Addenda 1 - Bidder Q&A M-57 Mill_Fill.pdf
PDF 62 KB Posted
- Attached to
- PMC M-57, Gratiot County, Washington Twp, HMA
- Solicitation number
- RFP-591-250000001767-2
- Issued by
- Gogebic County, Michigan
About this file
This document is an Addendum 1 Bidder Questions and Answers form issued by the State of Michigan Procurement for RFP 250000001767, specifically for the M-57 (Cleveland Road) HMA Cold Mill and Overlay project located in Washington Township, Gratiot County. The document provides a format for bidders to submit questions about the solicitation, with two key questions addressed: confirmation of the performance grade for Hot Mix Asphalt (HMA) and clarification on the contract pricing structure.
The document confirms that the project is a lump sum contract, and the desired performance grade for the HMA is PG 70-28P for the 5EML, High Stress mix. The questions were likely submitted during the bidding process to seek clarification on technical specifications and contract terms, which is a standard practice in state and local government procurement to ensure bidders have accurate information before submitting their proposals.
View the file
Other files
| File | Type | Posted |
|---|---|---|
| Attachment 2 - WHD-9917 FEB 9 2024.pdf | ||
| Attachment 1 - M-57 Proposal.pdf | ||
| Attachment 3 - WHD-9918 FEB 9 2024.pdf | ||
| RFP 25-1767 PMC M-57 Cleveland Road.docx | DOCX document | |
| Attachment 4 - ORS-002120_MDOT_M57_Issued.03.11.25.pdf |
On GovTribe
Work with this file
- Download the original file
- Contacts named in this file
- Similar government files
- Ask GovTribe AI about this file
Text version
Michigan.gov/MiProcurement
Version 2021-1
BIDDER QUESTIONS & ANSWERS
RFP 250000001767
M-57 (CLEVELAND ROAD) HMA COLD MILL AND OVERLAY
WASHINGTON TOWNSHIP, GRATIOT COUNTY
Bidders who have questions for the above Solicitation must fill the sections below and attach the document in an email to the Solicitation Manager, as described in the Instruction to Bidders.
Q # Document and Section
Page
Bidder Question Answer (to be completed by the State)
MDOT Standard Specifications for Construction, Division 5
Is the performance grade 70-28 shown in the HMA application table accurate, or is PG 70-28P desired for the HMA, 5EML, High Stress?
PG 70-28P is the desired mix for the HMA, 5EML, High Stress
RFP Document;
Schedule B - Pricing
22 &
Is this a lump sum or a unit price contract?
This project is a lump sum contract
File details come from the government source that posted it. Updated .