72066825Q00021-00001 - DIESEL FUELlp.pdf

(x)

72066825Q00021 x x copies of the amendment; (b) By acknowledging receipt of this amendment on each copy of the offer submitted ; or (c) By separate letter or electronic communication which includes a reference to the solicitation and amendment numbers. FAILURE OF YOUR ACKNOWLEDGEMENT TO BE

RECEIVED AT THE PLACE DESIGNATED FOR THE RECEIPT OF OFFERS PRIOR TO THE HOUR AND DATE SPECIFIED MAY RESULT IN REJECTION OF YOUR

OFFER. If by virtue of this amendment you desire to change an offer already submitted , such change may be made by letter or electronic communication, provided each letter or electronic communication makes reference to the solicitation and this amendment, and is received prior to the opening hour and date specified.

x

720668

00000 Washington DC 20521-4420 4420 Juba Place USAID/South Sudan

13. THIS ITEM ONLY APPLIES TO MODIFICATION OF CONTRACTS/ORDERS. IT MODIFIES THE CONTRACT/ORDER NO. AS DESCRIBED IN ITEM 14.

12. ACCOUNTING AND APPROPRIATION DATA (If required) is not extended.is extended, Items 8 and 15, and returning __1_________

Offers must acknowledge receipt of this amendment prior to the hour and date specified in the solicitation or as amended , by one of the following methods: (a) By completing

The above numbered solicitation is amended as set forth in Item 14. The hour and date specified for receipt of Offers

11. THIS ITEM ONLY APPLIES TO AMENDMENTS OF SOLICITATIONS

FACILITY CODE CODE

10B. DATED (SEE ITEM 13)

10A. MODIFICATION OF CONTRACT/ORDER NO.

9B. DATED (SEE ITEM 11)

9A. AMENDMENT OF SOLICITATION NO.

CODE

8. NAME AND ADDRESS OF CONTRACTOR (No., street, county, State and ZIP Code)

7. ADMINISTERED BY (If other than Item 6)CODE 6. ISSUED BY

PAGE OF PAGES

4. REQUISITION/PURCHASE REQ. NO.3. EFFECTIVE DATE2. AMENDMENT/MODIFICATION NO. 5. PROJECT NO. (If applicable)

1. CONTRACT ID CODE

AMENDMENT OF SOLICITATION/MODIFICATION OF CONTRACT

CHECK ONE A. THIS CHANGE ORDER IS ISSUED PURSUANT TO: (Specify authority) THE CHANGES SET FORTH IN ITEM 14 ARE MADE IN THE CONTRACT

B. THE ABOVE NUMBERED CONTRACT/ORDER IS MODIFIED TO REFLECT THE ADMINISTRATIVE CHANGES (such as changes in paying office, C. THIS SUPPLEMENTAL AGREEMENT IS ENTERED INTO PURSUANT TO AUTHORITY OF:

D. OTHER (Specify type of modification and authority) appropriation data, etc.) SET FORTH IN ITEM 14, PURSUANT TO THE AUTHORITY OF FAR 43.103(b).

E. IMPORTANT: Contractor is not is required to sign this document and return __________________ copies to the issuing office.

ORDER NO. IN ITEM 10A.

14. DESCRIPTION OF AMENDMENT/MODIFICATION (Organized by UCF section headings, including solicitation/contract subject matter where feasible.)

The purpose of this amendment no. 00001 is to extend the closing date, change quantity and add evaluation factors under solicitation 72066825Q00021 for Diesel fuel.

Accordingly, the solicitation is amended as follows:

1) The new closing date and time is extended to January 16, 2025 at 1700 (CAT) local Juba time;

2) Delete '300,000' and replace with new quantity of '600,000' liters and;

3) Insert evaluation factors.

Except as provided herein, all other terms and conditions remain unchanged and in full

Continued ...

16A. NAME AND TITLE OF CONTRACTING OFFICER (Type or print)15A. NAME AND TITLE OF SIGNER (Type or print)

15C. DATE SIGNED 16B. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA 15B. CONTRACTOR/OFFEROR 16C. DATE SIGNED

(Signature of person authorized to sign) (Signature of Contracting Officer)

STANDARD FORM 30 (REV. 11/2016)

Prescribed by GSA FAR (48 CFR) 53.243

Previous edition unusable

Except as provided herein, all terms and conditions of the document referenced in Item 9 A or 10A, as heretofore changed, remains unchanged and in full force and effect .

00001 REQ-668-25-000038

12/23/2024

X

LESLIE PETERSEN

Leslie CARL Petersen

Digitally signed by Leslie CARL Petersen Date: 2025.01.08 22:13:16 -03'00'

SOL -72066825Q000021-00001

DIESEL FUEL Page 2 of 2

I. EVALUATION FACTORS:

The US Government intends to make an award to Technically acceptable lowest offeror and will evaluate offers based on factors outlined below and award the contract to the responsible Bidder offering the best value to the U.S. Government. “Best value” is defined as the quotation that results in the most beneficial solution for the Government, considering technical, cost, and other relevant factors. In this evaluation, technical evaluation criteria hold significantly more important than price evaluation criteria. The Government reserves the right to make an award without discussions.

The Government will evaluate quotations based on the following criteria:

a. Technical Evaluation Criteria

1. Prior Experience and Past Performance: The Bidder must submit at least two (3), but not more than five (5), examples of previous projects that align closely with the technical scope and complexity requirement described in the original RFQ. Each reference project must have been substantially or fully completed within South Sudan or any US Embassy in the past five (5) years. Projects reflecting similar challenges and successful outcomes will be considered satisfactory.

Prior Experience and Past Performance will be scored by assigning one of the following confidence ratings:

• Substantial Confidence - Based on the Offeror’s recent/relevant past performance record, the Government has a high expectation that the Offeror will successfully perform the contract requirements.

• Satisfactory Confidence - Based on the Offeror’s recent/relevant past performance record, the Government has a reasonable expectation that the Offeror will successfully perform the contract requirements.

• Limited Confidence - Based on the Offeror’s recent/relevant past performance record, the Government has a low expectation that the Offeror will successfully perform the contract requirements.

• A “Neutral” score will be given to Offerors who have no record of relevant past performance, or who have a record of relevant past performance that is not extensive.

An Offeror’s performance will not be evaluated favorably or unfavorably (Neutral rating) when:

• The Offeror lacks relevant performance history,

• Information on performance is not available, or

• The Offeror is a member of a class of Offerors where there is provision not to rate the class against a sub factor.

b. Price Evaluation Criteria

1. Cost Realism: The Bidder must submit price that projected costs, such as labor, equipment, and any indirect costs. The price should reflect a sound understanding of the requirements and challenges and price reasonableness should reflect the current market rates.

[END OF AMENDMENT 00001]