Attachment 2_Rev.1_GOSWIFT Past Performance Questionnaire.pdf
PDF 575 KB Posted
- Attached to
- GOSWIFT Test Pod
- Solicitation number
- 80AFRC26Q0006
About this file
This is a Past Performance Questionnaire for Solicitation No. 80AFRC26Q0006, issued by NASA Armstrong Flight Research Center for the Geometry Optimization and Sensing with Integration and Flight Test (GOSWIFT) project.
The questionnaire is designed to collect reference information from current or previous customers regarding a contractor's past performance on completed or ongoing contracts. Responses must be submitted by 5:00 PM Pacific Daylight Time on June 16, 2026, to Jenni Schnarr (jennifer.schnarr@nasa.gov) and Tanjanica Jackson (tanjanica.s.jackson@nasa.gov). The questionnaire requests that individuals responsible for administrative oversight of the project, such as the Contracting Officer's Representative or project manager, complete the survey. Completed questionnaires are considered sensitive information and will not be released to the offeror.
The questionnaire collects contract information including project title and contract number, total project value, prime contractor or subcontractor status, and contract type. Respondents must rate contractor performance across five categories—Quality, Schedule, Management, an optional Other category, and an Overall rating—using a six-point scale: Exceptional, Very Good, Satisfactory, Marginal, Unsatisfactory, or N/A. Each rating category includes specific definitions of performance criteria. The form also provides space for evaluator narratives supporting the ratings, additional beneficial information, and evaluator contact information including role and length of involvement with the project or contract.
View the file
Other files
Show all 11
On GovTribe
Work with this file
- Download the original file
- Contacts named in this file
- Similar government files
- Ask GovTribe AI about this file
Text version
Solicitation No. 80AFRC26Q0006
Geometry Optimization and Sensing with Integration and Flight Test (GOSWIFT)
PAST PERFORMANCE QUESTIONNAIRE
Name of Contractor Requesting the Reference: _____________________________
The purpose of this questionnaire is to obtain information regarding the quality of the above-named Contractor’s past performance relative to a contract, completed or in progress, at your company/agency. NASA Armstrong Flight Research Center’s Request for Quote No.
80AFRC26Q0006 requires Offerors to identify current or previous customers and solicit their response regarding our performance.
It is requested that the individual(s) responsible for the administrative oversight of the project
(e.g. COR, project manager, etc.) respond to this questionnaire.
Upon completion of the survey, please email this survey to: Jenni Schnarr at jennifer.schnarr@nasa.gov and Tanjanica Jackson at tanjanica.s.jackson@nasa.gov no later than
5:00PM Pacific Daylight Time on June 16, 2026.
The information contained in the completed Past Performance Questionnaire is considered sensitive information and cannot be released to us, the Offeror. If you have any questions about the acquisition or the attached questionnaire, your questions must be directed to Jenni Schnarr at jennifer.schnarr@nasa.gov.
Sincerely, Name: _________________________________
Title: __________________________________
Unsatisfactory
Contractor's performance is failing (or failed) to meet most contractual requirements. The contractual performance of the requirements contains a serious problem(s) for which the contractor’s corrective actions appear or were ineffective. Extensive customer oversight and involvement was required.
7) Please provide any additional information that may be beneficial to aid in this evaluation:
8) Please provide your contact information, role with this project/contract, and the length of your involvement:
1. Quality Unsatisfactory Marginal Satisfactory Very good Exceptional N/A
Evaluator’s narrative:
2. Schedule Unsatisfactory Marginal Satisfactory Very good Exceptional N/A
Evaluator’s narrative:
3. Management Unsatisfactory Marginal Satisfactory Very good Exceptional N/A
Evaluator’s narrative:
4. Other: Unsatisfactory Marginal Satisfactory Very good Exceptional N/A (Optional) ☐ ☐ ☐ ☐ ☐ ☐ Evaluator’s narrative:
5. OVERALL: Unsatisfactory Marginal Satisfactory Very good Exceptional N/A Evaluator’s narrative:
File details come from the government source that posted it. Updated .