9830-011P - Ghiglione Bridge Inspection 2019.pdf
PDF 2 MB Posted
- Attached to
- AK PRA DENA 10(36) Replace Ghiglione Bridge Federal contract opportunity
- Solicitation number
- 69056721B000019
About this file
This solicitation package seeks proposals for replacing the Ghiglione Bridge in Denali National Park and Preserve, Alaska. Key details include replacing the existing steel multi-beam bridge with a new single-span bridge to carry Denali Park Road over Ghiglione Creek. The work also involves approach roadway reconstruction for approximately 500 feet on each end of the new bridge. The estimated construction cost is $3 million. Proposals are due by August 15, 2019, with construction anticipated to begin in summer 2020 and be complete by fall 2021. The Federal Highway Administration is the contracting agency.
View the file
Other files for this federal contract opportunity
| File | Type | Posted |
|---|---|---|
| Tabulation of Bids ghiglione.pdf | ||
| BidSum.pdf | ||
| QA_08-04-2021.pdf | ||
| QA_08-02-2021.pdf | ||
| Amendment A003.pdf | ||
| QA_07-28-2021.pdf | ||
| QA_07-27-2021.pdf | ||
| Amendment A002.pdf | ||
| QA_07-26-2021.pdf | ||
| QA_07-23-2021.pdf | ||
| Amendment A001.pdf | ||
| QA_07-22-2021.pdf | ||
| QA_07-19-2021.pdf | ||
| QA_06-30-2021.pdf | ||
| 9830-011P - Ghiglione Bridge As-Built Plans.pdf | ||
| Ghiglione IFB.pdf | ||
| Ghiglione_ControlSheet.xlsx | XLSX spreadsheet | |
| DENA01036_XS.pdf | ||
| DENA01036_VA.pdf | ||
| DENA01036_HA.pdf | ||
| DENA01036_EW.pdf | ||
| DENA01036_plans.pdf | ||
| Toklat Pit_Scrape Material Photos.pdf | ||
| Geotech Report No 11-19 Ghiglione Final Foundation Report.pdf | ||
| DENA01036_SUP.pdf | ||
| DENA01036 xml files.zip | ZIP file | |
| CompiledSWPPP_AK for physical data.pdf |
Show all 27
On GovTribe
Work with this file on GovTribe
- Download the original file
- Contacts named in this file
- Similar government files
- Ask GovTribe AI about this file
Text version
STRUCTURE SUMMARY STRUCTURE NO. 9830-011P
GHIGLIONE CREEK BRIDGE INSPECTION DATE: 6/25/19
BRIDGE IDENTIFICATION AND DESCRIPTION
MAIN SPAN MATERIAL: ....... STEEL NO. OF MAIN SPANS:
MAIN SPAN TYPE: ............... STRINGER/MULTI-BEAM or GIRDER NO. OF APPR. SPANS:
# OF BEAMS, MAIN SPAN: .. 4 STRUCT. TOTAL LENGTH: ..
DECK TYPE: ......................... CONCRETE CAST-IN-PLACE MAX. SPAN LENGTH:
WEARING SURFACE: .......... MONOLITHIC CONCRETE DECK WIDTH:
ABUT. FOUNDATIONS: ........ PILE BENT CURB TO CURB WIDTH:
PIER FOUNDATION(S): ........ SPREAD FOOTING ON PILES YEAR BUILT:
ABUTMENT / PIER MAT'L: ... CONCRETE YEAR RECONSTRUCTED: ..
PROJ./PLAN REF. NO: ......... UNKNOWN / 956 SKEW ANGLE:
NPS ROAD CLASS: .............. 1 - PRINCIPAL PARK ROAD FRACTURE CRITICAL:
STRUCTURE HISTORY: ...... 11/02-EARTHQUAKE. 5/08, 5/12, 5/18 -SNOOPER INSPECTION.
LOCATION
139.0 FT (42.4 M)
45.0 FT (13.7 M)
32.5 FT (9.9 M)
28.0 FT (8.5 M)
N/A
99 °
NO
DENALI NATIONAL PARK & PRESERVE MILE POINT: ..................... 41.90 (KM PT 67.43)
STATE: ................................. ALASKA LOCATION: 40.19 MILES WEST OF AK ROUTE 3 (MP
237.3) ON DENALI PARK ROAD. FACILITY CARRIED: ............ DENALI PARK ROAD
FEATURE INTERSECTED: .. GHIGLIONE CREEK
STRUCTURE EVALUATION SUMMARY
This steel multi-beam bridge is in fair condition overall. While there have been no significant changes in the condition of the bridge since the previous inspection, the possibility of additional movement of the structure and susceptibility to seismic events are sources of concern.
The main structural problem is sheared anchor bolts at the west abutment bearings, apparently due to thermal expansion of the superstructure along the curved alignment of the bridge. In addition, the beam ends at the east abutment appear to have shifted laterally up to 3/4", and have broken weld connections between the rocker plates and bottom flanges of the beams. This condition may be due to an earthquake that occurred in the vicinity of the structure in November 2002. The earthquake also appears to have caused heaving and subsequent settling (up to 4") of the embankment at both ends of the bridge, as well as a fissure in the embankment in front of the east abutment.
It should be noted that this bridge is scheduled to be removed in the near future under an upcoming roadway realignment project. Installation of object markers at the bridge corners is recommended to help improve motorist safety until the bridge is removed. Slope erosion at the southeast and southwest corners of the bridge has almost cut back to the roadway and should be repaired. In addition, until removed this structure should be inspected for damage immediately following any significant seismic event.
INSPECTION TEAM: E. MILTNER, F. R. QUINONEZ
CONDITION ASSESSMENT:
ED MILTNER, P.E., FIELD TEAM LEADER
REPORT REVIEW:
MARCUS MILLER, P.E., BRIDGE INSPECTION ENGINEER 703-404-6252
REPORT APPROVAL: DATE: 12/9/19
JORGOMAI CEESAY, PH.D., P.E., BIP SUPERVISORY ENGINEER 703-404-6244
RECOMMENDATIONS AND ESTIMATED COSTS STRUCTURE NO. 9830-011P
A (Critical) - Structure is closed, in imminent danger of collapse, or presents a critical safety hazard.
B (Major) - Structure exhibits severe deterioration, presents a safety hazard, or is designated a high priority due to age and/or condition.
C (Moderate) - Structure is deficient, functionally obsolete, or requires substantial repairs to prevent a serious deficiency or unsafe condition.
D (Minor) - Structure is generally in good condition. Preventative maintenance may be required.
E (Special) - Structure is under construction or reconstruction.
B226 PRIORITY OF IMPROVEMENT
ITEM
NO.
ROUTINE MAINTENANCE QTY. UNIT UNIT
COST
PRELIM.
COST
ESTIMATE
ITEM
NO.
REHABILITATION/RECONSTRUCTION
(TYPICALLY NEEDED WITHIN 5 YEARS)
QTY. UNIT
UNIT
COST
PRELIM. COST
ESTIMATES
REHAB. RECONSTR.
(*Includes typical contract costs for mobilization, traffic control, and design/construction engineering; but does not include detour bridges, work beyond the bridge limits, or work not listed above. Estimates are approximate and are for preliminary planning purposes only; they should not be used as a complete or final engineers estimate.)
REMARKS: Cost estimates assume that the recommended actions will be combined with similar work being performed on other structures.
Bridge is scheduled to be removed in the near future under an upcoming roadway realignment project
FIELD INSPECTION REPORT STRUCTURE NO. 9830-011P
CONDITION RATING CODES FOR ITEMS 58 - 62, 222, 223
N NOT APPLICABLE 3 SERIOUS CONDITION - loss of section, deterioration, spalling, or scour have seriously affected primary structural components. Local failures are possible.
9 EXCELLENT CONDITION Fatigue cracks in steel or shear cracks in concrete may be present.
8 VERY GOOD CONDITION - no problems noted. 2 CRITICAL CONDITION - advanced deterioration of primary structural elements. Fatigue cracks in steel or shear cracks in concrete may be present
7 GOOD CONDITION - some minor problems. or scour may have removed substructure support. Unless closely monitored it may be necessary to close the structure until corrective action can be taken.
6 SATISFACTORY CONDITION - structural elements show some minor deterioration. 1 “IMMINENT” FAILURE CONDITION - major deterioration or sec ion loss present in critical structural components or obvious vertical or horizontal 5 FAIR CONDITION - all primary structural elements are sound but may have movement affecting structure stability. Structure is closed to traffic but minor section loss, cracking, spalling, or scour. corrective action may return structure to light service.
4 POOR CONDITION - advanced section loss, deterioration, spalling, or scour. 0 FAILED CONDITION - out of service; beyond corrective action.
CONDITION RATING CODE EQUIVALENTS FOR SUB-ELEMENTS
G = GOOD (CODES 7 - 9) F = FAIR (CODES 5 - 6) P = POOR (CODES 0 - 4)
58. DECK 6 ITEM REFERENCE AND REMARKS
F1. DECK SLAB
P2. EXPANSION JOINTS
N3. WEARING SURFACE
G4. RIDEABILITY
F5. CURBS, SIDEWALKS, AND MEDIAN
F6. PARAPETS AND/OR RAILINGS
G7. DRAINS AND DRAINAGE
N8. UTILITIES
F9. DEFLECTION AND/OR VIBRATION
N10. OTHER
59. SUPERSTRUCTURE 5
F1. BEARING DEVICES
G2. GIRDERS OR BEAMS
N3. ARCH(ES) OR SLAB(S)
N4. FLOOR BEAMS AND STRINGERS
N5. TRUSSES
G6. DIAPHRAGMS AND BRACING
G7. PAINT
N8. FASCIA(E)
F9. DEFLECTION AND/OR VIBRATION
F10. ALIGNMENT
G11. OTHER (WILDLIFE)
60. SUBSTRUCTURE 6
RAILING TYPE HAS NOT BEEN CRASH-TESTED FOR SAFETY.
58.1 FULL-DEPTH PATCH IN DECK IN EAST SPAN, NORTH SIDE OF BEAM
#3, REMAINS IN GOOD CONDITION; SOME MINOR CRACKING ON
UNDERSIDE OF PATCH. EAST SPAN DECK SLAB IS 3/4" HIGHER
THAN CENTER SPAN AT EAST PIER, NORTH SIDE, AND IS 1/2"
LOWER THAN EAST ABUTMENT BACKWALL, BOTH SIDES.
CLEAT TRACK DAMAGE THROUGHOUT DECK SURFACE, UP TO 1/4"
DEEP. HAIRLINE TRANSVERSE SOME WITH EFFLORESCENCE AND
MAP CRACKING THROUGHOUT DECK UNDERSIDE. MINOR
HONEYCOMBING ON DECK UNDERSIDE NO EFFLORESCENCE OR
DELAMINATION, SPAN #2, CENTER BAY NEAR EAST PIER.
REMARKS FROM PREVIOUS SNOOPER INSPECTIONS:
AREA OF MODERATE HAIRLINE CRACKS IN EAST SPAN BETWEEN
BEAMS #1 AND #2 ON DECK UNDERSIDE, TWO AREAS WITH
EXPOSED REBAR IN WEST SPAN, BETWEEN BEAMS #1 AND #2 AND
BETWEEN #2 AND #3. SPALL ON DECK UNDERSIDE AT JOINT
OVERHANG ABOVE PIER #2.
58.2 DECK IS ON CURVED ALIGNMENT. EXPANSION JOINTS AT PIERS
ARE TIGHTER ON SOUTH SIDE OF BRIDGE (INSIDE OF CURVE) THAN
ON NORTH SIDE: JOINT WIDTH ON SOUTH SIDE - 3/4" AT WEST
PIER, 1" AT EAST PIER; NORTH SIDE - 2" AT WEST PIER, 2" AT EAST
PIER. MODERATE DETERIORATION OF SEALANT MATERIAL IN
THESE JOINTS; SEALANT IS EXTRUDING OUT AT SOUTH END OF
BOTH JOINTS, STRETCHED THIN AND DEVELOPING HOLES AT
NORTH END.
SEALANT IN JOINT OVER WEST ABUTMENT AND WEST PIER ARE
EXTRUDING UP OUT OF JOINT, MORE TOWARD NORTH END
(OUTSIDE OF CURVE), AS IF SUPERSTRUCTURE IS ROTATING
COUNTERCLOCKWISE.
CONCRETE PIECES ON TOP OF BOTH PIERS, BOTH SIDES, HAVE
FALLEN FROM SPALLS IN DECK JOINTS.
ABUTMENTS
1. BREASTWALLS OR COLUMNS F
2. PILE BENTS N
3. CAPS AND/OR BEARING SEATS G
4. BACKWALLS AND/OR BULKHEADS G
5. FOUNDATIONS G
6. WINGWALLS G
7. WEEP HOLES N
8. EXPANSION JOINTS N
9. EROSION AND/OR SCOUR F
10. SETTLEMENT OR DEFLECTION G
11. SLOPE PROTECTION N
12. OTHER N
PIER(S)
13. WALLS AND/OR COLUMNS G
14. PILE BENTS N
15. CAPS AND/OR BEARING SEATS G
16. FOUNDATIONS G
17. EROSION AND/OR SCOUR G
18. SETTLEMENT OR DEFLECTION G
19. OTHER N
ITEM REFERENCE AND REMARKS
61. CHANNEL 8
1. ALIGNMENT G
2. EROSION AND/OR SCOUR G
3. CHANNEL PROTECTION N
4. WATERWAY OBSTRUCTIONS G
5. OTHER N
6. ADEQUACY OF OPENING SUFF
7. NORMAL VELOCITY MED
8. AVERAGE CLEAR OPENING 35 FT.
9. STREAM BED COMPOSITION :
GRAVEL
222. APPROACHES 7
1. APPROACH SLABS
2. RELIEF JOINTS
3. APPROACH GUARDRAIL
4. SURFACING
5. EROSION
6. SETTLEMENT
7. SIGNS
8. ALIGNMENT
9. OTHER
N N N G F G N G N
223. RETAINING WALL N
1. WALL
2. WEEP HOLES
3. FOUNDATION
4. EROSION AND/OR SCOUR
5. SETTLEMENT OR DEFLECTION
6. OTHER
36. TRAFFIC AND SAFETY FEATURES
A. BRIDGE RAILINGS
B. TRANSITIONS
C. APPROACH GUARDRAILS
D. APPROACH GUARDRAIL ENDS
N N N
TRAFFIC SAFETY RATING CODES
0 - Does not meet standards or a safety feature is required and none is provided.
1 - Meets currently acceptable standards.
N - Not applicable or a safety feature is not required.
58.5 MODERATE SPALLING OF NORTH CURB AT JOINTS AT BOTH ENDS
OF BRIDGE, LIKELY DUE TO COMPRESSIVE FORCE FROM THERMAL
EXPANSION; DELAMINATION ALSO PRESENT AT EAST END OF
BRIDGE (SEE 59.9.10). SEVERE SPALLING AND DELAMINATION OF
BOTH INSIDE AND OUTSIDE FACES OF SOUTH CURB AT JOINT AT
EAST END OF BRIDGE.
58.6 LIGHT SPOT RUSTING OF TOP FLANGE OF RAILINGS. MINOR
CRACKING OF RAIL POSTS.
58.7 FIRST AND LAST DECK DRAINS HAVE BEEN PLUGGED WITH STEEL
PLATES. HEAVY SOIL BUILD-UP IN SOUTH SHOULDER AT EAST
EXPANSION JOINT.
59.1 BRIDGE PLANS INDICATE FIXED BEARINGS AT WEST ABUTMENT. 5
OF 8 ANCHOR BOLTS ARE SHEARED OFF (BOTH BOLTS FOR BEAMS
#1 AND #3, AND DOWNSTREAM BOLT FOR BEAM #2) AND REMAINING
3 ARE LOOSE, ALSO APPARENTLY SHEARED, BUT STILL IN PLACE.
SHEARING OF BOLTS IS LIKELY DUE TO THERMAL EXPANSION OF
SUPERSTRUCTURE AS IT HAD OCCURRED PRIOR TO 2002
EARTHQUAKE (SEE 59.9,10).
EXTERIOR BEARING PLATE ANCHOR BOLTS AT WEST ABUTMENT
WERE MISSING AT TIME OF INSPECTION.
REMARKS FROM PREVIOUS SNOOPER INSPECTIONS:
CENTER SPAN BEARINGS SHIFTED WEST (1 1/4" AT SOUTH END, 5/8"
NORTH END). ANCHOR BOLT BENT OR SHEARED ON BEARINGS
OVER WEST PIER, CENTER AND WEST SPANS. SOUTH BOLT
MISSING ON BEAM #2, WEST PIER. ALL ANCHOR BOLTS BENT
TOWARD WEST ON EAST SPAN SIDE. BEAM #1 AND BEAM #2
BOTTOM FLANGE OF CENTER SPAN RESTS ON SOLE PLATE OF
EAST SPAN BEAM. AREA OF OVERLAP ON BEAM #1 (1/2"L X 3"),
BEAM #2 (3/8"L X 2 1/2"). SOLE PLATE SHIFTED 1" TO WEST ON EAST
SPAN SIDE OF EAST PIER, ALL BEAMS. SPAN #1 BEAMS #1 & 2 AT
END OF SLOTTED DIA. HOLES AT PIERS #1 $ 2; BEAMS #3 & 4 STILL
HAVE ROOM. BEAMS #2 & 3 AT PIER #1 ON EAST FACE NORTH SIDE
HAVE PLATE WASHER BUCKLED WITH BENT ANCHOR BOLT. BEAM
#1, PIER #2 NORTH SIDE, MISSING (SHEARED) CENTER SPAN BOLT;
UNSEATED WEST SPAN BOLT.
59.1,10 BEAMS APPEAR TO HAVE SHIFTED LATERALLY UP TO 3/4" AT EAST
ABUTMENT, AND HAVE BROKEN WELD CONNECTIONS BETWEEN
ROCKER PLATES AND BOTTOM FLANGES. BOTTOM FLANGES ARE
NOW PUSHING AGAINST SOUTH ANCHOR BOLT WASHERS.
59.2 REMARKS FROM PREVIOUS SNOOPER INSPECTION:
MINOR SPECKLED RUST IN FEW LOCATIONS ON BEAMS. BEAM #1
HAS NO COVER PLATES IN ALL SPANS, WITH NOTICEABLE SAG.
59.6 BENT BOTTOM FLANGE OF DIAPHRAGM IN CENTER SPAN BETWEEN
BEAM #1 AND #2.
ADDITIONAL ITEM REFERENCE AND REMARKS
59.7 ISOLATED AREAS OF MINOR FLAKING OF TOP COAT OF PAINT ON BEAMS. MINOR FLAKING OF BOTTOM COAT IN
SOME AREAS; NO RUST NOTED.
59.9,10 BRIDGE SUPERSTRUCTURE APPEARS TO BE UNDERGOING EXCESSIVE THERMAL EXPANSION/CONTRACTION
ALONG RADIAL ALIGNMENT. MINOR DEAD LOAD SAG IN EACH SPAN.
59.11 ACTIVE RAVEN'S NEXT ON DOWNSTREAM ENDS OF PIER CAPS. NESTS COVER BEARINGS FOR BEAM #1.
60.1,3,6 1/8" WIDE, FULL HEIGHT VERTICAL CRACK IN CENTER OF EACH ABUTMENT BREASTWALL CONTINUES INTO
BEARING SEAT.
MODERATE VERTICAL CRACK EXTENDS FROM SOUTH CORNER OF EAST ABUTMENT BEARING SEAT INTO
ABUTMENT AND WINGWALL; SIMILAR CRACK AT SOUTH SIDE OF WEST ABUTMENT.
LARGE 12" X 15" SPALL WITH EXPOSED REBAR AT TOP OUTSIDE CORNER OF NORTHEAST WINGWALL ADJACENT
TO END OF BRIDGE.
SURVEY MARKER ON SOUTHEAST AND SOUTHWEST WINGWALLS.
60.3 ABUTMENT #2 HAS VISIBLY SETTLED MATCHING PREVIOUSLY REPORTED EMBANKMENT SETTLEMENT.
60.4 SURFACE SPALLS ON CONCRETE BACKWALLS.
60.9 MODERATE TO SEVERE EROSION AT SOUTH CORNERS OF BOTH ABUTMENTS; SLOPE MATERIAL IS EXTREMELY ERODIBLE AND STEEP. LARGE SECTION OF SOIL HAS SLOUGHED OFF AT DOWNSTREAM SIDE OF EAST
ABUTMENT.
VEGETATION GROWING ON DOWNSTREAM SIDE OF WEST APPROACH.
2002 EARTHQUAKE APPEARS TO HAVE DROPPED EMBANKMENT UP TO 4" AT ABUTMENTS. FISSURE IN SOIL NEAR WEST ABUTMENT, LIKELY FROM EARTHQUAKE, EXTENDING ENTIRELY ACROSS EMBANKMENT IN FRONT
OF ABUTMENT.
60.15 LARGE BIRDS NEST ON TOP OF BOTH PIERS, SOUTH SIDE.
BIRD DROPPING STAINS ON THE WEST APPROACH WINGWALL (DOWNSTREAM SIDE).
REMARKS FROM PREVIOUS SNOOPER INSPECTIONS:
DEBRIS FROM DECK JOINTS ON PIERS #1 & #2 DIAPHRAGMS AND CAPS.
60.17 EROSION OF EAST BANK AT SOUTH COLUMN OF EAST PIER HAS EXPOSED OLD TIMBER PILES.
61.2 SEE BRIDGE FILE FOR SCOUR EVALUATION.
222.4,6 MINOR SETTLEMENT OF GRAVEL APPROACH ROADWAY SURFACE AT EAST APPROACHES. MINOR GRAVEL
MIGRATION ONTO BOTH ENDS OF DECK FROM APPROACHES.
ADDITIONAL ITEM REFERENCE AND REMARKS
222.5 APPROACH EMBANKMENT EROSION AT BOTH SOUTHEAST AND SOUTHWEST CORNERS OF BRIDGE. SIGNIFICANT
RILLS IN SOUTHEAST APPROACH EMBANKMENT HAVE ALMOST CUT SLOPE BACK TO ROAD.
222.7 NO OBJECT MARKERS PRESENT AT EITHER APPROACH.
36.A RAILING TYPE HAS NOT BEEN CRASH-TESTED FOR SAFETY.2
STRUCTURE LOAD RATING STRUCTURE NO. 9830-011P
TRUCK TYPE
INVENTORY RATING (NORMAL TRAFFIC) OPERATING RATING (MAXIMUM LOAD)
TONS METRIC TONS TONS METRIC TONS
H 22 20 37 34
HS 29 26 49 44
TYPE 3 27 24 45 41
TYPE 3S2 42 38 71 64
TYPE 3-3 51 46 86 78
DESIGN LOADING: HS15 (MS13.5)
X CAPACITY MEETS OR EXCEEDS DESIGN LOAD
CAPACITY IS LESS THAN DESIGN LOAD
ORIGINAL LOAD RATING CALCULATION APPLICABLE
X ORIGINAL LOAD RATING CALCULATION REVISED
DATE OF LOAD RATING CALCULATION: 7/15
LOAD RATING CONTROLLED BY: SERVICE, MOMENT
REMARKS: SEE BRIDGE FILE FOR LOAD RATING CALCULATIONS.
STRUCTURE INVENTORY AND APPRAISAL STRUCTURE NO. 9830-011P
STRUCTURE IDENTIFICATION
(201) PARK: DENALI NATIONAL PARK & PRESERVE (1) STATE: ....................................... 020 - ALASKA (AK)
(202) STRUCTURE NAME: .......... GHIGLIONE CREEK BRIDGE (2) STATE HWY. AGENCY DIST:
(203) STRUCTURE KIND: ............1 - BRIDGE (3) COUNTY CODE: ........................ 290 - YUKON-KOYUKUK
(204) STRUCTURE NUMBER: ..... 9830-011P (4) CITY/PLACE CODE:
(205) NPS REGION: .................... 7 - ALASKA (5) INVENTORY ROUTE:
(206) ROUTE CODE NUMBER: ... 10 (6) FEATURES INTERSECTED:....... GHIGLIONE CREEK
(207) ROAD SECTION NO: ..........011P (7) FACILITY CARRIED: .................. DENALI PARK ROAD
(208) NPS ROAD CLASS: ............ 1 - PRINCIPAL PARK ROAD (8) STATE STRUCTURE NO: .......... 9830011P0000000
(209) WITHIN NPS BNDRY?: .......YES (9) LOCATION: ................................ 40.19 MILES WEST OF AK RO
(210) OPERATING UNIT: ............. PARK (10) INV. RTE. - MIN. VERT. CLR: .. 99.99 FT (99.99 M)
(211) PROJECT NO(S): ................UNKNOWN (11) MILE POINT: .............................41.90 (KM PT 67.43)
(212) DRAWING NUMBERS: ....... 956 (27) YEAR BUILT:
(21) MAINTAINED BY: ................. 66 - NATIONAL PARK SERVICE (106) YEAR RECONSTRUCTED: .... N/A
(22) OWNER: ............................... 66 - NATIONAL PARK SERVICE (20) TOLL: ........................................3 - FREE ROAD
(37) HISTORICAL DESIGNATION: .. 5 - NOT ELIGIBLE
STRUCTURE DESCRIPTION, FOUNDATION, AND DECK TYPE
(43A) MAIN STR. MATERIAL: ..
(43B) MAIN STR. TYPE:
(45) NO. OF MAIN SPANS:
(48) MAX. SPAN LENGTH:
(49) STRUCTURE LENGTH:
(216A) ABUTMENT #1 FDN:
(216B) ABUTMENT #2 FDN:
(217A) PREDOM. PIER FDN.: ..
(217B) SECOND. PIER FDN: ...
(107) DECK TYPE:
3 - STEEL
02 - STRINGER/MULTI-BEAM or GIRDER
45.0 FT (13.7 M)
139.0 FT (42.4 M)
4 - PILE BENT
4 - PILE BENT
3 - SPREAD FOOTING ON PILES
3 - SPREAD FOOTING ON PILES
1 - CONCRETE CAST-IN-PLACE
(44A) APPR. STR. MATERIAL: ........ 0 - OTHER
(44B) APPR. STR. TYPE: ................ 00 - OTHER
(46) NO. OF APPROACH SPANS: .. 0
(108) WEAR SURFACE/PROTECT SYSTEM:
A) TYPE WEARING SURFACE: .. 1 - MONOLITHIC CONCRETE
B) TYPE MEMBRANE: ................. 0 - NONE
C) TYPE PROTECTION: .............. 0 - NONE
(218) IS SALT USED?: ..................... NO
LOAD RATING AND POSTING
(31) DESIGN LOAD: ................. 3 - HS15 (MS13.5) (41) LOAD RESTRICTION: ......... A - OPEN, NO RESTRICTION
(66) INVENTORY RATING: ...... 29.0 TONS (26.3 METRIC TONS) (70) BRIDGE POSTING: .............. 5 - NO POSTING REQUIRED
(64) OPERATING RATING: ...... 49.0 TONS (44.5 METRIC TONS)
INSPECTION DATES
(90) INSPECTION DATE: 6/19 (91) FREQ. OF INSP: 24 MONTHS (92 / 93) CRITICAL FEATURE INSPECTION (CFI):
(219) ADD. STUDIES NEEDED: N - 0 - NONE (A) FRACTURE CRITICAL: ... NO
INSP. EVERY: MONTHS - LAST INSP. : (220) SPECIAL STUDY TYPE: 5 - SCOUR
(B) UNDERWATER: .............. NO
(221) SPECIAL STUDY DATE: 9/98 INSP. EVERY: MONTHS - LAST INSP. :
(C) SPECIAL INSPECTION: .. NO
INSP. EVERY: MONTHS - LAST INSP. :
STRUCTURE INVENTORY AND APPRAISAL STRUCTURE NO. 9830-011P
GEOMETRY, TRAFFIC, AND NAVIGATIONAL DATA
(16) LATITUDE: ............................. 63°33'23.30"
(17) LONGITUDE: ......................... 149°45'13.90"
(19) DETOUR LENGTH: ............... 199 MI (199 KM)
(28A) LANES ON STRUCT:
(28B) LANES UNDER STRUCT: ... 00
(42A) SERVICE ON: ..................... 1 - HIGHWAY
(42B) SERVICE UNDER: .............. 5 - WATERWAY
(29) AVG. DAILY TRAFFIC:
(30) YEAR OF ADT:
(114) FUTURE ADT:
(115) YEAR OF FUTURE ADT:
(101) PARALLEL STRUCTURE: ... N - NONE
(38) NAVIGATION CONTROL?: ... 0
(39) VERTICAL CLEARANCE: ...... 0.0 FT (0.0 M)
(40) HORIZ. CLEARANCE: ........... 0.0 FT (0.0 M)
(111) ABUT. OR PIER PROT:
LATERAL UNDERCLEARANCE:
(55) RIGHT: ....................... 0.0 FT (0.0 M)
(56) LEFT: ......................... 0.0 FT (0.0 M)
(51) CURB TO CURB WIDTH:
(52) DECK WIDTH:
(32) APPR. ROADWAY WIDTH:
(213) APPR. PAVEMENT WIDTH:
LEFT SHOULDER:
RIGHT SHOULDER:
(33) BRIDGE MEDIAN:
(34) SKEW ANGLE:
(35) DECK FLARE?:
(47) TOTAL HORIZ. CLEARANCE:
(50) SIDEWALKS:
LEFT :
RIGHT :
(214) BRIDGE RAIL TYPE:
RAIL CONFIGURATION:
MATERIAL:
DESIGN TYPE:
(215) BRIDGE RAIL HEIGHT:
(53) MIN. VRT. CLEAR. OVER DECK:
(54) MIN. VRT. UNDERCLEARANCE:
28.0 FT (8.5 M)
32.5 FT (9.9 M)
30.0 FT (9.1 M)
24.0 FT (7.3 M)
3.0 FT (0.9 M)
3.0 FT (0.9 M)
0 - NO MEDIAN
99 °
NO
24.0 FT (7.3 M)
2.3 FT (0.7 M)
2.3 FT (0.7 M)
1 - FULL HEIGHT (NO PARAPE
4 - STEEL
1 - CONTINUOUS RAIL
2.33 FT (0.71 M)
99.99 FT (99.99 M)
0.00 FT (0.00 M)
CONDITION AND APPRAISAL DATA, PROPOSED IMPROVEMENTS, AND COST
(58) DECK:
(59) SUPERSTRUCTURE:
(60) SUBSTRUCTURE:
(61) CHANNEL:
(62) CULVERT: ...........................N
(222) APPROACHES:
(223) RETAINING WALL: ........... N
(36) TRAFFIC SAFETY FEAT: ... 0NNN
(75A) TYPE OF WORK:
(75B) WORK DONE BY:
(76) IMPROVEMENT LENGTH: ..
(67) STRUCTURAL EVALUATION:
(68) DECK GEOMETRY:
(69) UNDERCLEARANCES:
(71) WATERWAY ADEQUACY:
(72) APPROACH ALIGNMENT:
(113) SCOUR CRITICAL:
(225) PURPOSE OF IMPROVEMENT:
(226) PRIORITY OF IMPROVEMENT:
(227) MAINTENANCE COST:
(228) REHAB./RECONSTR. COST: ...
(229) CONSTRUCTION COST:
N
5 - Stable; scour within limits of
2 - REHAB/RECONSTRUCTION
B - MAJOR
$3,000
$0
ADDITIONAL INFORMATION
(230) STRUCTURE HISTORY:
11/02-EARTHQUAKE. 5/08, 5/12, 5/18 -SNOOPER INSPECTION.
(231) ADDITIONAL CONSIDERATIONS:
(330) ADDITIONAL CONFIG. INFO.:
SPAN #1, #2, & #3 - LENGTH 44.9', 45.3', & 44.8'
APPENDIX STRUCTURE NO. 9830-011P
PHOTOGRAPHS STRUCTURE NO. 9830-011P
PHOTO #1 - LOOKING EAST
FLOW
PHOTO #2 - SOUTH (DOWNSTREAM) SIDE
PHOTO #3 - GENERAL TOPSIDE VIEW LOOKING EAST
PHOTO #4 - GENERAL VIEW OF PATCH IN DECK NEAR EAST ABUTMENT
PHOTO #5 - TYPICAL OF CURB AND RAIL, DOWNSTREAM SIDE
LOOKING EAST SHOWN
PHOTO #6 - GENERAL CONDITION OF EAST JOINT
PHOTO #7 - SPALLING OF UPSTREAM CURBS NEAR EAST ABUTMENT
PHOTO #8 - CURB DAMAGE ON DOWNSTREAM SIDE NEAR EAST
ABUTMENT
PHOTO #9 - SEPARATION OF GUARD ANGLE AND BACKWALL AT EAST
JOINT, UPSTREAM SIDE SHOWN
PHOTO #10 - GENERAL CONDITION OF WEST JOINT; NOTE JOINT
FAILURE
PHOTO #11 - CLOSE-UP VIEW OF JOINT FAILURE AT WEST JOINT
PHOTO #12 - GENERAL CONDITION OF JOINT OVER WEST PIER
PHOTO #13 - FAILURE OF JOINT SEALANT AT UPSTREAM CURBS ABOVE
WEST PIER
PHOTO #14 - FAILURE OF JOINT SEALANT AT UPSTREAM CURBS ABOVE
EAST PIER
PHOTO #15 - GENERAL VIEW OF UNDERSIDE OF SUPERSTRUCTURE IN
EAST SPAN LOOKING EAST
PHOTO #16 - GENERAL VIEW OF UNDERSIDE OF SUPERSTRUCTURE IN
MID SPAN LOOKING WEST
PHOTO #17 - GENERAL VIEW OF UNDERSIDE OF SUPERSTRUCTURE IN
WEST SPAN LOOKING EAST
PHOTO #18 - GENERAL VIEW OF EAST ABUTMENT
PHOTO #19 - SPALLING AT UPSTREAM CORNER OF EAST BACKWALL
PHOTO #20 - GENERAL VIEW OF EAST PIER LOOKING WEST
PHOTO #21 - GENERAL VIEW OF WEST PIER LOOKING DOWNSTREAM
PHOTO #22 - GENERAL VIEW OF WEST ABUTMENT
PHOTO #23 - DELAMINATION AT UPSTREAM CORNER OF WEST
BACKWALL; NOTE SHEARED ANCHOR BOLT
PHOTO #24 - SHEARED ANCHOR BOLT AT UPSTREAM BEARING OF
WEST ABUTMENT
PHOTO #25 - MINOR HONEYCOMBING ON DECK UNDERSIDE BETWEEN
BEAMS #1 AND #2, EAST SPAN SHOWN (5/16/2018 PHOTO)
PHOTO #26 - SAG IN BEAM LINE "1" AT ALL SPANS; NOTE NO COVER
PLATE (5/16/2018 PHOTO)
PHOTO #27 - ACTIVE RAVEN'S NEST ON DOWNSTREAM SIDE OF PIER
CAPS; NESTS COVER BEARINGS FOR BEAM LINE "1" (5/16/2018 PHOTO)
PHOTO #28 - BEAM LINE "1" BEARING AT EAST PIER, UPSTREAM SIDE
SHOWN (5/16/2018 PHOTO)
PHOTO #29 - BEAM LINE "1" AT WEST PIER CENTER SPAN BOLT
MISSING; NOTE UNSEATED WEST BOLT (5/16/2018 PHOTO)
PHOTO #30 - NORTH SIDE PLATE WASHER BUCKLED WITH BENT
ANCHOR BOLT; BEAM LINE "2" AT EAST PIER SHOWN (5/16/2018
PHOTO)
PHOTO #31 - BEAM LINE "2" AT WEST PIER CENTER SPAN SOUTH BOLT
MISSING (5/16/2018 PHOTO)
PHOTO #32 - NORTH SIDE PLATE WASHER BUCKLED WITH BENT
ANCHOR BOLT; BEAM LINE "3" AT EAST PIER SHOWN (5/16/2018
PHOTO)
PHOTO #33 - CLOSE-UP VIEW OF PREVIOUS PHOTO (5/16/2018 PHOTO)
PHOTO #34 - SPALL ON DECK UNDERSIDE AT JOINT OVERHANG ABOVE
WEST PIER (5/16/2018 PHOTO)
PHOTO #35 - DEBRIS FROM DECK JOINT ON PIER DIAPHRAGMS AND
CAPS, WEST PIER SHOWN (5/16/2018 PHOTO)
PHOTO #36 - EAST APPROACH
PHOTO #37 - WEST APPROACH
PHOTO #38 - VIEW FROM BRIDGE LOOKING UPSTREAM
PHOTO #39 - VIEW FROM BRIDGE LOOKING DOWNSTREAM
File details come from the government source that posted it. Updated .