77344424Q0047 questions and answers_02.15.24.docx

DOCX document 29 KB Posted

Attached to
Performance Assessment of the Effectiveness of DFC Loan Portfolio Guaranties in Increasing Access to Finance for Agriculture Enterprises in Sub-Saharan Africa
Solicitation number
77344424Q0047
Issued by

About this file

This combined synopsis and solicitation requests quotations for a performance assessment of the effectiveness of the International Development Finance Corporation's loan portfolio guaranties. Vendors will assess ten loan portfolio guaranties focused on increasing access to finance for agriculture enterprises in Sub-Saharan Africa. The assessment will include impact scoring, additionality and sustainability metrics, and interviews with borrowers and banks. The solicitation is a total small business set-aside with responses due in two phases by February 21, 2024 and March 15, 2024. Phase two involves an oral presentation, pricing, and representations. The firm-fixed price assessment is due by October 31, 2024 with webinars continuing through March 2025. Travel will be reimbursed at cost. The solicitation will result in a single purchase order award made to the best value vendor based on experience, capabilities, past performance, and price.

View the file

Other files

File Type Posted
77344424Q0047 questions and answers_02.29.24.docx DOCX document
Attachment 5 Form for FAR 52.212-3.pdf PDF
Attachment 4. Interested vendors list_02.15.24.docx DOCX document
Attachment 1. Statement of work_02.15.24.docx DOCX document
Attachment 4. Interested vendors list.docx DOCX document
Attachment 1. Statement of work.docx DOCX document
77344424Q0047 questions and answers.docx DOCX document
Attachment 4. Interested vendors list.docx DOCX document
Attachment 4. Interested vendors list.docx DOCX document
Attachment 1. Statement of work.docx DOCX document
Attachment 3 Additional clauses.docx DOCX document
Attachment 4. Interested vendors list.docx DOCX document
Attachment 2 Full text of FAR 52.212-5.docx DOCX document
Show all 13

On GovTribe

Work with this file

  • Download the original file
  • Contacts named in this file
  • Similar government files
  • Ask GovTribe AI about this file

Text version

Performance Assessment of the Effectiveness of DFC Loan Portfolio Guaranties

RFQ No. 77344424Q0047
Questions and Answers as of February 15, 2024
Page 2 of 2

U.S. International Development Finance Corporation (DFC)

Performance Assessment of the Effectiveness of DFC Loan Portfolio Guaranties in Increasing Access to Finance for Agriculture Enterprises in Sub-Saharan Africa RFQ No. 77344424Q0047

Questions and Answers as of February 15, 2024

Number
Question
Answer
1
Has this performance assessment been done before? If so, is the previous contract available?

While assessments have been done before, this specific assessment for these loan portfolio guaranties has not been performed before.

2
Should we provide the response #2 Phase 1 (A) & (B) in addition to our previous submission [in response to the draft SOW, RFI, and sources sought special notice, notice ID REQ-24-0048], which was very comprehensive or respond on to #2, Phase 1 (A) & (B)?

This procurement is separate from the draft SOW, RFI, and sources sought special notice previously issued. Responses to that earlier notice will not be evaluated as part of this acquisition. Vendors interested in this acquisition must submit Phase I quotes by the respective due date to be considered for this award.

3
List of LPGs to evaluate: Has the DFC identified which ten LPG to commercial banks for Ag-SMEs will be evaluated? Is it possible to share so we can properly estimate time and survey requirements?

DFC has identified the commercial banks we plan to include in the study, noting that the list may change due to unforeseen circumstances (e.g., non-cooperation, country crisis). DFC will disclose the names of the partner banks once they are informed of the upcoming study. Vendors shall assume that there will be one commercial bank located in each of the ten countries listed in footnote 1 in the revised statement of work, contained in attachment 1 to the solicitation.

4
Control group: Should the evaluation consider the construction of a control group to compare the DFC LPG’s to commercial banks to advance Ag-SME lending vs. other types of DFC support?

DFC is open to recommendations on constructing a control group if it is possible to do so within the timeframe and budget. Note that DFC does not offer other types of support to these banks, which would make comparability and data collection a challenge.

5
Approval for borrower consultations: Has approval been obtained from the commercial banks in the LPG Ag Portfolio to contact their clients for stakeholder interviews or surveys that we are tasked with conducting?

DFC will be notifying the commercial banks about the study in the next few weeks and will seek approval for contacting a sample of borrowers for interviews and/or surveying before award of this contract. Vendors shall assume that all ten banks will consent to contacting their clients.

6
Scope of borrower engagement: Are said interviews/surveys expected to encompass all ten commercial banks involved in the evaluation, or will they be limited to a representative sample?

The scope of borrower engagement will depend on the willingness of the partner commercial banks to facilitate the interviews/surveys but may include all ten banks, if they agree. Vendors shall assume that all ten banks will consent to interviews/surveys with borrowers.

7
Impact Scoring approach: Is it anticipated that we will utilize existing or preliminary Impact Quotient (IQ) scores as part of our assessment of the LPG Ag Portfolio or will we develop our own ex-post IQ scores and evaluation reports for each LPG evaluated?

The ten LPGs were originated prior to implementation of the IQ, so there are no existing or preliminary IQ scores. The consultant will conduct an IQ assessment and IQ score for each LPG using DFC’s existing IQ User Guide and templates.

8
Additionality and sustainability metrics: Has the DFC team already identified specific metrics to assess additionality and sustainability of DFC LPG’s or should the offeror identify and suggest how to assess additionality and sustainability metrics?

DFC is considering approaches to assess additionality and sustainability and would welcome suggestions on specific metrics, including those specific to LPGs.

9
Steering committee involvement: Who will be on the Steering Committee to oversee the work, and which department(s) do they sit in?

The Steering Committee consists of at least one member each from DFC’s LPG origination team, relationship management team, impact monitoring team, agribusiness team, evaluation team, and a representative from USAID’s AgFinance team.

10
Database development: Will there be a need to develop a database that can be adapted into a Power BI or another interactive data visualization tool for DFC's use?

DFC requests that data be stored and shared in Excel.

11
Deliverable structure: Is it expected that the external written report and presentation will differ significantly in content or format from the presentation and webinar prepared for DFC staff and other external parties?

The external written report will need to adequately protect business confidential information, which may require anonymization of commercial bank names, countries of operations, and other identifiable information. If it is not possible to adequately protect business confidential information through anonymization, the external report and presentation will need to be in the form of an abstract or other format.

12
Will DFC reopen a targeted Q&A window for Offerors who are selected for Phase II?

Yes – please see amendment 2 to the solicitation.

13
Can the DFC provide broad budget guidance for the activity?

DFC anticipates the value of this contract will be roughly the same magnitude or lower relative to recent evaluation work for DFC’s Portfolio for Impact (PI2) under task order no. 77344423F0114, which was awarded in June 2023 in the amount of $491,792. This task order involved a greater number of projects than the instant requirement and is only roughly comparable; as such, DFC considers the value of this past project to be the upper bound estimate for our current requirement. This estimate is not binding on vendors and is not a ceiling or floor on quotes; rather, this information is provided as a courtesy to prospective vendors. DFC may select a quote for award with a price below, at, or exceeding this figure.

14
Will there be a requirement for key personnel?

Yes, there is a requirement for key personnel. Please see section (h)(2)(iv)(A) of the solicitation, as amended, regarding the oral presentation, specifically:

· (1)(c), requiring a discussion of proposed key personnel during the oral presentation.

· (3), requiring the submission of a resume for any designated key personnel, and specifying that the project manager/lead shall be key personnel while the vendor shall propose the designation of any other key personnel.

Key personnel will be evaluated under the capabilities and approach factor, as described in paragraph (i)(2) of the solicitation.

15
Are the financial intermediaries obligated to share data or information with the evaluators about loan origination processes, quantitative data on loan portfolios, and lists and contact information for borrowers?

Financial intermediaries (FIs) who have signed guaranty agreements with DFC agree to share transaction and impact information on their loan portfolios. DFC also reserves the right to make reasonable requests for additional information to support an evaluation such as information on the FIs loan origination processes. However, they are not obligated to share contact information for borrowers. Some FIs may be willing to share contact information, while others may not; it will depend on their internal data privacy and protection policies. Nonetheless, vendors shall assume that all ten banks will consent to providing contact information for their borrowers.

16
Does DFC have an estimated date by which it will notify prospective contractors of whether they were selected to proceed to Phase 2 of the solicitation process?

We anticipate providing the advisory downselect notices on or about February 29, 2024. This date is subject to change.

17
For prospective contractors that make it to Phase 2 of the solicitation process, will there be another opportunity to ask questions?

Yes – please see our answer to question #12 above.

18
Did DFC conduct ex-ante IQ scoring for the LPG program, and will that information be available to the contractor to inform the reconstruction of the theory of change and ex-post IQ scoring?

The proposed LPGs were originated prior to the implementation of IQ, so are no ex-ante IQ assessments. We anticipate that the guaranty agreements and term sheets will help inform the development of a reconstructed theory of change and ex-post IQ scoring.

File details come from the government source that posted it. Updated .