Addendum_1_-_RFP_2018-0369.pdf
PDF 189 KB Posted
- Attached to
- Property and Casualty Insurance
- Solicitation number
- RFP-2018-0369
- Issued by
- Florida
About this file
This document is Addendum 1 for Request for Proposal (RFP) No. 2018-0369 issued by the City of Casselberry, Florida, seeking property and casualty insurance services. The RFP seeks to procure comprehensive insurance coverage, with the proposal due date set for August 10, 2018. The city is interested in exploring insurance options in the marketplace and has not previously bid its insurance services. The addendum provides clarifications and additional details to potential bidders, including information about the city's current insurance environment, law enforcement personnel breakdown, and specific insurance requirements.
The city's current policy premiums have been relatively stable, ranging from $645,519 in 2018 to $652,832 in 2016. The city has no reported underinsured or uninsured losses in the past three years and no major risk management concerns. The current Workers' Compensation experience modification is 1.22, and the total payroll is $9,573,175. Key details include 58 full-time law enforcement officers, a $500 All Other Perils (AOP) property deductible with no stop loss, and a Workers' Compensation arrangement with a $25,000 deductible stop loss. The addendum also clarifies various technical details about coverage, personnel, and administrative specifications to assist potential insurance providers in preparing their proposals.
View the file
Other files
| File | Type | Posted |
|---|---|---|
| RFP-2018-0369_PUR-F-216_Notice_of_Intent_to_Award.pdf | ||
| Work_Comp_Loss_Runs.xls | XLS spreadsheet | |
| Auto_Schedule_as_of_07-05-2018.xls | XLS spreadsheet | |
| Inland_Marine_Schedule_as_of_07-05-2018.xls | XLS spreadsheet | |
| Property_Schedule_as_of_07-05-2018.xls | XLS spreadsheet | |
| Liability_Loss_Runs.xlsx | XLSX spreadsheet | |
| RFP-2018-0369_-_Property_and_Casualty_Insurance.pdf | ||
| Attachment_B_-_Statement_of_Values.pdf | ||
| Attachment_C_-_Projected_Payroll.pdf | ||
| Attachment_D_-_Loss_History.pdf | ||
| Attachment_E_-_Drug_Free_Workplace.pdf | ||
| Attachment_A_-_Coverage_Document.pdf |
Show all 12
On GovTribe
Work with this file
- Download the original file
- Contacts named in this file
- Similar government files
- Ask GovTribe AI about this file
Text version
City of Casselberry
PROPERTY AND CASUALTY INSURANCE
FOR THE CITY OF CASSELBERRY
Addendum 1 for RFP No. 2018-0369
1) Last three years of Policy Premiums.
a. 2018 – $645,519
2017 – $647,286 2016 – $652,832
2) List of any underinsured or not insured losses sustained by the City in the last three years?
a. None.
3) What is the motivation for the issuance of the current RFP?
a. The City has not previously bid its insurance and is interested in what is available in the marketplace.
4) Broker Compensation for the past three years, either in the form of commissions and/or fees and/or a combination of the prior two areas? The reason we ask this question is to understand what the level of service which has been required by the City to service the needs of the City.
This will assist in helping us to understand the level of service we will need to commit to satisfy the City’s future needs.
a. All broker compensation, commission and fees are included in the policy premiums as listed in question 1.
5) What one area from a Risk Management standpoint is your greatest fear, i.e. what keeps you up at night from a Risk Management standpoint?
a. There are no major concerns at this time.
6) Are there any future construction projects over $10,000,000 that the City is planning in the near future?
a. None at this time.
7) There is a property schedule in Attachment A that is different than Attachment B. Please confirm which property schedule to use.
a. Please use the attached schedules.
8) Does the City wish to use the most current experience modification for Workers Compensation?
a. The City wants to use whatever results in the most competitively priced product.
9) Please provide a breakdown of the law enforcement personnel in the following categories.
a. Full Time with Arrest Powers - 58
Part Time with Arrest Powers - 0 Full or Part Time without Arrest Powers - 1 CSO Volunteers - 2 plus various volunteer chaplains Clerical in the Police Department - 8 Police Dogs - 0 Police Horses - 0
10) The proposal due date is shown as August 10th and August 3 on page 2 of the RFP. Can you clarify which date is correct?
a. The correct due date is August 10, 2018.
11) The FMIT policy provided in the RFP shows 57 sworn law enforcement officers. However the
City's website shows 53 sworn officers. Which number should we use for underwriting?
a. 58
12) Does the City have ride-along program in the police department?
a. Yes.
13) Are there any part time or auxiliary (volunteer) police officers?
a. No.
14) Current Workers’ Compensation Experience Mod
a. The workers’ compensation experience mod for the 18-19 period is 1.22.
15) The payroll schedule provided does not add up to the total provided. The final total on the schedule is $9,351,465 but the sum of the provided payrolls is $9,573,175. Are there any missing class codes or was the total incorrect?
a. The correct total of payroll is $9,573,175.
16) Can you provide the auto schedule in Excel?
a. Please see attached.
17) Can you provide the property schedule in Excel?
18) Can you provide more recent loss runs, preferably in Excel?
19) Can you provide claim details for claim WC2014128780 on 03/04/2014?
a. This claim is closed, it settled for $39,100, inclusive
20) What is the current AOP deductible and is there a stop loss?
a. The AOP deductible for property coverage is $500. There is no stop loss on this line of coverage.
21) On page 14 of the RFP under 11. Current Coverage Information, it states that Workers’ Compensation is a first dollar program with no retention. However on Page 18, it states that Workers’ Compensation has a $25,000 deductible stop loss with a $169,598 maximum. Can you clarify?
a. Losses are adjusted by the carrier from the ground up and a deductible is then assessed. It is a true deductible and not a self-insured retention.
File details come from the government source that posted it. Updated .