9-Attachment A Sample Plan Design Modeling.pdf

PDF 28 KB Posted

Attached to
Benefits Consulting and Actuarial Services
Solicitation number
RFP-27-00026
Issued by
Hillsborough County, Florida

About this file

This file is a sample plan design modeling document illustrating actuarial scenarios for a generic public-sector employer benefits program. The document demonstrates how a benefits consultant would evaluate various plan-design alternatives, estimate relative changes in plan value, and project annual financial impacts using synthetic data. The scenarios presented include modifications to traditional health plan structures such as increasing individual and family deductibles (estimated savings of $980,000 with a 1.2% plan value reduction), adjusting out-of-pocket maximums ($720,000 savings at 0.9% reduction), modifying coinsurance percentages ($465,000 savings at 0.6% reduction), and revising copay structures for primary care, specialist, emergency department, and pharmacy services. Additional scenarios address high-deductible plan modifications, including reduced employer Health Savings Account contributions (estimated $1,250,000 impact) and increased out-of-pocket maximums ($560,000 savings at 1.4% reduction).

The modeling document emphasizes that all values are illustrative and based on synthetic data with assumptions held constant for network, utilization, and enrollment distribution where applicable. The document notes that financial impacts represent estimated reductions in plan-paid claims or employer contributions, with plan value changes reflecting estimated shifts in actuarial value. Critical consultant support requirements include documenting assumptions, identifying interactions among scenarios, distinguishing modeled savings from guaranteed results, and performing separate modeling for combined scenario changes, as impacts are not necessarily additive. This sample modeling directly supports Hillsborough County's five-year Benefits Consulting and Actuarial Services contract opportunity in Florida, valued at $1,208,376.34, which seeks competitive sealed proposals for comprehensive employee benefits consulting services.

View the file

Other files

Show all 11

On GovTribe

Work with this file

  • Download the original file
  • Contacts named in this file
  • Similar government files
  • Ask GovTribe AI about this file

Text version

SAMPLE - S

YNTHETIC DATA

Illustrative reference only. No actual employer, member, or carrier data. Page 1

Plan Design Modeling Illustrative scenarios for a generic public-sector employer

Purpose Demonstrate how a benefits consultant would compare plan-design alternatives, estimate relative plan-value changes, and summarize modeled annual financial impact. All values are synthetic.

Scenario Plan type Modeled year Plan value change Annual impact Key assumption

Increase individual/family deductible Traditional Proposed (1.2%) ($980,000) Network and utilization held constant

Increase out-of-pocket maximum Traditional Proposed (0.9%) ($720,000) No change to covered services

Adjust coinsurance from 10% to 20% Traditional Proposed (0.6%) ($465,000) Applies after deductible

Increase primary and specialist copays Traditional Proposed (0.4%) ($310,000) Utilization held constant

Increase emergency department copay Traditional Proposed (0.1%) ($85,000) Copay waived upon admission

Revise pharmacy tier copays Both plans Proposed (0.5%) ($395,000) Retail and mail-order factors modeled

Reduce employer HSA contribution High-deductible Proposed N/A ($1,250,000) Flat contribution across coverage tiers

Increase high-deductible plan OOP maximum High-deductible Proposed (1.4%) ($560,000) Enrollment distribution held constant

Modeling notes

Financial impact Estimated reduction in plan-paid claims or employer contribution. Parentheses indicate savings.

Plan value change Estimated relative change in actuarial value; N/A where the change affects employer funding only.

Required consultant support Document assumptions, identify interactions among scenarios, and distinguish modeled savings from guaranteed results.

Combination warning Scenario impacts are not necessarily additive. Combined changes require separate modeling.

File details come from the government source that posted it. Updated .