ADDENDA 1.pdf
PDF 3 MB Posted
- Attached to
- Steel Materials
- Solicitation number
- S-63500-00006875
- Issued by
- Union County, Oregon
About this file
Summary
This is an Addenda #1 document issued on May 31, 2023, by the Oregon City School District #62 in response to questions submitted during the mandatory pre-bid meeting held on May 18, 2023, for Architecture/Engineering Services with a district-wide focus. The addenda clarifies 15 key questions regarding proposal requirements, selection criteria, and project scope. A pre-bid meeting attendee list (Exhibit A) identifies 29 firms and sub-consultants that participated, including primary proposers such as BRIC Architecture, Integras YGH Architecture, Bora Architecture and Interiors, Arcadis, LSW Architects, Opsis, Mahlum Architects, Soderstrom Architects, Waechter Architecture, Bassetti Architects, and Axiotecture Architecture. The scope encompasses comprehensive facility assessments and improvement planning for six elementary schools (Gaffney Lane, John McLoughlin, Beavercreek, Redland, Holcomb, and one unnamed school), three high schools (Oregon City High School, Clackamas Academy of Industrial Sciences, and King Oregon City Service Learning Academy), and two additional district facilities (District Office and Barclay Campus). The addenda confirms no page limits for proposals, clarifies that "Principal Engineer" refers to the firm providing the majority of engineering services, and states that sub-consultant approval remains subject to district determination. The anticipated construction start date for major projects at elementary schools is June 2025, contingent upon passage of a bond measure scheduled for the November 5, 2024 election.
The addenda provides detailed building assessment information for all facilities, documenting numerous condition issues including deteriorated roofing, outdated HVAC systems, non-compliant plumbing fixtures, asbestos and lead-based paint hazards, antiquated electrical panels, inefficient lighting systems, and accessibility deficiencies across all buildings. The district notes that all schedules are tentative and dependent upon the bond election outcome and resource availability. The selection committee will evaluate proposals based on criteria including similar project experience in Oregon and Western Washington (15 points), skills and experience of proposed team members with various stakeholders (15 points), and collective, concise, and comprehensive presentation of information. The district confirmed its willingness to share pre-design documents from previous middle school projects (Tumwata and Gardiner) with the selected firm and indicated that it will evaluate and select the most appropriate construction delivery method for each project package individually.
View the file
Other files
On GovTribe
Work with this file
- Download the original file
- Contacts named in this file
- Similar government files
- Ask GovTribe AI about this file
Text version
ADDENDA #1 – May 31, 2023
Architecture/Engineering Services District Wide Focus
Oregon City School District
1. Will there be an attendee list provided from the mandatory pre-bid meeting? (Submitted by multiple agencies)
Yes, please see attached Exhibit A, pages 3-5
2. Will the assessments sheets for the elementaries, high school, and admin buildings be made available? (Submitted by Mahlum Architecture)
Yes, please see attached Exhibit B, pages 6-19
3. For projects commencing June 2025, what is the anticipated bid date? (Submitted by Arcadis
Architects)
There is not an anticipated bid date at this time. This will be determined during the design phase.
4. Is there a page count for this proposal? If so, what is/what is not excluded from the page count?
(Submitted by Opsis Architecture, Interiors & Planning)
There are no page number limits for proposals. However, be mindful of the scoring criteria of “G.
Selection Criteria, 1, a, viii – Collective, concise and comprehensive presentation of information.”
5. Regarding project experience, do we want to see similar project types, pre-bond services experience, or both? (Submitted by Opsis Architecture, Interiors & Planning)
We would like to see all experience you feel would be pertinent to this project.
6. On page 10, in the G. Selection Criteria section, the RFP says: (iii). Similar Oregon and Western Washington projects completed by the Principal Architect, Principal Engineer, and Project Manager (15 pts). – How is Principal Engineer defined? For example, is this the lead Civil Engineer, what about Structural, MEP engineers? (Submitted by Opsis Architecture, Interiors & Planning) “Principal Engineer” is defined as the engineering firm providing the majority of engineering services.
7. On page 9/10, in the G. Selection Criteria section, the RFP says: (ii). Skills and experience including presentations to various stakeholders at their interest levels (school board, staff, community), and time working together of the proposed project team (15 pts). – Does this refer to just the
Architectural project team or does this mean the entire team, i.e. time working with subs on the team as well? (Submitted by Opsis Architecture, Interiors & Planning)
“Time working together of the proposed project team” refers, at a minimum, to the architectural project team but could be expanded to include the sub-consultants working with the architectural team.
8. Can you please provide some clarification regarding what you are looking for regarding subconsultants. Per page 9, Section F. Proposal Requirements, Question #10, each subconsultant included is required to have multiple pieces of information, including project examples. But you also mention that you will be involved in the final selection of all subs and will determine whether they will be on the team for the Project.
Inclusion of sub-consultant information does not mean those sub-consultants would be automatically approved. The District wants to be clear that the District will need to approve all sub-consultants who are part of the professional services covered under this RFP.
9. On page 4, Section B - Scope of Work the RFP lists a handful of “anticipated services” and says to refer to the Matrix of Services in Attachment B for more services. Attachment B has a large amount of services/disciplines listed.
Page 4, Section B – Scope of Work provides a representation of anticipated services with Matrix of
Services in Attachment B providing a more complete list.
10. Are we supposed to list subconsultants for every service listed under A/E Basic Services and/or
Supplemental Services? If not, can you please be specific regarding what services you would like us to include? (Submitted by Opsis Architecture, Interiors & Planning)
You should list all sub-consultants you would utilize for every service under the A/E basic services.
If there is a service where you would not utilize a sub-consultant, then there would be no sub-consultant listed.
11. Can you please provide clarification on targeted completion dates? Per the RFP on page 4, the tentative schedule targets “June 2025 for major construction to commence at several elementary schools.” Would that then mean that most of the design services take place before November 2024 as well? Working on a tentative schedule for our approach, and this targeted completion date puts the design start on or around February 2024 in order to secure permits and be completed by June
2025. (Submitted by Bora Architecture & Interiors)
As stated in the RFP, the School District is in the process of planning for a future bond anticipated for the November 5, 2024 election. The schedules listed in the RFP are tentative, as stated, and all depend on the outcome of the election for the bond and the availability of resources for pre-bond planning and design.
12. What construction delivery method is the District planning to use for these projects? (Submitted by
Bora Architecture & Interiors)
The District will evaluate each construction project/s package and determine the best construction delivery method for that particular package.
13. I don’t see a page limit in the RFP, can you please confirm there are no page limits? And, if there are page limits, please clarify anything that is exempted from those limits (required forms, for example).
(Submitted by Bora Architecture & Interiors) There are no page number limits for proposals. However, be mindful of the scoring criteria of “G.
Selection Criteria, 1, a, viii – Collective, concise and comprehensive presentation of information.”
14. Would the District be willing to share any pre-design documents from the previous middle schools (Tumwata and Gardiner)? (Submitted by Bora Architecture & Interiors) The District would be willing to share these documents with the firm, once they are selected.
15. We understand that the selection committee will be awarding points for the “Collective, concise, and comprehensive presentation of information.” In addition to prioritizing brevity, can the District confirm whether there are specific parameters around the proposal’s page limit that proposers ought to abide by? (Submitted by BRIC Architecture, Inc.)
There are no page number limits for proposals. However, be mindful of the scoring criteria of “G.
Selection Criteria, 1, a, viii – Collective, concise and comprehensive presentation of information.”
SIGN IN SHEET
ADDENDA #1 - MAY 31, 2023
EXHIBIT A
OREGON CITY SCHOOL DISTRICT #62
2023 ARCHITECT AND ENGINEERING SERVICES RFP
MANDATORY PRE BID MEETING - MAY 18, 2023
FIRM NAME PRIMARY
(Yes / No)
NAME PHONE # EMAIL
KCL Engineering No Mark Blanchette 503-212-4612 mblanchette@kclengineering.com
BRIC Architecture Yes David Johnson 716-523-1609 david.johnson@bric-arch.com
Integras YGH
Architecture
Yes Tom Robbins 503-221-0150 tom@ygh.com
Protocad Design No Todd Given 503-475-8147 t.m.given@protocad.inc.com
Bora Architecture and
Interiors
Yes Stefee Knudsen 503-740-6509 stefee.knudsen@bora.co
Interface Engineering No Jim McClelland 503-382-2745 jimm@interfaceeng.com
Studio Petretti
Architecture
No Jeff Vincent 503-488-5430 jeff@studiopetretti.com
Lancaster Mobley No Todd Mobley 503-248-0313 todd@lancastermobley.com
Pages 3
3J Consulting No Mercedes Serra 541-999-7870 mercedes.serra@3jconsulting.org
Arcadis Yes Kristine Merkel Hein 435-705-1079 kristine.merkel@arcadis.com
LSW Architects Yes Jason Olson 360-907-4681 jason@lswarchitects.com
OHPD Yes Nick Hadfield 530-651-4336 nick.hadfield@ohpd.net
Opsis Yes Randall Heeb 503-943-6226 randall@opsisarch.com
Mahlum Architects Yes Rene Berndt 503-224-4032
503-548-2242 rberndt@mahlum.com
Mahlum Architects Yes Alyssa Leeviraphan 503-224-4032 alyssal@mahlum.com
Mahlum Architects Yes Leroy Landers 503-224-4032 llanders@mahlum.com
Miller Consulting
Engineers
No 503-246-1450 sommer@miller-se.com
GRI No Thomas Odell 503-929-5336 todell@gri.com
PCS Structural No Steven Williams 503-232-3746 swilliams@pcs-structural.com
Soderstrom Architects Yes Andy Bonesz 503-595-2532 andyb@sdra.com
Waechter Architecture Yes Yuki Bowman
Keith Alnwick
503-388-9825
503-388-9404 yuki@waechterarchitecture.com keith@waechterarchitecture.com
Pages 4
Bassetti Architects Yes Joe Echeverin
Nate Hidalgo
503-224-9162 jecheverin@bassettiarch.com nhilda@bassettiarch.com
Lango Hansen
Landscape Architect
No Brian Martin 503-553-9242 brian@langohansen.com
Axiotecture
Architecture
Yes Rick Larson 503-336-0560 rlarosa@axiotecture.com
3J Consulting No Chase Welborn 503-946-9365 chase.welborn@3j-consulting.com
Pages 5
OREGON CITY SCHOOL TOURS
Gaffney Lane Elementary School 13521 Gaffney Lane, Oregon City, OR 97045
BUILDING SIZE:
Main Building: 55,898 SF Modular Classrooms: 1,800 SF
SITE: 10 Acres
YEAR CONSTRUCTED: 1965
ADDITIONS:
Main Entrance Vestibule & Canopy:
2020 (as part of 2018 Bond Implementation) Service Areas: Unknown Classrooms: 1974
CAPACITY**:
Main Building: 562 Students Modular Classroom: 56 Students
2020 SAFETY & SECURITY UPGRADE,
AND BUILDING IMPROVEMENTS:
Secure the site perimeter with fencing New pavement at front of building Accessible route to building entrance New Entrance Canopy Secure Vestibule at Main Building Entrance Renovation of Library to create Maker Space Administrative Office Area Remodel Some roof replacement (to address critical issues)
**Based on 2016 Facility Assessment and LRFAC Report
SERVICE SERVICE
ENTRYENTRY
MAIN MAIN
ENTRYENTRY
COVERED COVERED
PLAYPLAY
Gaff ney
Lan e
Gaff ney
Lan e
SITE PLAN
© 2023 BRIC Architecture All rights reserved
@bric-arch@bric_arch
CLASSROOMS
CLASSROOMS
CLASSROOMS
CLASSROOMS
LIBRARY
MAKER
SPACE
KINDER-
GARTEN
STAGE/
CR
KITCHEN
ADMIN
CLASSROOMS
CLASSROOMS
CAFETERIA
MAIN
ENTRY
GYMNASIUM
FLOOR PLAN
BUILDING ASSESSMENT: MAIN BUILDING
Issues Comments ROM Architectural Deteriorating Masonry Clean and repair areas with damaged
Masonry $220K
Single pane glazing at Exterior Windows in some areas
Upgrade exterior glazing to improve energy efficiency
$140K
Many areas of the roof have reached their end of life
Most roof areas are ready for replacement
$1.7M
Some building areas have sub standard wheelchair accessibility
Remodeling as required to improve access to Gym and ELD program.
$100K
Damaged and non-compliant door hardware
Replace selected exterior and interior door hardware
$80K
Existing vinyl asbestos tile Removal of hazardous materials is required in areas of remodel
$160K
Existing interior walls and ceilings are worn
Replace damaged ceiling tiles, patch & repair and paint walls
$100K
Chipped laminate and broken hardware
Replace counter tops and repair as needed
$60K
Plumbing Non-compliant plumbing fixtures Update toilet rooms to meet accessibility needs $85K
Water distribution piping is mostly from original construction
Replace galvanized piping $160K
Sanitary waste piping is mostly from original construction
Portions of the system are failing and ready to be replaced
$125K
Mechanical Building heating is provided by electric resistance heating. Ventilation is typically provide by passive relief or through unit ventilators
Repair in-room ventilators and heaters $165K
Original pneumatic HVAC controls Update HVAC controls to provide central and remote monitoring
$195K
Mechanical Existing electrical panels are outdated Replace electrical panels for safety concerns $430K
Update Classroom Lighting to LED fixtures and controls
Energy Trust of Oregon offers incentives to school districts to upgrade to LED lighting
$320K
BUILDING ASSESSMENT: MODULAR CLASSROOMS
Some accessibility updates needed Replace some plumbing fixtures, handrail at ramp $10K
Exterior repairs - walls and roof Patch, repair and paint $20K Replace outdated interior finishes $20K
OREGON CITY LONG-RANGE CAPITAL PLANNING COMMITTEE (LR-CPC)
John McLoughlin Elementary School 19230 South End Road, Oregon City, OR 97045
BUILDING SIZE:
Main Building: 55,100 SF Modular Classrooms: 900 SF
SITE: 12 Acres
YEAR CONSTRUCTED: 1975
ADDITIONS:
2021 Classrooms
CAPACITY**:
Main Building: 644 Students Modular Classroom: 28 Students
2020 SAFETY & SECURITY UPGRADE,
AND BUILDING IMPROVEMENTS:
Secure the kinder play area with fencing New school bus arrival student entrance Accessible route to building entrance Secure Vestibule at main building entrance Administrative office area remodel Accessible toilet rooms
STUDENT STUDENT
BUS BUS
ENTRYENTRY
MAIN MAIN
ENTRYENTRY
COVERED COVERED
PLAYPLAY
SITE PLAN
© 2023 BRIC Architecture All rights reserved
@bric-arch@bric_arch
**Based on 2016 Facility Assessment and LRFAC Report
CLASSROOMS
CLASSROOMS
CLASSROOMS
CLASSROOMSCLASSROOMS
MEDIA
CENTER
KINDER
PLAY
AREA
MUSIC
KINDER-
GARTEN
KINDER-
GARTEN
SPECIAL
ED
KITCHEN
ADMIN CAFETERIA
MAIN
ENTRY
STUDENT
BUS
ENTRY
COVERED
PLAY
GYMNASIUM
FLOOR PLAN
BUILDING ASSESSMENT: MAIN BUILDING
Issues Comments Site Update Parking Lot Lighting to LED fixtures Energy Trust of Oregon offers incentives to school districts to upgrade to LED lighting
Architectural Single pane glazing at Exterior Windows in some areas
Upgrade exterior glazing to double pane $ $
Many areas of the roof have reached their end of life
Most roof areas are ready for replacement $ $
Damaged and non-compliant door hardware
Replace selected exterior and interior door hardware
Existing carpet is worn Replace carpet in selected areas $ $ Stained and damaged ceiling tiles Replace ceiling tiles and upgrade the support grid $ Existing non-compliant student toilet room Complete remodel including compartments and finishes
Chipped laminate and broken hardware Repair or replace as needed $ Plumbing Non-compliant and some inoperable plumbing fixtures
Replace or repair broken fixtures and update toilet rooms to meet accessibility needs
Water distribution piping is galvanized and mostly from original building construction
Replace galvanized piping $ $
Sanitary piping is mostly from original building construction
Snake sanitary system, clean blockages, replace portions of the system found to be failing
Mechanical Boiler is standard efficiency operating at end of life expectancy
Replace boiler with high efficiency condensing boiler
Air handlers and ductwork are mostly from original building construction with a lack of ventilation
Replace the handlers and revise ductwork for minimum ventilation
Mostly original pneumatic HVAC controls Update HVAC controls to provide central and remote monitoring and control
Electrical Existing electrical panels by manufacturer Federal Pacific Electrical Company are obsolete
Replace aging panels $
Existing classroom lighting is inadequate for a learning environment due to low light levels and conflicting lamp color temperatures
Replace classroom fluorescent lighting with LED, Energy Trust of Oregon offers incentives to school districts to upgrade to LED lighting
Outdated lighting controls in classrooms Replace with dimming light switches, occupancy sensors and daylight sensors to reduce energy usage
BUILDING ASSESSMENT: MODULAR CLASSROOMS
HVAC controls are not tied to district DDC system
Update HVAC controls to have remote monitoring and control
Key: $ = <$100K; $$ = $100-500K; $$$ = $500k-1M; $$$$ = >$1MNote: Costs provided were generated by State of Oregon Department of Education Worksheet.
Beavercreek Elementary School 21944 S Yeoman Road, Beavercreek, OR 97004
BUILDING SIZE:
Main Building: 55,700 SF Modular Classrooms: Not Applicable
SITE: 9 Acres
YEAR CONSTRUCTED: 1948
ADDITIONS:
1956 - 6,000 SF Gym/Cafeteria 1968 - 9,500 SF Classrooms 1974 - 29,000 SF Classrooms 2000 - 8,400 SF Classrooms & Gym
CAPACITY**:
Main Building: 577 Students
**Based on 2016 Facility Assessment and LRFAC Report
SERVICE SERVICE
ENTRYENTRY
MAIN MAIN
ENTRYENTRY
COVERED COVERED
PLAYPLAY
SITE PLAN
© 2023 BRIC Architecture All rights reserved
@bric-arch@bric_arch
2020 SAFETY & SECURITY UPGRADE,
AND BUILDING IMPROVEMENTS:
Secure Vestibule at Main Building Entrance Secure site perimeter Administrative office area remodel New classroom Staff lounge
MEDIA
CENTER CR
CR
CR
CRCRCR
CR
CR
CR
RESOURCE
ROOM
CR
CRCRCRCR
CR
CR
CR
CR
CR
MUSIC
CR
CR WELLNESS
WELLNESS
KITCHEN
ADMIN
CAFETERIA
MAIN
ENTRY
GYM
COVERED
PLAY
FLOOR PLAN
BUILDING ASSESSMENT: MAIN BUILDING
Issues Comments Site Cracked uneven paving in parking lot Resurface parking lot $ Site Lighting Replace selected fixtures $ Architectural Excessive cracking at interior slab on grade in multipurpose room
Cafeteria use makes it difficult to keep floors clean. Replace slab
Exterior painting needed Patch and repair of masonry and wood siding needed as preparation for painting
Single pane glazing at Exterior Windows in some areas
Upgrade exterior glazing to double pane $ $
Many areas of the roof have reached their end of life
Several roof areas are ready for replacement
Damaged and non-compliant door hardware Replace selected exterior and interior door hardware
Existing carpet is worn Replace carpet in selected areas $ $ Damaged ceiling tiles $ $ Existing non-compliant student toilet room
Chipped laminate and broken hardware $ Plumbing Non-compliant and some inoperable plumbing fixtures
Replace/repair broken fixtures and update toilet rooms to meet accessibility needs
Water distribution piping is galvanized and mostly from original building construction
Replace galvanized piping $ $
Sanitary piping is mostly from original building construction
Snake sanitary system, clear blockages, replace portions of the system found to be failing
Mechanical Unit ventilators and radiators are mostly original to building construction
Replace aging equipment $ $
Electrical Existing electrical panels installed in 1975 are obsolete
Replace aging equipment $ $
Outdated classroom lighting Replace classroom lighting with LED and provide dimming light switches. Energy Trust of Oregon offers incentives to school districts to upgrade to LED lighting
Outdated classroom lighting controls Replace with dimming light switches, occupancy sensors and daylight sensors to reduce energy usage
Key: Bolded = High Priority; $ = <$100K; $$ = $100-500K; $$$ = $500k-1M; $$$$ = >$1M
Note: Costs provided were generated by State of Oregon Department of Education Worksheet. Page 11
Redland Elementary School
Ph ot o Cr ed it
: h tt ps oc sc ho ol bo nd
.o rg
18131 S Redland Road, Oregon City, OR 97045
BUILDING SIZE:
Main Building: 60,984 SF Modular Classrooms: Not Applicable
SITE: 9 Acres
YEAR CONSTRUCTED: 1948
ADDITIONS:
1966 - Classrooms 1971 - Classrooms 1990 - Classrooms 2020 - Relocated Administration Under Existing Covered Play Roof
CAPACITY**:
Main Building: 534 Students
**Based on 2016 Facility Assessment and LRFAC Report
MAIN MAIN
ENTRYENTRY
COVERED COVERED
PLAYPLAY
SITE PLAN
© 2023 BRIC Architecture All rights reserved
@bric-arch@bric_arch
2020 SAFETY & SECURITY UPGRADE,
AND BUILDING IMPROVEMENTS:
Secure Vestibule at Main Building Entrance Administrative Office Area Remodel Classroom Addition Interior Ramps
S Redland School Rd
S Redland School Rd
LIBRARY
CR CR CR
CR
CR
CR
CR
CR
CR
CR
CR
CR
CR
CR
CR
CR
CR
CR
CR
CR
CR
CR
CR
CR
COMPUTER
ROOM
STAGE
MUSICKITCHEN
ADMIN
ADMIN
CAFETERIA
MAIN
ENTRY
GYMNASIUM
FLOOR PLAN
BUILDING ASSESSMENT: MAIN BUILDING
Issues Comments Site Portions of parking lot asphalt paving is cracking and should be replaced
Architectural Excessive cracking at boiler room slab on grade
Exterior wood and masonry need to be painted $ All areas of the roof have reached their end of life and need to be replaced
Single pane glazing at exterior windows in some areas Upgrade exterior glazing to double pane $ $ Damaged and non-compliant door hardware Replace selected exterior and interior door hardware
Existing vinyl asbestos tile Vinyl asbestos tile needs to be removed in areas of remodel
Carpet is worn and ready to be replaced $ Damaged ceiling tiles $ $ Existing non-compliant student toilet room
Chipped laminate and broken hardware $ $ Plumbing Broken and/or non-compliant plumbing fixtures
Replace/repair broken fixtures and update toilet rooms to meet accessibility needs
Water distribution piping is mostly original construction
Replace galvanized piping $ $ $
Sanitary piping is mostly from original building construction
Snake sanitary system, clear blockages, replace portions of the system found to be failing
Mechanical Heating is by standard efficiency oil boiler with distribution mostly original to building construction
Replace boiler with high efficiency condensing boiler and replace distribution piping
Unit ventilators and radiators are mostly original to building construction
Replace aging equipment $ $
Mostly original pneumatic HVAC controls Update HVAC controls to provide central and remote monitoring and control
Electrical Existing electrical panels by manufacturer Zinsco are obsolete
Replace aging equipment $ $
Outdated lighting Replace classroom lighting with LED and provide dimming light switches. Energy Trust of Oregon offers incentives to school districts to upgrade to LED lighting
Outdated lighting controls Replace with dimming light switches, occupancy sensors and daylight sensors to reduce energy usage
Key: Bolded = High Priority; $ = <$100K; $$ = $100-500K; $$$ = $500k-1M; $$$$ = >$1MNote: Costs provided were generated by State of Oregon Department of Education Worksheet.
Holcomb Elementary School 14625 Holcomb Boulevard, Oregon City, OR 97045
BUILDING SIZE:
Main Building: 52,100 SF Modular Classrooms: 2,900 SF
SITE: 10 Acres
YEAR CONSTRUCTED: 1966
ADDITIONS:
Classrooms: 1974 Classrooms: 2001
CAPACITY**:
Main Building: 480 Students Modular Classroom: 84 Students
2020 SAFETY & SECURITY UPGRADE,
AND BUILDING IMPROVEMENTS:
Secure Vestibule at Main Building Entrance Administrative Office Area Remodel
SERVICE SERVICE
ENTRYENTRY
MAIN MAIN
ENTRYENTRY
COVERED COVERED
PLAYPLAY
SITE PLAN
© 2023 BRIC Architecture All rights reserved
@bric-arch@bric_arch **Based on 2016 Facility Assessment and LRFAC Report
LIBRARY
COMPUTER
LAB
KITCHEN
ADMIN
CRCRCR
CRCRCR
CRCR
CR
CR CR
CR
CR
CR
KINDER-
GARTEN
CR
CR
CR
CR
CR
GYM
CR CR CR
CAFETERIA
BUILDING ASSESSMENT: MAIN BUILDING
Issues Comments Architectural Wood siding is deteriorating and ready to be replaced
Mortar areas in disrepair Minor masonry repairs needed $ Single pane glazing at Exterior Windows in some areas
Upgrade exterior glazing to double pane
Many areas of the roof have reached their end of life
Most roof areas are ready for replacement
Damaged and non-compliant door hardware Replace selected exterior and interior door hardware
Existing vinyl asbestos tile Vinyl asbestos tile needs to be removed in areas of remodel
Damaged ceiling tiles and areas to be painted $ Existing non-compliant student toilet rooms $ $ Chipped laminate and broken hardware $ Plumbing Broken and/or non-compliant plumbing fixtures
Water distribution piping is mostly original construction
Replace galvanized piping $ $
Sanitary piping is mostly form original building
Snake sanitary system, clear blockages, replace portions of the system found to be failing
Mechanical Heating is by standard efficiency oil boiler with distribution mostly original to building construction
Replace boiler with high efficiency condensing boiler and replace distribution piping
Unit ventilators and radiators are mostly original to building construction
Replace aging equipment $ $
Mostly original pneumatic HVAC Controls Update HVAC controls to provide central and remote monitoring
Electrical Existing electrical panels are outdated Replace electrical panels for safety concerns
Update Classroom Lighting to LED fixtures and controls
Energy Trust of Oregon offers incentives to school districts to upgrade to LED lighting
BUILDING ASSESSMENT: MODULAR CLASSROOMS
General condition of the modular classrooms is poor. Issues range from sub-structure, exterior envelope, and interior environment concerns
Modular classroom buildings have reached the end of their useful life
Key: Bolded = High Priority; $ = <$100K; $$ = $100-500K; $$$ = $500k-1M; $$$$ = >$1M Note: Costs provided were generated by State of Oregon Department of Education Worksheet.
MAIN
ENTRY
MODULAR
CLASSROOMS
FLOOR PLAN
FLOOR PLAN
COVERED
PLAY
Note: Costs provided were generated by State of Oregon Department of Education Worksheet.
BUILDING ASSESSMENT: MAIN BUILDING
Issues
Architectural
Deteriorated ends of exterior
Single pane glazing at exterior windows in some areas
Some roof areas are ready for replacement and other roof repairs
Comments
Upgrade exterior glazing to double pane
Damaged and non-compliant door hardware Replace selected exterior and interior door hardware
Cracked floor tiles
.. Oarna&ed nd stained �eiling tiles. ..
Replace existing VAT in areas with cracked tiles
Existing non-compliant student toilet Complete remodel of student toilet rooms _ roorri� nec1� �uildiri� ent�)' ..
Chipped laminate and broken hardware
Plumbing
Non-compliant and some inoperable plumbing fixtures
Water distribution piping is galvanized and
.. m ostly from ori&in�l building constru�tion
Sanitary piping is mostly from original building construction
Mechanical
Boiler is standard efficiency operating at end of life expectancy
Unit ventilators and radiators are
.. ITlo�tlyoriginal tc,.� uil�in�.
con�tru�tiori.
Mostly original pneumatic HVAC controls
Electrical
Outdated classroom lighting
Replace/repair broken fixtures and update toilet rooms to meet accessibility needs
Replace galvanized piping
Snake sanitary system, clear blockages, replace portions of the system found to be failing
Replace boiler with high efficiency cc,ndensin� �oilE!r
Replace aging equipment
Update HVAC controls to provide central and remote monitoring and control
Replace classroom lighting with LED and provide dimming light switches. Energy Trust of Oregon offers incentives to school districts to upgrade to LED li&�tin&
Outdated classroom lighting controls Replace with dimming light switches, occupancy sensors and daylight sensors to reduce energy usage
BUILDING ASSESSMENT: MODULAR CLASSROOM BUILDING
Mechanical Update HVAC controls to and connect $ to central system
Key: Bolded = High Priority; $ = <$100K; $$ = $100-SOOK; $$$ = $500k-1M; $$$$ = >$1M
OREGON CITY LONG-RANGE CAPITAL PLANNING COMMITTEE (LR-CPC): HIGH SCHOOLS SUMMARY
Oregon City High School
19761 S Beavercreek Road, Oregon City, OR 97045 Clackamas Academy of Industrial Sciences (CAIS) - Jackson B & C
1306 12th Street, Oregon City, OR 97045 King Oregon City Service Learning Academy (OCSLA)
995 South End Road, Oregon City, OR 97045
FCI* Unknown FCI 2016 Rank 4/5 Building B: 25.5% FCI; Building C: 28.5% FCI Unknown FCI 2016 Rank 3/5
Bu ild in g
D at a Main Building: 326,007 SF Site: 63.43 Acres Constructed: Old Moss Building 1967
High School 2003 Additions: 2020 CTE Area Remodel
Main Building Capacity: 2,500
Based on 2016 LRFAC Report
Building B: 33,100 SF Building C: 55,000 SF Site: 3 Acres Constructed: Building B 1960
Building C 1948
Capacity: Building B ????
Building C ????
Based on 2016 LRFAC Report
Main Building: 44,200 SF Site: 8.65 Acres Constructed: 1958
Capacity: ????
Based on 2016 LRFAC Report
Fa ci lit y
Co nd it io n A ss es sm en t
Site:
| ɚ Grade and drainage issues |
| ɚ Completed Landscape and other improvements to meet current City code requirements |
Site:
| ɚ Portions of pedestrian paving is cracking and should be replaced |
| ɚ Portions of roadway and loading dock asphalt paving is cracking and should be replaced |
Site: None
Building:
| ɚ Worn exterior paint including doors, downspouts, concrete walls and canopies |
| ɚ Masonry in disrepair (Some flashing and exterior masonry issues) |
| ɚ Worn interior finishes including flooring, paint, counter tops and ceilings |
| ɚ Building systems are 20 years old and may soon require life cycle maintenance and |
replacement
Building:
ɚ Building C: Excessive cracking at interior slab on grade and some cracked concrete wall panels at Gym. Some spalling of skim coat and paint.
ɚ Building B: Worn paint on concrete wall panels. Masonry repairs needed (Building B roof scheduled for replacement 2023)
| ɚ Majority of roof areas are at end of life and failing |
| ɚ Worn interior finishes including flooring, paint, counter tops and ceilings |
| ɚ Original galvanized piping |
| ɚ Clogged sanitary waste piping |
| ɚ Shop spaces not designed for today’s equipment and need ventilation, power and other |
upgrades ɚ Existing main switchgear and electrical panels installed in 1975 are obsolete
Building:
| ɚ Majority of roof is at end of life |
| ɚ Worn paint on exterior including covered play |
| ɚ Worn interior finishes including flooring, paint, counter tops and ceilings primarily in |
classrooms ɚ Original galvanized piping
Sa fe ty
Se cu ri ty
| ɚ 2023 Security vestibule was added (Security glazing and film) |
| ɚ Student movement presents challenges relative to Safety & Security |
| ɚ 2023 Camera systems provided to address challenging issues relative to supervision |
(Additional cameras are planned)
| ɚ Damaged or outdated door hardware on exterior and interior |
| ɚ Poor site circulation & directional signage |
ɚ 2018 Security vestibule and perimeter fencing were provided (especially at early childhood program)
Ac ce ss ib ili ty ɚ Facility was constructed to be fully accessible ɚ No striping and/or signage for ADA parking and van accessible spaces
| ɚ Non-compliant student and staff toilet rooms |
| ɚ No directional signage to accessible features (Building C entrance is not accessible) |
| ɚ Some remaining non-compliant student and staff toilet rooms |
| ɚ No directional signage to accessible features |
| ɚ Remaining accessibility issues at play fields |
| ɚ 2018 ramp to provide access to covered play improved access to outdoor classroom |
Ha rm fu l
Su bs ta nc
| es | ɚ Unlikely to be present due to newer age of the building | ɚ Lead based paint and asbestos are present and actively managed |
| ɚ Cracked areas with VAT | ||
| ɚ Radon levels are within range |
| ɚ Lead based paint and asbestos are present and actively managed |
| ɚ Radon levels are within range |
En er gy E ff ic ie nc y
| ɚ Inefficient fluorescent classroom lighting |
| ɚ HVAC equipment is newer |
| ɚ Lighting is not tied to direct digital control (DDC) system |
| ɚ HVAC system meets 2000 era standards relative to efficiency |
| ɚ HVAC controls are tied to direct digital control (DDC) system |
| ɚ Exterior single pane glazing |
| ɚ Inefficient fluorescent Lighting |
| ɚ Inefficient HVAC equipment |
- Building B: Air handlers are original to building or operating at end of expected life
- Building C: Central plant equipment (including boiler and chiller) and distribution are original to building construction and at end of life. Air handlers, fans, and ductwork are mostly original to building construction ɚ HVAC & lighting controls not tied to direct digital control (DDC) system
| ɚ Exterior single pane glazing |
| ɚ Inefficient fluorescent classroom lighting |
| ɚ Inefficient parking lot lighting |
| ɚ Inefficient HVAC equipment |
| ɚ HVAC and lighting controls not tied to direct digital control (DDC) system |
N ot es
*A facility condition index (FCI) is an industry standard metric that serves as an objective benchmark following a facility condition assessment. FCI is calculated by taking the total cost of existing renewal/repair cost and dividing this number by the total estimate replacement value. Page 18
OREGON CITY LONG-RANGE CAPITAL PLANNING COMMITTEE (LR-CPC): OTHER DISTRICT FACILITIES District Office
1417 12th Street, Oregon City, OR 97045 Barclay Campus
817 12th Street, Oregon City, OR 97045
FCI* 22.8% FCI Main Building: 51.9% FCI; Gym: 62.0% FCI
Bu ild in g
D at a Main Building: 7,640 SF Site: 13 Acres (includes the Stadium) Constructed: Unknown Additions: 1976 (2-story addition)
Main Building: 23,750 SF Gym Building: 2,800 SF Site: 2 Acres Constructed: 1936
Upgrades:
2018 (seismic upgrades & lower level remodel) 2020 (Boys toilet remodel)
Historic Buildings
Fa ci lit y
Co nd it io n A ss es sm en t
Site: Portions of pedestrian paving are cracking Site: Existing publicly owned storm water piping run under gym building ɚ Site drainage issues on play field
Building:
| ɚ Cracks in foundation |
| ɚ Deteriorated areas of Masonry wall |
| ɚ Areas of roof are failing |
| ɚ Worn interior finishes including flooring, paint, counter tops and ceilings |
| ɚ Clogged sanitary waste piping from original construction and has had backups in the past |
| ɚ Building is significantly over capacity |
| ɚ Existing electrical panels installed in 1975 are obsolete |
Building:
| ɚ Gym foundation and roof need repair and structural upgrades |
| ɚ Roof is at end of life |
| ɚ Worn interior finishes including flooring, paint, counter tops and ceilings |
| ɚ Clogged sanitary waste piping from original construction |
| ɚ Existing electrical panels installed in 1975 are obsolete |
| ɚ Some elements may need to be upgraded to meet historic guidelines |
| ɚ Significant siding and window issues |
Sa fe ty
Se cu ri ty ɚ Separate entrance to lower level
| ɚ No secure vestibule at main entry |
| ɚ No direct view of parking from main office |
Ac ce ss ib ili ty ɚ No striping and/or signage for ADA parking and van accessible spaces
| ɚ Non-compliant door hardware in some areas |
| ɚ Non-compliant single use toilets |
| ɚ No directional signage to accessible features |
| ɚ No elevator to access lower level conference |
| ɚ No striping and/or signage for ADA parking and van accessible spaces |
| ɚ Non-compliant student and staff toilet rooms |
| ɚ No directional signage to accessible features |
| ɚ Main entrance is not accessible |
H ar m fu l Su bs ta nc es ɚ Lead based paint and asbestos are present and actively managed
| ɚ Radon levels are within range |
| ɚ Lead based paint and asbestos are present and actively managed |
| ɚ Radon levels are within range |
En er gy E ff ic ie nc
| y | ɚ Exterior single pane glazing & failing insulated units |
| ɚ Inefficient fluorescent lighting | |
| ɚ Most air handlers and furnace are operating beyond end of expected life | |
| ɚ HVAC & lighting controls not tied to DDC system |
| ɚ Exterior single pane glazing |
| ɚ Inefficient fluorescent Lighting |
| ɚ Inefficient steam boiler with distribution from original construction |
| ɚ Building does not have any mechanical ventilation and steam radiators are original to |
building construction
| ɚ One of two unit heaters are broken in gym building |
| ɚ HVAC & lighting controls not tied to DDC system |
N ot es
*A facility condition index (FCI) is an industry standard metric that serves as an objective benchmark following a facility condition assessment. FCI is calculated by taking the total cost of existing renewal/repair cost and dividing this number by the total estimate replacement value. Page 19
File details come from the government source that posted it. Updated .