SATPC0033794 Tab 10 BNJ redacted.pdf

PDF 276 KB Posted

Attached to
Aeva Aeries II Lidar Sensor and Technica Media Converter Federal contract opportunity
Solicitation number
80NSSC24856949Q
Issued by
National Aeronautics and Space Administration Shared Services Center

About this file

This document contains a brand name justification for the acquisition of an Aeva Aeries II Lidar Sensor and Technica MC 1000 Base Media Converter. The justification states that the Technica MC 1000 is the only protocol translator compatible with the Aeva sensor, and no other existing systems can enable communication between the Lidar and computer systems. Procuring a media converter from a different vendor would render existing systems incapable of communicating. The total estimated cost is redacted and the period of performance is 6-8 weeks. The contracting officer has accepted the brand name justification and determined that only one source is reasonably available for the requirements.

View the file

Other files for this federal contract opportunity

Other files attached to Aeva Aeries II Lidar Sensor and Technica Media Converter, newest first.
File Type Posted
SATPC0033794 Tab 10 Open Market RFQ.pdf PDF
SATPC0033794 Tab 04 4 SOW.pdf PDF

On GovTribe

Work with this file on GovTribe

  • Download the original file
  • Contacts named in this file
  • Similar government files
  • Ask GovTribe AI about this file

Text version

Page 1 V2.0 3-15-2017

NATIONAL AERONAUTICS AND SPACE ADMINISTRATION

NASA SHARED SERVICES CENTER

RECOMMENDATION AND DETERMINATION TO SOLICIT FROM ONE SOURCE

OR BRAND NAME

PICK ONE

Sole Source:

I recommend that NASA, NASA Shared Services Center negotiate with Vendor Name only for _____.

The total estimated cost of this effort is Enter Dollar amount and the estimated period of performance or lead-time for delivery is Date.

OR

Brand Name Justification:

I recommend that NASA, NASA Shared Services Center negotiate only with vendors who can provide the subject brand name from Aeva for Aeries II LiDAR Sensor and Technica MC 1000 Base Media Converter. The total estimated cost of this effort is and the estimated period of performance or lead-time for delivery is 6-8 Weeks ARO.

This recommendation is for the acquisition of supplies or services determined to be reasonably available from only one source/only one manufacture. Competition is impractical for the following reasons (please answer the questions below):

1. What are the reasons for soliciting only the suggested source/suggested brand name? Please provide the unique characteristics of the items or services along with the supporting rationale and the market research performed to substantiate your reason for the suggested source/brand name.

In accordance to the manufacturer of the Aeva Aeries II FMCW LiDAR, the Technica MC 1000Base-T1 Matenet Media Converter is the only protocol translator that is compatible with the sensor.

2. What is the impact to the government if another vendor/brand is used? Include any dollar, schedule, or compatibility impacts if possible.

No other existing systems in hand or on the market can enable communication between the LIDAR and existing computer systems. Procuring a media converter from a different vendor would render our existing systems incapable of communicating with each other.

ADDITIONAL COMMENTS:

Date

NAV GUIDANCE & CONTROL SYSTEMS

Title

JSC EG211

Office

Page 2 V3.0 01/18/2023

****FOR NSSC SAT USE ONLY****

The above justification in pursuant to one of the following (only select one):

- Recommendation and Determination to Solicit from One Source (RDSS): For open market purchases, pursuant to FAR 5.101(a)(1), the proposed contract action will be placed on SAM.gov under the authority of FAR 13.106 - 1(b)(1)(i).

- Recommendation and Determination to Solicit from One Source (RDSS): For open market purchases, pursuant to FAR 5.101(a)(2), the proposed contraction action was not placed on SAM.gov as oral solicitation will be used to solicit quotation under the authority of FAR 13.106-1(c).

- Recommendation and Determination to Solicit from One Source (RDSS): For open market purchases, pursuant to FAR 5.202(a)(2), the proposed contract action is exempt from publication on SAM.gov because the government would be seriously injured if the Agency complies with the time periods specified in FAR 5.203.

- Brand Name Justification (BNJ): For open market purchases, pursuant to FAR 13.106-1(b)(1)(i), the acquisition of the referenced brand name item is hereby justified. (Under $25,000)

- Brand Name Justification (BNJ): For open market purchases, pursuant to FAR 13.106-1(b)(1)(i), the acquisition of the referenced brand name item is hereby justified. Pursuant to FAR 5.201, any contract action over $25,000 shall be synopsized in the Government wide Point of Entry (GPE) and the brand name justification must be attached.

SEWP/IDIQ Brand Name Justification (BNJ): For schedule/IDIQ purchases, pursuant to FAR 16.505(4)(i)(ii), the acquisition of the referenced brand name item(s) is hereby justified. (under $30,000)

SEWP/IDIQ Brand Name Justification (BNJ): For schedule/IDIQ purchases, pursuant to FAR 16.505(a)(4)(i)(ii)(iii)(A), the acquisition of the referenced brand name item(s) is hereby justified. Any action over $30,000 the brand name shall be posted on the agency website used to solicit offers for orders.

- Limited Source Justification (LSJ) Sole Source: For GSA orders, pursuant to FAR 8.405-6(a)(1)(i)(B), only one source is capable of providing the supplies or services required at the level of quality required because the supplies or services are unique or highly specialized. Action will be performed against GSA Contract ___________________.

- Limited Source Justification (LSJ) Brand Name: For GSA orders, pursuant to FAR 8.405-6(b), the item is peculiar to one manufacturer. A brand name item, whether available on one or more schedule contracts, is an item peculiar to one manufacturer.

- Exception to Fair Opportunity (EFO): For SEWP orders or orders placed against other IDIQ contracts, under the authority of the Federal Acquisition Streamlining Act (FASA) and Pursuant to FAR 16.505(b), exemption under FAR 16.505(b)(2) used is based on the following:

(A) The agency need for the supplies or services is so urgent that providing a fair opportunity would result in unacceptable delays

(B) Only one awardee is capable of providing the supplies or services required at the level of quality required because the supplies or services ordered are unique or highly specialized.

(C) The order must be issued on a sole-source basis in the interest of economy and efficiency because it is a logical follow-on to an order already issued under the contract, provided that all awardees were given a fair opportunity to be considered for the original order.

I hereby accept the above stated recommendation and determine that the circumstances of the contract action deem only one source reasonably available.

X

Contracting Officer

File details come from the government source that posted it. Updated .