A2. Statement of Objectives - K9 Simulator.docx

STATEMENT OF OBJECTIVES

12 JANUARY 2025

K9 MEDICAL SIMULATOR

WASHINGTON CDP WRCTC BUILDING 104

CAMP MURRAY, WASHINGTON

1. DESCRIPTION OF SERVICES

1.1. Requirements of K9 Simulator: The K9 simulators should provide interactive life-like response to medical treatment and allow learners to perform a wide range of critical life-saving tasks, with realistic experience. The simulator must be a state-of-the-art skills trainer that simulates active breathing, audio queues and replicates the look, feel, and function of actual medical procedures.

1.2. System Functionality:

a. Full anatomical skeletal motion

b. Realistic airway with adjustable breathing

c. Intubation with chest rise and fall

d. Audio queues including barking, whimpering, growling, stertor, and stridor

e. Cephalic IV training (bilateral) with flash cue

f. Needle decompression/thoracocentesis with air release (bilateral)

g. Femoral pulses strength and speed adjustable via remote control

h. Gastric Dilatation Volvulus decompression (GDV) site (bloat)

i. CPR chest compressions with resistance

j. Mouth-to-snout resuscitation

k. Packable bleeding junctional wound

l. Moveable, simulated Gun Shot Wound (GSW) for chest seal training

m. Tracheostomy training site with multi-layered tissue

n. Realistic look and feel

o. Remote control with real-time sensor data and programmable scenario

2. EVALUATION OF OFFERS

2.1. Essential Characteristics: The following are the minimum essential characteristics that must be incorporated into the design or requirement specifics:

a. Packable wound

b. Pulse

c. Airway management

d. Movable jaw

e. Intubation

f. Breathing response

g. Tracheostomy

h. Needle decompression (thoracocentesis)

i. CPR

j. IV insertion

k. Intraosseous infusion

2.2. Best Value Determination/Evaluation of Offers

a. The basis for evaluation will be a Best Value (Trade-off) process where price and other factors will be considered. Other factors include (but are not limited to): Included warranty, system support, ease of use/functionality of equipment, compatibility with future products/technology, quality of products as related to industry standards, currency of technology, scheduled delivery/installation time. The Contracting Officer will have broad discretion to make an award in the best interest of the government based on these evaluation criteria and IAW FAR 13.106-2(b).

b. The Government encourages solutions that will maximize efficiency and cost savings while providing a high quality, dynamic, and technologically current system.

c. Any perceived restrictive language (including listed specifications) in this Statement of Objectives is open to discussion and clarification. It is not the intention of the government to restrict innovation or technologically advanced solutions. All changes must comply with the intended purpose of this facility.