Addendum - 52.212-2, Evaluation.pdf
PDF 132 KB Posted
- Attached to
- Radio Systems Communication Upgrade (RSCU) Federal contract opportunity
- Solicitation number
- FA446025Q0321
About this file
This document is an Addendum for Evaluation of Commercial Products and Commercial Services (52.212-2, Nov 2021) for a Radio Systems Communication Upgrade (RSCU) solicitation by the Department of the Air Force Air Mobility Command. The evaluation process involves a two-step assessment where offerors are first ranked by price, and then evaluated for technical capability, with the government seeking at least three acceptable offers.
The key evaluation factors include price and technical capability, with technical and past performance considered equally important. The government will award the contract to the most advantageous offer, reserving the right to deem offers unresponsive for incomplete or unbalanced pricing. If fewer than three offers are received, all will be evaluated, and if no offers are deemed acceptable, no award will be made and the requirement will be re-evaluated. The solicitation allows the government to communicate with offerors as needed and to not select a contractor based on offer quality or fund availability.
View the file
Other files for this federal contract opportunity
| File | Type | Posted |
|---|---|---|
| Questions and Answers From Mission Owner.pdf | ||
| Combo - FA446025Q0321 - RSCU - Amended.pdf | ||
| MFR - Amendment - FA446025Q032.pdf | ||
| Single Source Justification - RSCU.pdf | ||
| Combo - FA446025Q0321 - RSCU.pdf | ||
| Wage Determination.pdf | ||
| CLS - FA446025Q0321 - RSCU.pdf | ||
| SOW - RSCU.pdf | ||
| Addendum - 52.212-1, Instructions to Offeror.pdf |
On GovTribe
Work with this file on GovTribe
- Download the original file
- Contacts named in this file
- Similar government files
- Ask GovTribe AI about this file
Text version
ADDENDUM
52.212-2, Evaluation—Commercial Products and Commercial Services. (Nov 2021)
1. The Government will award a contract resulting from this solicitation to the responsible offeror whose offer conforming to the solicitation will be most advantageous to the Government, price and other factors considered. The following factors shall be used to evaluate offers:
1.1. Price.
1.2. Technical Capability.
2. By submission of its offer, the offeror agrees to abide by all terms, conditions, and provisions included in the solicitation. Offers/Offerors that fail to furnish required representations or information, or reject the terms and conditions of the solicitation may be considered non-responsive and/or excluded from consideration. (IAW 52.212-1)
3. Technical and past performance, when combined, are considered equal in importance.
4. Evaluation Factors and Process Defined:
4.1. First, the Government shall rank all responsive offers by price.
4.1.1. An offeror’s total evaluated price will include the total of all Contract Line Items as outlined in this solicitation or any associated attachments.
4.1.2. The Government reserves the right to deem an offeror's overall quotation to be unresponsive in the event that incomplete, unreasonable, or unbalanced pricing is submitted.
4.2. Second, the Government will conduct a Technical Evaluation, starting with the lowest priced evaluated responsive offer, to determine if they are “Acceptable” or “Unacceptable,” based on the offer/offeror meeting requirements as outlined in the solicitation or any associated attachments.
4.2.1. “Acceptable” means: A solution is "technically acceptable" if it meets all mandatory requirements (e.g., performance standards, specifications, compliance criteria) outlined in the SOW.
4.2.2. “Unacceptable” means: the description DOES NOT meet the specifications described in the SOW and associated attachments. An unacceptable technical description will result in offer/offeror being removed from further consideration.
ADDENDUM
52.212-2, Evaluation—Commercial Products and Commercial Services. (Nov 2021)
4.2.3. The Technical Evaluation processing of offers will continue (in order by price) until the
Government determines that at least three (3) offerors are determined to have an “Acceptable” technical rating.
4.2.3.1. If there are less than 3 offers/offerors, the Government will perform a Technical
Evaluation on ALL offers/offerors.
4.2.3.2. If no offer/offeror is determined to be “Acceptable,” then no award will be made, and the Contracting Officer will re-evaluate the requirement.
4.3. Third, once the requisite number of offers/offerors have been evaluated for both Price and
Technical Capability, the Government will make an award to the offer/offeror. This offer/offeror represents the best value to the Government.
5. The Government reserves the right to communicate with all, some, or none of the offerors to address any issues, if necessary. The Government also reserves the right not to select a contractor, depending on the quality of the offers/offerors submitted and the availability of funds.
6. A written notice of award or acceptance of an offer, mailed or otherwise furnished to the successful offeror within the time for acceptance specified in the offer, shall result in a binding contract without further action by either party. Before the offer’s specified expiration time, the Government may accept an offer (or part of an offer), whether or not there are negotiations after its receipt, unless a written notice of withdrawal is received before award.
File details come from the government source that posted it. Updated .