Addendum No. 01 Responses

A Unit of the University System of Georgia An Equal Education and Employment Opportunity Institution

April 7, 2022 Via Georgia Procurement Registry

ADDENDUM NO. 001

This addendum is issued as part of the solicitation entitled:

Request for Qualifications for Indefinite Delivery Indefinite Quantity (IDIQ)

Athletic Facility Architectural Services Solicitation/Contract No. 1131-22

A. GENERAL

Please see responses to RFQ Questions received by the deadline:

1. Is the limit for the number of pages fir this RFQ 25 pages – inclusive of all materials, except tab pages or is the limit for the number of pages for this RFQ 25 sheets (double-sided for a total of 50 pages) – inclusive of all materials, except tab pages

Answer 1: Please limit to 25 single sided sheets, inclusive of all materials except tab and cover sheets and the signed forms included in the exhibits.

2. The RFQ limits the page count to 25 - 8 ½ X11 sheets plus the dividers. It also calls for the SF 330 form as well, which has multiple pages and duplicative information. Are we to treat the SF330 form as independent from the 25 pages allowed to respond to the questions and submittal documents? Or must we submit no more than 25 pages total?

Answer 2: The only part of the SF330 form that needs to be filled out is the section G matrix with the project key containing the relevant projects listed elsewhere in your qualifications, and the personnel listed the personnel proposed for this contract. This chart should be included within the 25 pages.

3. Regarding the completed SF330, is that a full 330 Parts I and II to be completed within the 25 page limit?

Answer 3: See answer to question 2.

4. Will Civil, Structural, and MEPF Engineering be required for the Georgia Tech IDIQ Athletic Facility Architectural Services RFQ? We heard Civil may not be needed.

151 Sixth Street., NW Atlanta, Georgia 30332

A Unit of the University System of Georgia An Equal Education and Employment Opportunity Institution

Answer 4: Varying sub-consultants may be needed depending on the type of project. In the past MEPF has been the most heavily used sub-consultants, however, Civil may be needed for programming and concept design studies, and structural may be needed for larger renovation design work. While prime sub-consultants should be listed in response, specific design experience with athletic facilities is what will set the teams apart. If a specialty consultant is not listed on in the selected team’s qualifications (for example, food service or AV) and it is needed in the future it can be added at the time of the project.

5. In the RFQ/P you are asking for 1 electronic copy on a thumb drive (5MB or less) to be delivered to your office. I know there is a greater risk of viruses being imbedded on thumb drives and that file size might reduce the quality of the images we include so would you rather we upload our proposal to you via your file sharing site?

Answer 5: Please provide a physical thumb drive, per the RFP instructions.

Website quality images will be sufficient resolution.

6. Please confirm if we are required to deliver a USB Drive that includes the electronic copy as part of the submission process.

Answer 6: Yes. The electronic copy will be the main way the proposal is delivered to the selection committee. Please also provide 1 printed copy as a back-up for quick reference.

B. CHANGES TO THE BID FORMS

None

C. CHANGES TO SPECIFICATIONS

D. CHANGES TO DRAWINGS

End of Addendum No. 01

* * * PLEASE ACKNOWLEDGE ADDENDUM BY SIGNING AND INCLUDING WITH YOUR

QUALIFICATIONS PACKAGE. * * *

Proposer (Legal Firm Name)

Signature Print Name/Title of Signer

Brenda Cochran, Contracting Officer brenda.cochran@facilities.gatech.edu Lindsey Cottingham, Project Manager - lindsey.cottingham@facilities.gatech.edu