Addendum to FAR 52.212-2 2025.09.17.pdf

Addendum to FAR 52.212-2 Evaluation – Commercial Products and Commercial Services

In accordance with FAR part 13.5, Award will be made to the responsible offeror whose proposal represents the best overall value to the Government, considering both price and non-price factors. The Government will evaluate proposal using a price and other factors approach, where non-price factors, when combined, are approximately equal to price. All non-price factors and subfactors will be rated as either "acceptable" or" unacceptable". In order to be considered for award, there must be an "acceptable" rating in every non-price factor/subfactor. In other words, a rating of "unacceptable" for any factor or subfactor will result in the entire offer being rated "unacceptable".

The following ratings will be used in evaluating all non-price factors and subfactors except Past Performance:

ACCEPTABLE: Offer meets the requirements of the solicitation.

UNACCEPTABLE: Offer does not meet the requirements of solicitation.

FACTOR A: TECHNICAL

Sub-Factor 1- Prime Contractor’s Prior Experience:

The offeror shall be evaluated on documentation demonstrating a minimum of two (2) years’ experience within the last seven (7) years in Field Level Maintenance and Repair of Tracked Vehicle and Engineer Equipment or similar types of services from the issuance date of this solicitation. The experience of a subcontractor cannot be substituted for the prime contractor’s experience.

Sub-Factor 2- Prime Contractor’s Registration and Certification:

The offeror shall be evaluated on submitted copies of current and valid registration issued by the ROK Government i) Business Registration (사업자등록증) ii) Registration for Comprehensive Construction

Machinery Maintenance and Repair (건설기계종합정비업) including anything of the following sub-categories listed below.

•All types (전기종)

•Excavator (굴착기)

•Forklift (지게차)

•Crane (기중기)

iii) Registration for General Automotive Vehicle Maintenance and Repair Business [Korean:

자동차종합정비업]

Sub-Factor 3 – Personnel Qualification:

(1) Contract Manager (CM): CM shall have a minimum of two (2) years of experience within seven (7) years of experience from the issuance date of this solicitation or any amendment as a CM in performing field level maintenance and repair of Tracked Vehicle and Engineer Equipment, or similar vehicles and equipment service. CM shall submit proof of, at minimum score of TOEFL iBT 65 or TOEIC score of 550.

(2) Site Manager (SM): The Contractor shall designate Site Manager at each site among Contractor mechanics who meet the Contractor Mechanics requirements stated below subparagraph 1.6.1.4.3.

The SM shall manage their workforce at each site in daily operation, coordinate with the Government representatives, and maintain a close liaison with the Government. The SM shall have a minimum of two (2) years of experience within the last seven (7) years in managing Field Level Maintenance and Repair of Tracked Vehicle and Engineer Equipment, or similar vehicles and equipment service as a site manager. The SM shall be competent in English, fully understand the requirement of this contract, and address all contract related issued to the COR. SM shall submit proof of, at minimum score of TOEFL iBT 50 or TOEIC 450.

(3) Contractor Mechanic: The Contractor shall have at minimum of 12 Contractor Mechanics at Camp Casey, and 10 Contractor Mechanics at Camp Humphreys. Contractor Mechanics shall have a minimum of two (2) years’ experience within the last seven (7) years in performing filed level maintenance and repair of Tracked Vehicle and Engineer Equipment, or similar vehicles and equipment service. The Contractor Mechanics shall possess the license of “Craftsman Motor Vehicles Maintenance License [Korean: 자동차정비기능사]” issued by ROK government.

FACTOR B: MANAGEMENT PLAN

(1) Organization Chart: The contractor shall have an Organization Chart which clearly demonstrates the existence of command and control, and which identifies at a minimum the following:

(a) Logical lines of communications, command and control

(b) Logical Organization Hierarchy

(c) Concurrent operation of all locations indicated in the PWS

(2) Staffing Plan: The contractor shall have a staffing plan that clearly demonstrates how they plan to perform operations of tracked vehicles and engineering equipment. At a minimum the staffing plan shall include a chart that clearly identifies mechanics in each location of the PWS. In addition, the plan shall include a written replacement strategy, backup policy, retention policy and any other information pertinent to the execution of this requirement. At a minimum, the staffing plan shall be addressed the following:

(a) Manpower Placement Status by workplaces.

(b) Key Personnel (Contract Manager and Site Managers) and each of their responsibilities in the management of the operations of tracked vehicle and engineering equipment. The contractor shall discuss each of the Key Personnel including detailing responsibilities of each position and how each of the Key Persons should support the operation of tracked vehicle and engineer equipment.

(c) Other Personnel and their roles in the operations of the tracked vehicle and engineer equipment. The contractor shall discuss the proposed other personnel detailed responsibilities of positions the operation of tracked vehicle and engineer equipment.

(d) Certifications and experience of the personnel proposed shall be addressed.

The feasibility of the proposed Staffing Plan will be assessed against the contractor’s overall Technical Capability and Management Approach to ensure the contractor has an adequate number of qualified personnel in appropriate labor categories to satisfy all PWS requirements.

FACTOR C: PAST PERFORMANCE

The factor evaluates the offeror’s past performance history in performing same or similar requirement as set forth in this contract to determine the offeror’s capability to perform the contract. Past performance will be evaluated only on proposals that received a technically acceptable rating for these technical criteria in paragraph I above.

The offeror shall be evaluated on submitted evidence of at least two (2) or more references for recent and relevant past performance within the last seven (7) years from the issuance date of this solicitation. This data on recent contracts will be used by the Contracting Officer to evaluate past performance. The offerors shall present past performance for themselves, whose effort on this contract will significantly influence the performance of the proposed effort.

The following ratings will be used in evaluating Past Performance:

ACCEPTABLE: Based on the Offeror’s performance record, the Government has a reasonable expectation that the Offeror will successfully perform the required effort, or the Offeror’s performance record is unknown (See note below).

UNACCEPTABLE: Based on the Offeror’s performance record, the Government has no reasonable expectation that the Offeror will be able to successfully perform the required effort.

NOTE: In the case of an offeror without a record of relevant past performance or for whom information on past performance is not available or so sparse that no meaningful past performance rating can be reasonably assigned, the offeror may not be evaluated favorably or unfavorably on past performance (see FAR 15.305(a)(2)(iv)). Therefore, the offeror shall be determined to have unknown past performance. In the context of acceptability/unacceptability, “unknown” shall be considered “acceptable”

FACTOR D – PRICE

The proposed price will be evaluated to determine if the estimate is complete and reasonable. The pricing proposals will be evaluated in accordance with FAR 15.404-1 (b). The analysis will be conducted on the total price to include the base period, option periods. The following applies to that evaluation.

(a) Completeness: Pricing information for all CLINs identified for base period each year during five (5) years’ period (include total prices for all five (5) years).

(b) Reasonableness: Price should also reflect fair market value and be reasonable when compared to the independent Government estimate, previous and/or current market prices for same or similar services and/or when compared among other technically acceptable offerors.

Note: Price is not scored as acceptable/unacceptable. The lowest price for award purposes will be the combined total of the effective period of five (5) years from the date of the award. Price must include all CLIN/SLINs as listed in the Price Schedule. The Government intends to evaluate proposals and award a contract without discussion. Therefore, Offerors are instructed that submitted proposals should contain their best pricing.

(c) FAR Clause 52.217-8 Option to Extend Services. As part of price evaluation, the Government will evaluate its option to extend services (FAR Clause 52.217-8 - Option to Extend Services) by adding one-half of the Offeror’s final option period prices to the Offeror’s total price. Thus, the Offeror’s total price for the purpose of evaluation will include the base period, 1st option, 2nd option, 3rd option, 4th option, and one-half of the 4th option. Offerors are required only to price the base and four (4) options.

Offerors shall not submit a price for the potential one-half-year extension of services period.

End of Addendum to FAR 52.212-2 Evaluation – Commercial Products and Commercial Services