80SSC024R0001_MCASS_SECTION_5_ATTACHMENTS.pdf

80SSC024R0001 MCASS DRFP PPQ Attachment 5.1

5.1 - 1 of 3

ATTACHMENT 5-PPQ

PAST PERFORMANCE QUESTIONNAIRE

A. NAME OF CONTRACTOR REQUESTING THE REFERENCE

Contractor

The purpose of this questionnaire is to obtain information regarding the above named Contractor’s past/current performance relative to a contract completed, or in progress, at your company/agency.

NASA Stennis Space Center (SSC) is considering this Contractor for a task order for construction services at SSC. We would greatly appreciate your input regarding the quality of the Contractor’s past performance.

Handwritten responses are sufficient. We request that the individual(s) responsible for oversight of the project (i.e., Contracting Officer, Contracting Officer’s Representative, etc.) respond to the questionnaire.

Upon completion of the questionnaire, please email the questionnaire to Ms. Rachel Clayton, at rachel.clayton@nasa.gov. If you have any questions please call (228) 688-2822.

Questionnaires can be submitted early, but must be received by the Contracting Officer no later than 3:00 p.m. central time on TBD

B. CONTRACT IDENTIFICATION

1. Company:

2. Contract Number: ______________________________

3. Award Date: ______________________________

4. Contract Completion Date: ______________________________

5. Contract Value: ______________________________

6. Contract Type (i.e., FFP): ______________________________

7. Contractor provided services as (Prime Contractor / Subcontractor): ________________

8. Contract Title/Short Description:

5.1 - 1 of 3

C. PAST PERFORMANCE EVALUATION

Quality Ratings:

A = Exceptional: Performance meets contractual requirements and exceeds many to the Government’s benefit.

B = Very Good: Performance meets contractual requirements and exceeds some to the Government’s benefit.

C = Satisfactory: Performance meets contractual requirements.

D = Marginal: Performance does not meet some contractual requirements.

E = Unsatisfactory: Performance does not meet most contractual requirements.

F = NA: Not Applicable.

Please rate the contractor’s performance using the quality ratings (A through F) identified above.

Areas/Sub-Areas Services Performed

(Y/N)

Quality of Service

(E/VG/G/S/P/NA)

Comments

Technical Performance Word Processing/Correspondence Travel Coordination (Official domestic and international travel documentation preparation and processing using travel software.)

Schedule/Calendar Management (Appointment scheduling and maintaining of calendars utilizing MS Outlook or other applications.)

Telephone Services Data Management Records Management Information Dissemination Technical competence of contractor personnel Insight in understanding customer requirements and priorities Contractor’s practices to ensure the safeguarding and protection of personally identifiable and sensitive information

Ability to identify and resolve performance deficiencies in a timely manner

Adherence to safety requirements Experience supporting executive level personnel Overall Technical Performance Rating N/A Management Working relationships with associate contractors, subcontractors, and the Government/Customer in a team environment

Experience with managing contract employees at multiple locations

Ability to recruit and retain quality personnel in a timely manner

Ability to maintain a stable, high quality and well-trained workforce

Ability to develop, implement and maintain training programs for employees to ensure proficiency

Attentiveness to overall safety and health Ability to respond to fluctuating workloads Effectiveness of contract phase-in Content, accuracy, quality, and timeliness of reports and deliverables

Experience with the Service Contract Act (SCA) and applicable Wage Determination Compliance

Overall Management Performance Rating N/A

5.1 - 2 of 3

D. NARRATIVE QUESTIONS:

1. Discuss any particular strong/weak points of contractor’s performance.

2. Management team’s approach in identifying unforeseen problems (causes, impact, and resolutions) that arose during execution of those tasks and ability to identify and alleviate risk.

E. RESPONDENT INFORMATION

A. Name of Evaluator:

B. Agency/Company Name and Mailing Address:

C. Position Title:

D. Telephone Number:

E. E-Mail Address:

Signature Date

80SSC024R0001 MCASS DRFP Matrix Attachment 5.2

5.2 - 1 of 1

ATTACHMENT 5 MATRIX – PAST PERFORMANCE MATRIX

SOURCE SELECTION SENSITIVE WHEN COMPLETED

*****NOT TO BE RELEASED OUTSIDE GOVERNMENT CHANNELS*****

Offeror Name:_______________________________________________________

Offerors shall complete the following matrix:

References Contract ID/Number

Contract Name/Title Customer Offeror or Team Member Name

$ Value Contract Complete (Y/N)

Admin.

Services (Y/N)

Admin.

Services to executive personnel (Y/N)

Travel Coord.

(Y/N)

Safeguarding of Sensitive Information (Y/N)

Multiple Geographic locations (Y/N)

Employee Training Program (Y/N)

Note 1: Offeror may add rows as necessary.

Note 2: In the last seven (7) columns of the matrix, Offeror shall input a “Y” for “Yes” and an “N” for “No” indicating whether or not the contract being referenced included those specific services/activities.

Note 3: Offerors past performance history shall address the relevant experience as defined in 5.15.3.2, paragraph a, sub bullet 2. Relevant Experience: of the RFP. A copy of the reference paragraph is provided below:

2. Relevant (Pertinent) Experience: The accomplishment of administrative support services similar in size, scope, and complexity to the administrative support services required by this solicitation. Relevant/pertinent size is defined as projects over $4M.

Relevant/pertinent scope is defined as administrative services. Providing past administrative services experience that includes administrative services for executive level personnel, travel coordination, and safeguarding of sensitive information will receive additional consideration. Relevant/pertinent complexity is defined as administrative services performed at multiple geographic locations and a continuous employee-training program. Providing past experience that includes services at multiple geographic locations under a single contract and a continuous employee-training program will receive additional consideration.

80SSC024R0001 MCASS DRFP Attachment 5.3 CL - Consent Letter

ATTACHMENT 5.3-CL

SUBCONTRACTOR/TEAMING PARTNER CONSENT FORM FOR THE

RELEASE OF PAST AND PRESENT PERFORMANCE INFORMATION TO THE

PRIME CONTRACTOR

Past performance information concerning subcontractors and teaming partners cannot be disclosed to a private party without the subcontractor’s or teaming partner’s consent.

Because a prime contractor is a private party, the Government will need that consent before disclosing subcontractor/teaming partner past and present performance information to the prime during exchanges. In an effort to assist the Government in assessing your past performance relevancy and confidence, we request that the following consent form be completed by the major subcontractors/teaming partners identified in your proposal. The completed consent forms should be submitted as part of your Past Performance Volume (or Proposal). (Note: Section 5 should specify if past performance is to be submitted as a separate proposal volume.)

SAMPLE

Dear (Contracting Officer)

We are currently participating as a (subcontractor/teaming partner) with (prime contractor or name of entity providing proposal) in responding to the NASA, Stennis Space Center, Request for Proposal (solicitation number) for the (program title or description of effort).

We understand that the Government is placing increased emphasis on past performance in order to obtain best value in source selections. In order to facilitate the performance confidence assessment process, we are signing this consent form to allow you to discuss our past and present performance information with the prime contractor during the source selection process.

(Signature and Title of individual who has the authority to sign for and legally bind the company)

Company Name:

Address: