Addendum Attachment_5_-_PPQ.pdf

PDF 172 KB Posted

Attached to
Executive Airlift Flight Dispatch Services Federal contract opportunity
Solicitation number
FA286021R0013
Issued by
Department of the Air Force Headquarters District Washington

About this file

This document is a past performance questionnaire related to a solicitation for executive airlift flight dispatch services. The 316th Contracting Squadron intends to procure worldwide flight dispatch services for four Boeing 757-200 aircraft designated as C-32A, four Boeing 737-700 aircraft designated as C-40B, and seven Boeing 737-700 aircraft designated as C-40C. The services shall include 24/7/365 operations comparable to commercial airlines and performed in accordance with applicable laws, standards, and requirements outlined in the performance work statement. The contract will be a firm-fixed price award for a one year base period beginning February 1st, 2022 through January 31st, 2023, with four one year option periods extending through January 31st, 2027. Responses are due by email to the points of contact provided by the specified date.

View the file

Other files for this federal contract opportunity

Show all 20

On GovTribe

Work with this file on GovTribe

  • Download the original file
  • Contacts named in this file
  • Similar government files
  • Ask GovTribe AI about this file

Text version

RFP FA2860-21-R-0013

ADDENDUM ATTACHMENT 5

PAST/PRESENT PERFORMANCE QUESTIONNAIRE (PPQ)

WHEN FILLED IN THIS DOCUMENT IS SOURCE SELECTION SENSITIVE INFORMATION IAW FAR 2.101 & 3.104

SECTION 1: CONTRACT IDENTIFICATION

A. Contractor:________________________________________________________________________

B. Prime or Subcontractor for this contract: _________________________

C. Contractor Cage Code: _________________________________

D. Contract number: ______________________________________

E. Contract type: ______________________________

F. Was this a competitive contract? Yes _____ No _____

G. Period of performance: _________________________________________________________

H. Initial contract cost: $____________________________

I. Current/final contract cost: $_______________________________

J. Reasons for differences between initial contract cost and final contract costs:

K. Description of service provided:

SECTION 2: CUSTOMER OR AGENCY IDENTIFICATION

A. Customer or agency name: __________________________________________________________

B. Customer or agency description (if applicable): __________________________________________

C. Geographic description of services under this contract, i.e. local, nationwide, worldwide, other Commands:________________________________________________________________________

SECTION 3: EVALUATOR IDENTIFICATION

A. Evaluator's name: __________________________________________________________________

B. Evaluator's title: ___________________________________________________________________

C. Evaluator's phone/fax number: ________________________________________________________ Length of time (number of years/months) evaluator worked on subject contract: ____________________

SECTION 4: EVALUATION

Please indicate your satisfaction with the contractor’s performance by placing an “X” in the appropriate block using the scale provided to the right of each question. This scale is defined as follows:

CODE PERFORMANCE RATING

B BLUE/EXCEPTIONAL - During the entire period, the contractor met and exceeded many of the requirements of the contract and consistently performed at a superior level.

Performance was accomplished with very few minor problems, and the contractor took immediate and effective corrective actions for those problems that did occur.

P PURPLE/VERY GOOD - During the entire period, the contractor met and exceeded some of the requirements of the contract and consistently performed very well. Performance was accomplished with some minor problems, and the contractor took timely and effective corrective action for those problems that did occur.

G GREEN/SATISFACTORY - During the entire period, the contractor met the requirements of the contract and consistently performed at an acceptable level. Performance was accomplished with some problems, and the contractor took effective corrective action for those problems that did occur.

Y YELLOW/MARGINAL – During the entire period, the contractor did not always meet some of the requirements of the contract and intervention was required to continue performance. There were instances where performance was at a less than acceptable level;

performance was accomplished with some problems and some corrective actions appear only marginally effective or were not fully implemented.

R RED/UNSATISFACTORY – During the entire period, the contractor did not meet the requirements of the contract and performance was at an unacceptable level. There were a number of serious problems that required extensive oversight and involvement, and corrective actions were either ineffective or non-existent.

N/A NOT APPLICABLE - Unable to provide a rating. Contract did not include performance for this aspect, or information was not available. Do not know.

Technical Approach B P G Y R N/A

T1. How would you rate the contractor's capability to provide mission diplomatic clearances?

Remarks:

T2. How would you rate the contractor's capability to provide mission analysis?

T3. How would you rate the contractor's capability to provide mission planning packages?

T4. How would you rate the contractor capability to provide TOLD and

WB?

T5. How would you rate the contractor’s capability to provide dispatch packages?

T6. How would you rate the contractor’s capability to provide mission replanning?

T7. How would you rate the contractor’s capability to provide world-wide weather/communications?

T8. How would you rate the contractor’s capability to manage a technical interface such as ACARS?

T9. How would you rate the contractor’s capability to provide aircraft Software updates?

T10. How would you rate the contractor’s capability to provide subscription service management?

Staffing Approach B P G Y R N/A

S1. How effective was overall contract management (including ability to effectively lead, manage, control and deliver on-time)?

S2. How effective were the types of personnel (skill and expertise) used by the contractor in accomplishing the effort without Government intervention?

S3. Did the contractor provide replacement personnel of the same quality and skills of vacancies with minimum disruption to the support effort?

S4. How effective was the contractor in maintaining continuity of mission support while transitioning/phasing in resources and personnel?

1. Please discuss every response for which you indicated B/E (Blue/Exceptional), Y/M (Yellow/Marginal) or R/U (Red/Unsatisfactory) in remarks section of each of the questions above (use additional sheets, if necessary).

2. Government Contracts Only: Was this contract partially or completely terminated for default or convenience or are there any pending terminations?

Yes___ Default___ Convenience___ Pending Terminations___ No ___ If yes, please explain (e.g., inability to meet cost, performance, or delivery schedules).

SECTION 5: NARRATIVE SUMMARY

Would you have any reservations about soliciting this contractor in the future or having them perform one of your critical and demanding programs?

Please provide any additional comments concerning this contractor’s performance, as desired.

Evaluator’s Signature Date

Thank you for your prompt response and assistance!

Please return this completed questionnaire by email to:

E-mail to: craig.mcclain.2@us.af.mil mailto:craig.mcclain.2@us.af.mil

File details come from the government source that posted it. Updated .