Amendment 4_to Combined Synopsis-Solicitation FA930126Q0004_20260129.pdf

Automatic Doors Maintenance at Edwards, AFB FA930126Q0004 Amendment-4 Page 1 of 1

Amendment-4 to Combined Synopsis/Solicitation FA930126Q0004 Automatic Doors Stand Alone

Date of this Amendment-4: 30 January 2026

Amendment-4 to the Combined Synopsis/Solicitation is to extend the solicitation end date to 11 February 2026 due to not receiving compliant solicitation responses. To be considered, all vendors must submit all the requested documentation including a breakdown of the CLIN and SLINs found on Atch1_Solicitation Model Contract_FA930126Q0004 along with the total, technical capabilities, and past performance documentation as outlined in Atch6_Addendum_to_FAR_52.212-1_and-2_Solicitation_20260129 by 11 February 2026 at 3pm PST.

Please note that evaluation factors outlined in Atch5_Combined-Synopsis- Solicitation_FA930126Q0004_20260129 and Atch6_Addendum_to_FAR_52.212-1_and- 2_Solicitation_20251216 must be addressed in their entirety to be considered for this requirement. Failure to follow all instructions outlined under the factors and subfactors on the Atch5_Combined-Synopsis-Solicitation_FA930126Q0004_20260129 and Atch6_Addendum_to_FAR_52.212-1_and-2_Solicitation_20251216 will result in being considered non-responsive and will not be considered for award.

Ref: FA930126Q0004

Combined Synopsis/Solicitation for Automatic Door Repairs at Edwards, AFB FA930126Q0004 Page 1 of 7

AFTC/PZIOB Directorate of Contracting, 5 South Wolfe Avenue, Edwards AFB, CA 93524

SUBJECT: Automatic Doors Repairs at Edwards, AFB – Combine Synopsis/Solicitation

REF NO.: FA930126Q0004

(i) This is a combined synopsis/solicitation (hereafter referred to as “solicitation”) for commercial services prepared in accordance with the format in Federal Acquisition Regulation (FAR) Subpart 12.6, as supplemented with additional information included in this notice. This announcement constitutes the only solicitation; Quotes are being requested and a written solicitation will not be issued. The Simplified Acquisition Procedures (FAR Subpart 13.5) will be used for requirement.

(ii) Solicitation Number: FA930126Q0004**Please provide the full solicitation number on all correspondence**This solicitation is issued as a Request for Quote (RFQ)

(iii) This solicitation document and incorporated provisions and clauses are in effect through Federal Acquisition Circular 2025-06, DPN 20251024, DAFAC 2025-1016

(iv) THIS REQUIRMENT WILL BE: 100% Full and Open Competition. The North American Industry Classification System (NAICS) number for this acquisition is 238290 with a size standard of 22,000,000 employees. The applicable Product Service Code (PSC) is Z1QA, maintenance and restoration of real property (public or private)

(v)Contract Line Item Number (CLIN) Nomenclature- The following services are required for each year of contract services and are provided as an example of the CLIN structure. See model contract/solicitation, attachment -1 for more information:

CLIN 0001: Building 145 (Exterior - Door ID A1484469) labor and parts

SLIN 0001AA: Bldg. 145 Exterior - Door ID A1484469: HDR PKG MF UNIV 75" PAIR VIS DKB (Part# 334360) and Labor

SLIN 0001AB: Bldg. 145 Exterior - Door ID A1484469: OPERATOR-IQ-M FORCE (Part# 314309) and Labor

SLIN 0001AC: Bldg. 145 Exterior - Door ID A1484469: KIT-CONTROLLER-IQ-MF/MS DUAL (Part# 314315) and Labor

SLIN 0001AD: Bldg. 145 Exterior - Door ID A1484469: ARM-DOOR VISIBLE OUT PKG DRK BRZ (Part# 907332251) and Labor

SLIN 0001AE: Bldg. 145 Exterior - Door ID A1484469: ROD-TIE-VISIBLE 12 1/2 OUT DRK BRZ (Part# 907730116) and Labor

Combined Synopsis/Solicitation for Automatic Door Repairs at Edwards, AFB FA930126Q0004 Page 2 of 7

CLIN 0002: Building 1020 (Interior - Door ID A1735687) Parts and Labor

SLIN 0002AA: Bldg. 1020 (Interior - Door ID A1735687): LOAD WHEEL and Labor (Part# 414011) and Labor

SLIN 0002AB: Bldg. 1020 (Interior - Door ID A1735687): SENSOR-OPTEX X-ZONE ST (Part# 700447) and Labor

SLIN 0002AC: Bldg. 1020 (Interior - Door ID A1735687): KIT-CONTROLLER-IQ-MF/MS

SLIN 0002AD: Bldg. 1020 (Interior - Door ID A1735687): KIT-CONTROLLER-IQ-MF/MS

SLIN 0002AE: Bldg. 1020 (Exterior - Door ID A1735686): SENSOR-OPTEX X-ZONE ST (Part# 700447) and Labor

SLIN 0002AF: Bldg. 1020 (Exterior - Door ID A1735686): KIT-CONTROLLER-IQ-MF/MS

SLIN 0002AG: Bldg. 1020 (Exterior - Door ID A1735686): KIT-MOTOR & GEAR BOX-D/G- IQ-RPC (Part# 314328) and Labor

CLIN 0003: Building 1199 (Exterior - Door ID A1735689) Parts and Labor

SLIN 0003AA: Bldg. 1199 (Exterior - Door ID A1735689): KIT-CONTROLLER-IQ-MF/MS DUAL (Part#314315) and Labor

SLIN 0003AB: Bldg. 1199 (Exterior - Door ID A1735689): KIT-MOTOR & GEAR BOX-D/G- IQ-RPC (Part#314328) and Labor

SLIN 0003AC: Bldg. 1199 (Exterior - Door ID A1735689): SENSOR-OPTEX X-ZONE ST (Part#700447) and Labor

SLIN 0003AD: Bldg. 1199 (Exterior - Door ID A1735689): IDLER ASSY (Part#515059) and Labor

CLIN 0004: Building 1600 (Interior - Door ID A1720270 and Exterior - Door ID A1720269) Parts and Labor

SLIN 0004AA: Bldg. 1600 (Interior - Door ID A1720270): KIT-CONTROLLER-IQ-MF/MS

SLIN 0004AB: Bldg. 1600 (Interior - Door ID A1720270): KIT-MOTOR & GEAR BOX-D/G-

SLIN 0004AC: Bldg. 1600 (Interior - Door ID A1720270): SENSOR-OPTEX X-ZONE ST

SLIN 0004AD: Bldg. 1600 (Interior - Door ID A1720270): SPRING BREAKOUT ASSM (Part#411842) and Labor

Combined Synopsis/Solicitation for Automatic Door Repairs at Edwards, AFB FA930126Q0004 Page 3 of 7

SLIN 0004AE: Bldg. 1600 (Exterior - Door ID A1720269): KIT-CONTROLLER-IQ-MF/MS

SLIN 0004AF: Bldg. 1600 (Exterior - Door ID A1720269): KIT-MOTOR & GEAR BOX-D/G-

SLIN 0004AG: Bldg. 1600 (Exterior - Door ID A1720269): SENSOR-OPTEX X-ZONE ST

SLIN 0004AH: Bldg. 1600 (Exterior - Door ID A1720269): SPRING BREAKOUT ASSM (Part#411842) and Labor

CLIN 0005: Building 1610 (Exterior -Door ID A1520717) Labor and Parts

SLIN 0005AA: Bldg. 1610 (Exterior - Door ID A1735681): DOORWAY HOLDING BEAM- DUAL (Part# 313710) and Labor

CLIN 0006: Building 1830A (Exterior - Door ID A1720262): Parts and Labor

SLIN 0006AA: Bldg. 1830A (Exterior - Door ID A1720262): HRT C0805-1 BALL CATCH ASSY W/C830R2 BRT (Part#CL2001699) and Labor

SLIN 0006AB: Bldg. 1830A (Exterior - Door ID A1720262): DOORWAY HOLDING BEAM- DUAL (Part#313710) and Labor

SLIN 0006AC: Bldg. 1830A (Exterior - Door ID A1720262): SENSOR-OPTEX X-ZONE ST

SLIN 0006AD: Bldg. 1830A (Exterior - Door ID A1720262): HRT C2873B BOTTOM TRACK DKBZ 4"/W FBO (Part#CL2119) and Labor

CLIN 0007: Building 2200 Interior (Door ID A1502714 and Exterior - Door ID A1502715)

SLIN 0007AA: Bldg. 2200 (Interior - Door ID A1502714): SENSOR-OPTEX X-ZONE ST

SLIN 0007AB: Bldg. 2200 (Interior - Door ID A1502714): KIT-MOTOR & GEAR BOX-D/G-

SLIN 0007AC: Bldg. 2200 (Interior - Door ID A1502714): KIT-CONTROLLER-IQ-DUAL- RPC (Part#314321) and Labor

SLIN 0007AD: Bldg. 2200 (Exterior - Door ID A1502715): KIT-CONTROLLER-IQ-DUAL-

SLIN 0007AE: Bldg. 2200 (Exterior - Door ID A1502715): SENSOR-OPTEX X-ZONE ST

SLIN 0007AF: Bldg. 2200 (Exterior - Door ID A1502715): KIT-MOTOR & GEAR BOX-D/G-

Combined Synopsis/Solicitation for Automatic Door Repairs at Edwards, AFB FA930126Q0004 Page 4 of 7

SLIN 0007AG: Bldg. 2200 (Exterior - Door ID A1502715): LOAD WHEEL PKG - DURA GLIDE (Part#972312729) and Labor

CLIN 0008: Building 2665 (Exterior -Door ID A1520717) Labor and Parts

SLIN 0008AA: Bldg. 2665 (Exterior -Door ID A1520717): SENSOR-OPTEX X-ZONE ST

CLIN 0009: Building 3000 (Exterior - Door ID A1720266) Parts and Labor

SLIN 0009AA: Bldg. 3000 (Exterior - Door ID A1720266) SENSOR-OPTEX X-ZONE ST (Part#700447) Parts and Labor

SLIN 0009AB: Bldg. 3000 (Exterior - Door ID A1720266): DOORWAY HOLDING BEAM- DUAL (Part#313710) Parts and Labor

SLIN 0009AC: Bldg. 3000 (Exterior - Door ID A1720266): HRT C3636 BELT SLIDER/CARRIAGE WHEEL (Part#CL2199) and Labor

CLIN 0010: Building 4505 (Exterior - Door ID A1720287 and Exterior - Door ID A1720288)

SLIN 0010AA: Bldg. 4505 (Exterior - Door ID A1720287): SENSOR-OPTEX X-ZONE ST

SLIN 0010AB: Bldg. 4505 (Exterior - Door ID A1720288): SENSOR-OPTEX X-ZONE ST

CLIN 0011: Building 5210 (Exterior - Door ID A1720283) Parts and Labor

SLIN 0011AA: Bldg. 5210 (Exterior - Door ID A1720283): SENSOR-OPTEX X-ZONE ST

SLIN 0011AB: Bldg. 5210 (Exterior - Door ID A1720283): HOOD-RAIN X-ZONE ST SENSOR (Part#700844) and Labor

SLIN 0011AC: Bldg. 5210 (Exterior - Door ID A1720283): HRT C5656 FAIL SECURE AUTO LOCK 2003 (Part#CL4069) and Labor

SLIN 0011AD: Bldg. 5210 (Exterior - Door ID A1720283): HRT C3636 BELT SLIDER/CARRIAGE WHEEL (Part#CL2199) and Labor

CLIN 0012: Building 5232 (Exterior - Door ID A1720284 and Interior - Door ID A1720286)

SLIN 0012AA: Bldg. 5232 (Exterior - Door ID A1720284): KIT-CONTROLLER-IQ-DUAL-

SLIN 0012AB: Bldg. 5232 (Exterior - Door ID A1720284): KIT-MOTOR & GEAR BOX-D/G-

Combined Synopsis/Solicitation for Automatic Door Repairs at Edwards, AFB FA930126Q0004 Page 5 of 7

SLIN 0012AC: Bldg. 5232 (Exterior - Door ID A1720284): SOLENOID LOCK PKG LH FAIL SEC-MC521 (Part#313985-4) and Labor

SLIN 0012AD: Bldg. 5232 (Interior - Door ID A1720286): KIT-CONTROLLER-IQ-DUAL-

SLIN 0012AE: Bldg. 5232 (Interior - Door ID A1720286): KIT-MOTOR & GEAR BOX-D/G-

(vi) Description: The Air Force Test Center (AFTC), 412th Test Wing Civil Engineering (412 CE/CEOES), Edwards AFB, CA requires Automatic Door Repairs at Edwards, AFB. The Contractor shall The Contractor shall furnish all supervision, equipment, tools, labor, and supplies necessary to perform the repair and replacement of automatic door components at specified facilities located on Edwards Air Force Base (EAFB), California. The work shall be performed in accordance with (IAW) this SOW, industry standards and/or manufacturer recommendations, whichever is strictest.

(vii) The anticipated contract will a one-time Firm-Fixed-Price (FFP), Purchase Order. The period of performance is 23 February 2026 - 30 September 2026.

(viii) The provision at 52.212-1 "Instructions to Offerors -- Commercial" applies to this acquisition. Please review the FAR 52.212-1 Addendum document attached to this solicitation as Attachment 5 and 6.

(ix) The provision at FAR 52.212-2 "Evaluation -- Commercial Items" applies to this acquisition.

(a) Addendum to the provision at FAR 52.212-2 "Evaluation -- Commercial Items": Please review the FAR 52.212-2 Addendum document attached to this solicitation as Attachment 5 and 6 in its entirety to ensure all submissions address the evaluation criteria as described.

The provision at FAR 52.212-2 "Evaluation -- Commercial Items" applies to this acquisition.

(a) Addendum to the provision at FAR 52.212-2 "Evaluation -- Commercial Items": Please review the FAR 52.212-2 Addendum document attached to this solicitation as Attachment 5 and 6 in its entirety to ensure all submissions address the evaluation criteria as described.

(xiii) Additional Contract Requirement or Terms and Conditions: See solicitation model contract (Attachment-1)

(xiv) Defense Priorities and Allocation System (DPAS): N/A

(xv) Vendor quotes are due by 11 February 2026 at 3:00PM PDT, and shall be submitted via email to the Contract Specialist Alejandra Negrete at alejandra.negrete@us.af.mil and the Contracting Officer Eric Romero at eric.romero.11@us.af.mil. No late quotations will be accepted.

mailto:alejandra.negrete@us.af.mil mailto:eric.romero.11@us.af.mil

Combined Synopsis/Solicitation for Automatic Door Repairs at Edwards, AFB FA930126Q0004 Page 6 of 7

(xvi) Primary Point of Contact: Alejandra Negrete, Contract Specialist at alejandra.negrete@us.af.mil.

Secondary Point of Contact: Eric Romero, Contracting Officer at eric.romero.11@us.af.mil .

Interested parties who believe they can meet the requirements for the services described in this solicitation are invited to submit a completed quote using the attached SF. Vendors are required to submit with their quote enough information for the Government to evaluate the minimum requirements detailed in the solicitation. Any information provided in response to this solicitation is strictly voluntary; the Government will not pay for information submitted in response to this solicitation. Award will be made using the criteria in FAR 52.212-2 and its addendum (detailed within Solicitation Attachment-5 and 6). The Air Force will award to the offeror who provides the best overall value to the Government. The applicable contract provisions and clauses can be found on pages 19-75 of the SF 1449.

Contractors who conduct business with or are interested in conducting business with the Department of Defense must register with the System for Award Management (SAM) which can be accessed at http://www.sam.gov/. All Vendors must comply with the requirements at FAR Clause 52.204-7, System for Award Management, and DFARS Provision 252.204-7004 Alternate A, System for Award Management. Online representations and certifications application (ORCA) must be completed via SAM.

As a result of new policy beginning 10 November 2025, we would like to inform you of your responsibility to comply with the DoD's CMMC 2.0 framework at Level 1. CMMC is the DoD's program to verify that all contractors have implemented the required cybersecurity standards to protect Federal Contract Information (FCI). Per FAR 52.204-21, FCI is information, not intended for public release, that is provided by or generated for the Government under a contract to develop or deliver a product or service.

Your organization's CMMC status will be verified to be active and accurate in the Supplier Performance Risk System (SPRS) module of PIEE.

The DoD established the CMMC program to provide assurance that all contractors are protecting sensitive unclassified information at a level commensurate with the risk from cyber threats.

CMMC compliance is not optional. It will be verified as a non-negotiable "go/no-go" condition for contract eligibility and award going forward.

Attachments:

1. Solicitation Model Contract mailto:alejandra.negrete@us.af.mil http://www.sam.gov/

Combined Synopsis/Solicitation for Automatic Door Repairs at Edwards, AFB FA930126Q0004 Page 7 of 7

2. Statement of Work (SOW)

3. Wage Determination – Kern County

4. Wage Determination – Los Angeles County

5. Combined Synopsis Solicitation

6. Addendum to FAR 52.212-1 and -2

7. Door and Parts List

Attachment-4 “Addendum to FAR 52.212-1 and FAR 52.212-2” to FA930126Q0006

FAR Provision 52.212-1, Instructions to Offerors – Commercial Items (Mar 2023) applies to this acquisition and the following ADDENDUM applies:

1. Adherence to Instructions: The vendor must follow the instructions contained herein in providing their quotation. Vendors are required to meet all solicitation requirements, including terms and conditions, representations and certifications, and technical requirements. Failure to meet a requirement may result in a quotation being ineligible for award.

2. Exceptions to Terms and Conditions: Vendors must clearly identify any exception to solicitation terms and conditions and provide accompanying rationale.

3. Solicitation Face Page: Complete blocks 12 (if applicable), 17a (to include your CAGE code in the “CODE” box), total price of all CLINs in 26 and 30a, b, and c of the SF1449. In doing so, the vendor accedes to the contract terms and conditions as written in the SOLICITATION, with attachments. The SOLICITATION constitutes the model contract.

4. Period of Acceptance of Quotations: Paragraph 52.212-1(c), Period for Acceptance of Quotation, is tailored as follows: “The vendor agrees to hold the prices in its quotation firm for 90 calendar days from the date specified for receipt of quotations.”

5. Registration in System for Award Management (SAM): In order to be eligible for contract award, vendors must be registered in SAM at https://sam.gov. Award shall not be delayed due to as unregistered or inactive SAM account.

6. As of 10 November 2025, there is a new requirement for CMMC 2.0 Self-Assessment must be completed in SPRS by the solicitation due date of 11 February 2026: (See attachment 6 for instructions).

7. Cost or Pricing Data: The contracting officer has determined there is a high probability of adequate price competition in this acquisition. Upon examination of the initial quotations, the Contracting Officer will review this determination and if, in the Contracting Officer’s opinion, adequate price competition exists, no additional cost information will be requested. However, if at any time during this competition the Contracting Officer determines that adequate price competition no longer exists, vendors may be required to submit cost or pricing data to support a determination of price reasonableness and affordability. Further, the Contracting Officer may request that the data be submitted consistent with the format in Table 15-2 of FAR 15.408, but without the certification requirement of FAR 15.406-2 (see solicitation FAR Clause 52.215-20, Alt IV).

8. Quotation – General Information:

(a) The Quote shall consist of three (3) separate volumes:

i. Volume I - Price Quotation

ii. Volume II - Technical Submission

iii. Volume III - Past Performance Information

(b) Documents must be fully responsive to and consistent with the following:

i. Solicitation Requirements

ii. Evaluation factors for award in FAR Provision 52.212-2 EVALUATION -- COMMERCIAL ITEMS of the solicitation

iii. Page formatting and limitations – incorrectly formatted pages and excess pages will not be read or evaluated and will be removed from the quote. In addition, company introductory pages, to include marketing information, will not be read or evaluated and will be removed from the quote. The following sub-bullets apply to ALL three (3) quotation volumes.

• Page Margins When printed, all documents shall be formatted to print with 1” margins on all sides.

• Font & Spacing The font of all documents shall be Times New Roman font size 12 point or larger. All documents shall be single-spaced.

• Note that .zip files are NOT an acceptable format and will NOT go through the Air Force

Network.

iv. Quotation Submittal Quotation volumes and any other documents must be submitted via email to the Contracting Officer and Contract Specialist.

Note: This solicitation attachment provides addendums to two provisions.

Therefore, this attachment will NOT remain in the ensuing contract award.

Attachment-4 “Addendum to FAR 52.212-1 and FAR 52.212-2” https://sam.gov/

9. Volume I Price Quotation:

(a) Quotation Guidance:

i. Enter your pricing into the Contract Line Item Numbers (CLINs) # 0001- 0012 (Including the SLINs) of the Solicitation SF 1449, as noted in the following sub-bullets:

• Unit Price & Amount Vendors are to enter their quoted “Unit Price” amount, and then multiply that amount by the “Quantity” to determine the “Amount” for a CLIN. This process shall be done for all CLINs.

• Total Quoted Amount Vendors shall total the “Amount” of all CLINs to determine the Total Quoted Amount they shall place in Block #26 of the SF 1449.

• Solicitation Provisions Vendors are to ensure that they have completed all Solicitation Provisions.

(b) Electronic Copy: Shall submit an Adobe (.pdf) copy of the completed Solicitation to include any solicitation provisions.

(c) Page Limits: None

(d) Evaluation Criteria: See FAR Provision 52.212-2 EVALUATION -- COMMERCIAL ITEMS

10. Volume II, Technical Submission: Each vendor shall submit a technical submittal highlighting their ability to meet all technical requirements in the Statement of Work (SOW) and containing the subfactors as described in Section B of the Addendum to FAR 52.212-2 - Evaluation

(a) Electronic Copy: Must be in Adobe (.pdf)

(b) Page Limits: Submit no more than twenty five (25) pages (excluding cover page and signature/company information page)

(c) Evaluation Criteria: See FAR Provision 52.212-2 EVALUATION -- COMMERCIAL ITEMS

11. Volume III Past Performance Information:

(a) Form Guidance:

i. Contractors shall Submit Present and Past Performance information on a minimum of two (2) and no more than three (3) contracts that are current, recent, and relevant to demonstrate the ability to perform the proposed effort.

Include rationale supporting your assertion of relevance. All past performances shall be recent (within 3 years), relevant or similar in nature to this requirement. Refer to 52.212-2 Evaluation for determining if submissions meet the definition of current, recent, and relevant. Clearly demonstrate what management actions were employed in overcoming problems and the effects of those actions in terms of improvements achieved or problems rectified. Vendors are required to thoroughly explain corrective actions taken in the past, if any, for substandard performance and any current performance problems such as exceeded performance periods.

ii. Not having past performance history is not a disqualification factor but will be considered when selecting the best value offer. Offerors with no past performance will receive a Not applicable/Neutral (N) rating.

12.

(a) Electronic Copy: Must be in Adobe (.pdf)

(b) Page Limits: Limited to no more than six (6) pages.

(End Addendum to FAR 52.212-1, Proposal Preparation Instructions)

52.212-2 EVALUATION--COMMERCIAL ITEMS (NOV 2021)

The following words stating “offer”, “offeror”, and “proposal” are replaced with “quotation”, “vendor”, and “quote”.

(a) The Government will award a contract resulting from this solicitation to the responsible vendor whose quotation conforming to the solicitation will be most advantageous to the Government, price and other factors considered. The following factors shall be used to evaluate quotations:

(1) TECHNICAL

(2) PAST PERFORMANCE

(3) PRICE

In the integrated assessment upon which the award assessment will be made, Technical Acceptability and Past Performance shall be weighed more heavily than Price. The nature of this service demands a contractor with proven expertise, and prioritizing price alone risks compromising health and safety. Past performance is also critical, as contractors with historical success with the performance requirements and who can operate independently offer significant efficiency gains. The technical subfactors will be evaluated on a Technically Acceptable/Unacceptable basis.

(b) A written notice of award or acceptance of a quotation mailed or otherwise furnished to the successful vendor within the time for acceptance specified in the quotation, shall result in a binding contract without further action by either party. Before the quotation's specified expiration time, the Government may accept a quotation, whether or not there are negotiations after its receipt, unless a written notice of withdrawal is received before award.

ADDENDUM TO FAR 52.212-2

BASIS FOR CONTRACT AWARD: This is a competitive, best value evaluation in which competing vendors' technical capability, and past performance history will be evaluated on a basis significantly higher than price. By submission of its quotation in accordance with the instructions provided in FAR 52.212-1 “Instructions to Offerors” the vendor accedes to the terms of this solicitation and all such vendors shall be treated equally except for their prices, technical submissions, and performance records. Failure to meet a requirement may result in a quotation being determined non-responsive. Award will be made to the responsible vendor whose response conforms to all required terms and conditions, includes all required representations and certifications, meets all requirements set forth in the solicitation and provides the best value to the Government based on the results of the evaluation as described herein. Unbalanced, inaccurate, or incomplete price quotes may be grounds for eliminating a quote from competition. Offerors must clearly identify any exception to the solicitation terms and conditions and provide complete accompanying rationale. Failure to meet a requirement may result in an offer being determined technically unacceptable.

The evaluation process shall proceed as follows:

A. Price Evaluation. Initially offerors shall be ranked from lowest to highest according to the offeror’s proposed Total Evaluated Price (TEP). TEP is determined by multiplying the quantities identified in Section B by the proposed unit price for CLINs and adding the totals for all CLINs.

B. Technical Requirement. Next, the Government will evaluate the technical submission, on an acceptable or unacceptable basis, submitted by the lowest TEP ranked offeror. The offeror’s technical submission will be rated ‘Acceptable’ or ‘Unacceptable’ as defined within the subfactors and the table provided below. If the lowest priced offeror is deemed to be acceptable in each of the subfactors, they will advance to the Past Performance Evaluation. If the lowest priced offeror is deemed unacceptable in one or more of the following subfactors, the next lowest priced offeror will be evaluated for technical acceptability. The offeror must be acceptable for each subfactor listed below in order to be deemed acceptable overall.

C. Factor 1: Technical Capability This factor evaluates the offeror's understanding of and proposed approach to meeting the technical requirements of the SOW. The quote must demonstrate a clear and feasible plan to successfully perform the work.

Subfactor 1.1: Technical Work Plan: The degree to which the offeror’s proposal details a comprehensive plan for executing all tasks outlined in SOW Section 1.1. This includes their methodology for:

• Removal and Disposal: The plan for removing non-repairable parts without damaging surrounding structures and the proposed method for legally compliant disposal.

• Procurement and Installation: The strategy for sourcing new, precisely matching parts from reputable suppliers and the proposed installation process that adheres to manufacturer specifications.

• Calibration and Testing: The detailed process for calibrating the door systems and performing comprehensive testing to verify full functionality and compliance with all standards, including ADA requirements.

Subfactor 1.2: Quality Control and Standards Compliance: The offeror’s proposed Quality Control Plan (QCP) for ensuring all work meets or exceeds the standards specified in the SOW. The proposal should describe how the offeror will internally verify compliance with all ANSI/BHMA standards (SOW 2.0) before presenting the work for government inspection.

Subfactor 1.3: Environmental and Safety Compliance Plan: The offeror's plan to adhere to all environmental and safety regulations.

• Environmental: A detailed approach for managing hazardous materials and waste IAW SOW Section 8.0, including the process for submitting required forms (Contractor Hazardous Materials Usage Tracking Form, SDS) and coordinating waste disposal manifests with the Edwards AFB Environmental Management Office.

• Safety: A description of the offeror’s safety program, demonstrating a comprehensive understanding of OSHA requirements and a plan for mishap reporting as required by SOW Section 6.0.

Factor 2: Corporate Experience and Personnel Qualifications This factor evaluates the offeror's demonstrated experience in the automatic door industry and the qualifications of the personnel proposed to perform the work.

Subfactor 2.1: Corporate Experience: The offeror must provide verifiable evidence of meeting the experience requirements.

• Demonstrate at least ten (10) years of experience in the automatic door industry (SOW 2.1).

• Provide at least three (3) examples of contracts of similar size, scope, and complexity performed within the last five years. Include project descriptions, contract value, and a customer point of contact.

Subfactor 2.2: Personnel Qualifications and Certifications: The offeror must demonstrate that its proposed personnel meet or exceed all qualification requirements of the SOW.

• Provide the name and resume of the proposed Contract Manager, detailing their experience in managing similar contracts (SOW 4.1).

• Provide evidence that performing personnel possess a current American Association of Automatic Door Manufacturing (AAADM) Training Certificate as a Certified Inspector (SOW 2.1).

• Provide a copy of the company's valid General Contracting License in the State of California (SOW 2.1).

Factor 3: Management Approach & Security Compliance This factor evaluates the offeror’s plan for managing the contract, communicating with the government, and ensuring compliance with all installation security requirements.

Subfactor 3.1: Management and Communication Plan: The offeror’s proposed plan for contract management. The proposal should describe how the Contract Manager will ensure overall coordination, be available 24/7, and guarantee a response to government inquiries within one hour as required by SOW 4.1.

Subfactor 3.2: Security Plan: The offeror’s plan for complying with all Edwards AFB security requirements outlined in SOW Section 5.0. This includes their process for:

• Ensuring all employees undergo required background checks.

• Obtaining and displaying identification badges.

• Managing a current list of employees for the GPM/CO.

• Ensuring employees complete the required Antiterrorism and OPSEC training within the specified timeframes.

D. Past Performance.

Finally, the contractor shall provide at least two (2) past performance work records. The Government shall seek recent and relevant performance information based on (1) the past efforts provided by the Prime Offeror and (2) data independently obtained from other Government and commercial sources. The Government reserves the right to seek information on higher priced offerors if none of the lower priced offerors receive an ‘Exceptional’ past performance assessment rating. The purpose of the past performance evaluation is to assess the degree of confidence the Government has in the offeror’s ability to provide for the Automatic Door repair requirement to meet users’ needs, based on the offerors demonstrated record of performance. The offeror’s Past Performance Assessment will evaluate recency, relevancy, and quality and will result in a rating of Exceptional, Good, Satisfactory, Marginal, Unsatisfactory, or Not Applicable/Neutral. Offerors with no recent/relevant performance history or if the offeror’s performance record is so sparse that no meaningful past performance assessment rating can be reasonably assigned shall receive the rating ‘Not Applicable’, meaning the rating is treated neither favorably nor unfavorably (neutral)

Table C-2: Past Performance Evaluation rating Quality Assessment Rating Description EXCEPTIONAL (E) During the contract period, contractor performance is meeting (or met) all contract requirements and consistently exceeding (or exceeded) many. Very few, if any, minor problems encountered. Contractor took immediate and effective corrective action.

GOOD (G) During the contract period, contractor is meeting (or met) all contract requirements and consistently exceeding (or exceeded) some. Some minor problems encountered. Contractor took timely corrective action.

SATISFACTORY (S) During the contract period, contractor performance is meeting (or met) all contract requirements. For any problems encountered, contractor took effective corrective action.

MARGINAL (M) During the contract period, contractor performance is not meeting (or did not meet) some contract requirements. For problems encountered, corrective action appeared only marginally effective, not effective, or not fully implemented.

Customer involvement was required.

UNSATISFACTORY(U) During the contract period, contractor performance is failing (or fail) to meet most contract requirements. Serious problems encountered.

Corrective actions were either ineffective or non-existent. Extensive Customer oversight and involvement was required.

NOT

APPLICABLE/NEUTRAL (N)

Unable to provide a rating. Contract did not include performance for this aspect. The rating is treated neither favorably nor unfavorably

4. Award Decision: If the lowest priced offer is judged to have an ‘Exceptional’ past performance assessment rating, and receives an Acceptable rating on the technical evaluation, that offer represents the best value for the government and the evaluation process stops at this point. Award shall be made to that offeror without further consideration of any other offers.

If the lowest priced offeror is not judged to have an ‘Exceptional’ past performance assessment rating or receives an ‘Unacceptable’ rating on the technical evaluation, the next lowest priced offeror will be evaluated and the process will continue (in order by TEP) until an offeror is judged to have an ‘Exceptional’ past performance assessment, or until all offerors are evaluated.

E. Vendor Responsibilities: Vendors are cautioned to submit sufficient information and, in the format, specified in FAR 52.212-1, Instruction to Offerors -- Commercial Items. Vendors may be asked to clarify certain aspects of their quote (for example, the failure of a past performance) or respond to adverse past performance information to which the vendor has not previously had an opportunity to respond. Adverse past performance is defined as past performance information that supports a less than satisfactory rating or any unfavorable comments received from sources without a formal rating system. Interchanges between the Government and vendors conducted to resolve minor or clerical errors will not constitute interchanges and the Contracting Officer reserves the right to award a contract without the opportunity for quote revision.

F. Government Discretion Regarding Interchanges: The Government intends to award a contract without Interchanges with respective vendors in accordance with FAR 52.212-1, Instruction to Offerors – Competitive Acquisitions. The Government, however, reserves the right to conduct Interchanges if deemed in its best interest.

Interchanges may take place regarding any portion of the three quotation Volumes (Price, Technical, or Past Performance or general documentation). The Government may conduct Interchanges with one, some, none or all vendors at its discretion. Interchanges do not require a distinction between whether the Interchange results in a change to a quotation or only clarifies an administrative matter or quotation mistake. The Government has discretion to evaluate all quote submissions before inciting Interchanges with vendors (through Interchange Notices or “INs”), and vendors do not have to be offered an opportunity to revise their quotation through a Final Quotation Revision (FQR). If, during the evaluation period, the Simplified Acquisition Team determines to be in the best interest of the Government to hold Interchanges, vendor responses to INs and the FQR (if requested by the Government) will be considered in making the award decision. Note that in accordance with FAR 13, vendors do not have to be offered an opportunity to revise their quotation through a formal FQR. If the vendor’s quotation has been evaluated as acceptable at the time Interchanges are closed, any changes or exceptions in the FQR are subject to evaluation and may introduce risk that the vendor’s quotation be determined unacceptable and ineligible for award.

(End Addendum to FAR 52.212-2, Evaluation)

9. Volume I Price Quotation:

11. Volume III Past Performance Information:

(End Addendum to FAR 52.212-1, Proposal Preparation Instructions)

ADDENDUM TO FAR 52.212-2

D. Past Performance.