Sol_75H71026Q00173_Amd_0002.pdf

(x)

75H71026Q00173 x x copies of the amendment; (b) By acknowledging receipt of this amendment on each copy of the offer submitted ; or (c) By separate letter or electronic communication which includes a reference to the solicitation and amendment numbers. FAILURE OF YOUR ACKNOWLEDGEMENT TO BE

RECEIVED AT THE PLACE DESIGNATED FOR THE RECEIPT OF OFFERS PRIOR TO THE HOUR AND DATE SPECIFIED MAY RESULT IN REJECTION OF YOUR

OFFER. If by virtue of this amendment you desire to change an offer already submitted , such change may be made by letter or electronic communication, provided each letter or electronic communication makes reference to the solicitation and this amendment, and is received prior to the opening hour and date specified.

x

Kayenta AZ 86033

Highway 160, Mile Post 394.3 PO Box 368 Acquisition Department Kayenta Health Center

06/12/20260002

13. THIS ITEM ONLY APPLIES TO MODIFICATION OF CONTRACTS/ORDERS. IT MODIFIES THE CONTRACT/ORDER NO. AS DESCRIBED IN ITEM 14.

12. ACCOUNTING AND APPROPRIATION DATA (If required) is not extended.is extended, Items 8 and 15, and returning

Offers must acknowledge receipt of this amendment prior to the hour and date specified in the solicitation or as amended , by one of the following methods: (a) By completing

The above numbered solicitation is amended as set forth in Item 14. The hour and date specified for receipt of Offers

11. THIS ITEM ONLY APPLIES TO AMENDMENTS OF SOLICITATIONS

FACILITY CODE CODE

10B. DATED (SEE ITEM 13)

10A. MODIFICATION OF CONTRACT/ORDER NO.

9B. DATED (SEE ITEM 11)

9A. AMENDMENT OF SOLICITATION NO.

CODE

8. NAME AND ADDRESS OF CONTRACTOR (No., street, county, State and ZIP Code)

7. ADMINISTERED BY (If other than Item 6)CODE 6. ISSUED BY

PAGE OF PAGES

4. REQUISITION/PURCHASE REQ. NO.3. EFFECTIVE DATE2. AMENDMENT/MODIFICATION NO. 5. PROJECT NO. (If applicable)

1. CONTRACT ID CODE

AMENDMENT OF SOLICITATION/MODIFICATION OF CONTRACT

05/27/2026

CHECK ONE A. THIS CHANGE ORDER IS ISSUED PURSUANT TO: (Specify authority) THE CHANGES SET FORTH IN ITEM 14 ARE MADE IN THE CONTRACT

B. THE ABOVE NUMBERED CONTRACT/ORDER IS MODIFIED TO REFLECT THE ADMINISTRATIVE CHANGES (such as changes in paying office, C. THIS SUPPLEMENTAL AGREEMENT IS ENTERED INTO PURSUANT TO AUTHORITY OF:

D. OTHER (Specify type of modification and authority) appropriation data, etc.) SET FORTH IN ITEM 14, PURSUANT TO THE AUTHORITY OF FAR 43.103(b).

E. IMPORTANT: Contractor is not is required to sign this document and return __________________ copies to the issuing office.

ORDER NO. IN ITEM 10A.

14. DESCRIPTION OF AMENDMENT/MODIFICATION (Organized by UCF section headings, including solicitation/contract subject matter where feasible.)

The purpose of Amendment 75H71026Q00173 - 0002 is as follows:

1. Solicitation closing date will be extended to: June 26, 2026 @ 12:00 PM MST.

2. Provide Questions and Answers.

3. Changes were made to the Statement of Work through Amendment No.1.

Period of Performance: 07/01/2026 to 12/31/2026

All other terms and conditions remain unchanged.

16A. NAME AND TITLE OF CONTRACTING OFFICER (Type or print)15A. NAME AND TITLE OF SIGNER (Type or print)

15C. DATE SIGNED 16B. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA 15B. CONTRACTOR/OFFEROR 16C. DATE SIGNED

(Signature of person authorized to sign) (Signature of Contracting Officer)

JERLYN R. BEGAY

STANDARD FORM 30 (REV. 11/2016)

Prescribed by GSA FAR (48 CFR) 53.243

Previous edition unusable

Except as provided herein, all terms and conditions of the document referenced in Item 9 A or 10A, as heretofore changed, remains unchanged and in full force and effect .

Questions & Answers – Access Control System

1. Is contractor to provide a new Lenel On Guard server for this project is the new Lenel system to be added to an existing Lenel On Guard Server?

The Government maintains an existing Lenel OnGuard enterprise server environment at Kayenta Alternative Rural Hospital (KARH). The IHHC access control system will be integrated into the existing Government-owned Lenel OnGuard environment. A separate Lenel OnGuard server is not required under this project. The contractor will provide all controllers, workstations, licensing, programming, and integration services necessary to establish full system functionality within the existing enterprise environment. The purpose of this project is to extend and standardize the existing enterprise access control architecture.

2. What is version of existing Lenel On Guard server?

Existing Lenel OnGuard server information, including software version, licensing requirements, and integration specifications, will be provided to the successful contractor during project kickoff and coordination with Government IT personnel.

3. For the new card access doors with Magnetic locks or panic hardware, who is responsible for Fire alarm system connection for release, is a Fire alarm system is active at facility?

Yes, the facility is equipped with an active fire alarm system. The Government is not aware of any existing magnetic lock systems or electrified panic hardware currently installed at IHHC. The contractor shall evaluate the proposed access control hardware and identify any fire alarm interface requirements necessary to maintain compliance with NFPA 101, applicable codes, and life safety requirements. Any required fire alarm integration shall be coordinated with the Government during design review and installation planning.

4. Who is responsible for repairing any damaged/nonfunctioning door hardware PRIOR to start of new Lenel system install?

IHHC Facilities Management.

5. Can new cabling be installed Free Air above ceiling AND in walls at new devices locations?

Yes.

6. Are the Pharmacy walls/ceilings and grid tiles standard ½ drywall OR are the walls ceiling security screened in walls/ceilings?

The pharmacy consists of standard commercial construction with standard 5/8” gypsum boards and suspended ceiling system with lay-in ceiling tiles. There is no security screening, expanded metal or other security reinforcement within the wall or above the ceiling.

7. If existing hardware sets need to be replaced for new Lenel system install, who is responsible for any possible rekeying of locks? Contractor or Facility?

The contractor shall be responsible for coordinating and providing any rekeying required as a direct result of access control hardware installed or replaced under this project. Existing lock cylinders shall be retained whenever practical. Any rekeying requirements outside the scope of the access control installation shall be coordinated with the Government prior to implementation.

8. Are the doors hollow metal or knock down?

The facility contains both hollow metal and knock-down frame door assemblies. Contractor shall verify individual door and frame types in the field during installation and coordinate any hardware compatibility issues with the COR.

9. Do you know what the current paint color is for touch ups? Will entire wall sections need to be painted for 1 patch?

IHHC Facilities has the correct paint colors onsite and may be provided to the contractor.

10. Will any office furniture or staff desk/computers in the way of our work be moved by owner or contractor?

Any moves or removal will be conducted by the facility.

11. What, if any, ICRA will be required?

The contractor shall comply with all applicable Infection Control Risk Assessment (ICRA), Pre- Construction Risk Assessment (PCRA), and Interim Life Safety Measures (ILSM) requirements. The specific classification and mitigation measures will be determined by the Government prior to construction activities based on the final work locations and installation methods. The contractor shall coordinate all work activities with the COR and facility staff and comply with all infection prevention, dust control, and life safety requirements established by the Government.

12. Will the contractor have full access to all rooms in the location with a single mobilization?

Yes, with IHHC staff escorts. Contractors will be wearing company identification badges and checking in with security upon arrival.

13. Would like to respectfully request consideration of an alternate Physical Access Control System (PACS) solution. The Statement of Work specifies a Lenel OnGuard-compatible PACS. However, we noted that Lenel OnGuard does not appear on the current Approved 13.02 Topology PACS Products List maintained through IDManagement.gov. Several enterprise class PACS platforms that support federal identity management objectives and PIV credential interoperability are currently listed as approved 13.02 solutions. Given the Federal Government's continued emphasis on identity management, credential interoperability, and standards-based access control architectures, would the Government consider an Approved 13.02 Topology PACS solution as an acceptable substitute, provided it meets all operational, security, integration, and performance requirements of the project?

No. The Government requires compatibility and integration with the existing Lenel OnGuard enterprise access control system currently utilized by the Kayenta Service Unit. The contractor shall provide a Lenel OnGuard-compatible solution capable of integrating with the existing Government-owned enterprise environment. Alternate PACS platforms will not be considered.

CLARIFICATION - The project does not include implementation of a Federal ICAM program, PIV credential issuance, or PIV-based access control management. While the system includes PIV-capable reader technology for compatibility and future expansion, the primary objective is integration with the existing Government-owned Lenel OnGuard enterprise environment.

14. Certified System Engineer ICAM PACS (CSEIP). The solicitation does not currently require the PACS and associated identity credentialing components to be designed, reviewed, or approved by a Certified System Engineer ICAM PACS (CSEIP). Because the project includes access control infrastructure, PIV-capable readers, enterprise integration, and compliance with federal security requirements, please clarify whether the Government intends to require a CSEIP-certified professional to participate in the design and validation of the system. Such a requirement would help ensure compliance with federal identity management and access control standards and support successful system integration.

The Government does not require a Certified System Engineer ICAM PACS (CSEIP) certification for this procurement. Contractors will provide qualified personnel with the experience necessary to design, install, configure, and commission the specified system in accordance with all applicable Federal, IHS, manufacturer, and project requirements.

15. Physical Security Professional (PSP). The solicitation does not currently require the security system design to be reviewed or approved by a Physical Security Professional (PSP). As this project involves the protection of healthcare facilities, controlled substance storage areas, intrusion detection, lockdown functionality, and access control measures, please advise whether the Government will consider requiring a PSP-certified professional to validate the security design, perform security risk assessments, and ensure compliance with applicable physical security standards and best practices.

The Government does not require a Physical Security Professional (PSP) certification for this procurement. Contractors shall ensure personnel possess the qualifications and experience necessary to perform the work described in the Statement of Work

16. Registered Communications Distribution Designer (RCDD). The solicitation does not currently require the communications and structured cabling infrastructure to be designed, reviewed, or approved by a Registered Communications Distribution Designer (RCDD). Since the project includes network infrastructure, structured cabling, controller connectivity, workstation deployment, and future enterprise integration capabilities, please clarify whether the Government will consider requiring an RCDD-certified professional to oversee the communications infrastructure design and documentation to ensure compliance with industry standards and long-term system performance.

The Government does not require a Registered Communications Distribution Designer (RCDD) certification for this procurement. Contractors shall ensure all communications and structured cabling infrastructure is installed in accordance with applicable industry standards, manufacturer requirements, and project specifications.

AMENDMENT NO. 1

2026 IHHC ACCESS CONTROL AND INTRUSION DETECTION SYSTEM

STATEMENT OF WORK (SOW)

Inscription House Health Center (IHHC) Kayenta Service Unit – Indian Health Service

Purpose

This amendment clarifies the Lenel OnGuard system architecture and integration requirements for the Inscription House Health Center (IHHC) Access Control and Intrusion Detection System project. The intent of this amendment is to align the project with the existing Kayenta Service Unit (KSU) enterprise Lenel OnGuard platform hosted at Kayenta Area Health Center (KARH).

Amendment to Objectives Section

Delete the following statement:

"The project entails hardware, computers/servers, licensing, training and support services and warranties."

Replace with:

"The project entails access control and intrusion detection hardware, intelligent controllers, workstations, software licensing, training, support services, and warranties. The project shall integrate with the existing KSU enterprise Lenel OnGuard server infrastructure hosted at KARH. A separate OnGuard application server and database server at IHHC are not required unless specifically approved by the Government during final design review."

Amendment to System Design and Deployment Section

Delete the following statement:

"Provide local OnGuard workstation, software configuration, and client license."

Replace with:

"Provide one (1) dedicated IHHC Security workstation with Lenel OnGuard client software and the appropriate client licensing for local monitoring, alarm management, reporting, and administrative functions. The workstation shall communicate with and utilize the existing KSU/KARH enterprise Lenel OnGuard application and database servers."

Add the following paragraph:

"Contractor shall configure all access control panels, readers, alarm inputs, and associated devices for operation within the existing KSU enterprise Lenel OnGuard environment. All controller

Amendment 1 communications shall be integrated with the enterprise system hosted at KARH. The Contractor shall coordinate all software licensing, database configuration, communication server assignments, and network requirements necessary to support integration."

Amendment to System Requirements Section

Delete the following statement:

"Support future integration with KSU enterprise OnGuard server."

Replace with:

"Provide full integration with the existing KSU enterprise Lenel OnGuard server infrastructure hosted at KARH as part of this project. All access control and intrusion detection components shall be configured, tested, and commissioned for operation within the enterprise environment."

Add the following requirement:

"The Contractor shall verify network connectivity, bandwidth requirements, controller communications, alarm annunciation, cardholder synchronization, and system performance between IHHC and the KSU/KARH enterprise OnGuard environment prior to final acceptance."

Amendment to Deliverables Section

Add the following deliverable:

"Enterprise Integration Acceptance Report documenting successful communication between IHHC field devices and the KSU/KARH enterprise Lenel OnGuard system, including controller status verification, alarm reporting, cardholder synchronization, and workstation functionality."

All other terms and conditions of the Statement of Work remain unchanged.

END OF AMENDMENT NO. 1