J.4_Past_Performance_Ref_Check.docx
DOCX document 37 KB Posted
- Solicitation number
- 72026320R00003
About this file
This document contains a past performance reference form and details of a federal contract opportunity with USAID Egypt. The past performance reference form requests ratings and comments on an offeror's quality of service, cost control, schedule, management, and regulatory compliance on a previous award. It provides a rating table defining ratings from exceptional to unsatisfactory. The federal contract opportunity is for the Integrated Management of Cultural Tourism activity in Egypt. It focuses on sustainably growing cultural tourism in the destinations of Historic Cairo and Luxor through initiatives to overcome barriers and provide new tourism experiences. The activity will support partnerships to manage cultural assets, integrate local businesses and communities into the tourism value chain, and demonstrate the economic value of protecting cultural resources through unique visitor experiences.
Past Performance Reference Short Form
View the file
Other files
| File | Type | Posted |
|---|---|---|
| RFP Amendment 2.pdf | ||
| RFP Amendment 1- Questions and Answers.pdf | ||
| J.2_Budget_Template_for_SITE_RFP_(1).xlsx | XLSX spreadsheet | |
| J.5_Biographical_data_sheet.doc | DOC document | |
| IMCT_RFP__Final.pdf | ||
| J.1_USAID_Investments.docx | DOCX document | |
| J.3-_Past_Performance_Questionnaire.docx | DOCX document | |
| J.6_-_SF-LLL_Disclosure_of_Lobbying_Activities.docx | DOCX document |
On GovTribe
Work with this file
- Download the original file
- Contacts named in this file
- Similar government files
- Ask GovTribe AI about this file
Text version
PAST PERFORMANCE REFERENCE “SHORT” FORM
Subject: Reference for (fill in offeror’s name) __________ Please respond by _____ (insert date) Dear Ms./Mr. Reference, Your name has been provided by (fill in offeror’s name) __________ as a past performance reference for their work that they have done for your organization.
We are seeking relevant past performance information for a USAID solicitation focused on (FILL IN A BRIEF REQUIREMENT DESCRIPTION)___________________. Please provide some brief feedback and select one of the ratings provided in the table provided below for each of the subcriteria below, based on (FILL IN THE ORGANIZATION’S NAME)_ ___________________ performance implementing a future contract.
Please respond by ____ (insert date). If you have any additional questions or comments please feel free to email me. If you prefer to provide comments by phone, please call: (insert phone). Thanks for your time in responding.
Please rate (see the attached table) and comment on performance in the following areas:
Description of the Work Provided: ______________________ Award Type (Contract or Assistance): _________________________ [The Reference provides a description: ]
Please rate (see the attached table) and comment performance in the following areas:
1) Quality of product or service, including consistency in meeting goals and targets, and cooperation and effectiveness of the Prime in fixing problems.
_____ (Rating)
Comment:
2) Cost Control, including forecasting costs as well as accuracy in financial reporting.
_____ (Rating)
Comment:
3) Schedule/Timeliness of performance.
_____ (Rating)
Comment:
4) Management - satisfaction, including satisfactory business relationship to clients, initiation and management of several complex activities simultaneously, coordination among subcontractors and developing country partners, prompt and satisfactory correction of problems, and cooperative attitude in fixing problems.
_____ (Rating)
Comment:
5) Regulatory Compliance- performed in accordance with contract terms and conditions relating to applicable regulations and codes (financial, environmental, safety, and other reporting requirements).
_____ (Rating)
Comment:
6) Utilization of Small Business - Assess achievement on each individual small business goal stated within the contract/order or subcontracting plan including good faith effort if the goal was not achieved.
_____ (Rating)
Comment
RATING TABLE
| Adjective |
| Past Performance Definition |
| Exceptional |
| The offeror’s performance of previously awarded relevant contract met contractual requirements and exceeded many to the government’s benefit. The company performed with very few or minor problems, for which corrective actions taken were, or are, expected to be highly effective. Performance of completed contracts was either consistently of the highest quality or exhibited a trend of becoming so. The offeror’s past performance record leads to an extremely strong expectation of successful performance. |
| Very Good |
| The offeror’s performance of previously awarded relevant contracts met contractual requirements and exceeded some to the government’s benefit. The company performed with some minor problems, for which corrective actions taken were or are expected to be effective. Performance of completed contracts was either consistently of high quality or exhibited a trend towards becoming so. The offeror’s past performance record leads to a strong expectation of successful performance. |
| Satisfactory |
| The offeror’s past performance of previously awarded relevant contracts met contractual requirements. The company performed with some problems, for which corrective actions taken by the contractor were, or are expected to be, effective. Performance of completed contracts was consistently of adequate or better quality or exhibited a trend toward becoming so. The offerors past performance record leads to an expectation of successful performance. |
| Marginal |
| The offeror’s performance of previously awarded relevant contracts did not meet some contractual requirements. The contractor’s performance reflected some serious problems for which the contractor either failed to identify or implement corrective actions in a timely manner, or for which the correctible actions implemented were, or are expected to be, only partially effective. Performance of completed contracts was consistently of mediocre quality or exhibited a trend toward becoming so. The offeror’s past performance record leads to an expectation that successful performance might be difficult to achieve or that it can occur only with increased levels of government management and oversight. |
| Unsatisfactory |
| The offeror’s performance of previously awarded relevant contracts did not meet most contractual requirements and recovery, if any, did not occur within the stated period of performance. The contractor’s performance reflected serious problems for which the offeror either failed to identify or implement corrective actions were mostly ineffective. Performance of completed contracts was consistently of poor quality or a trend toward becoming so. The offeror’s past performance record leads to a strong expectation that successful performance would not be achieved or that it can occur only with greatly increased levels of government management and oversight. |
| Neutral |
| The offeror lacks a record of relevant or available past performance history. Based on this, there is no expectation of either successful or unsuccessful performance. |
(Revised June 2018) image1.png
File details come from the government source that posted it. Updated .