RFQ Q and A 8-17-26.pdf
PDF 46 KB Posted
- Attached to
- Fire & Emergency Medical Services Records Management System (FEMSRMS) BASE + 4 Option Years
- Solicitation number
- 80TECH26QA104
About this file
This document is a Questions and Answers (Q&A) file addressing clarifications on a NASA Request for Quote (RFQ) for the Federal Emergency Management System Records Management System (FEMSRMS) solution.
The Q&A addresses four key areas: (1) FedRAMP requirements, clarifying that the SaaS publisher/platform may hold the required FedRAMP High authorization at contract award rather than the prime contractor itself if the contractor is an authorized reseller/integrator; (2) quote format, confirming that NASA does not require a specific technical compliance matrix format and permits concise narratives or matrices demonstrating how the proposed COTS solution satisfies Section 4 requirements of the SOW, with quotations to be submitted as PDF documents; (3) quote details, requiring quoters to identify the software publisher and any major implementation/subcontracting partners within their submission; and (4) attachment labeling, confirming that the posted documents control and that an administrative error regarding attachment labeling was corrected in Amendment 0001. The responses emphasize that quoters must provide current, relevant, complete, and accurate information while keeping submissions as brief as possible and concentrating on substantive information essential for proper evaluation.
View the file
Other files
On GovTribe
Work with this file
- Download the original file
- Contacts named in this file
- Similar government files
- Ask GovTribe AI about this file
Text version
Question Title Question Answer
FedRAMP
The SOW requires the FEMSRMS solution to have an active FedRAMP High Authorization package at the time of award. If the prime contractor is an authorized reseller/integrator of the proposed SaaS solution, is it acceptable for the SaaS publisher/platform being proposed to hold the required FedRAMP High authorization, rather than the prime contractor itself?
As stated in the Statement of Work Section 3 "The contractor shall provide a solution that is Federal Risk and Authorization Management Program (FedRAMP) High
Authorized at the time of contract award".
Quote Format For purposes of demonstrating technical acceptability, does NASA require a specific technical compliance matrix or format, or may the Quoter provide a concise narrative/matrix showing how the proposed COTS solution satisfies each requirement in Section 4 of the SOW?
As stated in the RFQ posting, Only the required minimum amount of information is requested to be provided for proper evaluation. Efforts should be made to keep quotations as brief as possible, concentrating on substantive information essential for a proper evaluation.
In responding to this RFQ, it is the quoter’s responsibility to provide current, relevant, complete, and accurate information in their quotation. The quotation shall be submitted as a PDF document.
Quote Details Does NASA require the Quoter to identify the software publisher and any major implementation/subcontracting partners within the quotation?
Yes, quoters should identify the software publisher and any major parterners/subcontractors within their quote submission.
List of Attachments
The RFQ's List of Attachments identifies Attachment A as the OCIO/ITPOD Rider and Attachment B as the Statement of Work; however, the posted files identify Attachment A as the Statement of Work and Attachment B as the NASA IT
Software and Hardware Rider. Please confirm that the posted documents control and that this is only an attachment-labeling discrepancy.
This was an admin error and is fixed with Amendment 0001
File details come from the government source that posted it. Updated .