Addendum_1.pdf
PDF 305 KB Posted
- Attached to
- Phase 2 Study of the Port St. John Regional Advanced Wastewater Treatment Facility Project
- Solicitation number
- RFQ-7-25-08
- Issued by
- Brevard County, Eastpoint CDP, Florida
About this file
This is Addendum 1 for a Request for Qualifications (RFQ) issued by Brevard County Purchasing Services for the Phase 2 Study of the Port St John Regional Advanced Wastewater Treatment Facility, with the RFQ number 7-25-08. The addendum provides clarifications to questions submitted by potential proposers, addressing submission requirements such as the GSA Standard Form 330, proposal formatting, binding methods, font sizes, and project approach. The qualification opening date remains January 22, 2025, at 3:00 pm, and the county has removed the requirement for a Signed Public Entity Crime Affidavit Form.
The addendum clarifies that the county is seeking a professional engineering service to perform a study that will potentially serve as a platform for transitioning into a design phase. Key clarifications include: the project manager does not need to be a Professional Engineer, permits may be necessary during the study, and proposers should use 8-1/2 x 11-inch paper with a maximum of 5 pages for the project approach. The intent is to select a consulting firm that can provide comprehensive engineering services for a wastewater treatment facility study, with potential future design work, while maintaining specific formatting and documentation requirements for the proposal submission.
View the file
Other files
Show all 11
On GovTribe
Work with this file
- Download the original file
- Contacts named in this file
- Similar government files
- Ask GovTribe AI about this file
Text version
Purchasing Services 2725 Judge Fran Jamieson Way
Building C, Room 303 Viera, Florida 32940
Phase 2 Study of the Port St John Regional Advanced Wastewater Treatment Facility
RFQ# 7-25-08
January 13, 2025 Addendum 1
TO ALL PROSPECTIVE CONTRACTORS
This is an Addendum to and shall be considered as part of the original advertisement package for the above-mentioned Request for Qualifications. Consultants are requested to acknowledge receipt of this Addendum 1 with their submission.
CLARIFICATION TO QUESTIONS ASKED RECEIVED:
Question 1: On page 13 of the RFQ, Proposer Checklist, the 3rd item is “GSA Standard Form 330.”
Can the County confirm that it wants a completed GSA Standard Form 330 in addition to the page limited, tabbed, proposal outlined on pages 21 and 22 of the RFQ, even though this will create redundancy in resumes and project examples?
Answer 1: Only the GSA 330 is required, please indicate “refer to GSA SF 330 for resumes.”
Question 2: If the County does want a completed GSA Standard Form 330, can the County clarify in Section E of the SF 330 – Resumes of Key Personnel Proposed for this Contract- are we to only include the same resumes for the Leads we are providing resumes for in Tab 3 items #2 and #3 of the page limited proposal?
Answer 2: The GSA 330 is required. For section E. Include the Resumes for the Leads and indicate “refer to GSA SF 330 for Key Personnel resumes” on Tab 3.
Question 3: If the County does want a completed GSA Standard Form 330, can the County clarify in Section F of the SF 330 – Example Projects Which Best Illustrate Proposed Team’s Qualifications for this Contract – are we to only include the same five detailed projects we are including in Tab 4 item #2 of the page limited proposal?
Answer 3: Only the GSA 330 is required, please indicate “refer to GSA SF 330 Example Projects.”
Question 4: Under Submittal Format, on p.21, the County asks for proposals to be ‘bound in booklet style’. Can the County confirm that proposals can be spiral bound?
Answer 4: Spiral Bound is acceptable
Question 5: Can the County confirm that proposals can be spiral bound?
Answer 5: See answer to Question 4 above.
Question 6: Can font size be below 12pt on exhibits?
Phase 2 Study of the PSJ Regional Advanced WWTF
RFQ-7-25-08
January 13, 2025 Addendum 1 – Page Two
Answer 6: No. The fonts must be in at least 12-point size
Question 7: Can we use a “narrow” version of the fonts included in the list of acceptable fonts?
Answer 7: Please use the standard version of the approved fonts.
Question 8: Does the PM have to be a PE?
Answer 8: No. The PM does not need to be PE.
Question 9: The RFQ’s “General Conditions, Terms, and Provisions” uses the term “Contractor.”
“Part 1: Introduction, Background, Overview, Goals” states that “professional engineering services are required.” Is the awardee of this contract a Contractor or a professional engineer service?
Answer 9: The intent of the RFQ is to select a Professional Engineering Service to perform at study that should function as a platform to transition into the design phase if needed without much other, if any, due diligence needed.”
Question 10: On page 6 of the RFQ, “32 LICENSES, CERTIFICATIONS, AND PERMITS” states “The successful Contractor is responsible for obtaining all permits necessary to construct the project.”
Since this RFQ is to perform a Study and not construction, please confirm if construction permits will be required during the study.
Answer 10: Per page 14 of the RFQ “This study should function as a platform to transition into the design phase if needed without much other, if any, due diligence needed.” Therefore, permits may be necessary.
Question 11: The RFQ proposer checklist states the need for the GSA Standard Form 330. Please clarify which sections or parts of the SF330 forms need to be submitted.
Answer 11: See answer to question 1
Question 12: The RFQ allows one 11x17” page to be used for the organizational chart. May the proposer use an additional 11”x17” size page in the approach? If so, how many pages would this account for?
Answer 12: Please use 8-1/2 x 11-inch paper (Maximum of 5 pages) for Tab 5 Project Approach.
Phase 2 Study of the PSJ Regional Advanced WWTF
RFQ-7-25-08
January 13, 2025
Addendum 1 – Page Three
Please note that the qualification opening date and time remains January 22, 2025 @ 3:00 pm.
***Please see revised proposer checklist omitting Signed Public Entity Crime Affidavit Form, this form is not required.
All other terms and conditions remain unchanged.
Sincerely, Mary Bowers Purchasing Manager
END OF ADDENDUM NO. 1
| Phase 2 Study of the Port St John Regional Advanced Wastewater Treatment Facility |
| RFQ# 7-25-08 |
| January 13, 2025 |
| Addendum 1 |
| TO ALL PROSPECTIVE CONTRACTORS |
File details come from the government source that posted it. Updated .