Addendum 2 DEQ Covered Product Leakage Needs Assessment RFP.pdf
PDF 321 KB Posted
- Attached to
- Covered Product Leakage Needs Assessment
- Solicitation number
- S-34000-00015010
- Issued by
- Multnomah County, Oregon
About this file
This document is an Addendum #2 to an OregonBuys Bid Solicitation (#S-34000-00015010) issued by the Oregon Department of Environmental Quality (DEQ), focused on extended producer responsibility (EPR) for packaging. The solicitation seeks a contractor with technical expertise in modeling leakage during product life cycles, specifically for material production, consumption, and waste disposal. Contractors must demonstrate proficiency with material systems and life cycle approaches, including the ability to model scenarios using both generic and context-specific data. Due to the emerging nature of packaging EPR in the United States, DEQ acknowledges a limited candidate pool and is taking a nuanced approach to evaluating potential conflicts of interest.
The bid requires prospective contractors to complete a detailed Conflict of Interest Assessment (Attachment J) that transparently describes any current or potential projects that might pose a conflict of interest. DEQ is particularly interested in understanding the contractor's role, level of effort, project dates, and proposed mechanisms for mitigating potential conflicts. The assessment reflects DEQ's recognition of the rapid proliferation of packaging EPR contract opportunities across Oregon and three other states, and their intent to avoid excluding qualified contractors based on strict, singular conflict of interest criteria. Contractors must provide comprehensive details about their project engagements, including their role, contractual relationships, and proposed strategies for maintaining neutrality and ethical research practices.
View the file
Other files
Show all 16
On GovTribe
Work with this file
- Download the original file
- Contacts named in this file
- Similar government files
- Ask GovTribe AI about this file
Text version
OregonBuys Bid Solicitation #S-34000-00015010 Page 1 of 5
ADDENDUM #2
OregonBuys Bid Solicitation #S-34000-00015010 ADDENDUM # 2, Dated 10/13/2025
A. This is Addendum No. 2 to OregonBuys Bid Solicitation #S-34000-00015010 issued 10/1/2025.
B. The Bid Solicitation is hereby amended as follows. New language is indicated by bold and underlined font, deleted language is indicated by strikethrough font.
TABLE OF CONTENTS
SECTION 6: LIST OF ATTACHMENTS
ATTACHMENT J CONFLICT OF INTEREST ASSESSMENT 21
2.2 DEFINITION OF TERMS
2.2.2 Project Specific Definitions
Leakage: mismanaged waste material, including litter, micro-, and nano-particles, that is released and accumulates anywhere in the natural environment (e.g. in soil, air, rivers, coastlines, etc) via any number of pathways and at any stage in products’ life cycles. This term is used as an umbrella to encompass marine debris and litter (as well as other mismanaged waste), the two statutory focuses of the needs assessment.
3.1 MINIMUM OFFER REQUIREMENTS
3.1.1 CONFLICT OF INTEREST
To be considered for evaluation, DEQ will review Contractor’s Con�lict of Interest Assessment (Attachment J) to determine if Contractor meets the following requirements:
• Neutrality/no actual con�lict of interest for the Contractor, or
• Adequate mitigation of con�lict of interest elsewhere in the scope of work through transparency or other measures.
3.1.2 BUSINESS
To be considered for evaluation, Offeror must demonstrate how Offeror meets all of the following business requirements:
o Research expertise capabilities with access to latest data relevant to the topic.
o Consistent engagement in the topic of interest and demonstrated adherence to ethical use of secondary research.
3.1.3 TECHNICAL
To be considered for evaluation, Offeror must demonstrate how the proposed solution
OregonBuys Bid Solicitation #S-34000-00015010 Page 2 of 5 meets all of the following technical requirements:
o Demonstrated technical subject expertise related to modeling of leakage during the life cycle of covered products, e.g. during material production, consumption, and waste disposal.
o Demonstrated proficiency with material systems and life cycle approaches considering broad global and specific regional and local scenarios.
o Demonstrated ability to model scenarios of interest utilizing a combination of generic and context specific data.
3.4 OFFERS CONTENT REQUIREMENTS
3.4.8 Conflict of Interest Assessment (Attachment J)
Because extended producer responsibility (EPR) for packaging is very new to the United States (US), DEQ recognizes that the pool of quali�ied candidates for this work is extremely limited. Due to the very limited candidate pool and simultaneous rapid proliferation of contract opportunities involved with setting up packaging EPR systems in Oregon and three other US states, DEQ must take a more nuanced approach to avoiding con�lict of interest rather than drawing a singular bright line (for example, excluding from consideration any prospective contractor that has a contractual relationship with the PRO). Without taking such a nuanced approach, DEQ believes that it could be left without a quali�ied contractor for the project.
To enable DEQ’s distinguishing between actual and potential con�lict of interest, the Contractor must include a Con�lict of Interest Assessment (Attachment J) in its Offer.
In this assessment, the Contractor should describe any projects it has undertaken or may undertake that could pose either an actual or potential con�lict of interest. The following pertinent details should be included for any such project:
• A detailed description of the subject matter that has been/is being/will be focused on.
• A detailed description of the Contractor’s role, including the level of effort and time period of engagement.
• A description of how the Contractor’s engagement has been formalized, i.e., is the organization a direct contractor or a subcontractor, who is the contract with, and is the engagement at the organizational level or the individual level (i.e., through an individual consulting agreement).
For each project that could pose a con�lict of interest, the Contractor should describe any mechanisms that it would use to prevent a con�lict of interest from arising, such as through transparent decision-making.
3.4.9 Public Record/Confidential or Proprietary Information
SECTION 6: LIST OF ATTACHMENTS
ATTACHMENT J CONFLICT OF INTEREST ASSESSMENT
OregonBuys Bid Solicitation #S-34000-00015010 Page 3 of 5
C. The Bid Solicitation is hereby amended to add the attached ATTACHMENT J - CONFLICT OF INTEREST
ASSESSMENT.
D. Except as expressly amended above, all other specifications, terms and conditions of original solicitation notice and previous addenda are still in full force and effect.
OregonBuys Bid Solicitation #S-34000-00015010 Page 4 of 5
ATTACHMENT J — CONFLICT OF INTEREST ASSESSMENT
PROJECT 1: [Name] Name of �irm that has solicited / is soliciting /will solicit the work:
Dates of project:
Role of prospective Contractor in project (contractor / sub-contractor / other (describe)):
How is the prospective Contractor’s role formalized? (i.e., contract with [indicate entity], fee for service, etc.):
Level of effort (total amount of hours, number of FTEs, etc):
Detailed description of prospective Contractor’s scope of work:
Does the project represent an actual or potential con�lict of interest? Why or why not? (describe in detail):
If the project does represent a potential con�lict of interest, what mechanisms does the prospective Contractor propose to employ in order to limit the con�lict of interest? (describe in detail):
PROJECT 2: [Name]
Dates of project:
Role of prospective Contractor in project (contractor / sub-contractor / other (describe)):
How is the prospective Contractor’s role formalized? (i.e., contract with [indicate entity], fee for service, etc.):
Level of effort (total amount of hours, number of FTEs, etc):
Detailed description of prospective Contractor’s scope of work:
Does the project represent an actual or potential con�lict of interest? Why or why not? (describe in detail):
PROJECT 3: [Name]
Dates of project:
Role of prospective Contractor in project (contractor / sub-contractor / other (describe)):
How is the prospective Contractor’s role formalized? (i.e., contract with [indicate entity], fee for service, etc.):
Level of effort (total amount of hours, number of FTEs, etc):
Detailed description of prospective Contractor’s scope of work:
Does the project represent an actual or potential con�lict of interest? Why or why not? (describe in detail):
OregonBuys Bid Solicitation #S-34000-00015010 Page 5 of 5
PROJECT 4: [Name]
Dates of project:
Role of prospective Contractor in project (contractor / sub-contractor / other (describe)):
How is the prospective Contractor’s role formalized? (i.e., contract with [indicate entity], fee for service, etc.):
Level of effort (total amount of hours, number of FTEs, etc):
Detailed description of prospective Contractor’s scope of work:
Does the project represent an actual or potential con�lict of interest? Why or why not? (describe in detail):
| Because extended producer responsibility (EPR) for packaging is very new to the United States (US), DEQ recognizes that the pool of qualified candidates for this work is extremely limited. Due to the very limited candidate pool and simultaneous rapid... |
| To enable DEQ’s distinguishing between actual and potential conflict of interest, the Contractor must include a Conflict of Interest Assessment (Attachment J) in its Offer. In this assessment, the Contractor should describe any projects it has underta... |
| A detailed description of the subject matter that has been/is being/will be focused on. |
| A detailed description of the Contractor’s role, including the level of effort and time period of engagement. |
| A description of how the Contractor’s engagement has been formalized, i.e., is the organization a direct contractor or a subcontractor, who is the contract with, and is the engagement at the organizational level or the individual level (i.e., throug... |
| For each project that could pose a conflict of interest, the Contractor should describe any mechanisms that it would use to prevent a conflict of interest from arising, such as through transparent decision-making. |
File details come from the government source that posted it. Updated .