date:

Was liquidated damages assessed for late completion? __ Yes __ No If yes explain in narrative.

# of Contract Modifications Aggregate sum of all modifications: $

Work completed by the offeror: (enter % and $ value) % $

Subcontractor Information (for project listed above):

Number of subcontractors: Value of Subcontracts:

Technical Evaluation Narrative:

Complete a narrative for the project listed above with enough information for the Government to evaluate and rate your company’s ability to meet the criteria listed in the solicitation for Factor 1. Proposed Prime Contractor Recent and Relevant Experience.

The criteria may be found on Pages 138-139.

Note: Information submitted that was not requested, as part of this solicitation will not be evaluated.

AG-05M6-S-13-0038 Project: MBS Road Maintenance MATOC Page 140 of 147

Submittal Format:

Submit four (4) hardcopies as follows:

• Technical Evaluation Form Page 1

• Technical Evaluation Narrative o Maximum 6 pages including photos.

o 8 ½” by 11” sheets of paper.

o Pages may be printed front to back.

o Type shall be 12-point font.

o Text shall be spaced a minimum of 1 ½ spaces or not to exceed 35 lines per page and 100 characters per line.

o Use of bold face type for paragraph headings is acceptable.

• Each page of each copy should contain the following legend: “Source Selection Information”

Note: Electronic copies will not be accepted.

Where to submit:

Completed documents shall mailed with your proposal to the following:

Mt. Baker-Snoqualmie NF Attn: Brian Johnson (Mailroom – Do not open) 2930 Wetmore Ave, Suite 3A

Begin narrative below or attach it to this form.

AG-05M6-S-13-0038 Project: MBS Road Maintenance MATOC Page 141 of 147

TO: _____ FACSIMILE: ____

PHONE: E-MAIL:______________________

INFORMATION REQUEST FOR

PAST PERFORMANCE

(Questionnaire)

US Forest Service, Region 6 is currently in the process of soliciting offers for a contract.

Specifically, they are looking for past performance in Road Maintenance Service projects containing:

• Road Grading;

• Cold Mix Surface Maintenance;

• Roadway drainage Maintenance including ditch and culvert cleaning;

• Cutting Roadside Vegetation; and

• Road Hazard and Obstruction

Removal.

They will be evaluating our performance in the following areas:

Planning, Scheduling and Coordination Change Management (Collaboration with Owner) Quality Control System Project Superintendence and Management Personnel Subcontract Management

In order for USFS to complete its evaluation, the attached questionnaire must be completed and submitted directly to USFS not later than the proposal due date which is currently _____________________. The completed questionnaire may be e-mailed or faxed to:

FAX: (425) 783-0129, Attn: Brian Johnson, CO E-MAIL: bajohnson03@fs.fed.us

For your convenience, a cover sheet for use in mailing/faxing is provided below.

AG-05M6-S-13-0038 Project: MBS Road Maintenance MATOC Page 142 of 147

US Forest Service Mt. Baker-Snoqualmie NF

Attn: Brian Johnson, CO 2930 Wetmore Ave, Suite 3A

From: (Name and Address of Firm)

(Point of Contact Name):

(Facsimile/Phone Number)__________________________________________________

(E-mail Address)__________________________________________________

To (Point of Contact Name) Attn: Brian Johnson, CO

Mt Baker-Snoqualmie 2930 Wetmore Ave, Suite 3a Everett, WA 98201

Envelope must be marked: “AG-05M6-S-13-0038. For Addressee Only”

(Facsimile Number): (425) 783-0129

(E-mail Address): bajohnson03@fs.fed.us

AG-05M6-S-13-0038 Project: MBS Road Maintenance MATOC Page 143 of 147

Project Past Performance Questionnaire

(Submitted by Owner/Agency)

Directions: To be completed by the Owner/Agency and submitted directly to:

Mt. Baker-Snoqualmie NF

ATTN: Brian A. Johnson FAX: (425) 783-0129 2930 Wetmore Ave, Suite 3A Everett, WA 98201-4067 E-MAIL: bajohnson03@fs.fed.us

Part A - General Information (to be completed by the contractor):

Contractor’s Name

Contractor Name:

Owner/Agency

Contact Name: Contact Number:

Project Title

Project Number

Contract Number

Project Location (Town/State/Forest…)

Description of Work provided by the Contractor:

Contract Information for project listed above (to be completed by the Owner/Agency):

Contract Award Date: Contract Start Date:

Original Completion Date: Final Completion Date:

Were liquidated damages assessed for late completion? __ Yes __ No

Was a contractor evaluation prepared? __ Yes __ No If yes what was the overall rating?

AG-05M6-S-13-0038 Project: MBS Road Maintenance MATOC Page 144 of 147

Project Past Performance Questionnaire

(Submitted by Owner/Agency)

Evaluation Factor Rating System. Please provide ratings and comments regarding the Contractor’s performance in each area below using the following ratings:

N/A=Not Applicable U=Unsatisfactory P=Poor F=Fair G=Good E=Excellent O=Outstanding

Unsatisfactory--Response to inquiries, technical/service/administrative issues is not effective Poor--Response to inquiries, technical/service/administrative issues is marginally effective Fair--Response to inquiries, technical/service/administrative issues is somewhat effective Good--Response to inquiries, technical/service/administrative issues is usually effective Excellent--Response to inquiries, technical/service/administrative issues is effective Outstanding--The contractor has demonstrated an outstanding performance level that justifies adding a point to the score. (It is expected that this rating will be used in those rare circumstances where contractor performance clearly exceeds the performance levels described as "Excellent".)

For ratings of “Unsatisfactory” and “Poor” please provide a brief explanation in the remarks section.

Planning, Scheduling and Coordination

Developed realistic progress schedules, met established milestones, and submitted updated progress schedules as required.

N/A U P F G E O

Scheduling changes were clearly communicated to the workforce, suppliers and owner agency representatives. N/A U P F G E O

How would you rate the contractors overall project management performance in the areas of Planning, Scheduling and Coordination?

N/A U P F G E O

Change Management (Collaboration with Owner)

Supporting price/cost information for modifications was accurate, complete, and reasonable. N/A U P F G E O

The contractor effectively collaborated with the owner in an equitable, businesslike and timely manner to come to satisfactory agreements.

N/A U P F G E O

How would you rate the contractor’s overall effort at collaboration with the owner agency in problem solving? N/A U P F G E O

Quality Control System Did the contractor follow their contractor quality control plan? N/A U P F G E O

Was quality control (QC) documentation timely and adequate? N/A U P F G E O

Did the contractor’s QC program effectively monitor all work including that of subcontractors? N/A U P F G E O

AG-05M6-S-13-0038 Project: MBS Road Maintenance MATOC Page 145 of 147

Did the contractor consistently take responsibility to ensure that all work met contract requirements? N/A U P F G E O

Did the contractor complete work in accordance with the specifications without owner agency presence? N/A U P F G E O

Project Superintendence and Management Personnel

Did project superintendence and management personnel foster an attitude of contract compliance? N/A U P F G E O

Did project superintendence and management personnel act promptly to resolve problems? N/A U P F G E O

Did project superintendence and management personnel have sufficient authority to make decisions or to take appropriate actions.

N/A U P F G E O

Project superintendence and management personnel were consistently present and on site when work was performed. N/A U P F G E O

Did project superintendence and management personnel deal in an ethical, collaborative and businesslike manner with owner agency representatives, workforce, subcontractors and suppliers?

N/A U P F G E O

Subcontract Management

Did the contractor take accountability for subcontractor performance? N/A U P F G E O

Did the contractor coordinate with subcontractors regarding changes to schedules or work? N/A U P F G E O

Did contractor include subcontractors in daily contractor quality control activities? N/A U P F G E O

Did contractor effectively represent subcontractors to the owner concerning changes or construction problems? N/A U P F G E O

Did contractor facilitate corrective actions to ensure subcontractor work was completed in a timely and satisfactory manner?

N/A U P F G E O

Was the Contractor committed to customer satisfaction? Yes No

AG-05M6-S-13-0038 Project: MBS Road Maintenance MATOC Page 146 of 147

Remarks:

AG-05M6-S-13-0038 Project: MBS Road Maintenance MATOC Page 147 of 147

Mt. Baker-Snoqualmie National Forest 2930 Wetmore Ave., Suite 3A Everett, WA 98201

a. Replace MATOC pages 132-147 in their entirety (See attached pages 132-147). The amended sections are highlighted in yellow.

b. The Blanket Task Orders (BTOs) remain unchanged.

c. All other terms and conditions remain unchanged.