RFLP Developer Question Responses_4 Nov 2025.docx

RFLP Question Response Document Power Generation and Energy Requirements Question 1: Does the 100MW configuration requirement need to be from a single, contiguous source, or would modular configurations (e.g., 2×50MW systems) that collectively exceed 100MW be acceptable?

Response: Modular configurations like 2×50MW systems that collectively exceed 100MW would be acceptable.

Question 2: Will behind-the-meter (BTM) generation solutions receive evaluation consideration or credit for enhancing grid resilience and reducing strain on local infrastructure?

Response: BTM solutions that enhance the installation’s energy resilience would receive evaluation consideration. Note these solutions will be reviewed in the context of the respective state/market energy regulation and what is permissible.

Question 3: Are hybrid power supply models acceptable, such as combining behind-the-meter generation with grid-tied power purchase agreements (PPAs)?

Response: Hybrid models combining BTM generation and grid-tied PPAs would be acceptable. Note these solutions will be reviewed in the context of respective state/market energy regulation and what is permissible.

Question 4: How will the Government evaluate proposals that include resilience features such as backup power systems, microgrids, or energy storage solutions?

Response: RFLP Section 4.7.6 addresses Subfactor 1.2: Project Development, Construction and Operations and states if power generation is proposed, Offerors are required to provide a conceptual plan on how to provide backup power to the Installation in the event of a grid outage. The Government will evaluate proposals favorably that provide resilience.

Question 5: Can projects be developed in phases where the initial phase meets minimum requirements, but subsequent phases expand capacity or capabilities?

Response: Phased construction approaches are permitted. Offerors must provide a Project development and construction plan, including the number of phases required for completion. However, the initial phase must still meet the 100MW minimum to qualify as an "AI Data Center."

Infrastructure and Environmental Considerations Question 6: What infrastructure upgrades are anticipated at each site, and will the Government provide cost-sharing or assistance for major utility interconnections?

Response: Offerors will need to perform their own due diligence and eventual contractual relationships with respective utilities to determine required infrastructure upgrades. At this time, the Government does not intend to provide cost-sharing or assistance for major utility interconnections.

Question 7: Are there any restrictions on developing natural gas or electric facilities on-site to support data center operations?

Response: The Government is currently unaware of development restrictions for on-site natural gas or electric facilities. The Potential Lessee(s) with need to coordinate with the Installation to ensure that the Project meets all Installation and regulatory requirements.

Question 8: What is the expected timeline for NEPA compliance, and are there any anticipated environmental restrictions that could impact project development?

Response: Each site has different environmental considerations. As part of the NEPA process, the Potential Lessee must prepare an Environmental Analysis (EA) or Environmental Impact Statement (EIS) if required. The timeline associated with these actions is unknown, but the Government is committed to working with Potential Lessees to complete NEPA requirements in an expeditious manner.

Question 9: Are there specific construction or operational restrictions related to base security, flight operations, or other mission-critical activities?

Response: Each Installation will have its own construction or operational restrictions. The Potential Lessee(s) will need to coordinate with the Installation to determine any restrictions during Lease negotiations.

Financial and Lease Considerations Question 10: Will the Government consider non-cash considerations, such as infrastructure improvements, utility upgrades, or other in-kind contributions?

Response: The RFLP explicitly states that "consideration must be paid in cash" and "the Government does not request any in-kind consideration.”

Question 11: Can lease terms be adjusted based on market conditions, performance milestones, or changes in project scope over the lease duration?

Response: The lease can be for up to 50 years unless a longer term promotes national defense or is in the public interest. During this Lease term, the parties may negotiate changes. Any changes to the lease would be implemented through an amendment.

Security and Access Question 12: What specific anti-terrorism and force protection standards must be incorporated into project design and operations?

Response: Refer to UFC 4-010-01 DoD Minimum Antiterrorism Standards for Buildings. The Potential Lessee will need to coordinate with the Installation to determine any other unique requirements. This may be impacted by whether or not a separate perimeter can be established for the leased parcel with its own access to public roads.

Question 13: How will site access be managed for construction crews, operational personnel, and visitors, particularly in relation to base security protocols?

Response: Access varies by site. Developers will need to follow the procedures established by each Installation. Developers may need to access the site through existing security gates or new entry points could be installed to facilitate development. This may be impacted by whether or not a separate perimeter can be established for the leased parcel with its own access to public roads.

Market Rate and Profit Sharing Question 14: How will fair market value be determined for lease considerations, and what comparable properties or methodologies will be used?

Response: The Government will contract for an appraisal of the leasehold interest in the Properties using approved Government sources and means. This includes hiring an appraiser holding the MAI (Member, Appraisal Institute) designation who will select the appropriate sales comparison, cost, and/or income approach to conduct the valuation. The fair market value reflects the minimum acceptable level of consideration the Government can receive.

Question 15: Will the Government consider alternative valuation methodologies that account for the unique nature of AI data centers and their specialized requirements?

Response: Offerors may propose whatever supporting analysis, as they must provide relevant empirical and quantitative data and analysis to substantiate their proposed consideration.

Question 16: For the Government's profit-sharing arrangement, how will "profit" be calculated, and what financial metrics will be used?

Response: The term “profit-sharing” is not mentioned in the RFLP. For Lease consideration, Offerors can propose base rent, participation rent, or a combination. For participation rent, the Offerors are free to propose how participation rent is calculated. The Government will evaluate consideration structures based on the proposed payment amounts and the probability the Government will receive those payments.

Question 17: Does the Government's profit share extend to operational revenues, asset appreciation, or only specific transactions such as sale to third parties?

Response: The RFLP states that "the Government intends to share in the proceeds for any transfer or sale of a Project(s).” The RFLP does not contain specific details regarding how profit will be calculated for the Government's share upon sale to third parties. The Selected Lessee and the Government will negotiate these terms.

End User Coordination Question 18: Will the Government assist in coordinating with potential end users or provide introductions to agencies that may require AI data center services?

Response: No. The Government makes no representations regarding any market for any services or products arising directly or indirectly from the Lease and is under no obligation to purchase services. The responses must demonstrate a viable commercial (non-Federal government) need. Offerors are free to coordinate on their own with other federal agencies regarding the need for any AI Data Center services.

Available Parcels Question 19: Would the Government be inclined to consider other parcels in response to this Solicitation?

Response: No. The Government is considering only the parcels offered in the RFLP.