8-5 AG Legal Services Scoresheet DEQ.xls
XLS spreadsheet 39 KB Posted
- Solicitation number
- TR26-12
- Issued by
- Utah
About this file
This is an RFP evaluation scoresheet for legal services to assist the Office of the Attorney General of the State of Utah with civil enforcement litigation for the Department of Environmental Quality (DEQ). The RFP, designated TR26-12, seeks to establish a list of law firms eligible to enter into future professional service agreements (PSAs) with the OAG for a five-year period. The procurement will result in multiple contract awards, with successful offerors placed on an eligible vendor list. No specific response dates, due dates, site visits, or bidder's conferences are detailed in this scoresheet document. The contract term is five years, with vendors required to guarantee their pricing for one year.
The evaluation process employs a 500-point technical scoring system with five primary criteria: Lead Counsel and Senior Attorneys qualifications (40% weight, 200 points); geographic location and civil litigation experience in designated judicial districts (35% weight, 175 points); general civil litigation experience and case results (15% weight, 75 points); reference materials, conflicts of interest, and malpractice insurance documentation (5% weight, 25 points); and cost proposal (5% weight, 25 points). Offerors must meet five mandatory requirements, including certification of team experience, conflict-of-interest clearance, legal malpractice insurance coverage of at least $1,000,000 per incident, background check completion, and certification of non-debarment status. A minimum threshold of 350 points (70% of technical points) is required for placement on the eligible vendor list.
View the file
Other files
| File | Type | Posted |
|---|---|---|
| 2-Vendor Prerequisites - RFP Agency.pdf | ||
| 3-2 AG Legal Services MMR and Technical Critieria DEQ.docx | DOCX document | |
| 6-4 AG Legal Services CoverSheet DEQ.docx | DOCX document | |
| 7-1-Legal Services RFP and SOW for DEQ 2026.03.03.docx | DOCX document | |
| 5-6 AG Legal Services TermsandConditions DEQ.docx | DOCX document | |
| 4-3 AG Legal Services CostProposalForm DEQ.docx | DOCX document | |
| 1-Claim of Business Confidentiality Updated.pdf.pdf |
On GovTribe
Work with this file
- Download the original file
- Contacts named in this file
- Similar government files
- Ask GovTribe AI about this file
Text version
Score Sheet
| LEGAL SERVICES TO ASSIST THE OFFICE OF THE ATTORNEY GENERAL SUPPORTING DEQ CIVIL ENFORCEMENT LITIGATION | ||||||||||
| TR26-12 | ||||||||||
| RFP EVALUATION SCORESHEET | ||||||||||
| Score will be assigned as follows: | ||||||||||
| 0 = Fail, the proposal fails to address the requirements or criteria described in the RFP or cannot be assessed due to missing information | ||||||||||
| Firm Name: | 1 = Poor, the proposal inadequately addresses the requirements or criteria described in the RFP or cannot be assessed due to incomplete information | |||||||||
| 2 = Unsatisfactory, the proposal addresses the requirements or criteria described in the RFP in an unsatisfactory manner | ||||||||||
| Evaluator: | 3 = Satisfactory, the proposal addresses all requirements or criteria described in the RFP in a minimum satisfactory manner | |||||||||
| 4 = Good, the proposal addresses all requirements or criteria described in the RFP and in some respects exceeds them | ||||||||||
| Date: | 5 = Excellent, the proposal addresses and exceeds all of the requirements or criteria described in the RFP | |||||||||
| Minimum Mandatory Requirements | Evaluation (Pass/Fail) | |||||||||
| 1. | Offeror must certify it meets the experience and requirements of the Litigation Team. | |||||||||
| 2. | Offeror must certify that no members of the Litigation Team to whom a matter is assigned or the law firm that employs them have, or appear to have, any conflict of interest in providing the assigned Legal Services. | |||||||||
| 3. | Offeror must certify they have or will commit to acquiring legal malpractice insurance coverage in an amount not less than $1,000,000 per incident, which covers all attorneys and paralegals from that firm who are part of the Litigation Team. | |||||||||
| 4. | Offeror must certify it will complete a background check. | |||||||||
| 5. | Offeror must certify that they are not presently debarred, suspended, proposed for debarment or ineligible for contracting by a governmental entity. | |||||||||
| Scoreable Technical Criteria | Evaluator Score (0-5) | Criteria Weight | % of Tech Criteria | Points Possible | Points | |||||
| Earned | Minimum Required | |||||||||
| 1 | Lead Counsel/Senior Attorneys - Overall qualifications and experience of Lead Counsel and the designated Senior Attorneys. | 40 | 40.0% | 200.00 | 0.00 | |||||
| 2 | Geographic Location - Offeror's civil litigation experience in the designated judicial district(s) combined with the need for legal suport in that judicial district | 35 | 35.0% | 175.00 | 0.00 | |||||
| 3 | Offeror’s experience with civil litigation, including the quality of results obtained by the Offeror. Law Firm’s ability, qualifications and general approach to the type of civil litigation that the Offeror anticipates supporting. Offeror’s description of any experience that they have in handling cases similar in nature. | 15 | 15.0% | 75.00 | 0.00 | |||||
| 4 | Reference materials, conflicts of interest and malpractice insurance. | 5 | 5.0% | 25.00 | 0.00 | |||||
| 5 | Cost proposal | 5 | 5.0% | 25.00 | 0.00 | |||||
| 13 | 0.0% | 0.00 | 0.00 | |||||||
| 14 | 0.0% | 0.00 | 0.00 | |||||||
| 15 | 0.0% | 0.00 | 0.00 | |||||||
| 16 | 0.0% | 0.00 | 0.00 | |||||||
| 17 | 0.0% | 0.00 | 0.00 | |||||||
| 18 | 0.0% | 0.00 | 0.00 | |||||||
| 19 | 0.0% | 0.00 | 0.00 | |||||||
| 20 | 0.0% | 0.00 | 0.00 | |||||||
| 21 | 0.0% | 0.00 | 0.00 | |||||||
| 22 | 0.0% | 0.00 | 0.00 | |||||||
| 23 | 0.0% | 0.00 | 0.00 | |||||||
| 100.0% | 500.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | |||||||
| Required Technical Point Threshold | Min Percent | Min Points Required | Points Earned | Percent Earned | Evaluation | |||||
| 70% | 350.0 | 0.0 | 0.0% | 0 | ||||||
| Award methodology: Successful Offerors that receive 350 total points will be placed on a list of law firms eligible to enter into future professional service agreements "PSA". |
File details come from the government source that posted it. Updated .