9-Attachment A Sample Plan Design Modeling.pdf
PDF 28 KB Posted
- Attached to
- Benefits Consulting and Actuarial Services
- Solicitation number
- RFP-27-00026
- Issued by
- Hillsborough County, Florida
About this file
This file is a sample plan design modeling document illustrating actuarial scenarios for a generic public-sector employer benefits program. The document demonstrates how a benefits consultant would evaluate various plan-design alternatives, estimate relative changes in plan value, and project annual financial impacts using synthetic data. The scenarios presented include modifications to traditional health plan structures such as increasing individual and family deductibles (estimated savings of $980,000 with a 1.2% plan value reduction), adjusting out-of-pocket maximums ($720,000 savings at 0.9% reduction), modifying coinsurance percentages ($465,000 savings at 0.6% reduction), and revising copay structures for primary care, specialist, emergency department, and pharmacy services. Additional scenarios address high-deductible plan modifications, including reduced employer Health Savings Account contributions (estimated $1,250,000 impact) and increased out-of-pocket maximums ($560,000 savings at 1.4% reduction).
The modeling document emphasizes that all values are illustrative and based on synthetic data with assumptions held constant for network, utilization, and enrollment distribution where applicable. The document notes that financial impacts represent estimated reductions in plan-paid claims or employer contributions, with plan value changes reflecting estimated shifts in actuarial value. Critical consultant support requirements include documenting assumptions, identifying interactions among scenarios, distinguishing modeled savings from guaranteed results, and performing separate modeling for combined scenario changes, as impacts are not necessarily additive. This sample modeling directly supports Hillsborough County's five-year Benefits Consulting and Actuarial Services contract opportunity in Florida, valued at $1,208,376.34, which seeks competitive sealed proposals for comprehensive employee benefits consulting services.
View the file
Other files
Show all 11
On GovTribe
Work with this file
- Download the original file
- Contacts named in this file
- Similar government files
- Ask GovTribe AI about this file
Text version
SAMPLE - S
YNTHETIC DATA
Illustrative reference only. No actual employer, member, or carrier data. Page 1
Plan Design Modeling Illustrative scenarios for a generic public-sector employer
Purpose Demonstrate how a benefits consultant would compare plan-design alternatives, estimate relative plan-value changes, and summarize modeled annual financial impact. All values are synthetic.
Scenario Plan type Modeled year Plan value change Annual impact Key assumption
Increase individual/family deductible Traditional Proposed (1.2%) ($980,000) Network and utilization held constant
Increase out-of-pocket maximum Traditional Proposed (0.9%) ($720,000) No change to covered services
Adjust coinsurance from 10% to 20% Traditional Proposed (0.6%) ($465,000) Applies after deductible
Increase primary and specialist copays Traditional Proposed (0.4%) ($310,000) Utilization held constant
Increase emergency department copay Traditional Proposed (0.1%) ($85,000) Copay waived upon admission
Revise pharmacy tier copays Both plans Proposed (0.5%) ($395,000) Retail and mail-order factors modeled
Reduce employer HSA contribution High-deductible Proposed N/A ($1,250,000) Flat contribution across coverage tiers
Increase high-deductible plan OOP maximum High-deductible Proposed (1.4%) ($560,000) Enrollment distribution held constant
Modeling notes
Financial impact Estimated reduction in plan-paid claims or employer contribution. Parentheses indicate savings.
Plan value change Estimated relative change in actuarial value; N/A where the change affects employer funding only.
Required consultant support Document assumptions, identify interactions among scenarios, and distinguish modeled savings from guaranteed results.
Combination warning Scenario impacts are not necessarily additive. Combined changes require separate modeling.
File details come from the government source that posted it. Updated .